Role of the Drug Project Team in Formulating the Initial Development Plan of NCI-IND agents Jeff Moscow, MD IDB, CTEP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 FDA Industry Workshop Statistics in the FDA & Industry The Future David L DeMets, PhD Department of Biostatistics & Medical Informatics University of.
Advertisements

Paula M. Jacobs, Ph.D. SAIC Frederick Cancer Imaging Program/DCTD/NCI/NIH September 5, 2006 Phase 0 Trials in Oncologic Drug Development DCTD Phase 0 Workshop.
LCPC RESEARCH ARM TO BE TRANSFORMED INTO A RESEARCH INCUBATOR.
Role of the Statistician and the Bioinformatics Scientist in Cancer Clinical Trials Larry Rubinstein, PhD Biometric Research Branch, NCI International.
COURSE PROPOSAL: METHODS IN CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH Primary Instructor: Elizabeth Garrett-Mayer, PhD Professor of Biostatistics, Dept. of Public Health.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel PGIN Representative.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
CADTH Therapeutic Reviews
Technical Assistance Webinar: NLM Institutional Training Grants for Research Training in Biomedical Informatics RFA-LM Q & A Only NLM Extramural.
McLean Promotion to Associate Professor at Harvard Medical School Maureen T. Connelly, MD, MPH McLean Hospital February 3, 2010.
Oncology Pediatric Initiatives Richard Pazdur, MD Director, Division of Oncology Drug Products.
Academic Clinical Trial Do’s & Don’ts for Partnering with Pharma CCAF San Diego, CA April 14, 2014 J. Eric Bubbers, Ph.D.
1 The UK Opportunity: what is experimental medicine? UNLOCK YOUR GLOBAL BUSINESS POTENTIAL Pre- clinical develop- ment Phase I Phase II Phase III Product.
UAMS CENTER FOR CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH (CCTR) CCTR Novel Methodologies UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS FOR MEDICAL SCIENCES uams.edu/cctr Curtis L. Lowery,
CALGB Informational Session June 22, 2007 David Hurd, MD Interim Chair Data Audit Committee.
TYPE 2 TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH 2009 GRANT PROGRAMS UW Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (ICTR) Community-Academic Partnership Core (CAP)
Leveraging Patient Engagement & the Role of Advocacy.
The mission of the ONS Foundation is to support oncology nursing to improve the lives of people with or at risk for cancer.
Wishwa N. Kapoor, MD, MPH, Director Doris M. Rubio, PhD, Co-Director Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Scholars Program.
Annual Meeting 2011 Clinical Trial Development Clinical Trial Development: OEWG, RA’s Role, and Activating Trials on Deadline Martha Heckel Protocol Associate.
NCI Review of the Clinical Trials Process 6 th Annual National Forum on Biomedical Imaging in Oncology James H. Doroshow M.D. April 7, 2005 Bethesda, Maryland.
1 Targeted Strategies to Improve Physician and Patient Access to Cancer Clinical Research An Overview of Coalition Programs and Services Ruth Lambersky.
1 Safety Pharmacology for Oncology Pharmaceuticals at CDER John K. Leighton Associate Director for Pharmacology CDER/OND/OODP.
CTEP IND LOI Review and Approval Process. Study Proposals Letter of Intent May be sent in response to solicitation May be sent by investigator with interesting.
Extramural Program and Funding Opportunities: NCI David H. Harpole, Jr., M.D. Professor of Surgery Vice Chief of Surgical Sciences Department of Surgery.
CCR Clinical Research Priorities Clinical research is an essential part of the CCR research program Translational (collaborative) Interaction between basic.
CTEP Protocol and Information Office (PIO) Overview.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ARE HERE TO STAY: PROTECTING SCIENCE FROM BIAS Susan S. Ellenberg, Ph.D. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA Boston,
How can we work together? Partnering with Industry: An Investigator’s Perspective Robert L. Coleman, MD M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.
Quadrennial Review Retrospective performance review every 4 years Standardized to fairly evaluate Staff Scientists despite various roles Success judged.
