Examining Workplace Policies and Practices: Opportunities for Intervention Kristin Olsen Minot, M.S., Philadelphia Health Management Corp. Howard “Chip”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Yale-Griffin Prevention Research Center
Advertisements

1 Non-Response Bias Analyses of the Survey of Workplace Violence Prevention Andrew Kato, Kathy Downey, William McCarthy, and Samantha Cruz U.S. Bureau.
Privacy By Design Sample Use Case
Workplace Health Promotion Chapter 4.. Content Advance organizer Definitions Background to workplace health promotion The European Reference Model for.
Empowering tobacco-free coalitions to collect local data on worksite and restaurant smoking policies Mary Michaud, MPP University of Wisconsin-Cooperative.
Lessons Learned from the Implementation of a State Clean Indoor Air Law -New York- Ursula E. Bauer, Ph.D. Director, Tobacco Control Program NYS Department.
Crisis as Catalyst: The Affordable Care Act and Public Health in Philadelphia September 24, 2010 Nan Feyler, JD., MPH Chief of Staff Philadelphia Department.
Results Introduction Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of death in Wisconsin and the United States. Given the risk of smoking initiation during.
Lori Iarossi Bonnie Eisenberg, MPH Ian Brissette, PhD Bureau of Chronic Disease Epidemiology & Surveillance Division of Chronic Disease and Injury Prevention.
New York State Workforce Investment Board Healthcare Workforce Development Subcommittee Planning Grant Overview.
OSHA’s 21d Consultation Program SHARP TRFA 14 November 2005.
“This workforce solution was funded by a grant awarded under Workforce Innovation in Regional Economic Development (WIRED) as implemented by the U.S. Department.
Arizona Adult Tobacco Survey Response to Health Professional Query Behavior Richard S. Porter, MS Bob Leischow, MPH Arizona Department of Health Services.
August 2009 The TRU Movement in North Carolina: An Overview André Stanley HWTF Phase IV Regional Grantee Orientation Workshop TRU.
Texas Tobacco Laws. Senate Bill Texas Legislature Tobacco-Free Schools Sec TOBACCO ON SCHOOL PROPERTY The Board of Trustees of a school.
Occupational Health and Safety Part 2 - Committees, Worker’s Rights, Worker’s Compensation.
1 Red Cross Customer Analysis Final Report December 2002.
Eaton’s Alcohol, Drug, & Substance
©SHRM 2007SHRM Weekly Online Survey: June 19, Post-Hire Background Checks Sample comprised of 421 randomly selected HR professionals. Analyzing 421.
Objectives Objectives: Food safety management systems
Global Tobacco Surveillance System Accomplishments and Opportunities Samira Asma Associate Director Global Tobacco Control Office on Smoking and Health.
Collaboration Nation: Piloting EPA’s Small Local Governments Compliance Assistance Policy Ken Harmon, Attorney Office of Compliance U.S. Environmental.
1 Drug-Free Workplace Policy ScreenSafe Inc. Program Administrators Employee Resource Systems, Inc. Members Assistance Program.
Telephonic Health Coaching: How to do it best Erin MB Ratelis Master of Business Communication Final Project Presentation May 2006.
Higher Education Meets Public Health: Successful Collaborative Efforts to Change Tobacco Policies on Campus Maine Tobacco Free College Network Emily Rines,
Maintaining Essential Business and Community Services During a Pandemic Paul R. Patrick, Director Bureau of Emergency Medical Services Utah Department.
Office of Preventive Health Victor D. Sutton, PhD, MPPA Director.
METHODS Setting Kansas Study population Kansas Physician Assistants Study design Cross-sectional Measurements / Data points collected A survey consisting.
Quittin’ Time: Helping Employees Become Tobacco-free June 2005.
1 The Importance of Stakeholders’ Engagement in Program Quality Presented at the Short-Cycle Higher Education (SCHE) in Europe and the United States Varna,
Kansas Hospitals Are Tobacco-Free Kansas Public Health Association, Inc Fall Conference Cindy Samuelson Kansas Hospital Association.
Bringing the American Heart Association’s Start! Fit-Friendly Program to Employees at Erickson Retirement Communities Craig Thorne, MD, MPH, VP-Medical.
1 Commercial/Industrial Substance Abuse Policy ScreenSafe Inc. Program Administrators.
© 2004 SHRM SHRM Weekly Online Survey: December 7, 2004 Smoking In the Workplace Sample comprised of 270 randomly selected HR professionals. Analyzing.
Campaign Success: Focus on Employees and their Health Dawn Berney, MPA Wisconsin Public Health and Health Policy Institute Teresa Ryan, BS Tobacco-Free.
Implementing Adult Risk Factor Surveillance in Manitoba Case Studies ARFS Symposium January 26, 2011.
Chapter 4 Survey Designs Winston Jackson and Norine Verberg Methods: Doing Social Research, 4e.
Collaborations and Partnerships: Infusing AT into Work and the Community – The Pennsylvania Assistive Technology and Employment Collaborative Disability.
CHANGE (Community Health Assessment and Group Evaluation) Tool
Elimination of Chlorinated Solvent Use in Cleaning: Barriers to Success Regional Environmental Summit Providence, RI September 28, 2005 Presented by: Massachusetts.
Cuyahoga County Health Alliance Tobacco-Free Policy Workshop Planning a 100% Tobacco-Free Campus Policy Cuyahoga County Board of Health August 24, 2012.
1 ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY DRUG- FREE WORKPLACE FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM ScreenSafe, Inc. Phone: Fax:
1. 2 Ergonomics 3 THE ERGONOMIC PROCESS There are two approaches to ergonomics:  Pro-active intervention (NIOSH Model)  Reactive intervention.
Community Pharmacists' Role in Colorectal Cancer Screening ACCN Research Roundtable Hershey, PA September 28, 2007.
Design and First Year Results of the Healthy Hawaii Initiative Jay Maddock, Ph.D. Claudio Nigg, Ph.D. Jessica Yamauchi, M.A. University of Hawaii Funded.
OSHCON Texas’ Occupational Safety and Health Consultation Program.
Evaluating Local Tobacco Control Organizations. David Ahrens, Research Program Manager Research conducted by: Barbara.
Equity Impact Review Guide American Public Health Association November 5, 2013.
Division of Risk Management State of Florida Loss Prevention Program.
Implementation of the Massachusetts Smoke-free Workplace Law American Public Health Association November 8, 2006.
SPE Safety Guidelines Eric Busch October 6 th, 2014.
A Comprehensive Approach for Reducing Illegal Tobacco Sales to Youth Kevin A. Alvarnaz, Cessation Program Manager Bureau of Chronic Diseases & Injury Prevention.
Healthy Workplaces and the Voluntary Sector 12 th May 2015 Ginette Hogan Senior Public Health Officer – Worklessness and Workplace Lambeth and Southwark.
Healthy Arkansas Public Goals – Private Investment.
School Tobacco-Use & Addiction Prevention Toolkit Funded by ITPC Indiana Tobacco Prevention and Cessation Indiana Tobacco Prevention and Cessation.
OSHA Guidelines for Employers to Reduce Motor Vehicle Crashes
Outcome-based Planning and Evaluation Gloria Latimer, Ed.S, Director of Community Programs Jason Vahling, M.P.H., Community Program Specialist.
Tobacco Prevention & Control Help your employees quit tobacco & save money! Presenter: Eliza Muse, MSc Health Care Policy Alaska Tobacco Prevention & Control.
Glaxo Wellcome’s Employee Education Programs There was little in the way of a total marketing approach aimed at employee education GW wanted to develop.
Safety and Health Program Don Ebert- Risk Manager (509)
Department of Defense Voluntary Protection Programs Center of Excellence Development, Validation, Implementation and Enhancement for a Voluntary Protection.
CLEAN INDOOR AIR & HEALTH PROTECTION CLEAN INDOOR AIR & HEALTH PROTECTION Amendment of Ch July 10, 2012 City Council Meeting - Smoking Regulations.
INVOLVING WORK PLACES and WORKFORCES Who has been involved: Catalonia: human resources, workers representatives, trade unions through the human resources.
Multnomah County Employee Wellness Initiative Committee Board of County Commissioners Briefing September 4, 2012.
Building Momentum for Smoke-Free Ordinances National Conference on Tobacco or Health Chicago, Illinois May 5, 2005.
© Copyright  People at Work Project - Overview  People at Work Project - Theoretical Underpinnings  People at.
Building A Successful Worksite Wellness Program from Scratch William McPeck, MSW, CWWPC, WLCP Consultive Coach St. Albans, Maine Nationally Certified Worksite.
Understanding Cost Implications of the Pennsylvania Department of Health’s Regionalization Process for its Tobacco Control Program Illana Ron 1, Jennifer.
1 ELECTRICAL INDUSTRY DRUG- FREE WORKPLACE FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM ScreenSafe, Inc.
Dr. Lu Yuan, CSP Construction Substance-Abuse Programs & Safety Incentives OSHE 382, Spring 2016 Dr. Lu Yuan, CSP
Presentation transcript:

