1 Understanding Sources of Error and Uncertainty NOAA’S COLORADO BASIN RIVER FORECAST CENTER.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Water Year 2013: Current Conditions and Early Season Outlook in the Colorado River Basin CRFS November 14, 2012.
Advertisements

CBRFC Peak Flow Forecast Webinar April 9th, 2014 Greg Smith & Ashley Nielson These slides: Presentation are available.
Brian McInerney Hydrologist National Weather Service Hydrologic Outlook April 2006.
Robert J Zamora NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory Physical Sciences Division Boulder, CO Arizona HMT Soil Moisture Network.
Generating Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts for River Modeling
The Importance of Realistic Spatial Forcing in Understanding Hydroclimate Change-- Evaluation of Streamflow Changes in the Colorado River Basin Hydrology.
Hydrological Modeling FISH 513 April 10, Overview: What is wrong with simple statistical regressions of hydrologic response on impervious area?
CNRFC Operational Flood Forecasting Pete Fickenscher Hydrologist California-Nevada River Forecast Center National Weather Service October 18, 2006.
Idaho's Climate and Water Resource Forecast for the 2008 Water Year Sponsored by: The Climatic Impacts Group at the University of Washington and the.
June 23, 2011 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center 1 NOAA / CBRFC Water forecasts and data in support of western water management.
CBRFC April 2014 Water Supply Webinar April 7, 2014 Greg Smith These slides:
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Water Supply Forecasting Method Michelle Stokes Hydrologist in Charge Colorado Basin River Forecast Center April 28,
CBRFC June 2014 Water Supply Webinar June 5, 2014 Paul Miller These slides:
Reservoir and Diversion Data CBRFC Stakeholder Forum July 31, 2012.
2011 Peak Flows and Daily Forecasts CBRFC 2011 Stakeholder Forum November 3, 2011.
Temperature and Precipitation Data CBRFC Stakeholder Forum July 31, 2012.
CRFS March 30, Virgin River NWS-SWS: 90 NWS-ESP: (+8-15% El Nino weighted) NRCS daily: 80 NRCS statistical: 78 Coordinated: 80 / 195% median.
May West Gulf River Forecast Center Rio Grande Hydrologic Services Expansion Meeting.
CBRFC April 2014 CUWCD Briefing/Meeting 1:30pm April 8, 2014 Ashley Nielson.
Intervening flow forecasts (inflow between Lake Mead and Lake Powell) Inflow forecasts needs between Davis & Parker – Havasu operational limits Forecast.
Southwest Hydrometeorology Symposium Tempe, AZ September 28, 2011 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center : A Year of Extremes.
National Weather Service River Forecast System Model Calibration Fritz Fiedler Hydromet 00-3 Tuesday, 23 May East Prospect Road, Suite 1 Fort.
Klamath Basin Water Distribution Model Workshop. OUTLINE Brief Description of Water Distribution Models Model Setups Examples of networks and inputs Demand.
What Affects Forecast Quality Uncertainty in weather forecasts Data Network density Quality of measurements Missing measurements Loss of data sites used.
UTILIZING COCORAHS RAINFALL DATA IN OPERATIONAL RIVER FORECAST OPERATIONS AT THE NERFC Ronald S. W. Horwood Meteorologist SR HAS Forecaster National Weather.
Streamflow Predictability Tom Hopson. Conduct Idealized Predictability Experiments Document relative importance of uncertainties in basin initial conditions.
Forecasting Streamflow with the UW Hydrometeorological Forecast System Ed Maurer Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington Pacific Northwest.
Center for Hydrometeorology and Remote Sensing, University of California, Irvine Basin Scale Precipitation Data Merging Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.
Preliminary Applications of the HL-RDHM within the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Ed Clark, Hydrologist Presented July 26 th, 2007 as part of the.
National Weather Service - Southeast River Forecast Center Southeast River Forecast Center North Florida Visit July 17-20, 2006 Southeast River Forecast.
Applications of the NWS Research Distributed Hydrologic Model in Operational Hydrology The Colorado Basin River Forecast Center (CBRFC), an office of NOAA’s.
