The Urban Area/NFC Post-2010 Census Statewide Review State Coordinator between FHWA and MPO/local Mike Toth Transportation Planner MDOT Asset Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Data Activities Jane H. Smith State Transportation Data Administrator
Advertisements

Impacting Local Government Updating Functional Classification Using GIS September 12, 2013 Bentonville, Arkansas.
Unmet Transit Needs Process Kern Council of Governments March 15, 2001.
Transportation Strategy Board July 28, 2010 Responsible Growth.
ODOT STIP Process and Funding Jerri Bohard –Planning Section Manager –Transportation Development Division Jeff Scheick –Northwest Region Manager –Highway.
Transportation Data Activities John Hudler Transportation Data Group Leader
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
Impacts of “MAP-21”on the National Bridge Inspection Program Tribal Government Coordination Meeting Date August 7, 2014 Presented by: Gary Moss, P.E. Acting.
SPEED LIMITS Joe Gorfida, Jr. Main Office: (214) Direct Dial: (214) TEXAS MUNICIPAL COURTS EDUCATION CENTER 2012 Municipal.
Making Census Data Better in Wisconsin LTSB GIS TEAM| TONY J. VAN DER WIELENRYAN SQUIRESJAMES BEAUDOINGRACE WHITE.
1 LAFCO FEES The Statutory and Legal Framework 2010 Annual CALAFCO Meeting Hilton Hotel, Palm Springs Scott Browne.
VGIN 5 Year GIS Strategic Plan
Division of Local Assistance Office of Special & Discretionary Programs December 2, 2010.
1 IRR Program Inventory and Funding Formula Update M.A.S.T. Impact Week Washington, DC March
Highway Functional Classification PEAR Workshop September 2009 Spencer Stevens, Planning Office Joe Hausman, Office of Highway Information Ed Christopher,
Geographic Access Gravity Model 1.Statement of Problem (Measurement) 2.The Theory and Method (Potential Accessibility) 3.Applications (Examples -Preliminary.
ON THE ROAD TO THE 2020 CENSUS North Carolina GIS Conference February 26, 2015.
New Partners for Smart Growth 11th Annual Conference San Diego February 2, 2012 New Parking Standards for Affordable Housing.
Performance Measurement Requirements Notice of Proposed Rule Making.
A CULTURE of COOPERATION Intergovernmental Planning in McLean County 29 th Annual IDOT Fall Planning Conference Bloomington, Illinois October 10, 2014.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
Its All About Geography or Ed J. Christopher Midwestern Resource Center Federal Highway Administration Governors Drive Olympia Fields, IL
NCHRP Synthesis 458: Roadway Safety Data Interoperability Between Local and State Agencies Presented to ATSIP TRF 2014 Presented by Nancy Lefler Vanasse.
1 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS REDISTRICTING 2011.
Highway Program Financing July Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment.
QA/QC Team TPPCC GRIC May 6, Initial Issue: QA/QC Team Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/OC) Inventory Teams - As identified in our February.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
Buy America Effective Implementation - October 1, 2012.
Update on Public Use Microdata Areas and Urban Areas Michael Ratcliffe Geography Division U.S. Census Bureau 1.
IRRPCC Meeting Albuquerque, NM November 8,  Clarification needed on applicability of these roads into the IRR Inventory  Assignment given to IRRPCC.
The Virginia Department of Transportation Infrastructure Assets ( The data presented is for illustration purposes only ) November 8, 2000.
Mid-States Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety Conference Guan Xu, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Design.
Introductions Introduction to TCAG Federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Responsible for long-term planning for all modes of surface transportation.
GIS at DGR Geographic Information Systems A History of Innovative Public Service
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
Urban Boundaries and Functional Classification. Discussion FHWA Urban Area Boundaries Federal Functional Classification Transitioning Area Boundaries.
California Association of Local Agency Formation Commissions LAFCo 101 An Introduction to Local Agency Formation Commissions Bill Chiat, Executive Director.
WIOA Regional Planning Area Designation. Subpart B—Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act Local Governance (Workforce Development Areas) § What.
Judy Lorenzo Manager, Transportation Planning Office Fundamentals of Metropolitan and Regional Transportation Planning Organizations in Washington State.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 1 Process Development and Integration for the Six-Year Program.
‘‘Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act’’ or ‘‘MAP–21’’ Signed into Law July 6, 2012 Implications for Infrastructure Asset Management, Pavement.
Network Life Cycle Analysis for Bridge Management Rebecca Curtis, P.E. Michigan Department of Transportation Bridge Management Engineer 2015 Transportation.
Census Bureau and Urbanized Areas an interactive webinar What the Census Bureau is Planning in the way of Defining Urbanized Areas 1. Presentations 2.
Module II  Lesson 1  Overview of the HPMS Data Model  Lesson 2  Dataset Requirements and Specifications  Lesson 3  Geospatial Component of the Data.
REVISED DISPOSAL REPORTING & ADJUSTMENT METHOD REGULATIONS 14 CCR Sections et. seq. 14 CCR Section CCR Section
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
1 LAFCO Staff Workshop Crowne Plaza Hotel, San Jose Executive Officer Bob Braitman Legal Counsel Scott Browne.
Implementation Strategy July 2002 STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLE PROCESS ORP Publishes & Maintains 8 Standing Committee Recommends Approval / Disapproval.
Oregon land-use planning. Danger: Urban Sprawl.
Review of Principal Arterial Routes on the National Highway System For MAP-21 Reta R. Busher Chief of Planning and Programming October 17, 2012.
FHWA PROPOSED OVERSIGHT POLICY Implementation Issues FHWA SPRING BUSINESS MEETING King W. Gee May 8, 2001.
…..Kansas Department of Revenue – Property Valuation Division – Kansas GIS Policy Board - DASC ….. Statewide Tax Units Database A collaborative partnership.
Work Zone Safety and Mobility Transportation Management Plans Jason Gutting, P.E. Michigan Department of Transportation.
CTPP and Geography Census Geography Nesting Tracts and Blocks TAZs and TADs Resources.
Expert Group Meeting on the Revision of the Handbook on the Management of Population and Housing Censuses New York, 14 – 17 December 2015 Overview of the.
Statewide and Nonmetropolitan Planning Regional Transportation Planning Organizations (RTPOs) State Programs Meeting 8/7/13 John Sprowls Community Planner,
This file is part of the FS Resources section at:
Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Publication No. FHWA-HRT Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Presented to presented by Alabama Department of Transportation April 8, 2016 The Alabama Transportation Planner’s Guide to Safety Data Access and Documentation.
Abstract – This page not part of presentation. The One Maryland One Centerline (OMOC) Program is a collaborative effort between federal, state, and local.
INDOT Office of Traffic Safety Manager, Mike Holowaty
Hillsborough County Public School Siting MPO SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION WORKING GROUP
Metropolitan Planning Organization Advisory Council Florida Department of TRANSPORTATION Carmen Monroy Director, Office of Policy Planning April 28, 2016.
New Comprehensive Zoning By-law December 12, 2016.
New Fiscal Rules for Funding Flexibility with Title I, Part A
City Council Hearing #2 April 18, 2017.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking June 27, 2016
MPO School Transportation Working Group
Report on Recent CSS and Committee Chairs Meetings
Presentation transcript:

