HST Region High Speed Trains and Regional Development ”HST Region” Updated PP-Presentation October/December2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Better Accessible Transport To Encourage Robust Intermodal Enterprise Terry Waugh Action Renewables.
Advertisements

Belarus Denmark Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Norway Poland Russia Sweden Transnationality and locally implemented pilot actions in the BSR.
The EU Adaptation Strategy
Transport Study to support an impact assessment of the Urban Mobility Package on SUMPs CoR Meeting June 13 DG MOVE.
1 CIE Final Conference, 19 June 2014, Delft EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND CIE Final Conference, 19 June 2014, Delft EU Interregional Cooperation State.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
1 An EU Strategy for the Danube Region : Transport Working Group meeting Transport priorities Brussels, 16 September 2010 Johann Sollgruber, DG REGIO,
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME SUCCESS FACTORS FOR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT: focus on activities and partnership JTS CENTRAL EUROPE PROGRAMME.
INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery. INTERREG IIIB North Sea Northern Periphery Vision The Northern Maritime Corridor - a means of efficient, safe.
INTERREG IVA 2 Mers Seas Zeeën Crossborder Cooperation Programme Part-financed by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) Green: Going.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Event – date, place About INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG IVC Joint Technical Secretariat Iruma Kravale, The.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND GreenInfraNet/Smart Europe final conference, 4 November 2014, Almere EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and.
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
South Great Plain Regional Development Agency /SGPRDA/ Mr. Antal Ördögh Project manager Szeged, 16th of April 2007.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
Part-financed by the European Union Priority 2 of the BSR Programme External and internal accessibility of the BSR Ryszard Toczek, City of Gdynia.
Preparation of Bulgaria for future use of EU Structural Instruments Lyubomir Datzov Deputy Minister of Finance.
CEI Consultation on the European Technology Platform Food for Life: Optimising regional benefit Dr Kitti Németh VUP Food Research Institute, Bratislava,
16 September 2009, Ryn EUROREGION BALTIC – NEW CHALLENGES.
Part-financed by the European Union The new Baltic Sea Region Programme Susanne Scherrer, Director of the Joint Secretariat Rostock/Riga.
INTERREG IVC 1 EUROPEAN INTERREGIONAL COOPERATION 2007/13 Interreg IVC General overview 21 March 2007.
Innovation in the Rural Development Networks Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development Matthias Langemeyer & Iman Boot.
1 Europe and CIS Jacek Cukrowski AfT Team Leader, UNDP, Europe and the CIS Bratislava Regional Centre AID FOR TRADE FOR CENTRAL ASIA, SOUTH CAUCASUS AND.
The Draft Operational Programme Objective 3 Transnational territorial cooperation North West Europe IIIB NWE Joint Technical Secretariat, Lille,
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
European Union | European Regional Development Fund From INTERREG IVC to Interreg Europe Info day in Tullamore Akos Szabo| Project Officer Interreg Europe.
How to Use the Structural Funds ? 1.Financing sustainable energy projects. 2.Practical support – RUSE operation. Jana Cicmanova Energie-Cités.
EU Transport Policy Regional Meeting on Sustainable Transport Policies in South Eastern Europe Budapest, June Wioletta Szymanska Project Manager.
European Commission Environmental cooperation in the Mediterranean June 2009.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 Interregional Cooperation and the Lisbon and Gothenburg Agendas “GROW” Brussels, 18 October 2007 Territorial Co-operation.
NORTH SEA INTERREG PROGRAMME – Jon Jordan UK Contact Point for the North Sea INTERREG Programme europeanpolicysolutions.
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA INSTITUTE OF MACROECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT July 2007 Where is Lisbon? (and how far is it from Ljubljana)
