The LAMP/HRRR MELD FOR AVIATION FORECASTING Bob Glahn, Judy Ghirardelli, Jung-Sun Im, Adam Schnapp, Gordana Rancic, and Chenjie Huang Meteorological Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting
Advertisements

Forecasting Ceilings in EVENTS Meteorology 415 Fall 2012.
Experimental Aviation Grids at National Weather Service Marquette, Michigan Steven Fleegel NWS Marquette, MI Great Lakes Operational Meteorology Workshop.
Introduction to data assimilation in meteorology Pierre Brousseau, Ludovic Auger ATMO 08,Alghero, september 2008.
Jess Charba Fred Samplatsky Phil Shafer Meteorological Development Laboratory National Weather Service, NOAA Updated September 06, 2013 LAMP Convection.
Comparison of Several Methods for Probabilistic Forecasting of Locally-Heavy Rainfall in the 0-3 Hour Timeframe Z. Sokol 1, D. Kitzmiller 2, S. Guan 2.
GFS MOS Wind Guidance: Problem Solved? Eric Engle and Kathryn Gilbert MDL/Statistical Modeling Branch 15 May 2012.
Paul Fajman NOAA/NWS/MDL September 7,  NDFD ugly string  NDFD Forecasts and encoding  Observations  Assumptions  Output, Scores and Display.
Probabilistic Forecasting in Practice
Reliability Trends of the Global Forecast System Model Output Statistical Guidance in the Northeastern U.S. A Statistical Analysis with Operational Forecasting.
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
Depicting LAMP probabilities and uncertainty in best category forecast New LAMP web page product Judy E. Ghirardelli Scott Scallion National Weather Service.
Rapid Update Cycle Model William Sachman and Steven Earle ESC452 - Spring 2006.
The Effects of Grid Nudging on Polar WRF Forecasts in Antarctica Daniel F. Steinhoff 1 and David H. Bromwich 1 1 Polar Meteorology Group, Byrd Polar Research.
Improving Gridded Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Guidance by Using Emerging Forecast and Observation Systems Judy E. Ghirardelli, Jerome P. Charba,
MOS Performance MOS significantly improves on the skill of model output. National Weather Service verification statistics have shown a narrowing gap between.
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
1 Localized Aviation Model Output Statistics Program (LAMP): Improvements to convective forecasts in response to user feedback Judy E. Ghirardelli National.
Aviation Cloud Forecasts – A True Challenge for Forecasters v       Jeffrey S. Tongue NOAA/National Weather Service - Upton, NY Wheee !
Probabilistic forecasts of (severe) thunderstorms for the purpose of issuing a weather alarm Maurice Schmeits, Kees Kok, Daan Vogelezang and Rudolf van.
Generation and Application of Gridded Aviation Forecast Parameters in GFE and AvnFPS Chris Leonardi Aviation Focal Point, NWS Charleston WV National Weather.
Future of the NWS What Does It Mean? Where Are We Going? When Are We Going To Get There? How Are We Going To Get There? Aviation Is Foundational.
Enhancing Digital Services Changing Weather – Changing Forecasts Aviation Climate Fire Weather Marine Weather and Sea Ice Public Forecasts and Warnings.
NOAA’s National Weather Service National Digital Forecast Database: Status Update LeRoy Spayd Chief, Meteorological Services Division Unidata Policy Committee.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Task 1 of PP Interpretation 1.1Further applications of.
Utilizing Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) for Improved Forecasting Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory.
June 19, 2007 GRIDDED MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS STARTS WITH POINT (STATION) MOS –Essentially the same MOS that is in text bulletins –Number and.
Aviation/Turbulence Forecasting. Aviation Weather Center (AWC) National Weather Service office Turbulence, flight rules, upper level progs.
Improving Ensemble QPF in NMC Dr. Dai Kan National Meteorological Center of China (NMC) International Training Course for Weather Forecasters 11/1, 2012,
Henry Fuelberg Pete Saunders Pendleton, Oregon Research Region Map Types and Lightning Frequencies.
OUTLINE Current state of Ensemble MOS
AMB Verification and Quality Control monitoring Efforts involving RAOB, Profiler, Mesonets, Aircraft Bill Moninger, Xue Wei, Susan Sahm, Brian Jamison.
