Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Project Cycle Management
Advertisements

Overview of the Study Protocol
Addressing minority health access through community-based health literacy research Susan J. Shaw, Ph.D., University of Arizona.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
EVIDENCE BASED HEALTH CARE and BEST PRACTICES at Northwestern Health Sciences University Gert Bronfort DC, PhD; Michele Maiers, DC, MPH; Roni Evans DC,
Evaluation to Support Strategic Planning in Indian/Native Communities
EVALUATION OVERVIEW: Key Questions and Roles Mary L. Fennell, Ph.D. (EOC Chair) Professor and Chair, Brown University June 19, 2007.
GRANT MANAGEMENT SEMINAR
1 Ben George – Poet, Al Zantua & David Little Raven – Drummers.
Cancer Disparities Research Partnership Program Process & Outcome Evaluation Amanda Greene, PhD, MPH, RN Paul Young, MBA, MPH Natalie Stultz, MS NOVA Research.
1. 2 Implementing and Evaluating of an Evidence Based Nursing into Practice Prepared By Dr. Nahed Said El nagger Assistant Professor of Nursing H.
Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Illinois Medical Home Project Presented by Kathy Sanabria, MBA, PMP Project Director.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
Procurement Analyst Position Update Procurement Training Forum August 24, 2010.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Edward M. Haugh Jr. ESC Consultant. III. Recommendations for Applying Outcomes Planning to ESC  I. Introduction to Outcomes Planning II. A Sample ESC.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
From Evidence to Action: Addressing Challenges to Knowledge Translation in RHAs The Need to Know Team Meeting May 30, 2005.
Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 12 Undertaking Research for Specific Purposes.
ADAPT serving geriatric populations in rural communities. Project ADAPT Assessing Depression and Proactive Treatment The Minnesota Area Geriatric Education.
TOBACCO CONTROL INITIATIVE HCSD Disease Management Program Quarterly Meeting April 26, 2005 Sarah Moody Thomas, PhD Statewide Clinical Lead.
Role of the Oncology Research Team Carmen B. Jacobs, BS, RN,OCN, CCRP U.T.M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas U.S.A.
Overview of Evaluation Designs. Learning objectives By the end of this presentation, you will be able to: Explain evaluation design Describe the differences.
Agenda I. Prayer/Welcome II. Introductions III. Updates A. KC Faith CAB 1. Review of time line and upcoming activities 2. CAB 2013 Capacity Survey Review.
Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (LLS) Information Resource Center (IRC) Planning for a Service Program Evaluation - Case Study Public Administration 522 Presented.
Jing Wan.  Introduction  Logic model  Evaluation methods(Design, data collection, analysis)  Communication & dissemination.
Ruth Carrico PhD RN FSHEA CIC Associate Professor Division of Infectious Diseases.
Integrating Knowledge Translation and Exchange into a grant Maureen Dobbins, RN, PhD SON, January 14, 2013.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2c – Process Evaluation.
Get Your "Party" Started: Establishing a Successful Third-party Evaluation Martha Thurlow, Ph.D. & Vitaliy Shyyan, Ph.D.—National Center on Educational.
The NCI Central IRB Initiative Third Annual Medical Research Summit Washington, D.C. March 2003.
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
Factors impacting implementation of a community coalition-driven evidence- based intervention: results from a cluster randomized controlled trial Methods.
CaMSP Cohort 8 Orientation Cohort 8 State and Local Evaluation Overview, Reporting Requirements, and Attendance Database February 23, 2011 California Department.
Welcome 2011 California Statewide Medical and Health Exercise.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
1 Overview of Fellowship Projects. Project to depend on what is available in host institution with strong mentorship Should address activities and tasks.
Pathways to Safety (DR) In Monterey County A Community-Based Early Intervention Initiative.
Orientation and Summer Institutes Implementer’s Forum October 2005 Susan Barrett PBIS Maryland.
Community Assessment Training 3- Community Assessment Training 6-1.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Program Evaluation Principles and Applications PAS 2010.
The Kirkpatrick Model organizational change Richard Lambert, Ph.D.
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
August 20, 2008 Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) CTSA Evaluation Approach Institute for Clinical & Translational Research (ICTR)
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Overview Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health Institute.
Making It Better Planning Employee & Patient Satisfaction November 2010.
NCCCP Pilot – Clinical Trials Ann O’Mara, PhD, RN, FAAN Program Director Community Clinical Oncology Program Division of Cancer Prevention June 26, 2007.
Using Multiple Data Sources to Understand Variable Interventions Bruce E. Landon, M.D., M.B.A. Harvard Medical School AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting.
EVALUATION OF THE INLAND EMPIRE HEALTH PLAN (IEHP) BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INTEGRATION INITIATIVE (BHI-I) UCSD and USC.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
The Hospital CAHPS Program Presented by Maureen Parrish.
Yvonne Abel, Abt Associates Inc. November 2010, San Antonio, TX Enhancing the Quality of Evaluation Through Collaboration Among Funders, Programs, and.
CHB Conference 2007 Planning for and Promoting Healthy Communities Roles and Responsibilities of Community Health Boards Presented by Carla Anglehart Director,
Karen Cheung, MPH, Pamela Luna, DrPH, MST, Sarah Merkle, MPH American Evaluation Association Annual Meeting November 11, 2009 The findings and conclusions.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: April 30, 2014 Presented by: U.S. Departments.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
The VCCS Administrative & Professional Faculty Development, Evaluation, and Recognition System Task Force Report March, 2016.
Operations Research In MCH Programs: Measurement Challenges How MCHIP is working to Support PVOs CORE Spring Meeting, April 28, 2010 Wednesday 11:00-12:30.
From the Dry Run and National Implementation of the
Pre-implementation Processes Implementation, Adoption, and Utility of Family History in Diverse Care Settings Study Lori A. Orlando, MD MHS.
Daniela B. Friedman, University of South Carolina
Stakeholder engagement and research utilization: Insights from Namibia
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch June 25, 2007

