1 Stan Graves Vice President, Science & Engineering ATK Propulsion Systems 435-863-4062 March 23 – 24, 2011 NASA Technology Roadmaps.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Operational Strategy and Climate Change Operational Programs.
Advertisements

2013 Key Issues Review: Enabling Sustained Deep Space Exploration with a Broad Vision Congressional Visits Day Preparatory Briefing Teleconferences February.
Some Interesting Facts about Mechanical Engineering
Simulating Ground Support Capability for NASAs Reusable Launch Vehicle Program Kathryn E. Caggiano Peter L. Jackson John A. Muckstadt Cornell University.
Grenada Sustainable Energy Plan Stakeholders Meeting April 5, 2002.
A GenCorp Company High Thrust In-Space Propulsion Technology Development R. Joseph Cassady Aerojet 22 March 2011.
DRAFT Page 1 A unique, non-profit, economic development organization Who we are What we do Lead and partner with industry, academia and government regionally.
© The Aerospace Corporation 2011 NRC Workshop on NASA Technology Roadmaps TA01 - Launch Propulsion Systems Randy Kendall General Manager Launch Systems.
1 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee Evaluation Measures and Criteria for Humans Spaceflight Options 12 August 2009.
Continuous Value Enhancement Process
Introduction Over the past 20 years there have been numerous attempts to develop a new RLV All failed or prematurely canceled All share a common issue:
Architecture Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
The Normalization of Deviance at NASA. Background January 28, 1986 Shuttle engineers were worried about launching at the predicted temperature of 31 degrees.
Copyright © 2013 United Launch Alliance, LLC. Unpublished Work. All Rights Reserved. Civil Space 2013 Critical Challenges: Safety, Mission Assurance, and.
Propulsion Engineering Research Center NASA Technology Roadmap: Launch Propulsion Systems Robert J. Santoro The Propulsion Engineering Research Center.
1 Federal Aviation Administration Mid Term Architecture Briefing and NextGen Implementation 1 Federal Aviation Administration Mid Term Architecture Briefing.
Page - 1 Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power Role of EASY5 in Integrated Product Development Frank Gombos Boeing Canoga Park, CA.
0 Financial and Market Risks for Space Launch Providers Presented by: Charlie Precourt ATK Aerospace Systems Space Transportation Policy and.
SOCIETY OF MOTOR MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS LIMITED SMMT, the ‘S’ symbol and the ‘Driving the motor industry’ brandline are trademarks of SMMT Ltd Driving.
1 AAE 450 Spring 2008 Stephen Bluestone March 20, 2008 Propulsion Final Presentation Slides 1.
Reducing the cost of sustained operations through technology infusion April 2004 Darin Skelly NASA Kennedy Space Center Transformational Spaceport & Range.
Space Exploration: Should It Be Done? Nishith Patel.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA’s approach for quiet and efficient subsonic air transportation Prepared for Lynne Pickard,
The concept of Managing Sustainability on Toyota
Rocket Engine Physics and Design
Lecture 2 Engineering Design Process & Method. Introduction Design is a multidisciplinary field which integrates the scientific principle, technical information.
High Volume Manufacturing of Composites June 2014 Tobias Potyra Fraunhofer Project Western
Aeronautics Exploration Systems Space Flight Biological & Physical Physical Earth Science Space Science Education To Understand and Protect Our Home.
Alternative Fuel Study A nalysis, R ecommendations, VTOD T oday Dave Bird September 21, 2009.
The Economic Impact of Commercial Space Transportation on the U.S. Economy May 20, 2004 Paula Trimble Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator.
NASA PREFERRED TECHNICAL STANDARDS PUBLISHED
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
 fuel cell = device that generates electricity by a chemical reaction.  Every fuel cell has two electrodes, one positive and one negative, called, respectively,
Current Need Aging space shuttle fleet’s retirement is imminent If the ISS is going to continue operation there needs to be a replacement to get humans.
Establishing the Richmond Region as a Leader in the Revitalization of Advanced Manufacturing in the United States Barry W. Johnson Senior Associate Dean.
Production Engineering is the combination of Manufacturing Technology and Management Science.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
5/9/02 1 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Federal Government DoD DoC DoT NASA State Government NCSS Industry University Detailed.
Simulation Based Operational Analysis of Future Space Transportation Systems Alex J. Ruiz-Torres Information and Decision Sciences, COBA, UTEP Edgar Zapata.
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Transitioning Toward the Future of Commercial Human Spaceflight COMMERCIAL CREW PROGRAM AIAA Spring Dinner.
The Augustine Committee Review of Human Spaceflight Plans Committee Briefing to COMSTAC October 29, 2009 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee.
NASA/Air Force Cost Model presented by Keith Smith Science Applications International Corporation 2002 SCEA National Conference June
Bill Anderson Purdue University 23 March 2011 Perspectives on Launch Propulsion System Roadmap.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
Kiyoshi Higuchi Executive Director Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) JAXA Space transportation systems.
11 Space Transportation Policy and Market Risks Panel 5 – International Customers, Competitors and Partners The George Washington University Elliot School.
AIAA Corporate Membership Advisory Committees Propulsion & Energy (P&E) Conference CMAC 7 June 2013 CMC Meeting.
24b - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Safety Dave Bogart Code 302 August 16-17, 2005.
Infrastructure and transport in the Black Sea region Opening Remarks Emmanouil Vlachogiannis First Vice President Thessaloniki Chamber of Commerce and.
ASTWG Vision Team Group Exercise: Initial Summary of Results.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Approved For Public Release © The Aerospace Corporation 2009 June 17, 2009 Initial Summary of Human Rated Delta IV Heavy Study Briefing to the Review of.
INNOVATION Empowers turbopump designers to evaluate performance versus manufacturing cost/assembly efficacy early in, and throughout, the new product development.
Team 16: Alex Johnson Ashwin Nair Phuc Van Nguyen Ziran Zhu.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
Orbital Aggregation & Space Infrastructure Systems (OASIS) Background Develop robust and cost effective concepts in support of future space commercialization.
Data Center Energy Efficiency SC07 Birds of a Feather November, 2007 William Tschudi
0 Les moteurs du futur Les grands enjeux Technologiques J.Renvier Juin 09.
Space Tug Propellant Options AIAA 2016-vvvv
Kennedy Space Center Connecting Mid-Atlantic Space Grants with Spaceport and Range Technology and Science Thrust Areas Michael Freeman, PhD
NASA Hypersonic Research
Richard Blott, Space Enterprise Partnerships Limited
“Other” Breakout Session Summary
“Other” Breakout Session Summary
Derivation of the FSOA in Ariane 6 Specifications
NASA Technology Roadmaps ATK Commentary
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Presentation transcript:

1 Stan Graves Vice President, Science & Engineering ATK Propulsion Systems March 23 – 24, 2011 NASA Technology Roadmaps ATK Commentary

2 Assessment Guidelines and Assumptions: Next generation heavy lift vehicles will employ both liquid and solid propulsion elements to optimize reliability, performance and cost. Assessment evaluated: 1.Total propulsion system performance and reliability 2.Ground processing timelines 3.Launch delays Conclusion: ATK endorses NASA technology roadmap and provides guidance for priority and emphasis

3 All of today’s heavy lift vehicles use a combination of liquids and solids. The majority of tomorrow’s commercial vehicles of all sizes will also combine solids and liquids Heavy Lift Vehicles Use Both Liquids and Solids

4 The Solid/Liquid combination is not just a coincidence– it is a result of the physics, economics, and programmatics of the launch vehicle industry Solid/Liquid Combination is not a Coincidence Improved Reliability Solid propulsion performance and high reliability increases likelihood of crew survival – optimal designs reduce “lofting” and eliminate “black out” zones

5 Solids optimize first stage performance (density Isp). Liquids optimize Upper stage performance (Isp). Hybrids are somewhere in between. Solids Optimum for First Stage, Liquids Optimal for Upper Stage

6 Investments in both liquid and solid propulsion ground process technologies are prudent since launch operations timelines are virtually identical Space Shuttle Ground Processing Timelines

7 Technology investments should address overarching system level issues that contribute to launch delays. Solid propulsion reliability makes it an attractive element of a highly dependable architecture. Shuttle Launch Delays Length of Launch Delays Cost of Launch Delays* *NASA estimates that each scrub costs $500,000 in lost fuel, and $700,000 to pay for the extra workforce needed for launch attempts (ref: Space.com). The STS costs about $200M/month operate (ref: Augustine report).

8 Items in RED are in the roadmaps at a “lesser” level. ATK recommends elevating the priority level of these items to have equal consideration to the other items on this list. Electric TVC Advanced launch abort and range safety Advanced pyrotechnic systems Solar thermal propulsion, solar electric propulsion, and air breathing propulsion Assessment of Ground Processing & Propulsion Technologies

9 ATK Assessment of Ground Processing and Vehicle Technologies The majority of the technologies can benefit commercial vehicles or heavy lift. Many benefit both solids and liquids. Recommend higher TRL (4- 6) focus for these.

10 ATK Assessment of Ground Processing and Vehicle Technologies Highlighted technologies are not applicable to commercial vehicles primarily because of technology / implementation readiness levels. Recommend lower TRL (1-3) focus for these, with focus on heavy lift applications.

11 Integrated vehicle health management: More than just the health of the liquid systems: Solid rocket motor vehicle health management for composites, for logistics, for propellants, for joints and seals, for pyrotechnics… Electric TVC Electric TVC lends itself to a propulsion and power control type system, and enables launch processing efficiencies / synergies ATK Assessment of Ground Processing and Vehicle Technologies

12 Domestic Sourcing of SRM Materials: These technologies should include manufacturability considerations for the entire motor: Advanced robotics suitable for low volume, high precision, propellant and ordnance operations Certified tooling or processes that enable certification of key characteristics without redundant inspections Automated factory models (anthropomorphic /ergonomic) that include QD and logistics considerations specific to the SRM industry ATK Assessment of Ground Processing and Vehicle Technologies

13 Conclusion Application of both liquid and solid propulsion elements are necessary to optimize the overall system – Reliability – Performance – Cost The majority of the technologies identified can benefit both commercial vehicles or heavy lift vehicles – Most benefit both solids and liquids

14 Questions? ATK Assessment of Ground Processing and Vehicle Technologies