Assessment Committee. Communicate what we Think about Assessment. Learn to Integrate assessment into our teaching practice and Act on it toward continuous.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Aligning VALUE Rubrics to Institutional Purposes: Sharing Practical Approaches that Promote Consistent Scoring and Program Improvement Linda Siefert

Advertisements

How did we get Here and Where are We? Outcomes Assessment at Carteret Community College.

Writing Assessment Plans for Secondary Education / Foundations of Educations Department 9 th Annual Assessment Presentation December 3, 2013 Junko Yamamoto.

ACADEMIC DEGREE ASSESSMENT & GENERAL EDUCATION ASSESSMENT Nathan Lindsay Arts & Sciences Faculty Meeting March 12,

SLO Course Assessment in 5 Easy Steps Vivian Mun, Ed.D.

Faculty Learning Circle Introduction The goal of Achieving College Success Now! project is to impact post-secondary academic success of students with disabilities.

A ssessment at San Juan College Presented to the AQIP quality check-up Team February 1, 2007 by Andi Penner, chair, assessment committee and Lisa Wilson,

The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.

Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs

Preparing Elementary Teacher Candidates for the edTPA Prior to Student Teaching: Documenting Experiences in a Math Methods Course Dr. Erica Kwiatkowski-Egizio.

On Scoring Guides everything you were afraid to ask PART TWO.

Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.

DISTANCE EDUCATION PROGRAMS: BEST PRACTICES FOR RURAL COMMUNITY COLLEGES.

QEP Update CFCC Planning Retreat June 19, QEP Update Mid-Term Report Global Outcomes 1.Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills.

San Juan College Assessment Team Andrea Cooper, PhD.

Department of Humanities College of Sciences and Liberal Arts Writing Program Assessment at New Jersey Institute of Technology Carol Siri Johnson Associate.

Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.

Yanling Sun, Ph.D Carolyn Masterson, Ed. D. Implementing ePortfolio among Pre-service Teachers and Interns Montclair State University.

Assessment Surveys July 22, 2004 Chancellor’s Meeting.

Redesign of Beginning and Intermediate Algebra using ALEKS Lessons Learned Cheryl J. McAllister Laurie W. Overmann Southeast Missouri State University.

Tammy Muhs General Education Program Mathematics Coordinator University of Central Florida NCAT Redesign Scholar Course Redesign: A Way To Improve Student.

AAC&U/ Minnesota Collaborative Pilot (MCP) Project: Artifacts and Assessment Aug. 19, 2014 Professional Development Day 1.

Assessment Leader Training General Education Student Learning Assessment GEO Training Series: 2 of 5 Spring 2012 February 13, 2012.

Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.

Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.

Academic Year.  Still working well 17 reports submitted, 1 missing  9 of 18 departments expressed concerns about assessment 4 departments reported.

ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.

Describe what your team accomplished.  Rock Creek campus instituted a monthly “V&C Teaching Chat”  Across college sharing of ideas including: readings.

Strategies for Implementing Program-Level Assessment through Outcomes Jeremy Anderson Manager, Academic Computing Dr. Kaitlin Walsh Instructional Designer/Technologist.

Accreditation follow-up report. The team recommends that the college further refine its program review, planning, and resource allocation processes so.

Winter  Provide information and examples of the SLO process to help faculty use assessment to improve teaching and learning  Provide tools and.

1 What Happens After High School? Access Office St. Louis Community College at Meramec G:CEACCESS:Presents:SSDPresent.

Joanna Fulbright Jeremy Nicholson Chris Lorch Ozarka College, Melbourne, Arkansas Based on a process created by the Des Moines Area Community College System.

U SING A SSESSMENT TO I NFORM & R EFORM P RACTICE Academic Programs Assessment Committee (APAC) Presentation Melanie DiLoreto.

Department of Mathematical Sciences February 9, /11 Art Duval and Helmut Knaust Student Outcomes in Mathematics.

Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.

+ General Education Assessment Spring 2014 Quantitative Literacy.

Fall 2015 Professional Development Days C. Cruz-Johnson & R. Gamez August 28, Walking with Integrity Towards Student Success.

NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.

NSE Assessment Overview: Your Role in Outcomes-Based Assessment What Will We Learn About Our Students?

Teaching Council Recommendations to the Faculty Senate DRAFT 2/9/09 & 3rd DRAFT Feb 13, 2009 for use by the FS Exec Committee, March 4, 2009.