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Event – date, place About INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG EUROPE INTERREG IVC Joint Technical Secretariat.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
The Perspectives and Challenges of Transnational Cooperation in the next European Funding Period Fontwell Park, 17 October 2006 Julia ERIPRET,
The new EU cohesion policy ( ) EASPD Project Development Workshop May 10th – Sofia (BG) Jelle Reynaert – Policy Officer.
Objectives, Priorities and Concepts. OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME Operational Programme outlines the framework, strategy and management of the programme for.
EU funding Available EU Structural Funds. Objective 2 / Mål 2 Interreg 4A NORD Kolarctic ENPI CBC Northern Periphery Programme Baltic Sea programme North.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
Strategic project Call and themes for the Seventh Call How to Apply Seminar 16 th February 2011 – Copenhagen Christopher Parker.
PILOT PROJECTS ON FUTURE OUTCOME/RESULT INDICATORS The Interreg IVB North Sea Region Programme Case Carsten Westerholt Project Devlopment and Communications.
FP7 /1 EUROPEAN COMMISSION - Research DG – September 2006 Building a Europe of Knowledge Towards the Seventh Framework Programme
The Seventh Framework Programme for Research and Technological Development (FP7) supporting innovation Epp Tohver-Bulavs 07. November 2007, Tallinn.
Planning for People – an overview of the SUMP concept and its benefits UBC Joint Commission meeting in the City of Tallinn10-12 April 2013 Maija Rusanen.
PROGRESS AND MAIN ACHIEVEMENTS IN RELATION TO MACRO-REGIONAL STRATEGIES: EU strategy for the Baltic Sea region 5 December 2012 Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Akos Szabo Joint Technical Secretariat 26 June 2014, Brussels.
HST Region High Speed Trains and Regional Development ”HST Region” Updated PP-Presentation October 08/January 09.
Filippo Compagni – European Policy and External Funding Manager European and External Funding Unit Powys County Council I-SPEED Information Society Policies.
Political Issues and Social Policy in the E.U. Professor John Wilton Lecture 10 Regions and the E.U. policy process.
1 Second call for proposals – National Information Day EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Benoît Dalbert, Project Officer, Joint Technical Secretariat.
Transport Integration of cross-border transport infrastructure TEN-T strategy on large cross- border cooperation projects Gudrun Schulze, Team leader,
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Interregional Cooperation State of play and future perspectives SHARP final conference – 10 October 2012 Katja Ecke|
Iruma Kravale Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development Head of Development Instruments Department 28 November 2013, Riga.
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
EU context (networks & initiatives) and expectations EU context (networks & initiatives) and expectations Michel Viaud and/or Ingrid Weiss EPIA, Brussels,
Why does ERA Need to Flourish European Research Area Policy Fabienne Gautier, DG RTD, Unit ERA Policy and Reform 10 March 2016.
0 Project Conference – Friday 8 February DEVELOPING THE NATIONAL CAPABILITY FOR INTEGRATED BORDER MANAGEMENT (IBM) IN LEBANON Project Funded by the European.
European Union Public Policy Professor John Wilton Lecture 11 Regions and the E.U. public policy process.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND CLUE final conference, 24 September 2014, Turin EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Johanna.
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14.
Please note this information is subject to change.
Regional Research-driven clusters as a tool for strenghthening regional economic development: the FP7 Regions of Knowledge Programme and its synergies.
Transport cooperation for an interconnected Africa
South-East European Space
PRIORITIES in the area of employment and social policy during the Bulgarian Presidency of the Council of the European Union 1 January – 30.
The role of Territorial Cooperation in IWT and integrated planning
Recent developments in the EU transport policy
Action Plan on Urban Mobility
Presentation transcript:

HST Region High Speed Trains and Regional Development ”HST Region” Updated PP-Presentation October/December2008

HST Region Background In the light of the climate change, continuous traffic growth and global competitiveness, one of the biggest challenges the European Union faces is to provide the citizens with sustainable and competitive alternative to road and air traffic, both in central and peripheral areas of Europe.

HST Region EU policy context Gothenburg Agenda / Renewed Sustainable development strategy Energy & Climate Change package 2006 mid-term review of EU White Paper on transport 2nd and 3rd rail packages EC Communication on ”Greening of transport”

HST Region High Speed Train – A challenge for the regions The regions the HST is passing through may experience a “tunnel” effect, i.e. not benefiting from the services of the HST What are the necessary actions the regional and local entities have to take in order to secure the full benefit of HST investments.

HST Region Planning framework and impact analysis The planning and assessments of infrastructure may be complicated by different impact assessments (EIAs, CBAs etc) in different countries The same HST link may be calculated socio-economically favourable in one country, but not so in the other country The positive effects on regional development are not properly covered in most socio-economic analyses There is a need for harmonisation of planning framework and impact analysis methods for major infrastructure projects like HST

HST Region Vision HST as a means of connecting regions in an environmental and competitive manner, so that businesses develop and jobs are created at regional level, and at the same time contributing to reduced emission of green house gases

HST Region Objectives Overall objective: Alt 1: Promote sustainable transport by exchanging experience, sharing and transferring good practice on the development of High Speed Train (HST) networks and hubs Alt 2: Improve the effectiveness of sustainable transport policies by exchanging experience, sharing and transferring good practice on the development of High Speed Train (HST) networks and hubs

HST Region Objectives Sub-objectives:  Demonstrate the sustainability potential of HST links/network for the reduction of CO2/GHG emissions, road accidents and the expansion of labour markets  Facilitate the realisation of HST sustainability potentials by exchanging experience, sharing and transfering good practice on HST planning frameworks and impact assessment methods, and integratration of HST with secondary public transport systems To develop harmonized planning frameworks and impact assessment methods for HST links across borders

HST Region Sub-objectives cont. To test pilots /alternative concepts for HST hubs and route networks Improve the capacity of regional authorities to benefit the maximum from HST links going to or through their territory Provide recommendations for the implementation of relevant EU-, national and regional policies

HST Region Results Demonstration of HST sustainability potential on emissions, accidents and regional enlargement Improved capacity of regional stakeholders to realise sustainability potential from HST links going to or through their territory Successful transfer of good practice on how regions may benefit more/the maximum from HST links (running to or through their territorries Improvement of relevant policies for successful development of HST networks Transnationally harmonized planning frameworks and assessment methods for HST networks applicable on the European level

HST Region Component Structure (replace A – D by 1 – 4 according to the pre-defined component structure of the IVC Programme)

HST Region Component 1: Management and Coordination C 1: Management and Coordination, will be the main instrument for the Lead Partner to manage the project and coordinate the work. The various components will to some extent get input from other components as well as feeding information into other components. Envisaged results of C 1: A well running and coordinated project

HST Region Component 2: Communication and Dissemination Communication and dissemination is structured as a separate component in order to give this work a high priority with defined budget and separate responsible staff. A communication plan for the whole project period will be developed. The project will cooperate with other similar projects and programmes in order to seek synergy effects. Envisaged results of C 2: A two-way communication within the project as well as with other projects, EU bodies etc. that provides enhanced exchange of experiences and good practices.

HST Region Component 3: Exchange of Experiences and Good Practices This component will review existing HST links and existing hubs at HST stations and system for public transport C 3 will assess the applicability of concepts and solutions for the various partner regions and between regions Concrete cases will be studied to extract experiences and good practices, including operational concepts for the various cases. One important objective will be to compare planning framework and methods for impact assessments in different countries, and contribute to a harmonisation of such frameworks and methods for cross border projects. Envisaged results of C 3: Successful transfer of good practices on how regions may benefit the maximum from HST links, and contribute to harmonised planning framework and impact assessment methods

HST Region Component 4: Joint Development of New Instruments If the regions the HST goes to and goes through should fully benefit from the HST, other actions are to be implemented. A number of concerted actions related to land use planning and public transport as well as real estate development in hubs are needed. Follow-up the demonstration projects as well as extracting learning from their work and results. Make an overview of funding instruments and assist in preparing implementation plans and funding applications. Envisaged results of C 4: Workable concept plans for hubs at HST stations, related to real situations in the partner regions and Initiated concrete demonstration projects as “Fast Track Projects” for EU funding. Improved EU/national/regional policies of relevance for HST links and hubs

HST Region Possible partners Rogaland County Council, Lead Partner, Norway Vest-Agder/Aust-Agder County Councils, Norway Hordaland County Council, Norway South East England Development Agency ASEAL, Spain GEORAMA, Greece Consorcics ADEuropa, Spain Who is next?

HST Region Time Schedule Partner search at the Interreg IV conference in Lille, 27 – 29 October 2008 Preparation of Draft Project Document and Project Application, November 2008 Partner meeting, December 2008 Revision of project Document and Project Application, primo January 2009 Acceptance by partners (Partner meeting if necessary, mid January) Submission of application within 30 January 2009