Preliminary Scoping Effort. Presentation Objectives Identify need for additional sources of future funding Provide background on how elements were identified.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Site Characterization Instructional Goal: Upon completion of this topic the participant will better understand the need to identify and evaluate various.
Advertisements

Environment Canada Alberta Environment and Water April 23,
Benefit Transfer of Non-Market Values – Understanding the concepts John Rolfe Central Queensland University.
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
Metropolitan Council Environmental Services A Clean Water Agency Presented to the Environment Committee November 9, 2010 Information Item Master Water.
By: Carrie Turner Prepared for: New Jersey Association of Environmental Authorities Annual Conference March 12, 2013 Watershed Management Planning Provides.
Tonnie Cummings National Park Service, Pacific West Region National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 14, 2014.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
AIACC Regional Study AS07 Southeast Asia Regional Vulnerability to Changing Water Resources and Extreme Hydrological due to Climate Change.
Direct PM 2.5 Emissions Data, Testing, and Monitoring Issues Ron Myers Measurement Policy Group SPPD, OAQPS.
9.Monitoring Plan + 10.Implementation Plan + 4. LAs* 5. WLAs* 6. MOS* 7.Seasonal Variation* 8.Reasonable Assurance + TMDL Process 1 Problem Understanding.
Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.
Britta Bierwagen 1, Roxanne Thomas 2, Kathryn Mengerink 2 & Austin Kane 2 1 Global Change Research Program National Center for Environmental Assessment.
Nutrient Monitoring on the Ohio River: Balancing Information Needs.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Obtaining the goals.  Identify realistic future use of all water bodies – drinking water, irrigation water, livestock watering, bathing, fishing, recipient.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Regional Critical Mass SLICE can wait no longer!.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
California Rapid Assessment Method for Wetlands (CRAM) Project and Ambient Assessments.
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program (SWQM)
Dr. Matt Helmers Assistant Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Dept. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University How is.
ORSANCO Technical Committee Erich Emery USACE Great Lakes & Ohio River Division 11-Oct US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ®
Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting the Lake Michigan Mass Balance Project Collaborative Monitoring in the Great Lakes: Revisiting.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Modeling to Understand Stormwater Management Efforts Portland Harbor Superfund Site Dawn Sanders City of Portland Bureau of Environmental Services September.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Inventory and Monitoring Terrestrial Fauna Linking Field Activities to Budget Processes.
2013 Monitoring Activities: Summer Water Quality Conditions Technical Committee Meeting October 8-9, 2013 Agenda Item # 6.
Environment Canada’s Intervention on the Mary River Project Water Licence Application Nunavut Water Board Final Hearing Pond Inlet, NU Mark Dahl / Anne.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys Wadeable Streams Assessment Overview November, 2007.
Indicators to Measure Progress and Performance IWRM Training Course for the Mekong July 20-31, 2009.
Report of the NPDES Subcommittee. Conference Call Meetings July 8 and August 19 Mercury Discharges – Utility Request to Address Permit Requirements for.
OHIO RIVER MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT Program Overview.
Item 3b Guadalupe River Monitoring WY 2010 Jen Hunt, Ben Greenfield, Sarah Lowe, Lester McKee Sources, Pathway, and Loading Work Group May 6th, 2010.
FY14 Technical Programs Program & Finance Committee Meeting April 3, 2013.
Biological & Research Programs. Overview Status Future Direction.
Technical Committee Meeting October 6-7,  Ohio River Spill Modeling System ◦ Developed in 2001 ◦ Based on USGS BLTM model ◦ Uses USACE CASCADE.
I RIS E NVIRONMENTAL Independent Review of Documents Pertaining to the Lehigh Southwest Cement Permanente Facility Rob Balas & John McLaughlin February.
Potomac Toxics Monitoring Status and Issues ICPRB March 8, 2004.
City of San Diego’s Recycled Water Study Item W15a October 10, 2012 Presentation to the California Coastal Commission.
State Agency Needs for Remote Sensing Data Related to Water Quality By Bob Van Dolah Marine Resources Research Institute South Carolina Department of Natural.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Solving Water Pollution Problems in the Wakulla Springshed The City of Tallahassee’s Efforts to Reduce Stormwater Pollution Hydrogeology Workshop May 12-13,
Harmful Algal Blooms 1 Agenda Items 7a: Revision of HABs Response and Communications Plan 7b: HABs Stressor Response Data Assessment Strategy.
Report of the NPDES Subcommittee
ORSANCO’s FY16 Technical Program. WQ Monitoring Programs Bimonthly & Clean Metals Sampling – Metals & traditional 15 mainstem, 14 tribs,
Water Quality Monitoring in Michigan, : A Decade of Program Evolution By: Gerald Saalfeld, MI Department of Environmental Quality.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Paul Novak, IDEM 209 th Technical Committee Meeting October 6-7, 2015.
The National Monitoring Network: Monitoring & Management of Alabama Rivers Fred Leslie Alabama Dept of Environmental Management National Monitoring Conference.
2015 Subcommittee Report. Macroinvertebrate Program Incorporated into ALU Assessment 2 Methods collected at all sites Macro Index (ORMIn) est
305B REPORT Biennial Assessment of Ohio River Water Quality Conditions.
Source Water Protection Efforts Organics Detection System & Spill Notification Technical Committee Meeting, February 10-11, 2016 Covington, KY.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Speciation and Bioavailability of Mercury in Ambient and Wastewater-Influenced Water Samples: A Preliminary Study Rob Reash American Electric Power, Columbus,
TTWG Report & Technical Topics SRRTTF Meeting Dave Dilks March 16, 2016.
NPDES SUBCOMMITTEE BIOLOGICAL SUBCOMMITTEE MONITORING STRATEGY FY 14 Program Recommendations.
Environment and Climate Change Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Regarding Doris North Project Type A Water Licence Amendment Application Nunavut.
Characterization of Dissolved Solids in the Ohio River
US Environmental Protection Agency
Beaver River Watershed PCB Investigation
Welcome.
Public Meeting February 19, 2009
Two main areas identified
3rd meeting, 8 March 2006 EEA Copenhagen
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
KO meeting, Brussels, July 4th 2018
Presentation transcript:

Preliminary Scoping Effort

Presentation Objectives Identify need for additional sources of future funding Provide background on how elements were identified Provide broad overview to Technical Committee of preliminary scoping effort to identify potential major program needs Secure preliminary feedback on concept

Ohio River HABs Program An overview will be presented under TEC Item 10d. Costs: $2.75M - $3M Capital $600K - $900K O&M per yr.

Mercury Study Some study to generate the information necessary to more effectively manage mercury in the Ohio River. Scope, costs, and schedule to be determined by Ad Hoc Committee.

NPDES Permits GIS Database and Modeling Application Understanding pollutant loadings is critical to developing strategies to meet WQ objectives Develop GIS database of NPDES permits Link database to DMR and other monitoring datasets to characterize inputs Couple GIS database with river-wide water quality model to simulate pollutant loadings. Helps manage discharge, velocity, climate and concentration data Costs: $300K - $500K Capital $50K per yr O&M

Update Historic Datasets Used in 305b Assessments for Dioxin & PCBs Some monitoring data sets may have become outdated. Dioxin/PCBs – 1997 to 2002 Bacteria – 2003 to 2007 (longitudinal surveys) Always need more current data to ensure 305b assessments reflect current conditions 1. Dioxin/PCBs Sampling Conduct 3 round of hi-vol sampling at 10 sites. Repeat every 5 years. 2. Bacteria Sampling Proposal still to be developed. Revisiting datasets at reasonable intervals is a good and appropriate business practice for ORSANCO Costs: $200K Capital $150K per yr O&M

Remote Sensing Applications Build capacity to utilize remote sensing techniques to enhance system-wide water quality monitoring and assessment. Facilitate interagency cooperation to avoid duplication of effort Technology used for ever expanding list of parameters Cyanobacteria, phosphorus, invasive aquatic vegetation, heavy metals, temperature, etc. Costs: $100K Capital $ 50K per yr O&M

Convert Bimonthly/Clean Metals Grab Samples to X-Sectional Sampling & Add Parameters More representative samples and monitoring of mass loads. Add Methylmercury, Dissolved Phosphorus. Extend metals to tributaries. Costs: $100K Capital $350K per yr O&M

Impacts of Emerging Contaminants Wide-range of emerging contaminants (ECs) has been detected in the surface waters and drinking water supplies. Research has shown biological responses to ECs. Study: Test a range of biological endpoints which can be used to screen for potential impacts from multiple stressors and rank relative risk to Ohio River biota. Test two areas (1 higher risk and 1 lower risk). Collect 3 rounds of water chemistry and fish data. Compare fish to water chemistry to evaluate relationships between ECs and biological endpoints. Costs: $300,000 for one study.

Enhanced Biological Pool Surveys Increases the value of ORSANCO’s probabilistic pool surveys by incorporating the following: Determine effects of various factors (flow, invasive species, etc.) on bio assessments Targeted sampling (8 sites/pool) to assess impact of point sources In-season revisit of 1 pool To provide better estimates of precision of indices Revisit 1 pool from previous year Determine effects of annual variation of assessments due to flows, temperature, etc Collect Bimonthly water quality parameters at all biological survey sites 4x/yr. Costs: $250K per yr.

Conduct Mussel Surveys & Develop Ohio River Mussel Database Understanding mussel distributions and mussel/habitat & mussel/WQ relationships would enable ORSANCO to: Develop more accurate WQ Standards (e.g., ammonia, chloride). Explore development of mussels as 3 rd indicator group for biological pool assessments. Help identify exposure pathways Costs: $25K Capital $100K per yr O&M