Robert Hartman Acting Director NWS Office of Hydrologic Development GPM in the NOAA Integrated Water Forecasting Program.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Omaha Districts Inflow Forecast Regression Analysis Carrie Vuyovich and Steven Daly ERDC-CRREL Cold Regions.
Overview of the Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Lisa Holts.
CBRFC Postmortem Analysis on June 2010 flooding in UT and CO.
San Juan Basin. San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2) Upper ( ) Middle ( ) Lower ( ) San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2)
Hydrologic Model Review CBRFC Fourth Annual Stakeholder Forum February 25 – 26, 2014 Salt Lake City, UT.
Statistical Water Supply (SWS) Mathematical relationships, in the form of regression equations, between measurements of observed climate conditions (predictor.
The NOAA Hydrology Program and its requirements for GOES-R Pedro J. Restrepo Senior Scientist Office of Hydrologic Development NOAA’s National Weather.
CBRFC March Peak Flow Forecast Webinar March 11, 2014 Greg Smith & Brenda Alcorn These slides: Presentation.
Stream Gages CBRFC Stakeholder Forum July 31, 2012.
July 31, 2012 Kevin Werner NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Tim Bardsley Western Water Assessment 1 Future Colorado Basin Observing System.
A New Soil Moisture Observational Network In Arizona: Design, and Preliminary Results Robert Zamora NOAA/ESRL Physical Sciences Division Ed Clark NOAA/NWS.
Aspinall Operations Operational Considerations Aspinall Unit Purposes – Water storage / Compact Development – Power Production – Flood Control.
Hydrologic Forecasting With Statistical Models Angus Goodbody David Garen USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service National Water and Climate Center.
CRFS November 20, Green River Basin Upper Green  Near record February precipitation  Large increases in forecasts on March 1  Much above average.
NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE
Hydrologic Forecasting Alan F. Hamlet Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO/CSES Climate Impacts Group Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of.
Alan F. Hamlet Andy Wood Dennis P. Lettenmaier JISAO Center for Science in the Earth System Climate Impacts Group and the Department.
San Juan Basin. San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2) Upper ( ) Middle ( ) Lower ( ) San Juan-Pagosa Springs(PSPC2)
2 009 W ater S upply F orecasting William B. Reed Senior Hydrologist Colorado Basin RFC September 18, W ater S eminar “Dust in the Wind and.
Hydrologic Model Review
CBRFC April 2010 Water Supply Webinar 10am, May 7, 2010 Kevin Werner These slides: PLEASE MUTE YOUR PHONES.
Development of an Ensemble Gridded Hydrometeorological Forcing Dataset over the Contiguous United States Andrew J. Newman 1, Martyn P. Clark 1, Jason Craig.
Colorado Basin River Forecast Center Greg Smith Senior Hydrologist National Weather Service Colorado Basin River Forecast Center January 25, 2011 Navajo.
Overview of CBRFC Flood Operations Arizona WFOs – May 19, 2011 Kevin Werner, SCH.
National Weather Service River Forecast System (NWSRFS) Interactive Forecast Program (IFP) CBRFC Open House August 18, 2010.
Bias in April 1 forecasts (underforecast) for July-April unimpaired runoff for 15 Sierra Nevada basins was about 150% of average accumulation, i.e.
Quantitative vs. qualitative analysis of snowpack, snowmelt & runoff
Hydrologic Considerations in Global Precipitation Mission Planning
Management of Flood Waters through Mcphee Reservoir
Forecasting Streamflow with the UW Hydrometeorological Forecast System
Hydrologic Forecasting
Little Bear River 100-Year Storm Flood
Hydrologic issues in the measurement of snowfall
Forests, water & research in the Sierra Nevada
Real-time Sierra Nevada water monitoring system
2017 Snowpack Status and Streamflow Outlook for Walker Basin
Monitoring for Flood and Water Supply Forecasting
Presentation transcript:

1 Understanding Sources of Error and Uncertainty NOAA’S COLORADO BASIN RIVER FORECAST CENTER

2 Understanding Sources of Error Data – Undetected errors in historical/current observations – Data density/Gage network distribution – Unmeasured Depletions – Forecasted Weather Conditions Hydrologic Model – The model itself – Initial Conditions – Calibration Error (bias)

