Self Study Workshop Plenary V Self Study Report Considerations Philosophy and Tone February 2, 2007 Sonya Christian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Developing an Effective Tracking and Improvement System for Learning and Teaching Achievements and Future Challenges in Maintaining Academic Standards.
Advertisements

STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
NWCCU Standards for Accredition The new process. Revised NWCCU Accreditation Standards New Standards: reduced from 9 to 5 Standard One--Mission, Core.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
How to Interpret and Apply the Characteristics of Excellence: A Framework for Determining Compliance Karen Stout, President Montgomery County Community.
Medical Education Grand Rounds Self-Study Overview Middle States Commission on Higher Education January 13, 2010.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Preparation for Developmental Reviews.
WASC Educational Effectiveness Review Report First Draft March
NWCCU Standard 2 - Educational Program and Its Effectiveness Bea Babbitt & Francisco Menendez October 29, 2008 SU 219 Bea Babbitt & Francisco Menendez.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Alignment in Planning Outcomes from a Focus Session ”Planning for Transformation” Worcester, MA, March 17, 2001.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Accreditation Challenges in Multi-College Districts ASCCC Accreditation Institute Friday, February 20, 2015, 3:45 pm - 5:00 pm Bill Scroggins, President,
Proficiency level for Student Learning Outcomes - March 15, 2013  ACCJC College Status Report on Student Learning Outcomes Implementation  Respond to.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Overview Changes in the re-accreditation process since 2007 Assessment Resources.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Accreditation in a Multi-College District Accreditation Institute Academic Senate for California Community Colleges February 11, 2012, 1:00-2:00pm John.
League of Women Voters November 2, Governing Board Clackamas Community College Board of Education is a Governing Board CCC cannot legally exist.
2007 Strengthening Student Success Conference, San Jose Dr. Jack Friedlander Executive Vice President, Educational Programs Santa Barbara City College.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
ACCREDITATION Goals: Goals: - Certify to the public and to educational organizations that the school is recognized as an effective institution of learning.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Institutional Accreditation: What is it? Higher Learning Commission accredits degree- granting institutions in the North Central region. Assurance to the.
Standard Five NWCCU Workshop on Institutional Self-Study Hilton Seattle Airport & Conference Center Seattle, WA February 1 – 2, 2007.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
King Saud University, College of Science Workshop: Programme accreditation and quality assurance Riyadh, June 15-16, 2009 II.3 Self-Evaluation and Appendices.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
Accreditation: What we learned about ourselves College Forum Talk August 19, 2015 Patricia A. Fleming, Ph.D. Provost/ Senior Vice President for Academic.
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
NWCCU Workshop on Institutional Self Study1February 1-2, 2007 Workshop on Institutional Self Study Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President Northwest Commission.
Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015 Technology Task Force Mission Review/Discussion March 5, 2015.
Accreditation Who? Regional Accrediting Agency: NWCCU (Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities). What? Self-study followed by on-campus.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Embedding CRED Training Day. Timing: ~ Introductory session (2 hours) ~ One training day (6 hours) ~ Follow-up sessions (2 hours) Focus: ~ Embedding of.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Planning and SACS Stephen Riter Roy Mathew The University of Texas at El Paso.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Council March PREVIOUS Reductionistic Whole = Sum of the Parts A Snapshot of the institution at a specific moment in time NEW Synergistic Whole.
SNU HLC/NCA Accreditation Update SNU Graduate & Professional Studies Fall Meeting October 24, 2008.
HLC? What does this stand for? Who are they? What do they do?
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Self Study Workshop Plenary V Self Study Report Considerations Philosophy and Goal February 8, 2008 Sonya Christian.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Unrepresented Staff Yearly Performance Reviews Tips for an Effective Review.
HLC Criterion One Primer Criterion One. Mission August 27, 2015.
Accreditation 2007 Undergraduate Council September 26, 2005.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Standard Two Les Steele Executive Vice President.
1 Establishing a New Gallaudet Program Review Process Pat Hulsebosch Office of Academic Quality CUE – 9/3/08: CGE – 9/16/08.
Self Study Workshop Plenary III
Data You Can Use for Accreditation
YEAR ONE SELF-EVALUATION REPORT
DRAFT Standards for the Accreditation of e-Learning Programs
Curriculum and Accreditation
NICC Self-Study The Road to Excellence
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
Assessment Presentation
Accreditation and curriculum
NWCCU update February 13, 2018.
Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles
The Role of the Board of Management in School Development Planning
Kirsi Hiltunen 16 December 2015 Baku, Azerbaijan
February 21-22, 2018.
Navigating the College Culture
Presentation transcript:

Self Study Workshop Plenary V Self Study Report Considerations Philosophy and Tone February 2, 2007 Sonya Christian

Tone Is NotIs Academic Rigorous Factual Evidence based Meticulous Pedantic Boring Sterile Anecdotal Fussy Self-study

Your Story Your Values Accreditation Standards Self-study “Both” “And”

An Example Lane’s Story Learning- centered principles Core values

Initial Work: An Example 4.A.5 The institution provides for regular and systematic evaluation of faculty performance in order to ensure teaching effectiveness and the fulfillment of instructional and other faculty responsibilities. The institution's policies, regulations, and procedures provide for the evaluation of all faculty on a continuing basis consistent with Policy Faculty Evaluation, page 66. Eval Scale: 3—Strong Compliance to 0—No Compliance Evidence: What evidence/ data do we have? What data do we need to collect? Indicator based with one-to-one mapping.

Analysis What conclusions should we draw from the evidence? What is the data telling us about how well we are doing in relation to our embedded College Values: the Learning-centered College principles, as well as the College’s Vision, Mission & Core Values? Strengths (Provide Examples): Challenges (Provide Examples): Recommendations for Improvement - Alignment to Vision, Mission, Core Values, Learning College What are we going to do as a result of this analysis to improve our practice? Initial Work: An Example Indicator based with one-to-one mapping.

It is your story … Collective Story All the groups have their roles Self-Improvement Leads to improving every aspect of the institution … and not merely to respond to NWCCU