The Urban Area/NFC Post-2010 Census Statewide Review State Coordinator between FHWA and MPO/local Mike Toth Transportation Planner MDOT Asset Management

Legislation & Guidance* 23 USC Chapter 1 – Federal-Aid Highways Sec 101(a) (36) Urban area. - The term "urban area" means an urbanized area or, in the case of an urbanized area encompassing more than one State, that part of the urbanized area in each such State, or urban place as designated by the Bureau of the Census having a population of 5,000 or more and not within any urbanized area, within boundaries to be fixed by responsible State and local officials in cooperation with each other, subject to approval by the Secretary. Such boundaries shall encompass, at a minimum, the entire urban place designated by the Bureau of the Census, except in the case of cities in the State of Maine and in the State of New Hampshire * Subject to change, additional guidance expected spring of 2012 from FHWA

Urban/Rural Reporting to FHWA in the yearly Highway Performance Monitoring System (HPMS) report. Act 51 County formula Eligibility for High Risk Rural Road and Category F funds Used for determining spacing of federal-aid eligible roads (current guidelines)

Currently, “The” Site Recommended for Information /urbanized_areas_and_mpo_tma/ /urbanized_areas_and_mpo_tma/ –‘"reasonable implementation strategy" rather than statutory provisions directly’

MDOT Items State is a fair broker for a uniform process. Adjusted Urban Areas approved by FHWA are called Adjusted Census Urban Boundaries (ACUB) by MDOT, used to be called FAUB.

Responsible Officials ACUB/NFC Review and Revisions Responsible Local Officials by Area Type Area Type Inside an MPA? Responsible Local Officials RuralYesMPO RuralNoCounty Road Commission and any City/Village with Act51 jurisdiction Small UrbanYesMPO Small UrbanNo County Road Commission or any City/Village with Act51 jurisdiction UrbanizedYesMPO UrbanizedNoNot applicable – does not exist

Statewide Review Process MDOT mails maps and guidance to the responsible officials. The officials, or their staff, identify proposed ACUB/NFC changes, following the guidance and mark the changes manually on a map, or in a GIS file, if that capability exists. MDOT reviews the proposed changes and provides comments as needed till all agree. MDOT prepares maps which highlight proposed ACUB/NFC changes, and mileage information about the changes, and sends these to FHWA for review and final approval. Approved ACUB/NFC changes are incorporated into the next available version of the Michigan Geographic Framework (MGF), a statewide GIS maintained at the Center for Geographic Information.

Formats Web page for viewing purposes being developed. Including aerial imagery of 1998 and best mosaic from the Michigan Imagery Solution (MIS), current adjusted urban areas, 2010 urban areas, 2010 census blocks and base map. Paper maps or I can supply ESRI or Caliper files to those with GIS. (ESRI files are compatible with RoadSoft)

Expectations Predicting similar process and assuming similar guidelines. Not expecting large changes.

Questions?