Launch Readiness Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Controller Tests Stephen Kaye Controller Test Motivation Testing the controller before the next generation helps to shake out any remaining.
Advertisements

Full Mission Simulation Report Temple University Fred Avery, Gene Council, Ny’Jaa Bobo, Salvatore Giorgi, Jay Shukla 4/21/12.
World AC/DC Power Supply Line Neutral Earth Line Neutral Ground USB 4-20mA interface RF Sen Open + - Fill Level DisplaymA Out Display + - (A)Acquired Signal(S)
ELECTRICAL. Circuits Outline Power Hub Microcontroller Sensor Inputs Motor Driver.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
RockSat-C 2012 CDR Harding Flying Bison RockSat-C 2012 Team Critical Design Review Harding University Bonnie Enix, Joshua Griffith, Will Waldron, Edmond.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew.
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Critical Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch Program University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
RockSat 2010 Harding Flying Bison RockSat-C Rocket Team Harding University Ethan Lilly, Eric Locke, Darah McDaniel, Ed Wilson June 22, 2011.
Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
RockSat-C 2012 PDR Harding Flying Bison RockSat-C 2012 Rocket Team Preliminary Design Review Harding University Bonnie Enix, Joshua Griffith, Will Waldron,
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology Department of Electrical Engineering High Speed Digital Systems Lab Project performed by: Safi Seid-Ahmad Emile.
RockSat-C 2011 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Launch Readiness Review JASMM Virginia Tech Team Members: Robbie Robertson Zack HarlowJeremiah Shiflet Daniel Martin Matt James Anthony Rinaldi Senior.
Launch Readiness Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Launch Readiness Review River Rock 2010 University of Puerto Rico June 9, 2010.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR Harding Flying Bison ROCKSAT-C Team Conceptual Design Review Harding University Ed Wilson, Mentor, Will Waldron, Student 2, Student.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR CSU RocketSat-C Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Isaiah Franka Jordan Rath Abby Wilbourn Mike Yeager 10/1/10 1.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
Launch Readiness Review MinnSpec University of Minnesota Bryce Schaefer, Chris Woerhle, Art Graf
 Main Components:  Sensors  Micro controller  Motor drivers  Chasis.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
1 CCTV SYSTEMS CCD VERSUS CMOS COMPARISON CCD (charge coupled device) and CMOS (complementary metal oxide semiconductor) image sensors are two different.
Input technologies All require some form of data acquisition –e.g. Image scanner, Microphone Once acquired, if the signal is not already digital, it will.
ENGR 1181 First-Year Engineering Program College of Engineering Engineering Education Innovation Center First-Year Engineering Program Solar Energy Meter.
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
Hardware Unit Name: Mrs. Julie Buford Course and Grade Level: 8 th Grade Keyboarding Software Selected: Powerpoint.
MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Hy-V.1 Skin Friction Sensor Experiment Presenters: Ryan F. Johnson Mitchell Foral-Systems November 24, 2008 University of Virginia.
MinnRock Design and Canister Layout Team members Bryce Schaefer (team coordinator)- AEM Cameron Japuntich- AEM Liz Sefkow- ME Mitch Andrus-
Team JHK Project TIC Personnel Supreme Commander Jarrod Marsh.
1 Basic MOS Device Physics. 2 Why Analog Circuits? DSP algorithms were predicted to replace all analog blocks with the flexibility in silicon implementation.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report Harding University William Waldron, Joshua Griffith, Drew Cancienne, Edmond Wilson, David Stair 22 April.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson 4/23/2012.
Chris Quesada Pierre Hibart DC MANIPULATOR.  We are designing a circuit that will allow a Legacy Rebel® 800 Watt Amplifier to supply power to two mounted.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
Northwest Nazarene University Chad Larson, Ben Gordon, Seth Leija, David Vinson, Drew Johnson, Zach Thomas June 1 st, 2012.
The George Washington University Electrical & Computer Engineering Department ECE 002 Dr. S. Ahmadi Class3/Lab 2.
Strong as a Buck. Meet The Team Warn Wilson John Clark Dre Crumbly Electrical Engineering Computer Engineering.
RockSat-C 2013 FMSTR Full Mission Simulation Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
ECE 192: NATCAR Team (Triton X) Sponsored by IEEE ( Vincent Bantigue, Joseph Formanes,
Micro Processor Project ECE 300 April 17, 2004 Group 2.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Section 2: The Payload! User’s Guide Compliance Beta Prototype Testing Section 3: Check-In.
RequirementMethodStatus The payload must not exceed a weight of 1.45 Kgm.Design, Test The payload must conform to the WFF “no volt requirement”
 Today we will cover:  Voltage regulators  Sensors  motordrivers iBOT1.
RockSat-C 2012 LRR Launch Readiness Review University of Minnesota Alex Richman, Jacob Schultz, Justine Topel, Will Thorson 5/27/2012.
RockSat-C 2012 ISTR Individual Subsystem Testing Report Harding Flying Bison RockSat-C 2012 Rocket Team Harding University 13 February Team Members.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
Full Mission Simulation Test Report RocketSat CU Boulder
The entire system was tested in a small swimming pool. The fully constructed submarine is shown in Fig. 14. The only hardware that was not on the submarine.
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
RockSat-C 2013 SITR Payload Subsystem Integration and Testing Report University/Institution Team Members Date.
Parking Availability Indication System
Project Title DYNAMICALLY CHANGING SIGNAL LIGHT TIME ALLOTMENT IN STREET JUNCTIONS BASED ON TRAFFIC DENSITY Under the Guidance of Submitted by.
ARDUINO LINE FOLLOWER ROBOT
Remote Override of Traffic Signal in Emergency
Introduction to Arduino Microcontrollers
Team 70: Air Guitar Gloves
Launch Readiness Review
Launch Readiness Review
Launch Readiness Report West Virginia University
Presentation transcript:

Launch Readiness Review Harding University Drew Cancienne, Josh Griffith, David Stair, Will Waldron and Ed Wilson 5-22-2012

Fiber Optic Cable Integration

Final Payload All parts of payload shown except possible conditioning circuit.

Team Photo with Payload

Completed CG Apparatus

User Guide Compliance Requirement Payload Requirement Status Mass allotment: 6 lbs .4 Over Volume allotment: Top 4.5” Passes The payload’s center of gravity (CG): In 1”X1”X1” envelope of centroid (or in area designated for sharing teams? Developing Method to Test Activation met under requirement: (either 1.SYS.1 or 1.SYS.2) 1.SYS.2 Tested - Passed Structure mounts: Top and bottom bulkheads. No mounts to sides of cans. Passed Sharing: Fully developed? No Response from NW Nazarene

Integration Plan and Procedure Integration Update Payload all but Fully Integrated All but a few components integrated Must have self starting microcontroller May want to amplify CCD and photodiode signals Very close to complete and final integration

Integration Plan and Procedure Procedure Written? Procedure Written in PowerPoint with pictures for each step Example on next slide

Wire CCD Array to Micro Controller. White – Ground Green – VOUT Black – Power Red – ROG Blue - CLK

Integration Plan and Procedure Concerns Broke new shorter fiber optic cable Fix: Use last year’s longer fiber optic cable Note: Fixed No response from Northwestern Nazarene College about integration

Activation Testing Updates Testing Results G-Switch Circuit – Tested: Passed Microcontroller – Just about Must load TERN onto a 32-bit computer to load startup program onto microcontroller Testing Updates Spectrum taken with payload on next slide Full Mission Test Tuesday or Wednesday

Oxygen Water Water

Mission Requirements Met Testing Results Mission Requirements Met An optical port is mandatory An adequate, stable and reliable power supply A robust, responsive G-Switch A sensitive, rugged spectrometer operating in the 200 – 1000 nm wavelength range A photodiode sensitive to the same wavelengths as the spectrometer

Mission Requirements Met (cont.) Testing Results Mission Requirements Met (cont.) A microprocessor with two programmable clocks, high speed analog to digital converters, and memory to store the acquired spectra Software program to operate the payload

Mission Requirements Met (cont.) Testing Results Mission Requirements Met (cont.) Mounting hardware for the payload that will withstand the g-forces imposed during testing and flight and will not interfere with the NW Nazarene payload

Mission Requirements not met Testing Results Mission Requirements not met Signal conditioning board to insure the electrical inputs and outputs between the sensors and the microprocessor match in terms of voltage ranges, currents and impedances

Are you ready? We could fly today What is ready? Level of Readiness Are you ready? We could fly today What is ready? Software to fly Hardware What is not ready? Conditioning Circuit

Action items between now and June 15th? Level of Readiness Action items between now and June 15th? Finish conditioning circuit Full Missions Simulation completed this week Make the existing software better Test Possibility of Neutral Density Filter Filter that blocks out wavelengths equally

Are there any remaining questions about check-in? Check-In Inspections Are there any remaining questions about check-in? Have you tried it yet? Check Procedure run? No

Do you have any questions about how this week will go? Final Questions Do you have any questions about how this week will go? Any environmental test day questions? No Any integration day questions? No Any launch day questions? No Food questions? No Have you received your final payment check?