SAVVY ABOUT THE SLOAC Sandra Stefani Comerford, CSM Professor of English Ray Lapuz, Cañada Professor of Mathematics Karen Wong, Skyline Professor of English.

STEM MEET AND GREET MSJC Academy Spring 2012 Patricia Menchaca : Instructional Activities Leticia Luna-Sims: Student.

THE SLO PROCESS #1 create/update SLO’s, rubrics, & assessment methods #2 assess all students in all sections of all courses #3 maintain SLO assessment.

Program Review – Assessing the Health of Curriculum Programs Mark Lupton Director, Institutional Research, Planning and Effectiveness South Piedmont Community.

Subgrant Goals and Activities Frostburg State University.

San Juan College Assessment Team Chair: Andrea Cooper, PhD Spring 2014.

Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.

1 Michigan State University Preparation for EC 2000 Thomas F. Wolff, Ph.D., P.E. Associate Dean for Undergraduate Studies College of Engineering Michigan.

North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Analyzing Student Work to Change Teacher Practice.

Unit Meeting Feb. 15, ◦ Appreciative Inquiry Process-BOT Steering Committee and Committee Structure. ◦ Four strategies identified from AIP: Each.

Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Montgomery College Fall 2011 Orientation.

SAS CONFIDENTIAL PROPRIETARY Professional SAS Strand Rubrics December 14, 2009 DRAFT 1.0 Curriculum Design PAGE 0.

1 Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.

Assessment of Advising Linda Taylor, PhD, LPC, NCC September 9, 2011.

Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.

Evaluation of Tenure-Accruing Faculty

General Education Assessment

General Education Assessment

Institutional Program Review 2017 Update

Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment

Faculty Evaluation Plan

STUDENT AFFAIRS COMMITTEE MEETING

Program Review Teaching and learning committee Santa ana college

Accreditation & Institution Set Standards

Accreditation follow-up report

TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS

General Studies ePortfolio Pilot

Fall 2016/Spring 2017 Administrative Review Process Update

Presentation transcript:

Assessment Committee

Communicate what we Think about Assessment. Learn to Integrate assessment into our teaching practice and Act on it toward continuous improvement. Assessment Committee Mission Statement:

Institutional - Level Program - Level Course - Level Common Student Learning Outcomes AQIP Systems Portfolio Administrative SupportAcademy Expectations Outreach CTX Conversations Inventory

CSLO Assessment Procedure Indentify courses for assessment of each CSLO Select courses with enrollment of over 5 students with 45+ credits Randomly order selected courses Randomly sample students with 45+ credits in those courses to attain a 10% sample size Request artifacts from courses Student names, instructor names are kept confidential School administrative assistants pull and copy sampled student work and submit to Assessment Committee and returns all artifacts to instructor Committee meets to do a consensus assessment using rubrics Committee consists of representatives and content experts from each school Results are compiled, analyzed and shared with college community Copied artifacts are destroyed This procedure is constantly under review as part of the analysis

Spring 2009 Artifact Assessment Courses chosen throughout schools that lend themselves to the CSLO “THINK” and “LEARN” Courses and students randomly sorted Instructors notified by school representatives School admins given instructions and names of students Admins collect and copy student artifacts ___ courses identified, ___ courses sampled, ___ students identified Assessment Committee with school representatives meet on May 18 th for three hours, and again on June 1 st for three hours Some sample sets were unable to be assessed due to errors in collection and sampling but still may be useable 21 THINK artifacts, 26 LEARN artifacts

Assessment Results THINK Proficient: 7 Adequate: 6 Developing: 5 Unsatisfactory: 0 Unable to determine: 3 LEARN Proficient: 9 Adequate: 9 Developing: 5 Unsatisfactory: 0 Unable to determine: 3

Plans for future CSLO Assessment Determine courses applicable for each CSLO Refine collection process Training with School admins for the collection process Ongoing collection of artifacts throughout Fall and Spring semesters Goal of 50 artifacts per CSLO for the school year Assess artifacts in summer of 2010 Analyze results Continue to modify assessment process “norm” rubric assessment process Visit schools/departments to discuss CSLO assessment

Questions we still have Do we want to give feedback to programs? Faculty (at their request)? In what form? How can we maintain anonymity for students and instructors? How will we assess large groups of artifacts? What are the logistics? What kinds of recommendations to we foresee as we analyze artifacts in an institutional manner?