Examining Workplace Policies and Practices: Opportunities for Intervention Kristin Olsen Minot, M.S., Philadelphia Health Management Corp. Howard “Chip” Baker, LSW,CAC,CEAP and Jim Wall, MS; Bucks County Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence This project is supported by the Pennsylvania Department of Health

Background Tobacco Free Worksite/ Workforce Initiative Component of Bucks County Tobacco Control Project located in Southeastern Region of Pennsylvania Part of statewide comprehensive tobacco use prevention and cessation program consistent with CDC Best Practices Funds from PA Tobacco Master Settlement Agreement

Goal of Worksite Initiative Increase the number of tobacco free worksites and workforces in Bucks County

Purpose of the Survey The Survey was Designed to: – Assess the current state of worksite smoking policies and practices as a baseline measure for initiative; – Introduce the Tobacco-Free Worksite Initiative to business and industry in the county; and – Provide employers with an easy way to contact the program for information and assistance –

Survey M ethodology Survey was conducted by Philadelphia Health Management Corporation (PHMC) which is the local evaluator for the Bucks County Tobacco Control Project (BCTCP) Mail survey of a random sample (n =2000) of Bucks County businesses in June Response rate 20% (n=394) Survey topics and questions based on a review of the literature. Many questions taken or modified, with permission, from previously tested and administered worksite smoking surveys

Methodology The sample was stratified into five strata based on workforce size: a random sample was selected from each stratum. Worksites with 20 or more employees were oversampled to assure an adequate sample for analysis. Worksites with fewer than five employees were excluded as were restaurants and bars Initial surveys were followed by a follow-up postcard three weeks later. Cover letter and survey mailed to a random sample of 500 businesses that had not yet returned a completed survey..

Description of the Sample

Do Employers have Policies about Smoking? The majority of businesses in Bucks County have an official smoking policy About one out of ten businesses has no policy regarding smoking Large and mid-sized businesses are more likely to have an official policy compared to small businesses (< 20 employees ) Two out of three businesses are smoke-free

Type of Smoking Policy by Workforce Size

Smokefree Workplaces by Industry Type A smokefree workplace is one in which smoking is prohibited in all indoor areas (public, work, or non-work) or in company vehicles.

Why do Employers Restrict Smoking? Most Common Reasons Health Concerns Cleanliness Fire or Safety Reasons Employee Preference Least Common Reasons Reduce Risk of Legal Action Reduce health insurance and other insurance costs Regulatory or licensing reasons Collective Bargaining Unit

Reasons that Employers Restrict Smoking ReasonsNumberPercent Health Concerns % Cleanliness % Fire or Safety Reasons % Employee Preference % Owner sets policy7019.9% Increase work productivity6719.1% Customer demand5014.2% Reduce risk of legal action3710.6% Reduce health insurance or other insurance costs318.9% Regulatory of licensing reasons236.6% Collective bargaining unit61.8% Other reasons3510.0% Smoking is not restricted at all20.6% Respondents were asked to check ALL reasons; percentages, therefore, total to more than 100%.

Reasons that Employers Restrict Smoking by Workforce Size Respondents were asked to check ALL reasons; percentages, therefore, total to more than 100%.

Do Employers Help Their Employees to Quit Smoking? The majority of employers have not taken steps to encourage their employees to quit smoking: Fewer than one out of seven employers (13.1%) provide health insurance which includes coverage for smoking cessation Only 7.0% of employers have distributed smoking cessation materials Fewer than 5% of employers have sponsored a smoking cessation program within the company or Allowed their employees to attend a program during working hours

Employers’ Efforts to Encourage Employee Smoking Cessation by Workforce Size Respondents were asked to check ALL efforts to encourage their employees to stop smoking; percentages, therefore, total to more than 100%.

Recommendations Work with businesses to further restrict indoor smoking, limit outdoor smoking and smoking in company vehicles. Educate employers about productivity,health and legal consequences of allowing smoking in the workplace. Help employers in providing their employees with information about the dangers of tobacco use and resources to stop smoking. Tailor all worksite-related activities to meet the expressed needs of business.

Next Steps Initiative developed worksite partners from survey respondents, Chambers of Commerce, Professional Organizations Established 3-Tier system to recognize and award companies for advancing tobacco free worksites and workforces Used partners’ own circle of influence to expand program reach Provided training and motivational presentations to employers re internal and external factors related to creating and maintaining tobacco free worksites/workforces Plan to expand tobacco free living options coaching through small group presentations onsite at area workplaces

Lessons Learned Don’t try to tell employers what to do Employers participate when they see that their interests are being achieved Company leadership needs information and direction on ways to restrict/prohibit smoking Employees who are contemplating or planning to quit need coaching on options for quitting A successful tobacco free worksite initiative takes planning, effort and TIME

For Additional Information For additional information about the Bucks County Worksite Tobacco Survey or the Tobacco Free Worksite Initiative, contact : Kristin Minot, M.S. Philadelphia Health Management Corporation or

Notes on Methodology Many questions on the survey were taken or modified, with permission from previous surveys developed and administered by The Clearwater Research Group, The University of Wisconsin and the University of Arizona The sample was stratified into five strata based on workforce size: businesses with: 1) 5-19 employees; 2) employees; 3) employees; 4) 500+ employees; and 5) unknown.A weight was applied to the data to adjust for the oversampling of larger businesses. The three categories of business/industry type (production, service, sales) were based on Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) Codes.

Notes Restaurants and bars were surveyed separately through a special tobacco smoke pollution initiative of the Bucks County Tobacco Control project. Worksites with fewer than five employees were not included in the sample, as most of the questions regarding policy issues were inappropriate for these businesses The initial survey was mailed in June 2003, a follow-up postcard was sent three weeks later. Three weeks following this, the cover letter and survey were mailed a second time to a random sample of 500 businesses that had not yet returned a completed survey.