Presentation Overview Evaluation Approach Key Evaluation Features Evaluation Design Components Patient Survey Evaluation Timetable

NCCCP Evaluation Approach Formative not Summative Evaluation –What is the feasibility, sustainability and replicability of the NCCCP model? –How does strong institutional commitment and executive leadership support influence results? –Less emphasis on classical intervention or impact assessment –More emphasis on measurement of improvement from baseline assessment Emphasizes multi-method evaluation techniques –Qualitative assessments of organizational change –Quantitative assessment of trajectory of change Pre-post evaluation design –Performance assessment largely limited to intra- not inter-hospital and program comparisons

Key Evaluation Features Logic maps to rigorously define pilot site hospital and cancer program interventions Participatory research to achieve consensus on evaluation metrics and data collection approaches Baseline and follow-up patient surveys to assess improvement in patient program knowledge, program experience, and health- related quality of life Formal cost analysis of program implementation and operations Continued feedback of performance to NCI staff, program leadership and pilot sites

NCCCP Evaluation Design Components Year One – Refine Evaluation Design, Metrics, and Measures of Performance for hospital and program –Phase I – Evaluability Assessment and site visit (2-4 months) –Phase II – Participatory Research to select evaluation hypotheses/metrics – with pilot group input (4-7 months) –Phase III – Finalize evaluation design and collect baseline data (8-12 months) Year Two – Interim site visit, data collection, and first progress review by evaluation contractor Year Three – Final site visit, data collection and second progress review Year Four – Final data collection and report

Phase I – “Evaluability Assessment” Baseline data collection on pilot program components “Logic mapping” of program components (including hospital and community) to evaluation questions Anchored by evaluation contractor 2-day site visit to each pilot program – including multi-system leadership interviews Assessment completed within 4 months of contractor award

Phase II – Selecting Measures and Metrics NCI staff prepares initial set of evaluation measures and metrics Evaluation contractor refines measurement set and distributes to the sites for comment Sites meet with evaluator and provide feedback on the appropriateness, feasibility, and availability of metrics Evaluation contractor submits final recommendations to NCI NCI makes final decision on measures and metrics within 7 months of award

Phase III – Finalize evaluation plan and collect baseline data Evaluation contractor completes detailed evaluation plan for NCCCP pilot program NCI approves evaluation plan within 9 months of contractor award Sites complete baseline data collection on all key NCCCP evaluation questions by end of year one The “intervention” period begins for all hospital and community-based projects –Progress reviews annually –Final assessment at conclusion of year three

Pilot Site Role in Supporting Patient Surveys Evaluation contractor develops survey content based on their expertise, review of pilot site surveys, and NCI input –NCI approves final survey instrument Pilot sites administer patient survey with evaluation contractor support and training –Contractor develops survey administration protocols ( mailed surveys with telephone follow-up ) –Pilot Sites obtain their IRB approvals for patient survey –Contractor trains pilot site survey personnel –Pilot sites administer survey to eligible patients –Pilot sites return completed surveys to evaluation contractor

Patient Survey Schedule Patient survey administered twice: –Baseline survey completed at the end of year one Baseline survey report prepared for NCI and pilot sites to illustrate differences in site populations Results may prove useful in targeting NCCCP program interventions –Follow-up survey completed at end of year three Final report assesses change in patient experience and patient knowledge/use of pilot patient resources 300 patients will complete the survey per site and per survey round –Multi-system pilots will administer additional surveys for each component site

Patient Survey Measurement Domains Outcome Metrics : –Health-related quality of life (physical, mental, and social domains) –Overall program satisfaction Process Metrics –Self-perception of needed resources to assist in personal management of cancer treatment e.g., understanding disease, treatments, emotional and financial assistance services –Knowledge and use of pilot site patient resources Including access to clinical trials –Patient Experience with care trust, communication, decision-making access to care, appointments, and waiting time Experience with multi-disciplinary team practice

Evaluation Timetable – Key Year One Events Activity* Date Projected Contract Award Date July 20, ‘07 Initial Contractor Site Visits Oct-Nov ’07 Sites meet with Evaluation Contractor Dec’07 or Jan’08 Sites get trained on patient survey** April ‘08 Sites receive final evaluation design April ’08 All pilot baseline measurements final May ‘08 * Timetable depends on contract award date ** Site survey training depends on OMB clearance requirements