Beamline 8.3.1 summary 1.Strong PRT and staff 2.Robust optics and endstation 3.Safety: stable, simple operations 4.Funding: Operational funding secure.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NUCP 2371 Radiation Measurements II
Advertisements

Instrumental Chemistry
Elven Automation Elves examine images and set-up data processing Elves run… mosflm scala solve mlphare dm arp/warp Holton and Alber PNAS USA
X-ray Diffraction. X-ray Generation X-ray tube (sealed) Pure metal target (Cu) Electrons remover inner-shell electrons from target. Other electrons “fall”
1. Detector 2. Crystal diffraction conditions
Laue Photography Mathematics Structures time-resolved crystallography neutron crystallography electron crystallography.
RAD 350 Chapter 17Digital Rad Tech. Spatial Resolution – ability to distinguish small items in close proximity with near the same atomic mass density Spatial.
Bob Sweet Bill Furey Considerations in Collection of Anomalous Data.
Tomsk Polytechnic University1 A.S. Gogolev A. P. Potylitsyn A.M. Taratin.
Acknowledgements Christine Gee Janet Newman Tom Peat Center for Structure of Membrane Proteins Membrane Protein Expression Center II Center for HIV Accessory.
My Chapter 29 Lecture.
Atomic X-Ray Spectroscopy Chapter 12 X-ray range  Å to 100 Å Used  0.1Å to 25 Å.
Diffraction When “scattering” is not random. detector sample detector x-ray beam scattering.
Phys 102 – Lecture 25 The quantum mechanical model of light.
Radiation Exposure, Dose and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Medicine Background Image:
Exam II Review. Review of traveling wave interference Phase changes due to: Optical path length differences sources out of phase General solution.
Dose. Energy Gained Particles lose energy in matter. Eventually energy loss is due to ionization. An important measure is the amount of energy gained.
Images. Pinhole Lens Photons from a source can be focused by a small aperture. –Aperture radius a –Magnification m –Image is inverted Image is blurry.
Methods: Cryo-Electron Microscopy Biochemistry 4000 Dr. Ute Kothe.
Instrumental Chemistry Chapter 12 Atomic X-Ray Spectroscopic.
A U.S. Department of Energy laboratory managed by The University of Chicago X-Ray Damage to Biological Crystalline Samples Gerd Rosenbaum Structural Biology.
Qualitative, quantitative analysis and “standardless” analysis NON DESTRUCTIVE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS Notes by: Dr Ivan Gržetić, professor University of Belgrade.
Radiology is concerned with the application of radiation to the human body for diagnostically and therapeutically purposes. This requires an understanding.
PowerPoint File available: ~jamesh/powerpoint/ BNL_2011.ppt.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Dott. Dario Tresoldi CNR IPCF ME
Simulated diffraction image simulatedreal. SimulatedstatisticReal 5.4%R merge 6.2% 18.9I/sd I/sd (1.4 Ǻ) SDCORR PADFPH31.46.
DOSE, DAMAGE AND RESOLUTION - FUNDAMENTAL LIMITS IN COHERENT X- RAY-DIFFRACTION IMAGING H. Chapman % R. M. Glaeser * S. Hau-Riege % H. He* M. Howells*
ACA meeting July 2009 Highlights. Small Angle Scattering (X-rays, Neutrons) Don’t need.
A-LEVEL PHYSICS 15/09/ :49 Medical Physics.
Chapter 12 Atomic X-Ray Spectroscopy
Beamline PRT organization Funding Hardware Safety management Control system Scientific productivity.
Long Wave IR Visible UV X-rays Gamma rays wavelength (nm) X-rays absorption.
Beamline PRT organization Funding Hardware Safety management Control system Scientific productivity.
