Planning Your Own Research Kevin Schwartzman MD Epi 679 June 16, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bridging the gap between good practice principles and research study realities. Using case studies to build descriptors of the public involvement role.
Advertisements

Post Research Benefits Mandika Wijeyaratne MS, MD, FRCS Dept. of Surgery, Colombo.
Copyright © Healthcare Quality Quest, Proposed standards for a national clinical audit — How we got involved and what we have learned.
Peter Griffith and Megan McGroddy 4 th NACP All Investigators Meeting February 3, 2013 Expectations and Opportunities for NACP Investigators to Share and.
Adapted from ISEF webpage Society for Science and the Public “Roles and Responsibilities of students and adults” Roles and Responsibilities of students.
NIHR Research Design Service London Enabling Better Research Forming a research team Victoria Cornelius, PhD Senior Lecturer in Medical Statistics Deputy.
BA (Hons) Primary Education Year Three School Based Training Briefing
What they never taught me about being a clinician investigator.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 2 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
ROLE OF THE REVIEWER ESSA KAZIM. ROLE OF THE REVIEWER Refereeing or peer-review has the advantages of: –Identification of suitable scientific material.
The material was supported by an educational grant from Ferring How to Write a Scientific Article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
Elements of a clinical trial research protocol
GCP compliance for GenISIS  This presentation is intended for clinical staff involved in recruiting patients to the GenISIS (Genetics of Influenza Susceptibility.
Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities Peer Review Responsible Conduct of Research, Scholarship, and Creative Activities.
Staff Compensation Program Update
Helping Your Mentees Develop a Competitive K Award Application (K01, K07, K08, K23, K25, K99) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics.
McLean Promotion to Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School Maureen T. Connelly, MD, MPH McLean Hospital February 3, 2010.
Grant Writing1 Grant Writing Lecture What are the major types of grants available in mental health research? What is the process of grant preparation and.
HRB Webinar Health Research Awards Content Objective of the call Scope and Panels Principal Investigator Response to peer-reviewers (rebuttal) Some.
IRB Monthly Investigator Meeting Columbia University Medical Center IRB October 11, 2005.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
RESEARCH FRAMEWORK Yulia Sofiatin Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics 2012 YS 2011.
Assisting Residents With The Research Process Prepared by Margaret Kriegel, MSN, RN, CNS, CCRC Research Education Coordinator Scott & White.
Discussion Gitanjali Batmanabane MD PhD. Do you look like this?
SYDNEY MEDICAL SCHOOL NEPEAN HONOURS STUDENT APPLICATION PROCESS Step 1 - Once qualified, look for a supervisor at Nepean Hospital in your area of interest.
PTCS Service Provider Review 0 Background RTF assumed responsibility for maintaining PTCS specifications in March 2003  Developed PTCS Service Provider.
Research Questions By:Dr.Awatif Alam Associate Professor Department of family &community Medicine, KSU.
9/17/ Access WHI: Proposing Analyses and Ancillary Studies Andrea Z. LaCroix, PhD Professor of Epidemiology and Co-PI WHI Clinical Coordinating Center.
Title Name Institute. Background -1 (Main problem)
Components of a successful grant application Ann Crosland
Nursing Research Capacity Building. Background CON –opened as 9 th College at SQU in 2008 The CON’s next challenge is promoting nursing care based on.
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Discovery Phase: where do we go from here? Co-directors contact information: Dr. Maureen Powers, Department of Cell Biology,
Group Technical Assistance Webinar August 5, CFPHE RESEARCH METHODS FOR COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH.
PROMOTION AND TENURE FOR CLINICAL SCIENTISTS – BOTH PATHWAYS Peter Emanuel, M.D. Laura Lamps, M.D.
BSc Honours Project Introduction CSY4010 Amir Minai Module Leader.
Title of Scholar Project Month day, year Presenter: Supervisor(s): Critical Care Western.
How to write a scientific article Nikolaos P. Polyzos M.D. PhD.
+ Orientation to Resident Research Dr Karen Choong July, McMaster Pediatric Residency Programme.
Hayat Mushcab, B.Sc. M.Sc. W. George Kernohan, PhD Jonathan Wallace B.A., M.Sc. Roy Harper, M.D, and Suzanne Martin, PhD THE JOURNEY TOWARDS SUCCESSFUL.
An Intervention To Improve Antibiotic Prescribing Habits of Doctors in a Teaching Hospital Ofei F, Forson A, Tetteh R, Ofori-Adjei D University of Ghana.
CORE CURRICULUM RESEARCH SEMINAR SERIES Department of Surgery McMaster University July 16, 2008.
Framing the Research Question By B. Nelson. The question  Usually a research question starts with a query eg. Something you have seen during your work.
Career Development Awards (K series) and Research Project Grants (R series) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University.
Pilot and Feasibility Studies NIHR Research Design Service Sam Norton, Liz Steed, Lauren Bell.
Quality Education for a Healthier Scotland Audit Fiona McMillan Principal Lead, Vocational Training and Leadership Development NHS Education for Scotland.
Pilot Grant Program EGAD Study OCCUPATIONAL & ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH.
HA Central Register of Clinical Research 1 Dec 04 HA REC.
STANDARD 1: LEADERSHIP AND ADMINISTRATION. Standard 1 Team Members  Team Lead: Ken Roberts Vice Dean for Academic and Community Partnerships, ESF COM.
Data Coordinating Center University of Washington Department of Biostatistics Elizabeth Brown, ScD Siiri Bennett, MD.
Research Ethics Dónal O’Mathúna, PhD Senior Lecturer in Ethics, Decision-Making & Evidence
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Biostatistics Support for Medical Student Research (MSR) Projects Allen Kunselman Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Department of Public Health.
An Introduction to HelpDesk Answers
Community Participation in Research
MUHC Innovation Model.
Leigh E. Tenkku, PhD, MPH Department of Family and Community Medicine
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Choosing your elective
Research Questions By:Dr.Awatif Alam Associate Professor
Department of Medicine Michael Farkouh, Vice-Chair Research michael
Project Title Name Contact .
Tim Auton, Astellas September 2014
Clinical Audit Summary Guide
What the Editors want to see!
Research funding application process
Which Projects Do – and do Not – Require IRB Review?
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Biosketches and Other Attachments
Creating a good research question…
Presentation transcript:

Planning Your Own Research Kevin Schwartzman MD Epi 679 June 16, 2006

Why Do Research? To win friends and influence people (and get a fellowship/job/promotion?) To go to conferences in exciting places To address a scientific question To improve the evidence base To inform practice To explore a field/specialty To see if it is an activity you enjoy To develop contacts, mentoring, etc.

What Type of Research? Basic science (e.g. mechanisms of disease and/or treatment) Clinical (patient-oriented)-- observational, experimental Systematic reviews, meta-analyses Epidemiologic/public health Medical education Quality assurance

The Research Question The most difficult--and fundamental-- part of any project is formulating a suitable question Does the question make sense? Can it be answered? Can it be answered by you and the team?

The Research Question Should it be answered? (Is it something colleagues would want to know?) Should it be answered by you? (Is it something you would want to know?)

What Scope? Project should reflect reality of your own (and supervisor’s/colleagues’) time lines and availability For residents, might be anywhere from 1-6 months Well suited to chart audits/reviews, use of existing data resources, gathering of simple prospective data or small number of consecutive patient observations Systematic reviews, meta-analyses Decision analyses

What Scope? Pilot studies: collection of preliminary data to demonstrate feasibility, generate information for sample size calculations for more definitive work Resident research block not well suited to studies comparing clinical interventions (e.g. clinical trials) Not well suited to studies involving complicated prospective data, longer term followup, or recruitment of highly selected patients

Choosing a Supervisor/Team Experience in research, viewed in the context of your own proposed project (can ask for a CV; major research grants listed on Web sites e.g. CIHR; also many Quebec researchers are listed on FRSQ website) Experience with research supervision and mentoring (how did other residents or newcomers fare?) Accessibility, organization Well-defined team or unit is helpful (e.g. statistical support)

Choosing a Supervisor/Team (2) Support for your project (e.g. space, computer, technicians, etc.) Willingness to help set up the project e.g. ethics committee, data resources, etc.

What is Your Role? Needs to be described explicitly and agreed upon at the outset, whenever you work with supervisor(s) and/or a team You should be given primary responsibility and credit; that is, your project should “stand alone” with you as first author on presentations and manuscript(s) You should develop a protocol, with appropriate supervision and/or input from others, incorporating all the usual elements: background and literature review, hypotheses/objectives, methods including measurements and analyses

Your Role (2) The protocol should be finalized before your research “block,” for clinical trainees Where applicable, your supervisor should ensure that suitable administrative arrangements are made (e.g. ethics committee approval) You and your supervisor/colleagues should be satisfied that your project meets scientific and ethical standards, including requirements for confidentiality

Your Role (3) You should expect to take primary responsibility for data collection and management, and to contribute to the analysis This includes appropriate data management You should present your results at scientific meetings You should be responsible for the first draft of any manuscript(s) based primarily on your results You and your team should ensure timely submission of your results

Not Your Role To be a research assistant or technician To take primary responsibility for administrative issues e.g. ethics committees, research accounts, grant submissions To take responsibility for data storage, if you are working under supervision

Before Your Research Block Literature review and protocol completed (e.g. case/outcome/exposure definitions, inclusions/exclusions) Feasibility addressed, including sample size issues Administrative preparations completed e.g. ethics committee, DPS permission for chart reviews Study materials (questionnaires, chart review forms, databases) prepared

Funding Issues Your own time Small-scale expenses—may be covered through funds held by supervisor/team member, or from departmental funds e.g. pulling hospital charts, office supplies Medium-scale e.g. part-time research assistant—as above, plus some specific funding competitions e.g. MUHC pilot projects, FRSQ pilot projects, some specialty societies

At the End of the Day... You should have learned about your question You should have learned about the conduct of research You should have learned about writing a research protocol You should have learned about methods of data collection and analysis

At the End of the Day…(2) You should have had the opportunity to present and defend your results at scientific meeting(s), local and hopefully national/international You should hopefully have published a manuscript You should have had fun!!!