AAAC Jim Ulvestad December 1, 2012. Divestment issues  “Divestment,” in the parlance of the Portfolio Review, implies removal of a telescope from the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
+ Partners for Learning Assessment Exploration. + Overview Introducing Partners for Learning Assessment Exploration Sorting out what we do Finding out.
Advertisements

The CTCN Services UNEP – March 5th, 2014, Nairobi, Kenya.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 Large Synoptic Survey Telescope News since the February update Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee Telecon May 2012 Fred Borcherding/Nigel.
BULGARIA. Association " Children with special needs “  Organisation to support diagnosis and treatment of children with special needs; social integration.
PUTTING PEOPLE FIRST WORKSHOP FRIDAY 7 MARCH 08. Key documents Vision, specific expectations, proposed support mechanisms and resources set out in two.
Conversation with ACCORD on GSMT 21 January 2005 Michael S. Turner, Assistant Director Directorate for Mathematical & Physics Sciences National Science.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE Office of High Energy Physics, Cosmic Frontier Mid-Scale Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (MS-DESI) Experiment Fermilab PAC Oct.
SUGGESTIONS From White Papers received as of 10/06/14.
Changes of the American Community Survey State Date Center and Census Information Center Steering Committees Tasha Boone October 22, 2014.
SWIFT School Wide Integrated Framework for Transformation
Roadmap Name Strategic Roadmap #n Interim Report April 15, 2005.
Providing Access for US Astronomers to the Next Generation of Large Ground Based OIR Telescopes 1.Scientific Potential 2.Current Design Efforts 3.Complementarity.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
Flood Risk Management Program Rolf Olsen Institute for Water Resources U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
OIR C OMMITTEE S TATUS R EPORT 2 nd face-to-face meeting Oct , 2014 Beckman Center of the National Academies Irvine, CA.
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Field Project Planning, Operations and Data Services Jim Moore, EOL Field Project Services (FPS) Mike Daniels, EOL Computing, Data and Software (CDS) Facility.
1 Robert S. Webb and Roger S. Pulwarty NOAA Climate Service.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES STATE CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT BOARD REPORT, DECEMBER 7, 2010 SLO Coordinators: Maggie Taylor (FCC) and Eileen Apperson(RC)
AAAC Meeting February, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort at a.
The US CLIVAR SSC is undertaking an examination of progress made and priority science questions and research needs remaining to be addressed to: – improve.
Activities of and Prospective Issues before the Committee on Astronomy and Astrophysics Report by David Spergel, CAA Co-Chair Disclaimer: These slides.
AST Portfolio Review Tom Statler, NSF/AST AAAC Telecon, 11 May 2012.
A Roadmap forNationalOIRFacilities AAAC May 2005 OIR Long Range Planning Committee Document for submission to NSF AST and CAA May 2005.
Harvey Tananbaum Director Chandra X-ray Center Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics 13th HEAD Meeting April 8, 2013 Building International Space.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
NSF Update AAAC 8 February Update Topics FY2007 Budget Situation FY2007 Budget Situation FY2008 Request FY2008 Request Senior Review Status and.
Exo-Planet Task Force (ExoPTF) Jonathan Lunine (LPL) Stephen Ridgway (NASA)
An Approach to Outreach 13 December Outreach Fundamentals ICANN success dependent upon robust bottom-up, multi-stakeholder model Multi-stakeholder.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
NCAR’s Societal Impacts Program: WIST-Related Research Efforts Julie Demuth NCAR Societal Impacts Program 3 rd National Surface Transportation Weather.
“From the Ground Up: Balancing the NSF Astronomy Program” Senior Review Major Recommendations November 2006 Implications for GSMT.
ADBC: Background, Broader Impacts and Opportunity Anne Maglia Program Director, Division of Biological Infrastructure National Science Foundation
Brian Dewhurst Feb 9, 2007 Board on Physics and Astronomy NRC Astrophysics Update AAAC Feb 8-9, 2007 Brian Dewhurst BPA Staff.
Module III: Creating a Strategic Financing Plan Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015.
Recent Developments NASA IDL/MDL study indicated technical feasibility of an ISS mission NASA IDL/MDL cost estimate was well above Earth Venture limits.
Mapping New Strategies: National Science Foundation J. HicksNew York Academy of Sciences4 April 2006 Examples from our daily life at NSF Vision Opportunities.
School Improvement Partnership Programme: Summary of interim findings March 2014.
AST Update Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 10 May 2007.
What the Data Products Program Offers Users Todd Boroson Dick Shaw Presentation to NOAO Users Committee October 23, 2003.
NASA Applied Sciences Program Update John A. Haynes Program Manager, Weather National Aeronautics and Space Administration Applied Sciences Program Earth.
2 Developing Marketing Strategies and Plans
Gary Jedlovec Roadmap to Success transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations.
Climate Services: The Pacific Climate Information System (PaCIS) Approach Eileen L. Shea NOAA IDEA Center 31 st Climate Diagnostics.
Evolving a Legacy System Evolution of the Earth Observing Data and Information System M. Esfandiari 1, H. Ramapriyan 1, J. Behnke 1, E. Sofinowski 2 1.
Strategic Management (GJW ) Strategic Management - Introduction.
Seminar on community-led local development How to choose effective strategies, strong partnerships and coherent areas? Key building blocks for.
1 An Overview of Recent Actions/Events to Assure a Continued OSVW Capability.
Division of Astronomical Sciences Update (Life After the Senior Review) Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 11 October 2007.
Daniel Pinkham Nurturing Discovery: Biology Education for the 21 st Century A Strategic Plan for the NSF Biological Sciences Directorate BIO Advisory Committee.
PPAI Decadal Prediction/Predictability/Variability –Reviewed the WGCM/WGSIP Decadal Prediction Experiment –Reviewed/Revised Decadal WG Prospectus Reviewed.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations Short-term Prediction Research and Transition (SPoRT) Project Future Directions.
Senior Review of NSF Facilities NOAO Users Committee October 4, 2005.
Division of Astronomical Sciences Senior Review Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 10 May 2007.
Mid-Scale Projects Vernon Pankonin Team Leader. Mid-Scale Projects Programmatic Characteristics Not a formal funding program. Collection of proposals.
OSTP and Neutron Science OSTP is authorized to (under PL , National Science and Technology Policy, Organization, and Priorities Act of 1976): Advise.
Jim Ulvestad Division Director, AST May 6, 2011 Division of Astronomical Sciences.
GSMT SWG Meeting November, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort.
Study Overview Gravitational Waves Architecting Study Workshop December 20, Ken Anderson (Study Manager)
Regional Sediment Management Policy and Implementation Workshop April, 2009.
LSST CORPORATION Patricia Eliason LSSTC Executive Officer Belgrade, Serbia 2016.
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
NSF-NAC Jim Ulvestad, Division Director, MPS/AST
Oregon State Rail Plan Update
Community Science Updates
SOAR Observatory Strategic Planning Initial Concept Presentation
The International Science of Back to the Moon
Success For Each Child & Eliminate The Opportunity Gap
Charting the Course for Ocean Science in the United States:
Chapter 6.
Presentation transcript:

AAAC Jim Ulvestad December 1, 2012

Divestment issues  “Divestment,” in the parlance of the Portfolio Review, implies removal of a telescope from the NSF AST budget. This encompasses many options, all of which are likely to reduce or eliminate open-access astronomy research time 1.Divest to another operator, possibly with another mission 2.Develop funding partnership, possibly with mix of missions 3.Mothball 4.Close/deconstruct  Timescale for divestment decisions advertised as late 2013, to enable savings by time of FY 2017  Consideration of interagency partnerships follows various mixes of options 1 and 2 above  Strategy: interagency discussions about options/needs. If the other agency has interest, explore range of possible partnership models. Within agencies, determine how choices will be made among options. 2 12/01/2012

OIR System Definition  Long-term directions inferred from Portfolio Review Report  LSST should be at heart of OIR system  OIR system should center on >4m telescopes, with 4m telescopes being used primarily as supporting capabilities or survey capabilities  This leads to many questions  What does the post-2021 system look like, as a whole?  How do you make a transition to that system, and make the transition while continuing to deliver science capabilities along the way?  What are the opportunities to motivate private telescope operators to participate in an integrated system?  How much of the system is defined top-down vs. on a more ad-hoc bottom-up basis?  How is the system coordinated and managed?  How do Gemini and NOAO change over the next decade? 3 12/01/2012

Moving Toward the OIR System  Community self-organizing in workshops and other venues to determine best methods of doing LSST science  NSF and DOE discussing how DOE mission goals might be achieved using telescopes in the NSF part of the system  Given “Rocky-III” report, DOE has an idea of where the gaps are in their integrated program  Need community-led assessment of what we really want the system to look like post-2020 to deliver DOE mission science and NSF investigator science  Which telescopes, instruments, and observing methods best deliver the overall science capabilities and return? 4 12/01/2012