Determination of Crystal Structure (From Chapter 10 of Textbook 2) Unit cell  line positions Atom position  line intensity (known chemistry) Three steps.
Nuclear Instrumentation Laboratory Federal University of Rio de Janeiro -BRAZIL X-ray Fluorescence and X-ray Transmission Microtomography Imaging System.
PHYS 430/603 material Laszlo Takacs UMBC Department of Physics
Energy-Dispersive X-ray Microanalysis in the TEM Anthony J. Garratt-Reed Neil Rowlands.
PowerPoint File available: ~jamesh/powerpoint/ Oslo_2010.ppt.
fraction unconverted peak valley. XANES probe for damage rate fluence (10 15 photons/mm 2 ) fraction unconverted
Where do photons go When they come out of the beamline and hit my crystal.
Where do the X-rays come from?. Electric charge balloon Wool Sweater
Optimizing structure determination How many are we solving? What is the limit? Are we there yet? Why not? What are the biggest problems?
“hands-off” Screening with TOPAZ Chips For the purposes of testing both crystallization behavior and capability of the “tray goniometer”, chips were built.
Pursuing the initial stages of crystal growth using dynamic light scattering (DLS) and fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS) Takashi Sugiyama Miyasaka.
ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION subatomic particles (electron, photon, etc) have both PARTICLE and WAVE properties Light is electromagnetic radiation - crossed.
BEST strategy / SAD optimization Gleb Bourenkov EMBL-Hamburg Kappa Workgroup Meeting September 28-29, 2009 MAXLAB.
The development of the readout ASIC for the pair-monitor with SOI technology ~irradiation test~ Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ. 29 th Mar  Introduction.
Anomalous Differences Bijvoet differences (hkl) vs (-h-k-l) Dispersive Differences 1 (hkl) vs 2 (hkl) From merged (hkl)’s.
Key slides. Holton J. M. and Frankel K. A. (2010) Acta D66, 393–408.
PowerPoint File available: ~jamesh/powerpoint/ SHSSS_Berlin_2015.pptx.
Center for Structures of Membrane Proteins © 2006 Optimizing x-ray structure determination James Holton LBNL/UCSF April 6, 2006.
X-ray SNR in 3 steps. I ∆I. X-ray transmission SNR Review Let N = average number of transmitted x-rays N = N 0 exp [ - ∫  dz ] Emission and transmission.
We are investigating the dependence of efficiency of diamond detector samples on accumulated radiation dose. We have Sr 90  -source of known activity.
Chemistry – Chapter 4. Rutherford’s Atomic Model.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Acknowledgements Christine Gee Janet Newman Tom Peat Center for Structure of Membrane Proteins Membrane Protein Expression Center II Center for HIV Accessory.
PHYSICS – The Electromagnetic Spectrum
Gamma Detector of Plastic Scintillator Oct. 2, 2009 IP-BSM Group 1.
Beam Profile Monitor for Spot-Scanning System Yoshimasa YUASA.
Crystallography : How do you do? From Diffraction to structure…. Normally one would use a microscope to view very small objects. If we use a light microscope.
Considerations on the possibility of Phase Contrast Mammography using ICS sources B. Golosio a, P. Delogu b, I. Zanette b, M. Carpinelli a, G. L. Masala.
Top producing beamlines of the world Structures credited.
Why are. we not solving more struct tures? James Holton University of California San Francisco and Advanced Light Source Lawrence.
Serial Femtosecond Crystallography
Instrument Parameters in WDXRF
SFX and Laue Diffraction
FLAME TEST.
Chapter 16: Electron Diffraction
Presentation transcript:

Beamline summary 1.Strong PRT and staff 2.Robust optics and endstation 3.Safety: stable, simple operations 4.Funding: Operational funding secure 5.Scientific productivity: high 6.Future: streamlining success

Holton J. M. (2009) J. Synchrotron Rad ALS beamline Diffraction Methods Research

Howells et al. (2009) J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom resolution (Å) maximum tolerable dose (MGy)

10 MGy/Å what the is a MGy? damage_rates.pdf Holton J. M. (2009) J. Synchrotron Rad

Radiation Damage Model accumulated dose (MGy) normalized total intensity

Radiation Damage Model accumulated dose (MGy) best-fit B factor Kmetko et. al. (2006): lysozyme: apoferritin: slopes (Å 2 /MGy): lysozyme: apoferritin: 0.016

Simulated diffraction image MLFSOM simulatedreal

Crystal Size crystal size (μm) CC to correct model predicted Glaeser et.al. (2000) 1 μm amyloids Nelson et al Sawaya et al Glaeser et.al. (2000) Sliz et.al. (2003) ~12 μm xylanase Moukhametzianov et al μm cypovirus polyhedra Coulibaly et. al μm (13x) bovine rhodopsin Standfuss et al theoretical

Minimum Crystal Size n xtal - number of crystals needed n 0 - empirical constant (~ 3) d- d-spacing of interest (Å) B- Wilson B factor (Å 2 ) n xtal = n 0 MW V M 2 ℓ x ℓ y ℓ z (d ) exp(-0.5 B/d 2 ) MW- molecular weight (kDa) V M - Matthews number (~2.5 Å 3 /Da) ℓ- crystal size (microns) B ≈ 4 d Holton J. M. (2009) J. Synchrotron Rad

Where:  I  DL - average damage-limited intensity (photons/hkl) at a given resolution converting R from μm to m, r e from m to Å, ρ from g/cm 3 to kg/m 3 and MGy to Gy r e - classical electron radius (2.818 x m/electron) h- Planck’s constant (6.626 x J∙s) c- speed of light ( m/s) f decayed - fractional progress toward completely faded spots at end of data set ρ- density of crystal (~1.2 g/cm 3 ) R- radius of the spherical crystal (μm) λ- X-ray wavelength (Å) f NH - the Nave & Hill (2005) dose capture fraction (1 for large crystals) n ASU - number of proteins in the asymmetric unit M r - molecular weight of the protein (Daltons or g/mol) V M - Matthews’s coefficient (~2.4 Å 3 /Dalton) H- Howells’s criterion (10 MGy/Å) θ- Bragg angle  a 2  - number-averaged squared structure factor per protein atom (electron 2 )  M a  - number-averaged atomic weight of a protein atom (~7.1 Daltons) B- average (Wilson) temperature factor (Å 2 ) μ- attenuation coefficient of sphere material (m -1 ) μ en - mass energy-absorption coefficient of sphere material (m -1 ) Theoretical limit: Holton J. M. and Frankel K. A. (2010) Acta D submitted

Theoretical limit: at ~2.4 Å photon spot μm Holton J. M. and Frankel K. A. (2010) Acta D submitted for lysozyme

Optimum exposure time (faint spots) t hr optimum exposure time for data set (s) t ref exposure time of reference image (s) bg ref background level near weak spots on reference image (ADU) bg 0 ADC offset of detector (ADU) σ 0 rms read-out noise (ADU) gain ADU/photon m multiplicity of data set (including partials) Short answer: bg hr = 90 ADU for ADSC Q315r

Specific Damage

Damage changes absorption spectrum Photon energy (eV) counts 1 0 Holton J. M. (2007) J. Synchrotron Rad

fluorescence probe for damage fluence (10 15 photons/mm 2 ) Fraction unconverted 25mM SeMet in 25% glycerol Exposing at eV Se cross-section at eV Holton J. M. (2007) J. Synchrotron Rad

fluorescence probe for damage Absorbed Dose (MGy) Fraction unconverted Wide range of decay rates seen Half-dose = 41.7 ± 4 MGy “GCN4” in crystal Half-dose = 5.5 ± 0.6 MGy 8 mM SeMet in NaOH Protection factor: 660% ± 94% Holton J. M. (2007) J. Synchrotron Rad

Take-home lesson: radiation damage to metal sites is unpredictable Best strategy: 5 MGy to complete data geometrically increasing exposure Holton J. M. (2007) J. Synchrotron Rad

Minimum required signal (MAD/SAD)

dataset exposure1.0s0.1s1.0s frames x R merge 5.6% 11.2% 4.7% R anom 4.8%4.7% I/sd I/sd (2.0 Ǻ) redundancy PADFPH FOM FOMDM CC(1H87) same total dose with high and low redundancy

Spatial Noise downup R separate

Spatial Noise oddeven R mixed

Spatial Noise separate: mixed: 2.5% 0.9% 2.5% % 2 = 2.3% 2

Spatial Noise mult > ( — ) 2 2.3%

Minimum Crystal Size n xtal - number of crystals needed n for complete data set, 180 for MAD d- d-spacing of interest (Å) B- Wilson B factor (Å 2 ) n xtal = n 0 MW V M 2 ℓ x ℓ y ℓ z (d ) exp(-0.5 B/d 2 ) MW- molecular weight (kDa) V M - Matthews number (~2.5 Å 3 /Da) ℓ- crystal size (microns) B ≈ 4 d Holton J. M. (2009) J. Synchrotron Rad

Take-home lesson: need better crystals for MAD Best strategy: find them

accurate, unattended data colleciton

beamline microscope reference image Re-centering

accurate, unattended screening

sample shadow on detector Cu

sample shadow on detector

X-ray shadow of cryo stream

Plate goniometers