Mackenzie Gas Pipeline The Policy Landscape and the Road Forward Tind Shepper Ryen The Policy Landscape and the Road Forward Tind Shepper Ryen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presentation to the Joint Review Panel Yellowknife General Hearing December 5 th, 2006 Dennis Bevington MP Western Arctic.
Advertisements

First Working Draft Dehcho Land Use Plan Comments from the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development – March 2005.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UNDER ABORIGINAL CLAIMS AGREEMENTS MARCH 21, 2013.
Responsible Resource Development April 17, Context Government focussed on responsible development of Canada’s natural resources to create jobs and.
The Canadian Environmental Assessment Act 2012 and Aboriginal Consultation November 2012.
Violet Camsell-Blondin Chair, Wekèezhìi Land and Water Board Zabey Nevitt Executive Director, Wekèezhìi Land and Water Board Aboriginal Consultation for.
Current Reseach Challenges For Northern Oil and Gas Activities U.S. – Canada Oil and Gas Research Forum Anchorage, Alaska 13 November 202 Bharat Dixit.
Proposed Regulatory Framework for Wastewater Presented by Claude Fortin Winnipeg, Manitoba December 6, 2007.
Planning for Energy Development in Canada Allan Ingelson, University of Calgary March 14, 2014.
ABORIGINAL RIGHTS AND NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT FEBRUARY 7, 2013.
Wei Wai Kum Kwiakah Treaty Society Draft AIP Summary.
Mackenzie Gas Pipeline The Policy Landscape and the Road Forward Tind Shepper Ryen The Policy Landscape and the Road Forward Tind Shepper Ryen.
National Energy Board Office national de l’énergie Pipeline Approvals in the Mackenzie Valley Jann Atkinson Environmental Specialist Applications Unit,
Successful Community Strategies for Engaging with Resource Extraction Companies P. Jerry Asp.
“You Are on Indian Land”. In 1960, when “Status Indians” finally got the right to vote, most Aboriginal people were suffering through terrible living.
NUNAVUT TUNNGAVIK INCORPORATED Lands Policy Advisory Committee Draft Uranium Policy.
First Nations-Focused Scientific Reviews of Environmental Assessments MSESMSES Prepared by Sarah Hechtenthal, M.Sc., P. Biol.
Overview of Land and Resource Management in the NWT.
To preserve Inuvialuit cultural identity and values within a changing northern society To enable Inuvialuit to be equal and meaningful participants in.
Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System A North American Energy Solution Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System A North American Energy Solution November.
Washington State Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Region 10 Regional Response Team Northwest Area Committee Seattle, WA February 12, 2014 EFSEC.
The Proposed Devolution Agreement. What is a “devolution”? de·vo·lu·tionˌde-və-ˈlü-shən alsoˌdē-və- : transference of rights, powers, property, or responsibility.
Polar Bears in the Deep Offshore Regions of the Beaufort Sea: A Preliminary Study to Estimate Distribution and Density in Previously Under-Surveyed Areas.
Parks Canada in the Dehcho Presentation to the Dehcho Land Use Planning Committee Hay River, NWT March 30, 2005.
FORGING PARTNERSHIPS BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS, ABORIGINAL CANADIANS AND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT 23 January 2014 Douglas R. Eyford PRESENTATION TO BC CONSTRUCTION.
State of Oregon New Hydroelectric Projects Mary Grainey October 2008 Oregon Water Resources Department.
1 The Lower Athabasca Regional Plan: A Case Study Biol. 595 Sept. 16, 2009.
Joint Secretariat / Inuvialuit Regional Corporation Canada Northern Oil and Gas Research Forum Developing data and information sharing: Using existing.
Guidance for AONB Partnership Members Welsh Member Training January 26/
STRENGTHENING COMMUNITIES CONFERENCE LANDS ADMINISTRATION APRIL 12 th and 13 th YELLOWKNIFE.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT UNDER ABORIGINAL LAND CLAIM AGREEMENTS FEBRUARY 23, 2012.
