George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposed Indicators for Ecological Health & Diversity of Rangelands Rod Heitschmidt, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Miles City, MT and Linda Joyce,
Advertisements

Site Characterization Instructional Goal: Upon completion of this topic the participant will better understand the need to identify and evaluate various.
ECOLOGICAL SITES EXPANDING the CONCEPTS and APPLICATIONS of ECOLOGICAL SITES Joel Brown USDA NRCS Jornada Experimental Range Las Cruces NM.
Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
Ecological Systems Maintaining and Enhancing Natural Features and Minimizing Adverse Impacts of Infrastructure Projects Course Review.
MODELING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE – CHANGES MADE IN A SPECIES SPECIFIC MODELING SYSTEM Jim Chew, Kirk Moeller, Kirsten Ironside Invited presentation.
Changes in woody plant cover may be rapid, non-linear, and triggered by extreme environmental events (e.g., drought of 1950s) (from Archer et al. 1988)
Part I: What’s the reference? ? 5 The rangeland health reference is based on what is possible (long-term ecological potential) for a particular.
Longleaf Maintenance Condition Class 1 Revised Draft for Longleaf Partnership Council Discussion Clay Ware April 7, 2014.
Daren Carlson – MN DNR 14 April Overview Prairie monitoring – Change analysis – Status/trend monitoring – Grassland adaptive management collaborative.
Land. Land Use in the World US Public Lands Types of Forests 1) Old-growth (primary) forests – uncut or regenerated forest not hugely impacted by.
Development of a Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy for Georgia Georgia Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Resources Division.
Konza Prairie Long-Term Ecological Research Station Tall Grass Prairie Ecosystem.
FIELD METHODS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources Division Forest and Rangeland.
Rangeland Succession. Succession  The orderly change of plant communities over time.  The gradual replacement of one plant community by another through.
Grazing and Grazing Management. Positive Impacts Proper management – Reduced erosion – Improved water quality – Food for wildlife – Habitat and cover.
World Forests Forests cover 30% of the world’s land surface.
GRASSLAND ECOLOGY. WORLD GRASSLANDS NORTH AMERICAN GRASSLANDS REFLECT WEATHER PATTERNS.
FOREST SERVICE GHG ISSUES AND INFORMATION NEEDS Elizabeth Reinhardt, FS Climate Change Office.
Watersheds Capture, Store And Safely Release Water.
Chicago Wilderness: An Ecosystem Management Plan Katy Berlin Shelly Charron Lisa DuRussel NRE 317 April 11, 2001.
Future Research NeedsWorld Heritage and Climate Change World Heritage and Climate Change - Future Research Needs Bastian Bomhard World Heritage Officer.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
Disturbance regimes in restoration ecology: novel effects and ecological complexity Sarah Marcinko November 11, 2005.
 Necessary materials: PowerPoint Guide Teacher Information!
Some Major Problems In Managing Watersheds Of The Border Region Dr. M. Karl Wood, Director Water Resources Research Institute New Mexico State University.
2 Recognized by John C. Fremont as an area of interior drainage 145,546 square miles Precipitation, generally 7-12 inches annually Recognized by John.
Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) Grazing – Our Most Commonly Used Conservation Practices.
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Theories of Vegetation Change Mort Kothmann Texas A&M University.
PFC Assessment Approach & Definitions Creeks and Communities.
NRCS National Ecological Site Handbook Webinar April 18, 2013 George Peacock, Team Leader National Grazing Lands Team Central National Technology Support.
ECOLOGICAL SITES: DEVELOPMENT AND DESCRIPTION ESD Workshop Winnemuca NV 5 June 2012 Joel Brown USDA NRCS National Soil Survey Center /Jornada Experimental.
Impact of Climate Change on Plant Community Composition and Ecosystem Function in MOJN Parks Seth Munson, Jayne Belnap, Robert Webb (USGS) Nita Tallent.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
Rangeland Health Assessment and Monitoring (Framework for Ecological Site-Based Assessment and Monitoring in Mongolia) 7 July 2007 Ulan Bator, Mongolia.
Summary of Findings and Progress: Grasslands Prairies Regional Adaptation Collaborative Jeff Thorpe Saskatchewan Research Council February 15, 2012.
ESSM TAMU RANGELAND CEAP FINDINGS B RIEFING TO RCA R ANGELAND CEAP W RITING T EAM L EADERS David Briske, Prescribed Grazing Stuart Hardegree, Planting/Seeding.
Section 3: How Ecosystems Change
Wayne A. Robbie, Supervisory Soil Scientist USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region Albuquerque, NM Common Elements: Ecological Sites Descriptions and.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
European Marine Sites Update Ruth Crundwell. Natural England Advisers to the government on the environment, providing practical scientific advice on how.
Ecological Sites and the MLRA SSO Leader George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center.
AG-WL-3. Why do hunters establish food plots or use game feeders?
SCIENCE in California’s Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) California Department of Fish and Game Brenda S. Johnson, Ph.D.
Interpreting Ecological Sites for Grazing Management.
SPATIALLY EXPLICIT MODELING OF COLORADO PLATEAU LANDSCAPES FROM CONCEPTUAL MODELS TO A COMPUTER SYSTEM Chew, Jimmie D., Kirk Moeller, and Chris Stalling.
Sharon Stanton & FIA National Indicator Leads RECOMMENDATIONS FOR ENHANCED FOREST INDICATORS.
THE ARS WATERSHED RESEARCH PROGRAM Watershed Processes National Program Component AGRICULTURAL WATERSHED RESEARCH History Facilities.
Modeling the effects of forest succession on fire behavior potential in southeastern British Columbia S.W. Taylor, G.J. Baxter and B.C. Hawkes Natural.
Ecological Succession Environmental Science. Ecological Succession  Ecosystems are constantly changing.  Ecological succession is a gradual process.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
How Ecosystems WorkSection 3 Ecosystems are constantly changing. Ecological succession is a gradual process of change and replacement of the types of species.
Question: What are the types of Ecological Succession and what are the main causes? By: Nada Moawad Grade: 9 th April 28,2012.
Ecological Sites on Rangeland. A0po&list=PL7CD3CD7A9350A858.
Ecological Site Descriptions Foundation for Resource Management Decisions George Peacock Grazing Lands Technology Institute USDA-NRCS.
Ernest Nti Acheampong African Technology Policy Studies Network (ATPS)
UGIP Technical Committee Key Principles of Grazing Management Improves productivity Improves land health Shows responsibility to natural resources Ensures.
Soil Quality Assessment and the Plant Materials Program Susan S. Andrews, Arlene J. Tugel, Ann Lewandowski, and Mike Hubbs, NRCS Soil Quality Institute.
Tropical Rainy: Tropical Wet & Dry: Savannas. Tropical Savannas or Grasslands are associated with the tropical wet and dry climate type, but are not generally.
4FRI Biophysical Monitoring Indicators: Assigning Metrics of Success (or Failure) 4FRI Landscape Strategy & Science and Monitoring Working Groups –
Forests & Forestry Unit FIRE!!!. Objectives Explain the purpose of prescribed fire Describe the different types of forest fires Identify sources of forest.
Response of Understory Vegetation following Western Juniper (Juniperus occidentalis) Cutting on Two Sites Breanna S Sabin FS 533.
Rangeland NRI: 2002 and Beyond Presentation given to NRCS State Conservationists NRI Exec. Committee Northwest Watershed Research Center, Boise.
Inventory & Monitoring Program U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System Natural Resources Program Center National Office USFWS U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
Project Update SageCon, September 30, 2016
Ungrazed deep grassland
FIRES IN RIPARIAN AREAS AND WETLANDS
Rangeland Principles (Rem 151)
Describing and Monitoring Rangelands:
Presentation transcript:

George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil Survey Conference College Station, Texas July 13, 2010

Presentation Outline What is an Ecological Site? How are ESDs developed? Why do we need them? What is an Ecological Site? How are ESDs developed? Why do we need them?

WHAT

Ecological Sites Bailey, R.G., 1996 Ecosystem Geography

Product of all the environmental factors responsible for its development. Soils Soils Topography Topography Climate Climate Hydrology Hydrology Vegetation Vegetation Natural Disturbances Natural Disturbances Animal Community Animal Community Fire Regime Fire Regime Product of all the environmental factors responsible for its development. Soils Soils Topography Topography Climate Climate Hydrology Hydrology Vegetation Vegetation Natural Disturbances Natural Disturbances Animal Community Animal Community Fire Regime Fire Regime Ecological Site

Ecological Site Description C omprehensive reference document containing : Ecological Site Characteristics Physiographic Features Climatic Features Water Features Soils Plant Communities Site Interpretations Supporting Information Ecological Site Characteristics Physiographic Features Climatic Features Water Features Soils Plant Communities Site Interpretations Supporting Information

Community Phase 1.1 Community Phase 1.2 State 1 State 2 Community Phase T1R2 State and Transition Diagram States Communities phases Transitions Restoration Pathways States Communities phases Transitions Restoration Pathways

2.1 - One-seed juniper > 5’ tall Shrubs warm season tall and mid grasses Warm season tall and mid grasses Warm season mid and tall grasses and one-seed juniper < 5’ tall Shrubs 1.0 Reference State 2.0 Juniper/Shrub State One-seed juniper Shrubs and warm season mid grasses 3.0 Eroded State One-seed juniper active wind and water erosion 1.1a 1.2a T1a R2a R3a T2b 2.1a 2.2a

