A Retrospective of 25 Years Teaching Online: Secrets, the Future and Advice Dr. Diane Finley, Prince George’s Community College Annual Conference on Teaching,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eli Collins-Brown, Ed.D. Illinois State University July 12, 2006 Aspects of Online Courses That Are More Effective and Successful than Traditional, Face-to-Face.
Advertisements

Supporting Team-Based Learning Dr. Kathryn R. Ross, Indiana University Kokomo Team-Based Learning Conference 2007, Vancouver, Canada Copyright 2007 Kathryn.
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
Using the Seven Principles as a Framework for the Evaluation of Student Ratings and Teaching Karl Wirth and Adrienne Christiansen Serie Center for Scholarship.
What are your students learning? Classroom Assessment Strategies Center for Teaching & Learning Oregon State University
+ Taking the MSW Degree Online Pedagogy, Challenges, and Lessons Learned Sarah Bradley, MSSW, LCSW Associate Professor of Practice MSW Program Director.
Sharing the Secret Recipe: Deconstructing Key Performance Indicators for Quality Distance Social Work Education Social Work Distance Education Conference.
Kontos1 Principles of Quality Instruction in Web Classes George Kontos, Ed.D. Assistant Professor
Online Options for Enhancing Teaching Dr. Diane Finley Prince George’s Community College Dr. Kenneth Gray College of DuPage American Psychological Society.
NorthWest Teaching of Psychology Conference Des Moines WA November 23,2009.
Visioning and Fostering Quality Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in Ontario Council of Ontario Educational Developers: Judy Britnell (Ryerson)
No Longer the Wave of the Future. No Longer the Wave of the Future How do you know if you’ve caught the wave?
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
What Every SLMS Should Know about Collaborating with Other Literacy Professionals Prepared by the SLMS Role in Reading Task Force July 2009 July 2009.
1 Abu Dhabi Women’s College Certified Designer Course.
B LENDED L EARNING CID Lunch Presented by Robin Popow.
Peer Review of Classroom Teaching Anne E. Belcher, PhD, RN, AOCN, ANEF, FAAN Director, Office for Teaching Excellence Johns Hopkins University School of.
E_learning.
Everglades College Student Orientation by: EC Department of Professional Development.
Distance Education Distance Learning. Objectives Definition of Distance Education Overview of Adult Education History of Distance Education Distance Education.
If you must print – please switch to Outline View to conserve paper.
SECTION ONE: PEDAGOGICAL ISSUES Let us start our discussion here by posing two related questions as follows. First, does the literature tell us that a.
NERCOMP 2002, College for Lifelong Learning What Students, Faculty and the College are Learning about Teaching and Learning Online Managing the 24x7 Classroom.
Prince George’s Community College Online Express Training Faculty to Teach Online Mary Wells Margo Chaires Andrew Habermacher.
Designing and Delivering A More Effective Online Course
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
What Works: High Impact Programs for Student Success… A Classroom Perspective Becki Williams Chemistry Professor.
Best Practices and Resources for Online Teaching Jym Brittain, Director of the Center for Teaching and Learning - NSU.
Conceptual Framework for the College of Education Created by: Dr. Joe P. Brasher.
PEDAGOGY FOR LEARNER ENGAGEMENT. STUDENT-STAFF INTERACTION How do you directly engage with each of your students, formally and informally to: foster a.
TENN TLC addresses retention through student engagement UT SIFE students 13 May 2010.
The Integration and Effectiveness of Information and Communication Technologies in Canadian Postsecondary Education Dr. Carl Cuneo, Director, EvNet, Network.
Innovative Projects for Collaborating with Faculty Friday, September 26, 2014 Presented by: Todd Conaway, Instructional Designer Teaching & eLearning Support.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
Storyboard for Distance Education
Models of Online Learning – Identifying Components Week 3 Introduction to Web-Based Mentoring and Distance Education.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Course Management System Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools.
A Beginner’s Guide to (Cyber) Online Teaching: Pleasures and Pitfalls American Psychological Association Annual Meeting Toronto Canada August 6-10, 2003.
INTERACTION, ENGAGEMENT AND MOTIVATION. WELCOME o Facilitator name Position at university Contact info.
Building Best Practices In Online Courses Summer Institute 2003.
Teaching in a Web-Based Distance Learning Environment: An Evaluation Summary Based on Four Courses Charles Graham, Joni M. Craner, Byung-ro Lim, & Kursat.
Standards of Good Practice For Teaching Online Christina Sax University of Maryland University College.
Fundamental principles in training experienced face to face (f2f) lecturers to moderate online courses Marga Navarrete Imperial College London
1 Using Feedback as a Teaching Tool in the Online Classroom.
1 Techniques for Online Retention Dr. Andrea Henne, Dean, Online and Distributed Learning.
State University of New York An Emerging Model for Online Learning MERLOT International Conference – August A Systemic Approach to Online Learning.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Blueprint for Effective Conversion to Distance Education by Tamara Dawson e-Learning Instructional Designer Southern Nazarene University.
E-Learning The Future is Anytime, Anyplace, and Fun!!
Accentuating Time in Student- Professor Interactions: Time, Value and Course Quality Dr. Ann V. Doty.
Virtual Learning Communities (VLC) Engaging Students in Blended & Online Environments.
Orientation for Instructors Teaching Online Marriage between pedagogy and technology Karen Harker, January 2007.
An Evaluation of Professional Development for One-to-One Instruction at Pantego Christian Academy Steven R. Newby Kristi Fairbanks Marilyn Dardenne.
Instructor: Ming-puu Chen Presenter : Ching-ting Lin 2007/1/9CSL ICE.NTNU1 Considerations for Developing Evaluations of Online Courses Achtemeier,
Bianca Lochner 8841 Walden University. Distance Education Distance education represents an important alternative to address current challenges and to.
Keep Them Talking:Designing Effective Discussions Ferlin McGaskey, Ph.D., Postdoctoral Fellow, UT-Austin Center for Teaching and Learning
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
FOSTERING COMMUNITY OF RELATIONSHIPS VIA ONLINE DISCUSSION Kellie Smith, RN, MSN Thomas Jefferson University/ Jefferson School of Nursing Philadelphia,
Jamie DeWitt Sarah Legaspi Karen Amesse February 2016 IEM Growing Together Conference Teaching a Synchronous Online Course for Esi: Tips & Tricks.
Best Practices in F2F Teaching Renee F. Aitken, Ph.D.
Online Quality Course Design vs. Quality Teaching:
E-Learning & Virtual Classroom
Good Teaching Practices
Adjunct, newbies, and non-tenure track faculty – oh my!
Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs)
TENN TLC addresses retention
Katherine M. Hitchcock, Ph.D. Michelle Franz
Presentation transcript:

A Retrospective of 25 Years Teaching Online: Secrets, the Future and Advice Dr. Diane Finley, Prince George’s Community College Annual Conference on Teaching, Society for the Teaching of Psychology Atlanta GA October 16-17, 2015

QUICK OVERVIEW OF ONLINE EDUCATION

“Online education is possibly the biggest event in American intellectual life in the past 40 years. What’s happened is that a critical mass of intellectual capital in the country has moved outside the academy.” Dr. Gerald Heeger ( Baltimore Sun, 8/17/2003; education-higher-education-maryland-colleges/3) education-higher-education-maryland-colleges/3

History of Distance Education 1728 – first course advertised 1833 – Swedish distance education course 1840 – Isaac Pittman in England gives shorthand at a distance 1874 – Illinois Wesleyan University – degrees at a distance 1883 – Correspondence University of Ithaca NY founded Chautauqua Movement founded 1892 – University of Wisconsin – appears in catalog 1896 – William Rainey Harper found University of Chicago; university level correspondence courses 1920 – educational radio 1962 – Telstar launched; advent of telecourses

History of Online 1960s – computer based instruction sets the way for online learning 1981 – Open University (England) uses rudimentary whiteboard system; Bitnet founded 1984/85 – various institutions network and deliver courses 1990/91 – world wide web protocol developed 1995/96 – first LMS developed Distance Education Demonstration Project authorized 2006 – federal financial aid rules changed

Factoids In 2012, 21 million students took online courses (Title IV schools) Growth rate was 20% More common in 2-year and for-profit schools Asynchronous online delivery is most common Older students and those with mobility issues more likely to enroll online In , 1.3 million K-12 students took online courses

MY JOURNEY & “SECRETS”

My Journey as an Onliner Accidental – Baseball Early Training – Barebones Departmental Needs Workshops, workshops, workshops Quality Matters

“Secrets” About Online Technology does not make everything easier. Teaching online requires instructors to be tech savvy Teaching online requires more than posting lectures Online class dynamics can be very different from F2F – Participation – Relationship – Informality Online does allow more mobility and flexibility Online challenges my creativity

Not-So Secrets about Online Greater time is required for teaching Course creation is very time-intensive Technology is always changing Students have many misconceptions about online learning

Most Important Lessons I Have Learned Based on the Chickering and Gamson Principles Chickering, A. W. & Gamson, Z.F. (March, 1987) Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, pp. 3-7.