Land Use Planning in the Deh Cho territory. Overview Who are the Land Use Planning Committee? What is Land Use Planning? How does this relate to the Deh.
Environmental Assessment at a Crossroads Stephen Hazell December 5, 2012.
Energy, Environmental Impacts, and Sustainable Development Presented by Cat Shrier, Ph.D., P.G. Water Resources Planner (403)
Disclosure of Preliminary Screening to MVEIRB In Nunavut all screenings are conducted by the Nunavut Impact Review Board (NIRB). NIRB conducts screening.
MGPIF Dehcho Regional Investment Plan (RIP) Update to February 2009.
Dehcho First Nations1 MACKENZIE GAS PROJECT IMPACT FUND -MGPIF 1.Follows Joint Review Panel (JRP) & National Energy Board (NEB) decision 2.If JRP & NEB.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MARCH 15, 2012.
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ABORIGINAL LANDS AND PEOPLES NOVEMBER 5, 2012.
Canada’s Federal Environmental Assessment Regime Presentation to the Forum of Federations Environmental Assessment Conference Ottawa, Canada September.
Arctic Resources Company Northern Gas Pipeline Project Forrest E. Hoglund Chairman & Chief Executive Officer.
Doing Things Right: Implementing and Improving Co-Management in the NWT Willard Hagen Chair, Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board Inuvik Petroleum Show.
Nwtboardforum.com For reference only. Not a legal document Inuvialuit Settlement Region.
Presentation to the NWT Chamber of Commerce AGM April 3, 2012 Norman Wells Chamber Report.
1.What is the standard relicensing process in the U.S. and what is the ALP (Alternative Licensing Process) ? 2.How did we convince FERC to agree to an.
Environmental Assessment Act – Overview Environmental Media Group.
J. Michael Miltenberger Minister Environment and Natural Resources May 11, 2012 Reality of Co-management with Aboriginal Governments in the NWT: Environmental.
1 Update to Dehcho Land Use Planning Forum on Draft Changes to Interim Dehcho Land Use Plan Update to Dehcho Land Use Planning Forum on Draft Changes to.
Comments on “Arctic State Change: Implications for Governance” Mostly Yukon, NWT.
Northern Projects Management Office in Nunavut Nunavut Mining Symposium April 2012.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
Aboriginal Issues  In 1960, Aboriginal people were granted the right to vote  However, they still faced many issues: land claim disputes,
CEAA 2012 EA PROCESS OPTIONS OCTOBER 15, 2012
Indian Act “The happiest future for the Indian race is absorption into the general population, and this is the object of the policy of our government.
CURRENT SITUATION: Companies wanting to build a pipeline down the valley of the Mackenzie River to bring the gas and oil to southern markets. Native communities.
Public Participation in Sustainability Planning and Socio-Economic Impact Assessment in Canada.
GBLWMP-SLUP Integration February 5, 2010 Deline. Ecological Integrity Policy GBLWMPSLUP (a): All activities in the GBLW must be consistent with.
GBLWMP-SLUP Integration Meeting February 4-5, 2010 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board.
1 Sahtu Land Use Planning Board Public Hearing on the Draft 3 Sahtu Land Use Plan May 2011 INAC Presentation.
Adaptive Management for Climate Change and Biodiversity Protection: The Canadian Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Case Jamie Benidickson and Heather McLeod-Kilmurray.
Canadian Environmental Legislative David Hunter B.A., LL.B., LL.M. Bennett Jones LLP Presentation to: Fachbereich 1 Architektur, Bauingenieurwesen, Geomatik.
Proven Management – Proven Gold Districts – Safe Jurisdictions Symbol:PG Exchange:TSX Hardrock Project Environmental.
Forest Management in BC
Gwich’in Tribal Council INAC Self-Government Workshops, October 2016
Pierre Alvarez, President Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers
Rights and Interests Program
COOPERATION PLAN for the EIA and Regulatory Review of an NWT Pipeline Ricki Hurst : Pipeline Readiness Office, DIAND Bonnie Gray: Northern Gas Development,
Modernization of the National Energy Board
Additions to Reserve Policy
Ontario Presentation to the NEB Modernization Expert Panel
Presentation transcript:

Mackenzie Gas Pipeline The Policy Landscape and the Road Forward Tind Shepper Ryen The Policy Landscape and the Road Forward Tind Shepper Ryen

Today’s Overview  Finish review of Berger and Lysyk Inquiries.  Deh Cho obstacles.  Role of the Canadian government today.  Blanken Inquiry – Consensus building on MGP. Be prepared to talk! – The MGP will have what…  Environmental consequences?  Economic consequences?  Social consequences?  Finish review of Berger and Lysyk Inquiries.  Deh Cho obstacles.  Role of the Canadian government today.  Blanken Inquiry – Consensus building on MGP. Be prepared to talk! – The MGP will have what…  Environmental consequences?  Economic consequences?  Social consequences?

Berger Report Main Conclusions: Environment  A pipeline would threaten Northern Yukon.  No energy corridor should be created in the Delta.  There were no major concerns in the Mackenzie Valley.  A number of parks and reserves should be created: – Northern Yukon, Porcupine Caribou. – Mackenzie Bay, White Whales. – Mackenzie Valley, bird sanctuaries. – ANWR  A pipeline would threaten Northern Yukon.  No energy corridor should be created in the Delta.  There were no major concerns in the Mackenzie Valley.  A number of parks and reserves should be created: – Northern Yukon, Porcupine Caribou. – Mackenzie Bay, White Whales. – Mackenzie Valley, bird sanctuaries. – ANWR

Main Conclusions: Economic  Large-scale projects based on non-renewables rarely provide long-term employment.  Natives will fill only unskilled and semi-skilled jobs during construction.  Development undermines self-employment through hunting, fishing, and trapping.  A pipeline may accentuate economic problems in the North.  The Northern economy will not decline if a pipeline is not built.  Large-scale projects based on non-renewables rarely provide long-term employment.  Natives will fill only unskilled and semi-skilled jobs during construction.  Development undermines self-employment through hunting, fishing, and trapping.  A pipeline may accentuate economic problems in the North.  The Northern economy will not decline if a pipeline is not built.

Main Conclusions: Social and Cultural  Native culture not taken seriously.  “…[S]ocial consequences of the pipeline will not only be serious- they will be devastating.”  Development must conform to the wishes of those who live there.  Native culture not taken seriously.  “…[S]ocial consequences of the pipeline will not only be serious- they will be devastating.”  Development must conform to the wishes of those who live there.

Main Conclusions: Land Claims  Land claims part of desire for self-determination and broader native rights.  Rapid industrialization will block settlement of native rights issues.  Special status should be granted native peoples.  Land claims part of desire for self-determination and broader native rights.  Rapid industrialization will block settlement of native rights issues.  Special status should be granted native peoples.

Lysyk In Brief  Highway Pipeline benefits will largely go outside of Yukon.  Large conditional support for pipeline if: – Native land claims are settled. – Pipeline company pays to mitigate negative consequences.  A planning and regulatory agency is needed.  The pipeline should be delayed four years.  Video Part 1 Video  Highway Pipeline benefits will largely go outside of Yukon.  Large conditional support for pipeline if: – Native land claims are settled. – Pipeline company pays to mitigate negative consequences.  A planning and regulatory agency is needed.  The pipeline should be delayed four years.  Video Part 1 Video

Land Claims  Deh Cho – 40% of MGP runs through Deh Cho land. – A settlement in principal has been achieved. – Deh Cho are not part of the APG.  6 other ongoing negotiations.  Deh Cho – 40% of MGP runs through Deh Cho land. – A settlement in principal has been achieved. – Deh Cho are not part of the APG.  6 other ongoing negotiations.

Scandal!!!  Herb Norwegian, Deh Cho chief.  1998, 12 mineral claims made in name of Maureen Bernier directly in pipeline path.  Paul Bernier is vice-president of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.  Deh Cho “locked out” of environmental review.  Talks to resume December 15 th.  Herb Norwegian, Deh Cho chief.  1998, 12 mineral claims made in name of Maureen Bernier directly in pipeline path.  Paul Bernier is vice-president of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency.  Deh Cho “locked out” of environmental review.  Talks to resume December 15 th.