2.1 - One-seed juniper > 5’ tall Shrubs warm season tall and mid grasses Warm season mid and tall grasses and one-seed juniper < 5’ tall Shrubs 1.1 Warm season mid and tall grasses 1.0 Reference State 2.0 Juniper/Shrub State One-seed juniper Shrubs and warm season mid grasses 3.0 Eroded State One-seed juniper active wind and water erosion Reference State: Two community phases maintained by frequent fire and weather fluctuations (drought and wet years). Indicators: High perennial grass cover and production. Litter accumulation. Feedbacks: Organic matter inputs allows for increased soil moisture, production, root turnover and litter increasing soil surface stability. At-risk Community Phase: Either community phase is at risk when bare ground increases and organic matter inputs decline. Trigger: Elimination of fire and overgrazing causing increase juniper canopy Threshold: Increasing bare ground > ??% and increase in juniper canopy cover to 15%. Alternative State 2: Juniper canopy cover controls the soil moisture, herbaceous production and organic matter inputs. Management practices applied to maintain current canopy cover and herbaceous production. Manipulation of brush species and prescribed fire and grazing management planned to maintain or improve warm season mid grass production. Indicators: Juniper canopy cover>15%, bare ground > 35%. Feedbacks: Juniper use of moisture, decreasing herbaceous production, decreasing organic matter inputs. At-risk Community Phase: Either community phase is at risk if juniper seedling increase and canopy cover increases. Trigger: Juniper seedling established. Threshold: Bare ground > 50% and soil surface stability <3.0. Restoration Pathway: Decrease juniper canopy cover, increase organic matter inputs. Alternative State 3: Active wind and water erosion taking place. Active sand dunes with juniper trees. Indicators: Juniper canopy closed, soil surface stability indicators <3.0, active wind and water erosion prevalent. Feedbacks: Juniper use of all available moisture, eliminates organic matter inputs, decreases soil surface stability. Restoration Pathway: Management and restoration practices planned must decrease juniper canopy with little or no surface disturbance, grazing must plan for increasing herbaceous production and allow for litter accumulation to improve organic matter inputs to stabilize soil surface. 1.1a1.2a T1aR2a 2.2a2.1a T2a R3a

Feedbacks Juniper Encroachment Juniper captures moisture Decrease in understory vegetation Decrease in litter & SOM Increase in bare ground Deterioration in soil structure Decreased soil stability

Feedbacks Decrease in juniper canopy Increase in herbaceous production Decrease in bare ground Increased organic matter inputs Increased soil surface stability Increased annual production

HOW

Accomplishing the Task 1. Creation of initial Ecological Site concepts  Reconnaissance  Literature review

Data Sources Vegetation Transects and Clipping Plots NRCS, NPS, FS, BLM, ARS, DOD, USFWS, State Agencies, Organizations, etc. Research Data Historical records/accounts/journals Vegetation Transects and Clipping Plots NRCS, NPS, FS, BLM, ARS, DOD, USFWS, State Agencies, Organizations, etc. Research Data Historical records/accounts/journals

Accomplishing the Task 1. Creation of initial Ecological Site concepts 2. Develop a list of experts 3. Draft initial State and Transition Model

Involve experts from the area and other interested parties

Accomplishing the Task 1. Creation of initial Ecological Site concepts 2. Develop a list of experts 3. Draft initial State and Transition Model 4. Initial data collection and analysis  Primary objective to cover as much area as rapidly as possible  Visit all state and community phases  New states or communities may be identified

Accomplishing the Task 1. Creation of initial Ecological Site concepts 2. Develop a list of experts 3. Draft initial State and Transition Model 4. Initial data collection and analysis 5. Refine State and Transition Model and Ecological Site concept (if needed) 6. High intensity data collection  Quantify and test the relationships among properties identified as key feedbacks

Accomplishing the Task 1. Creation of initial Ecological Site concepts 2. Develop a list of experts 3. Draft initial State and Transition Model 4. Initial data collection and analysis 5. Refine State and Transition Model and Ecological Site concept (if needed) 6. High intensity data collection 7. Draft Ecological Site Description

Accomplishing the Task Multidisciplinary Interagency effort Involve others groups such as university, research, private groups, etc. Multidisciplinary Interagency effort Involve others groups such as university, research, private groups, etc.

Accomplishing the Task Linking Scientific Knowledge with Local Knowledge Linking Scientific Knowledge with Local Knowledge

WHY

Landscapes are Divided Into Ecological Sites for the Purposes of : Inventory Evaluation Management Inventory Evaluation Management

Potential Uses for ESDs Standard reference for natural resource information for all federal agencies and other interested groups/organizations Training tool and information source Tool to assess lands for potential values or resource specific concerns wildlife habitat carbon sinks vulnerability to loss or degradation Site restoration Tool to prioritize and target limited program dollars Standard reference for natural resource information for all federal agencies and other interested groups/organizations Training tool and information source Tool to assess lands for potential values or resource specific concerns wildlife habitat carbon sinks vulnerability to loss or degradation Site restoration Tool to prioritize and target limited program dollars

How ESDs Help Understanding ecological processes within plant communities on specific soils (ecological sites) can highlight opportunities for improvement Understanding how ecological sites become susceptible to degradation can help avoid problems Understanding ecological processes within plant communities on specific soils (ecological sites) can highlight opportunities for improvement Understanding how ecological sites become susceptible to degradation can help avoid problems

Finally… ESDs can provide valuable information regarding what ecological functions are critical in maintaining discrete ecological states Restoration of ecological functions should be addressed if long term plant restoration is to be realized. ESDs can provide valuable information regarding what ecological functions are critical in maintaining discrete ecological states Restoration of ecological functions should be addressed if long term plant restoration is to be realized.

Questions