Who Should Decide What’s Safe? Mallory Cases, MPH, CPH Hypothetical Course: Health Meets Life.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

NATIONAL TOBACCO CONTROL 1. PREVENT TOBACCO USE AMONG YOUTH 2. REDUCE NUMBERS OF SMOKERS REDUCE TOBACCO CONSUMPTION 3. LIMIT ENVIRONMENTAL TOBACCO SMOKE.

Advertisements

Canadas Health Warning Messages for Tobacco Products Labelling a Legally Available, Inherently Harmful Product WTO Learning Event on Product Labelling.

 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B Non-Combusting Products and Oral Products.

Technology for Retail Tobacco Control Paradoxos THE NEXT Durham, NC Friday June 7, 2013 Allison E. Myers, MPH.

The Evaluation of Canada’s Health Warning Messages: 18 Month Follow-Up Murrray Kaiserman 1, Eva M. Makomaski Illing 1, Donna Dasko 2 1 Tobacco Control.

© 2009 South-Western, Cengage LearningMARKETING 1 Chapter 2 SOCIALLY RESPONSIVE MARKETING 2-1The Impact of Marketing 2-2Criticisms of Marketing 2-3Increasing.

Chapter 8 Tobacco Lesson 4 Tobacco Use and Society Next >> Click for: Teacher’s notes are available in the notes section of this presentation. >> Main.

Prevention strategies

Evan Blecher and Corné Van Walbeek School of Economics University of Cape Town South Africa Tobacco Control and Research in Developing Countries: Lessons.

The Role of Research in Tobacco Control

FDA Tobacco Regulations. During the 90’s  1998 Master Settlement Agreement  Tobacco companies charged.

G. P. Richardson AAHB, March Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy University at Albany System Dynamics Mapping and Modeling for Tobacco.

Taking a Public Health Approach to Tobacco Control

The Economics of Smoking. One of the potential problems (from an economic perspective) with smoking is that there may be an externality in consumption,

MDQuit Best Practices Conference Kathleen S. Hoke, J.D. January 23, 2013.

© 2011 This material cannot be copied or reproduced without permission. Public Health Law: Improving Health Outcomes Marice Ashe, JD, MPH; Executive Director,

Higher Education Meets Public Health: Successful Collaborative Efforts to Change Tobacco Policies on Campus Maine Tobacco Free College Network Emily Rines,

Action to cut smoking rates and reduce tobacco use needs to take place locally, nationally and regionally if we are to have the most cost effective policies.

 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Secondhand Tobacco Smoke in Public Places Ana Navas-Acien, MD, PhD, MPH Johns Hopkins Bloomberg.

What is Food Recall A food recall is a voluntary action by a manufacturer or distributor to protect the public from products that may cause health problems.

 2012 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Annette David, MD, MPH, FACOEM Senior Partner for Health Consulting Services at Health Partners,

CDC’s Best Practices for Comprehensive Tobacco Control Programs Jerelyn Jordan Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Office on Smoking and Health.

Rules of Operation – Legal Limitations & Options Leslie Zellers, J.D. Technical Assistance Legal Center (TALC) ;

 2012 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Tobacco Surveillance and Evaluation: An Update Gary A. Giovino, PhD, MS University at Buffalo School.

 The purpose for this project is to inform the community of Owensboro about the dangers of smoking and to persuade them to switch to electronic cigarettes.

The impact of the EU accession on Croatia Public health policies on tobacco Marta Čivljak, MD, PHD Research Fellow Department of Medical Sociology and.

Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Funded by Bloomberg Philanthropies.

WORD GENERATION: LANGUAGE OBJECTIVES UNIT 1.16 ACCUMULATION – CONTRADICT– EXHIBIT– INEVITABLE– MANIPULATE Teen Smoking: Who is Responsible ?

Case study: alcohol and tobacco Professor Christine Godfrey Department of Health Sciences, University of York.

Blackpool Health Committee 5th July 2012 Consultation on Standardised Packaging of Tobacco Products.

 2012 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Joanna Cohen, PhD Director, Institute for Global Tobacco Control Bloomberg Professor of Disease.

CLP Up-date (The classification, labelling and packaging of chemical substances and mixtures) (DIRECTIVE 2008/112/EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF.

The Heart and Stroke Foundation South Africa 24 th January 2007 Presented by: Zulfa Abrahams.

Chapter 14 Tobacco Lesson 4 Costs to Society. Building Vocabulary secondhand smoke Air that has been contaminated by tobacco smoke mainstream smoke The.

 2007 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Section B Tracking Tobacco-Related Death and Disease.

The Importance of Research in Tobacco Control Jeffrey Koplan, MD, MPH Emory Global Health Institute- China Tobacco Control Partnership.

Banning Forms of Alcohol Advertising. Background  Injuries  Liver cirrhosis  Cancers  Cardiovascular diseases  Premature deaths  Poverty  Family.

1 Politics of Tobacco Regulation FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (U.S. 2000)

Introduction to Engineering and Technology Concepts Unit Six Chapter Three – Organizing Technological Enterprises.

Tobacco Use Reduction as a National and Regional Priority Tobacco-free College Campuses: Promoting a Culture of Health Patrick O’Carroll, MD, MPH Assistant.