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
1 NWS Forecast Grids Served by an NNEW Web Coverage Service AIXM/WXXM Conference Steve Olson Meteorological Development Laboratory Office of Science and.
MDL Lightning-Based Products Kathryn Hughes NOAA/NWS/OST December 3, 2003
Model Post Processing. Model Output Can Usually Be Improved with Post Processing Can remove systematic bias Can produce probabilistic information from.
Operational ALADIN forecast in Croatian Meteorological and Hydrological Service 26th EWGLAM & 11th SRNWP meetings 4th - 7th October 2004,Oslo, Norway Zoran.
Meteorology 415 October Numerical Guidance Skill dependent on: Skill dependent on: Initial Conditions Initial Conditions Resolution Resolution Model.
APPLICATION OF NUMERICAL MODELS IN THE FORECAST PROCESS - FROM NATIONAL CENTERS TO THE LOCAL WFO David W. Reynolds National Weather Service WFO San Francisco.
Meteorology 415 October Numerical Guidance Skill dependent on: Skill dependent on: Initial Conditions Initial Conditions Resolution Resolution Model.
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology Friday 2/8/2013 Quiz & Assignment 2 Results Finish Thermal Wind MOS decoding (Assignment) New England weather.
Digital Aviation Services Paving the way for aviation forecasts of the future Cammye Sims Cammye Sims.
1 Gridded Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Guidance for Aviation Forecasting Judy E. Ghirardelli and Bob Glahn National Weather Service Meteorological.
Application of an adaptive radiative transfer parameterisation in a mesoscale numerical weather prediction model DWD Extramural research Annika Schomburg.
Briefing by: Roque Vinicio Céspedes Finally Here! The MOST awaited briefing ever! February 16, 2011.
OPERATIONAL 2-H THUNDERSTORM GUIDANCE FCSTS TO 24 HRS ON 20-KM GRID JESS CHARBA FRED SAMPLATSKY METEOROLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT LABORATORY OST / NWS / NOAA.
An Examination Of Interesting Properties Regarding A Physics Ensemble 2012 WRF Users’ Workshop Nick P. Bassill June 28 th, 2012.
Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Weather Research Program (AWRP) Highlights for FPAW November 19, 2015.
Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory February 05, 2009.
Improved Gridded Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Ceiling and Visibility Guidance using HRRR model output Presenting: Judy E. Ghirardelli/Adam Schnapp.
MDL Requirements for RUA Judy Ghirardelli, David Myrick, and Bruce Veenhuis Contributions from: David Ruth and Matt Peroutka 1.
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC. RUC A major issue is how to assimilate and use the rapidly increasing array of offtime or continuous observations (not a 00.
Global vs mesoscale ATOVS assimilation at the Met Office Global Large obs error (4 K) NESDIS 1B radiances NOAA-15 & 16 HIRS and AMSU thinned to 154 km.
Aviation Products from the Localized Aviation MOS Program (LAMP) Judy E. Ghirardelli National Weather Service Meteorological Development Laboratory Presented.
NOAA Northeast Regional Climate Center Dr. Lee Tryhorn NOAA Climate Literacy Workshop April 2010 NOAA Northeast Regional Climate.
Translating Advances in Numerical Weather Prediction into Official NWS Forecasts David P. Ruth Meteorological Development Laboratory Symposium on the 50.
Developing GFS-based MOS Thunderstorm Guidance for Alaska Phillip E. Shafer* and Kathryn Gilbert Meteorological Development Laboratory, NWS, NOAA
11 Short-Range QPF for Flash Flood Prediction and Small Basin Forecasts Prediction Forecasts David Kitzmiller, Yu Zhang, Wanru Wu, Shaorong Wu, Feng Ding.
LAMP improvements for ceiling height and visibility guidance*
A few examples of heavy precipitation forecast Ming Xue Director
Model Post Processing.
MOS Developed by and Run at the NWS Meteorological Development Lab (MDL) Full range of products available at:
Naval Research Laboratory
Rapid Update Cycle-RUC Rapid Refresh-RR High Resolution Rapid Refresh-HRRR RTMA.
Post Processing.
Digital Services for Aviation
WMO NWP Wokshop: Blending Breakout
Thunderstorm Ceiling/Visibility Climatology
Atmospheric Sciences 452 Spring 2019
Model Output Statistics
Presentation transcript:

The LAMP/HRRR MELD FOR AVIATION FORECASTING Bob Glahn, Judy Ghirardelli, Jung-Sun Im, Adam Schnapp, Gordana Rancic, and Chenjie Huang Meteorological Development Laboratory, National Weather Service, NOAA 1

OUTLINE LAMP forecasts HRRR forecasts Ceiling and Visibility Meld – Method – Verification – Example Conclusions Plans 2

CEILING HEIGHT AND VISIBILITY FORECASTS Ceiling height and visibility forecasts are contained in weather forecast products for the aviation community, including the TAFs. – Ceiling in hundreds (hds) ft above ground. – Visibility in miles. Guidance based partly on numerical models is needed to produce the final forecasts. LAMP provides forecasts for aviation products 3

LAMP (LOCALIZED AVIATION MOS PROGRAM) LAMP Guidance Products: – Forecasts produced each hour, for most weather elements contained in aviation and public weather products, including ceiling and visibility, in hourly increments out to 25 hours. – Forecasts of convection and lightning potential. Forecasts are available in text and gridded forms. 4

LAMP LAMP Forecasts are statistically produced as a combination of: – current observations, – simple advective models, and – MOS forecasts (based on NCEP’s Global Forecast System). Ceiling and visibility forecasts are in terms of: – categories (e.g., ceiling ft) and – the probability of each category. 5

LAMP CEILING HEIGHT FORECAST, 7-H PROJECTION FROM APRIL 11, 2013, 1200 UTC 6

SEA LEVEL PRESSURE AND FRONTS APRIL 11, 2013, 1200 UTC 7

HRRR MODEL (HIGH RESOLUTION RAPID REFRESH MODEL) HRRR is a 3-km dynamic model – Forecasts produced each hour, for a variety of weather elements, including ceiling and visibility, in hourly increments out to 15 hours. Ceiling in terms of meters above sea level. Visibility in meters. 8

HRRR CEILING HEIGHT FORECAST FOR APRIL 11, 2013, 8-H PROJECTION FROM 1100 UTC 9

CEILING AND VISIBILITY AS A MELD OF LAMP AND HRRR Both LAMP and HRRR produce ceiling and visibility forecasts – LAMP in terms of categorical forecasts and the probability of each category (e.g., ceiling ft; visibility 3-5 mi) at 1552 specific sites (stations). – HRRR in terms of specific values of ceiling in meters above sea level and visibility in meters on a grid. Ceiling (Visibility) Meld forecasts are produced as a combination of LAMP and HRRR ceiling (visibility) forecasts. 10

DATA AVAILABLE LAMP has a long archive Two warm seasons of HRRR data were available (April-September, 2013, 2014) – 8 months used for development – 4 months used for independent verification April 2013, August 2013, June 2014, September 2014 Previous work used 1 season of cool season data (not reported here) 11

REEP USED FOR PRODUCING MELD (REGRESSION ESTIMATION OF EVENT PROBABILITIES) REEP predictors for ceiling (visibility): – LAMP Probability of each of 7 (6) categories at the 1552 LAMP stations Probabilities better than categorical values as predictors – HRRR forecasts in binary form, total of 12 (11), interpolated to the LAMP stations Small spots removed/coalesced before making binaries – Observations (obs) in binary form, total of 15 (15) at the LAMP stations REEP predictands in binary form, total of 24 (16) categories at the LAMP stations (ground truth) – More definition than original LAMP Generalized development—All points grouped together 12

REEP PREDICTOR SELECTION Forward selection of predictors – > 0.5% reduction of variance cutoff for any projection for any predictand category For ceiling (visibility) 15 (14) predictors were selected: – All 7 (6) LAMP probabilities – 5 (3 ) HRRR binaries – 3 (5 ) Obs binaries 13

REEP EQUATIONS REEP produces 24 X 25 = 600 (16 X 25 = 400) equations, one for each of 24 (16) categories of ceiling (visibility) for each of the 25 projections. – Each equation has the same predictors, except that the LAMP and HRRR forecasts match the predictand projections. – The same-cycle HRRR is not available in time to be used, so the 1-h old forecast is used. – Beyond 14 hours, the 14-h HRRR is continued for all predictand projections. 14

VERIFICATION ON INDEPENDENT DATA Primary performance metrics – Threat score for < categories – Bias for categories 15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY Development was done at points Implementation was done on the 2.5-km NDFD grid – Analyze LAMP probabilities to the grid – Analyze obs to the grid – Apply the HRRR forecasts on the grid – Apply the REEP equations at each gridpoint Other implementation strategies possible 24

LAMP/HRRR MELD CEILING HEIGHT FORECAST FOR APRIL 11, 2013, 7-H PROJECTION FROM 1200 UTC 25

LAMP CEILING HEIGHT FORECAST, 7-H PROJECTION FROM APRIL 11, 2013, 1200 UTC 26

HRRR CEILING HEIGHT FORECAST FOR APRIL 11, 2013, 8-H PROJECTION FROM 1100 UTC 27

CONCLUSIONS The Meld of LAMP and HRRR for one cycle (start time) has produced ceiling and visibility forecasts generally superior to LAMP and especially to HRRR. It is MDL’s intention to implement a LAMP/HRRR Meld built on the work shown here with possible improvements. 28

REFERENCE Glahn, B., A. D. Schnapp, and J.-S. Im, 2015: The LAMP and HRRR ceiling height and visibility meld. MDL Office Note Meteorological Development Laboratory, National Weather Service, NOAA., U.S. Department of Commerce, 28 pp. Can be found at: lamp_hrrr_office_note_ON_15-1_7_31_15_final.pdf The general LAMP web site URL: