MONITORING AND EVALUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF LOCAL REGULATION NO. 5 YEAR 2008 ABOUT SMOKE- FREE AREA (SFA) AND SMOKE- RESTRICTED AREA (SRA) IN SURABAYA Oleh Kurnia Dwi Artanti Santi Martini Kusuma Scorpia Lestari Presented at The 2 nd ITCRN 21April 2015 Faculty of Public Health, Airlangga University Surabaya, East Java

Background Local regulations regarding Smoke Free Area (SFA) and Smoke Restricted Area ( SRA) in Surabaya city have been implemented since % facilities in the area SFA and SRA have not yet put right “no-smoking signs” The survey in Smoking- Restricted Area ( SRA ) in 2012 found smoker inside the building, an ashtray, cigarettes butt, and seller cigarette

Background (Cont..) Smoke Free- Area : an area where individuals who is prohibited to conduct activities related smoking like as: producing or making cigarettes; sell cigarettes; organized cigarette advertising; promoting cigarettes and cigarette use. Smoke Restricted Area : an area where individuals are permited to smoke in limited areas. The management must provide a designated smoking room and put “ No smoking” signage in other areas.

Research Objectives General : To monitor and evaluate of implementation of Local Regulation No. 5/ 2008 in Surabaya about SFA and SRA public facilities Specific : To get description of the local regulation implementation at work and public places. To identify obstacles and supporting factors in regarding to implement the local regulation To get input for implementation the local regulation optimally.

Methodology Research design : cross – sectional study The Study location consist of restaurant, hotel, mall, park, market, transportation. Sample size are 200 places chosen randomly Sampling for this study used cluster random sampling based on area in Surabaya (East, West, Center, North, and South).

Methodology (cont.....) To get description of implementation of the local regulation at work and public places. Observation Check list 200 places To identify obstacles and supporting factors in regarding to implement the local regulation. Semi-structure interview Questionnaire open ended 200 places To get input for implementation the local regulation optimally Semi-structure interview Questionnaire open ended 200 places

Results Signate HotelRestoMallParkTransportMarket Frequency n% Get “No smoking” Signage Accordance to Regulation Get “ No smoking” Signage Not Accordance Regulation Not Get Signage Sum Overview Implementation Regulation about Signage

The Signage The Standard Signage No The Standard Signage

Result (Cont.....) Overview Implementation Regulation about Founded smoking room Indicators HotelRestoMallParkTransportMarket Frequency N% Outside Building Accordace Regulation Outside Building Not Accordace Regulation Inside Building Outside Building Not Accordace Regulation and Inside Building Do Not have smoking room Sum

Result (Cont.....) Indicators HotelRestoMallParkTransportMarket Frequency N % Founded Smoker weekday ,5 Founded Smoker weekend Founded the smell cigarette smoke weekday ,5 Founded the smell cigarette smoke weekend Founded Astray and Lighter weekday ,5 Founded Astray and Lighter weekend Overview Implementation Regulation about Violation

Result (Cont...) Overview Implementation Regulation about Violation Indicators HotelRestoMallParkTransportMarket Frequency N % Founded Cigarette Butts weekday ,5 Founded Cigarette Butts weekend ,5 Presence cooperation with tobacco industry weekday ,5 Presence cooperation with tobacco industry weekend Founded cigarette sales weekday Founded cigarette sales weekend

Supports and Obtacles 64.5% managers of public facilities did not know about the regulation SFA in Surabaya which ban smoking in the area public facility. Facilities have done implement these regulations were still 52.5%. Although public facilities have been implementing regulations, but still a little (30%) already provides for sanctions include verbal warning. Only 12% of public facilities are already recorded every sanctions already given. Managers do not aware that if they do not implement the regulation of SFA and SRA cause managers public facilities get sanction from the local government.

Suggestion to Increase Implementation NoSuggestionNumber of Facilities 1. Given Information session conducted by public facilities management Given Information session conducted by outsider Give Punishment or Reward There is a smoking area / special place Signing No smoking Establishment of a monitoring team at public facilities 7 7. Rejected 23

Conclusion An overview of the implementation of the Regional Regulation of Surabaya No. 5 of 2008 is still very weak because there are many violation in almost all indicators observed. The most violation is installation signage “no smoking” and providing smoking room that is not in accordance with the Regional Regulation No. 5 tahun 2008 of Surabaya City. Constraints met by managers of public facilities in the implementing regulations SFA and SRA is the manager did not know about the regulation SFA and SRA in Surabaya which bans smoking in the building / the public facility The Most Suggestion for Optimization of implementation regulations are give Information session from the manager of a public facility or outside.

Recommendations To improve the effectiveness of the implementation of Regulation No. 5 of 2008 about SFA and SRA, Given Information session of these regulations should be done regularly and continuously. Installation of signange “no-smoking “ in accordance Perwali no. 25 of 2009 and its implementation should be monitored by the Monitoring Team SFA and SRA at City level. For the implementation of this Regulation SFA and SRA optimally, then sanctions for violations should be upheld both for smokers who violate the regulations and management public facilities.

Thank You