Credible Tobacco Control Resources. Credible Resources 1998 Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) Tobacco Control and Prevention  Attorneys general of.

There is a trade-off between economic freedom and government protection. Why must such a trade-off exist? List four goals of government intervention:

Citizens of Harvestland Against Tobacco (CHAT) Coalition Harvestland, Missouri Teaming Up To End Tobacco Use.

The Heart and Stroke Foundation South Africa Presented by: Zulfa Abrahams (Dietician)

Myths and Facts of Tobacco and E-Cigarettes OCTOBER 14, 2015.

Secondhand smoke is harmful, but there are ways to reduce exposure.

National Program for Tobacco Control in the Republic of Uzbekistan for Mr.Mamutov R.Sh. Director, National Centre for Tobacco Control.

Comprehensive Tobacco Action Group Summary December 16, 2005.

Responsibilities of Smoking By: Erika Schell And Lara Taniguchi.

Lorillard Tobacco Company v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525 (2001) What is MA trying to do? Types of Preemption Explicit Implicit How is the United States Supreme.

1 Chapter 6: Human Resources The Functions of Human Resources Management Royalty or Licensing Fee A royalty is a fee paid to the owner of a patent or copyright.

Consumer Research Proposal Exotic Smokes Cigarette Company Tara Appling-Crisp MKT/554 July 18, 2011.

The ‘impossible dream’ Implementing a No Smoking Policy on hospital grounds - Why preventing smoking in the workplace requires more than just policy Trina.

The Role of Epidemiological Surveillance in Tobacco Control Yang Gonghuan China CDC/PUMC.

What’s your stand on smoking?. 2 Objective To gauge the smoking behavior and habits of people To analyze the trends, and patterns amongst respondents.

1 Politics of Tobacco Regulation FDA v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120 (U.S. 2000)

Objectives and results Thinking concepts #3. Which actions will bring about the best results?  Change does not just happen  If cellphone use in cars.

6 th Grade  Physical & Personal Wellness  Emotional & Social Wellness  Prevention & Risk Management.

Chapter 14 Tobacco Lesson 4 Costs to Society.

TOBACCO PRODUCTS CONTROL AMENDMENT BILL 2006, SOUTH AFRICA

2017 Legislative Priorities Social Media Toolkit

TOBACCO PRODUCTS CONTROL AMENDMENT BILL 2006, SOUTH AFRICA

Tobacco Use and Society

Tobacco control.

Ch. 5, Social Responsibility

Lorillard Tobacco Company v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525 (2001)

Purposes of a Tobacco-Related Surveillance System

Tobacco in the Colonies

Lorillard Tobacco Company v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525 (2001)

Presentation transcript:

Who Should Decide What’s Safe? Mallory Cases, MPH, CPH Hypothetical Course: Health Meets Life

Course Objectives Explain how policy and law affect population health. Understand the role of prevention in promoting a healthy community.

Some background knowledge… Some tobacco companies are working to develop a cigarette they say will be safer than products currently on the market But who decides what's safe?

Some history… Enacted in 1965, landmark federal legislation required health warnings on cigarette packages In 1984, the law was amended to require one of the four warning labels below in most cigarette-related advertising

Activity Read the federal laws regarding cigarette package labeling and advertisements and then decide what role you think the government should play in public health concerns Form groups for teaching demonstration activity Each group pick up 1 set of handouts

U.S. Code Title 15—Commerce and Trade; Chapter 36—Cigarette Labeling and Advertising; Sec Labeling; requirements; conspicuous statement Required warnings; packages; advertisements It shall be unlawful for any person to manufacture, package, or import for sale or distribution within the United States any cigarettes the package of which fails to bear, in accordance with the requirements of this section, one of the following labels: (see below) It shall be unlawful for any manufacturer or importer of cigarettes to advertise or cause to be advertised (other than through the use of outdoor billboards) within the United States any cigarette unless the advertising bears, in accordance with the requirements of this section, one of the following labels:

Question 1 What impact do you think these warnings have had on the smoking population? Defend your reasoning.

Question 2 Evaluate each warning. What message does each warning convey?

Question 3 Would different language create more of an effect? If so, what?

Question 4 Is it enough to warn consumers that a product is dangerous or should its availability be controlled? Explain your answer.

Do they have an effect? Warning labels have been found to inform smokers about the health hazards of smoking, encourage smokers to quit, and prevent nonsmokers from starting to smoke. Warning labels on tobacco products are an ideal way of communicating with smokers. Since the intervention is delivered at the time of smoking, nearly all smokers are exposed to warning labels and pack-a-day smokers could be exposed to the warnings more than 7,000 times per year. Further, two-thirds of all smokers indicate that the package is an important source of health information and health knowledge is strongly associated with an intention to quit smoking.

References Hammond, D, et al., “Impact of the graphic Canadian warning labels on adult smoking behavior,” Tobacco Control 12(4): , December Hammond, D, et al., “Effectiveness of Cigarette Warning Labels in informing smokers about the risks of smoking: Findings from the International Control Four Country Study,” Tobacco Control 15(Suppl III):19-25, June 2006.