Regulation along the Mackenzie Valley  11 Main Regulatory Agencies: – National Energy Board (NEB) – Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board (MVEIRB) – Sahtu Land and Water Board – Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency – Inuvialuit Land Administration – Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board – Gwich'in Land and Water Board – Inuvialuit Settlement Regional Joint Secretariat Environmental Impact Screening Committee – Government of the Northwest Territories Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development (RWED) – NWT Water Resources Division Indian and Northern Affairs Canada – Indian and Northern Affairs Canada  11 Main Regulatory Agencies: – National Energy Board (NEB) – Mackenzie Valley Environmental Impact Review Board (MVEIRB) – Sahtu Land and Water Board – Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency – Inuvialuit Land Administration – Mackenzie Valley Land and Water Board – Gwich'in Land and Water Board – Inuvialuit Settlement Regional Joint Secretariat Environmental Impact Screening Committee – Government of the Northwest Territories Resources, Wildlife and Economic Development (RWED) – NWT Water Resources Division Indian and Northern Affairs Canada – Indian and Northern Affairs Canada

Pipeline Regulations  Specifics determined project by project.  Guidelines are available for each region, pipelines crossing regions will likely negotiate to keep policies uniform.  MGP crosses at least 4 distinct areas just in NWT.  Specifics determined project by project.  Guidelines are available for each region, pipelines crossing regions will likely negotiate to keep policies uniform.  MGP crosses at least 4 distinct areas just in NWT.

General Guidelines  Consultation with the public is mandated. – Must be meaningful and comprehensive. – Continues throughout project, planning to abandonment.  Applicant must show how development plans changed to respond to public.  Consultation can take many forms: – Public hearing. – Mailings. – Advertising. – First Nation mandated groups.  Consultation with the public is mandated. – Must be meaningful and comprehensive. – Continues throughout project, planning to abandonment.  Applicant must show how development plans changed to respond to public.  Consultation can take many forms: – Public hearing. – Mailings. – Advertising. – First Nation mandated groups.

General Continued  Applicant performs Comprehensive Study Report, with participation of regulators and submits activity plan. – Preliminary Information Package and CSR submitted.  Environmental Impact Screening Committee: – No negative impact – no further review. – Deficient – pipeline terminated. – Further review.  Environmental Impact Review Board may impose conditions.  Applicant performs Comprehensive Study Report, with participation of regulators and submits activity plan. – Preliminary Information Package and CSR submitted.  Environmental Impact Screening Committee: – No negative impact – no further review. – Deficient – pipeline terminated. – Further review.  Environmental Impact Review Board may impose conditions.

And Continued Again  Minister of Environment receives CSR and initiates public comment.  NEB hold public hearing.  NEB makes regulatory decision.  Governor General makes final approval.  Minister of Environment receives CSR and initiates public comment.  NEB hold public hearing.  NEB makes regulatory decision.  Governor General makes final approval.

First Nation Settlement Areas  Inuvialuit, Gwich’in, and Sahtu have additional regulatory authority.  Each may refuse to authorize permits, thus stopping a project.  Deh Cho do not have any such authority.  Inuvialuit, Gwich’in, and Sahtu have additional regulatory authority.  Each may refuse to authorize permits, thus stopping a project.  Deh Cho do not have any such authority.

Blanken Inquiry  What risk does the Mackenzie Pipeline pose to: – The Environment? – The Economy? – The Society? – None, low, medium, high?  Yes or no, the NEB should allow construction of the Mackenzie Gas Pipeline?  What risk does the Mackenzie Pipeline pose to: – The Environment? – The Economy? – The Society? – None, low, medium, high?  Yes or no, the NEB should allow construction of the Mackenzie Gas Pipeline?

End Happy Thanksgiving! Tind Shepper Ryen Doctoral Candidate, Environmental Studies University of Colorado, Boulder colorado.edu Tind Shepper Ryen Doctoral Candidate, Environmental Studies University of Colorado, Boulder colorado.edu