Yale Center for Clinical Investigation: Academic Home to the CTSA Secretary’s Advisory Committee on Human Research Protections (SACHRP) Presentation Tesheia.
VICTR Funding Overview Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) June 22, 2012.
Update From FDA: Office of the Commissioner and Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Janet Woodcock, M.D. Acting Deputy Commissioner for Operations.
RESIDENT PROJECTS ROBERT LEONHARD QUALITY IMPROVEMENT MANAGER.
Measuring the Feasibility and Cost of PRO-CTCAE Implementation in Trials Presentation to NCI Stakeholders Based on work of the PRO-CTCAE Task 8 (Feasibility)
Supporting Informed Formulary Decision Making: CADTH’s Common Drug Review Denis Bélanger, Director, CADTH New Brunswick Stroke Summit November 27, 2010,
SF Coordinating Center Multicenter Trials Industry-sponored Trials Steve Cummings, MD Director, SF Coordinating Center.
Gynecologic Oncology Group Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) Sharon Stockman, C-CRC The University of Iowa Hospitals Iowa City, IA Chair, GOG Data Management.
SARC: Participation and Protocol / Concept Review Robert Maki, MD PhD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Cancer Centers In Clinical Trials Sandrine Marreaud Head of Medical Department.
Slide 1 Community Networks to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities Pre-Application Conference May 26, 2004 Bethesda, MD Kenneth C. Chu, PhD Chief, Disparities.
Building Sustainable Community-Linked Infrastructure to Enable Health Science Research (RC4) RFA OD Pre-application workshop October 23, 2009.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Anne Beal, MD, MPH, Chief Operating Officer.
Letters of Intent (LOIs) Through the NCI’s Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP) Dr. Patricia M. LoRusso, D.O. Karmanos Cancer Institute Wayne State.
Wishwa N. Kapoor, MD, MPH, Director Doris M. Rubio, PhD, Co-Director Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Scholars Program.
Research Funding Opportunity & Scientific Capacity Building in Developing Countries By Dina R. Andersson 1.
BIO AC November 18, 2004 Broadening the Participation of Underrepresented Groups in Science.
CTEP Visiting Physician Externship Coordinator: Igor Espinoza-Delgado, M.D. NCI CTEP Investigational Drug Branch
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
SARC Restructuring. SARC Strategic Plan  Mission  Given there is no successful structure in the US to provide platform to make progress in the diagnosis.
1 Impediments to Early Initiation of Pediatric Studies in a Clinical Oncology Drug Development Program A Large Pharmaceutical Company Perspective  Corporate.
1 Extending the Wisconsin Idea UW Funding Opportunities for Technologies with Promising Potential.
OVERVIEW OF THE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DOMAIN TASK FORCE APRIL 16, 2015 Joan D. Nagel, M.D., M.P.H. Program Director, Division of Clinical Innovation National.
Main topics Who are we at EMA and what is our regulatory experience in Parkinson’s disease (PD) Initiatives available at EMA to stimulate and support.
AACR Genomics In Clinical Medicine Think Tank
Community Participation in Research
MUHC Innovation Model.
Novartis Pediatric Drug Development Faculty Program
Grant Writing Information Session
From Bench to Clinical Applications: Money Talks
Non For Profit Model for Rare Disease Therapy Development
Pediatric Preclinical Testing Consortium
Information Session January 18, :00-1:45 pm
Clinical and Translational Science Awards Program
Gynecologic Cancer Committee Clinical Trial Development
Clinical Trial Development: NRG Processes and NCI Requirements
National Pediatric Critical Care Collaborative Research Network
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
Partnership for Research and Innovation in the Health System (PRIHS) /2020 Sean Dewitt, Program Manager, Health, Alberta Innovates Marc Leduc,
Clinical Trial Development: NRG Processes and NCI Requirements
Presentation transcript:

Role of the Drug Project Team in Formulating the Initial Development Plan of NCI-IND agents Jeff Moscow, MD IDB, CTEP

2 Overall Process of NCI-Sponsored Drug Development  Pharmaceutical Company X applies for CTEP collaboration through the NExT program to help develop Drug X  The NExT application proposes an envisioned collaboration in which NCI-sponsored clinical trials test Drug X in combination with specific CTEP IND agents  If Drug X is approved by NExT, an internal NCI committee makes a preliminary development plan, which is reviewed and approved by another internal NCI committee.  At this point, 2 things happen:  The Drug X Project Team is formed  CRADA negotiations with Pharmaceutical Company X are initiated.  Both processes have a 6 month deadline

3 Why do pharmaceutical companies apply to NExT for NCI-sponsored development of their agents?  CTEP has access to novel agents from competitors- can act as an honest broker.  Companies realize that there are potential therapeutic indications that do not have high enough priority to compete for limited corporate resources  CTEP has a network of experienced clinical trialists and centralized clinical trial support systems  CTEP can expend public funds for clinical trials and regulatory support.

4 Why does NCI help pharmaceutical companies develop their agents?  NCI recognizes that there is a significant public interest in finding indications for new oncology drugs beyond those that may be the most profitable.  NCI can advance the understanding of cancer biology and treatment through carefully designed clinical trials

5 The Drug Project Team (1)  Leading extramural experts, together with intramural staff, formulate the initial NCI drug development plan.  Though the previous drug development plans (NExT application and preliminary internal plan) may be referenced, the Drug Project Team starts from a clean slate.  There are three major benefits:  Involvement of extramural community in development of the initial plan, instead of CTEP staff deciding on the plan.  Concurrent drug development planning with CRADA negotiations shortens the timeline  Eliminates the inefficient and frustrating process of preparing and reviewing unsolicited LOI’s

6 The Drug Project Team (2)  A ‘quick team’ that is intended to be in existence for 6-12 weeks.  Has intramural and extramural participation  Three extramural roles: clinical scientists, translational scientists, and basic scientists  Two extramural scientists and the IDB drug monitor serve as co- chairs  All meetings are by webinar  Requires a commitment to participate in all meetings

7 The Drug Project Team (3)  Since the concept is to recruit the most qualified experts to develop the initial development plan, only individuals, and not teams, may apply.  The exception is that YI’s can apply with a mentor.  For YI’s, the most important advice is: apply with a mentor. It is highly unlikely that a YI could be competitive without a mentor.  For potential mentors the most important advice is: apply with a YI. Preference is given to mentor/YI combinations, as training YI’s is an ETCTN program goal.

8 The Drug Project Team (4)  PTMA is very simple form, and requires only the attachment of your NIH Biosketch.  Customize your personal statement to the Drug Project Team application.  The primary goal of the Drug Project team is to present a Drug Development plan to the IDSC.  Clinician scientist members of the Drug Project Team are anticipated to be the PI’s of the clinical trials that come out of the process.  Translational and basic scientists on the project team may also become members of the study teams for these trials.

9 Responsibilities - DPT clinician scientists  Expected to actively participate in developing a comprehensive plan to be endorsed by the IDSC  Leaders (co-chairs) will present clinical information to the IDSC  Expected to lead or co-lead clinical trials that come out of the DPT planning process  Not guaranteed – selected clinical investigators that do not participate in team activities will be replaced  Should be from ETCTN-affiliated sites

10 Responsibilities- DPT translational scientists  Expected to help develop biomarker endpoints for clinical studies  Expected to help select appropriate technology platforms, and to work out many details of biomarker selection and test qualification with CDP  May be eligible to apply for supplemental UM1 grant funds for selected projects.  Have the opportunity to incorporate the same biomarkers on the same platforms in multiple trials  Do not need to be from ETCTN-affiliated sites

11 Responsibilities- DPT basic scientists  Expected to educate the team about the basic science behind the drug  Expected to help guide trial design based on underlying knowledge of mechanism of action of the agent  Expected to help guide biomarker selection  May perform experiments to help guide deliberations – will have access to NCI drugs  May be eligible to apply for supplemental UM1 grant funds for selected projects.  Do not need to be from ETCTN-affiliated sites

12 Drug Project Team Outcomes (1)  Presentation to the Investigational Drug Steering Committee (IDSC)  IDSC is an advisory committee to CTEP. Recommendations are important but not binding  The IDSC has the following expertise: drug development, clinical pharmacology, clinical immunology, clinical trial design, omics, imaging, biostatistics, patient advocacy and HRQOL.  Members include Principal Investigators (PIs) of all phase I UM1 grants (including pediatric oncology) and all phase II N01 contracts; this includes all PIs from multi-PI sites.  IDSC votes by secret ballot on the Drug Project Team proposal

13 Drug Project Team Outcomes (2)  If approved by the IDSC, the overall plan is presented to another internal committee for final approval.  If CRADA has been successfully negotiated, clinicians on the Drug Project Teams are invited to form study committees and submit LOI’s.

Open for discussion