3 Data Gage Issues – Freezing, aquatic growth – Malfunctions – Flooding issues (gage destroyed, channel changes, etc…) – Measurement accuracy Bad data Missing data Calculated inflow data -1 – 15 cfs Model simulation 10 cfs

4 Colorado – Dotsero Last visit 10/17 Measured vs. rated = 0% diff No changes made Red = observed Blue = simulated Roaring Fork – Glenwood Springs Last visit 10/6 Measured vs. rated = -4.2% diff (~30 cfs) No changes made ~200 cfs Colorado – Glenwood Springs Last visit 8/13 Measured vs. rated = -0.4% diff New shift applied Colorado – Cameo Last visit 10/16 Measured vs. rated = -3% diff (~100 cfs) No changes made ~175 cfs ~75 cfs *These dates are from The USGS has visited all these sites multiple times since then!

5 San Juan – Shiprock Visited 10/9 New rating downloaded 10/14 San Juan – Four Corners Visited 10/9 New rating downloaded 10/15 San Juan – Bluff, nr Visited 10/1 New rating downloaded 10/1 *Again, these dates are from The USGS has visited all these sites multiple times since then! Note shift application Shift Impacts

6 Missing Data Model simulation 35 cfs Modeled Unmeasured Depletion 10 cfs

7 Missing Data Observed Pool Elevation – This is how we know we’re close! Reservoir Operations, as best as we know

8 Gage Density SNOTEL Network – Since it became available, has improved accuracy of forecasts – In some areas the gage density is better All gages 

9 Gage Density SNOTEL Network – Since it became available, has improved accuracy of forecasts – In some areas the gage density is better All gages > 7,000 ft. 

10 Gage Density SNOTEL Network – Since it became available, has improved accuracy of forecasts – In some areas the gage density is better All gages > 9,000 ft. 

11 Gage Density SNOTEL Network – Since it became available, has improved accuracy of forecasts – In some areas the gage density is better All gages > 10,000 ft. 

12 DAILY_QC 24 HOUR PRECIPITATION ENDING 10/13/ Z ALL GAGES SNOTEL ONLY

13 DAILY_QC TEMPERATURE STATIONS ALL GAGES SNOTEL ONLY

14 SNOTEL Issues Bad precipitation readings (2014) – Columbine – Lake Irene – Tower – Schofield Pass Bad pillow readings (2014) – Lily Pond Changing conditions at the sites – Vail Mountain – Upper San Juan

15

16

17

18 Quantitative Precipitation Estimate (QPE) Combination of gage, radar, and satellite information Coverage can vary based on season Despite QA/QC process, incorrect data can slip through

19 Climate patterns Rain Gage Measurement GOES Satellite Estimate Gridded Precipitation Estimate Radar Estimate Forecaster Analysis Quantitative Precipitation Estimates (QPE)

20 Quantitative Precipitation/Temperature Forecast (QPF/QTF) We use precipitation forecast out to 5 days We use temperature forecast out to 10 days Convective storms are difficult for models to forecast

21 Unmeasured Depletions Representative of water taken from the basin, but not gaged and/or reported Function of temperature and irrigated acreage An calculated value, not based on actual use that may be occurring

22 Hydrologic Model Current model is basically a temperature index model – Could we do better with a more physically based model? – A distributed model? – Could a different model utilize more and new data in a timely way?

23 CBRFC Soil Moisture Seasonal volumes are controlled by SWE and soil moisture Do we have SWE right? – Mischaracterizing rain vs. snow events – Missed precipitation event Do we have the soil moisture right? – Have we captured baseflow conditions accurately? – Has a storm event impacted soil state conditions?

24 Hydrologic Model Initial Conditions can be a source of error – Data errors caused by gage malfunction or inaccuracy – Missing Data – Incorrect model states Common errors – SWE too high/low, snow or rain? – Bad streamflow information – Inaccurate precip/temp – Reservoir conditions – Diversions