Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Assessment FOR Learning in theory
Advertisements

21 st Century Learning Title I Technology Integration Specialists.
School Based Assessment and Reporting Unit Curriculum Directorate
Breakfast & Conversation
Key Stage 3 National Strategy Standards and assessment: session 2.
Region 3 Assessment Binder Cheryl Bashutski Sun West School Division Mike Walter Regina Public Schools.
Assessment The purpose of this workshop / discussion is to extend further teachers’ understanding of the Department's Assessment Advice. This workshop.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Matching Instruction to the Gap. This PowerPoint was adapted from a Presentation by Margaret Heritage as part of the Iowa Assessment for Learning Institute.
Consistency of Assessment
Types and Purposes of Assessment Mathematics Assessment and Intervention.
MARZANO’S HIGH YIELD STRATEGIES
Key Stage 3 National Strategy © Crown copyright 2004 Swanshurst School: Assessment for learning Presenter: John Hopkin, BASS Modified from Key Stage 3.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Learning targets Learning Goals, Learning Targets, Success Criteria,
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
NYC Teacher Effectiveness A Preview of the NYC Teacher Effectiveness Framework for Created by The Center for the Professional Education of Teachers,
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Designing High Quality Professional Development Knowledge, Management, & Dissemination Conference.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Co-Teaching as Best Practice in Student Teaching
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics Project, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Summer 2013 Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Some Intro questions… Introductions – name, subject(s) taught, and… What science vocabulary term explains you and why…and..Think-pair-share How will you.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
This professional development is brought to you by: (AACC) Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center: A WestEd and CRESST partnership (
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Margaret Heritage CRESST/UCLA Iowa Department of Education Webinar April 28, 2010 Peer & Self-Assessment.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. or its affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 What Assessment for Learning Looks Like in the Classroom.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Ch 2 Diagnosis and correction Teacher’s Role. Accountability Achievement scores 15% of the variance is the result of the teacher’s influence on the child’s.
The Key Attributes of a Successful School. 1.A belief that every child matters and can achieve at the highest level – a culture, ethos and vision that.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Introduction to the Process of Formative Assessment.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
9 Common Characteristics of Successful Schools From: What we know about successful school leadership (2003). - American Education Research Association.
Reflecting on Practice Week 3 Day 3 Reflecting on Practice.
PEER ASSESSMENT AND SELF- ASSESSMENT. Peer assessment  The practice is employed to save teachers time and improve students' understanding of course materials.
Introduction to Strong Educator Support System.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
Calderdale and Kirklees SCITT June 2015 Ian Ross.
Interactive Teaching Resources. Encourages maximum amount of interaction between teachers and students Ideally with a 70/30 split between student participation.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Monitor and Revise Teaching. ObjectivesObjectives Describe how to monitor teaching List ways to contribute to broader evaluations Explain how to review.
Orientation Classroom Teaching and Learning Theory Course Introduction and Overview.
DEVELOPING TEACHING SKILLS IN PE (GED3043)
The Wicked Problem of Measuring the Impact of Teacher Preparation: Increasing Rigor in Documenting Preparation Practices Larry Maheady, Buffalo State University.
Focus: All Students 21st Century Ready
Welcome to fame community of practice Module 1
Lesson 3.9 – Performance Psychology (Part 2)
Assessment The purpose of this workshop / discussion is to extend further teachers’ understanding of the Department's Assessment Advice. This workshop.
Orientation Classroom Teaching and Learning Theory Course Introduction and Overview.
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel

This professional development is brought to you by: (AACC) Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center: A WestEd and CRESST partnership ( and the (NCCC) North Central Comprehensive Center at McREL ( The work reported herein was supported by WestEd, grant number 4956 s05-093, through the Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center, and by McREL, grant number S283B050024, through the North Central Comprehensive Center at McREL, as administered by the U.S. Department of Education. The findings and opinions expressed in this program are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the positions or policies of AACC, CRESST, WestEd, McREL, NCCC, or the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel Positive Classroom Culture Peer Assessment Supporting Peer Assessment Self-Assessment Introduction Lesson 1 Lesson 2Lesson 3Lesson 4Lesson 5 Supporting Self-Assessment Main Messages, Learning Goals, Success Criteria Slide 1

Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel Main Messages Slide 2 Lesson 1 Positive classroom culture is constructed, supported and maintained by both teachers and students Lesson 2 Peer assessment is a process where students provide feedback to each other Lesson 3 Teachers need to teach, model, provide practice, feedback and monitor students’ use of peer assessment strategies Lesson 4 When students are involved in self-assessment, they are developing metacognitive skills Lesson 5 Students need to be taught strategies for self-assessment

Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel  Understand the need for a classroom culture conducive to formative assessment  Understand the impact of teacher attitudes and beliefs about student learning on student achievement  Understand the role of metacognition in learning  Gain knowledge of strategies for peer and self-assessment  Understand the value of peer and self-assessment in learning Learning Goals Slide 3

Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel  Identify the indicators of a classroom culture that supports formative assessment practices  Explain how a classroom culture supports formative assessment practices  Describe the impact of teacher attitudes and beliefs about student learning on student achievement  Explain the role of metacognition in learning  Identify strategies for peer and self-assessment  Explain the value of peer and self-assessment in learning Success Criteria Slide 4

Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel The Process of Formative Assessment (Heritage, 2010) Slide 5 Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel

The Process of Formative Assessment (Heritage, 2010) Slide 6 Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel

What do we mean… When we say… Students take responsibility for their own learning? Students are partners in learning? Students are involved in their learning? Slide 7

Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel Turn & Talk Slide 8 In pairs or small groups, discuss your ideas about what student involvement in learning and assessment entails. Copyright © 2012 Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive Center & North Central Comprehensive Center at McRel