Principle One Student-Faculty Contact Contact is the most important factor in student motivation and involvement in the discipline and school Online courses promote interaction through easier access, discussions, space for interaction to occur, attenuation of perceived barriers As an instructor, you MUST be present in the discussions and questions conferences. Quick response is critical.

Principle Two Encourages Cooperation Learning is enhanced when there is a team effort and it is collaborative. Online courses facilitate student to student contact through a ready space for communication and the reduction of time and space obstacles. Tools such as Google Hangout facilitate that cooperation. The instructor must require interaction

Principle Three Active Learning Active learning promotes thinking skills and touches on multiple learning styles. Online courses are tailored for active learning The instructor must create activities that require interaction with content, instructor and other students.

Principle Four Immediate Feedback Prompt feedback is essential. The online environment enables the instructor to give almost immediate feedback. There is no need to wait for the next class. Most CMS (course management systems) have gradebooks that enable the student to see grades without any Buckley worries.

Principle Five Time on Task Emphasis on time-on-task is critical Online courses can make time on task more efficient. Online courses makes it easier for the instructor to track student time on task and to remediate when necessary. Online courses record all participation so students (and instructors) can see what they are doing.

Principle Six High Expectations Good practice communicates high expectations Online courses can more easily post expectations in terms of objectives, etc. Online courses make it easier for an instructor to highlight good work, thus giving other students examples of work that meets expectations. The same high expectations held for face-to-face students must be maintained for online students.

Principle Seven Respect Diverse Strengths Good practice respects diverse talents and ways of learning Different students have different learning preferences and talents. The online environment allows the instructor to tap into all of these. While online is primarily a text based format, it is very easy to include media and out of class experiential assignment.

FUTURE PROMISES OF THE ONLINE CLASSROOM

Future Directions Accessibility Alternate Formats and Timing New Paradigm for teaching

Current Research Findings Learning is affected by the quality of design AND good implementation Need for learner focused design student feelings and reactions are important Learning communities can help isolation Need for continuous training of students and faculty Need for better tech support

Future Research Questions Need for more randomized, controlled studied Need larger samples Need to examine total programs not just individual courses Need longitudinal data

Other Issues To Consider Faculty selection & training Time demands - compensation Equipment needs – both faculty and student Technology literacy and competency requirements (faculty and students) Student expectations & student support servives Enrollment limits Intellectual property rights

Advice for New (and Experienced) Onliners Chickering & Gamson Seven Principles Administrator Misconceptions Flexibility – to a degree! Tolerance for Unexpected Technology literacy Motives and beliefs (misconceptions) about online

Online Resources MERLOT – a free and open resourcehttp:// Quality Matters – course design issues Online Learning Consortium (formerly Sloan Consortium) Tips from the U. Michigan Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology

References and Resources Duffy, T. M., & Kirley, J. R. (Eds.). (2004). Learner-centered theory and practice in distance education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Ko, S & Rossen. S (2004). Teaching online: A practical guide. College teaching series. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Major, C.H. (2015). Teaching online: A guide to theory, research, and practice. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. McKeachie, W.J. & Hofer, B. (2001). McKeachie’s Teaching Tips: Strategies, Research and Theory for College and University Teachers, 11 th ed.. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath & Co. U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies. Retrieved from

References cont. Baran, E. & Correia, A. (Sept/Oct. 2014). A professional development framework for online teaching. Tech Trends. 58(5), pp Clay, R.A. (June, 2012). APA does not accredit fully online programs in professional psychology. Here’s why. Monitor on Psychology, Major, C. H. (2015). Teaching online: A guide to theory, research, and practice. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Shelton, K, & Saltsman, G. (October, 2004). Tips and tricks for teaching online: How to teach like a pro. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. Retrieved 8/17/ Tallent-Rounds, M.K., Thomas, J.A., Lan,W.Y., Cooper, S.,Ahern, T.C., Shaw, S.M., & Liu, X. (2006). Teaching courses online: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), doi: /

Contact Information Dr. Diane Finley Department of Psychology Prince George’s Community College 301 Largo Road Largo MD