Two Level Systems in Phase Qubits: Tunnel Barriers & Wiring Dielectrics Jeff Kline March 6, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Electrostatics, Circuits, and Magnetism 4/29/2008
Advertisements

Introduction to RF for Accelerators
Superconducting qubits
1 Quantum Enabling Technology Materials Research for Superconducting Quantum Computing Materials P.I. - D. P. Pappas Affiliates: Jeff Kline Fabio da Silva.
18_12afig_PChem.jpg Rotational Motion Center of Mass Translational Motion r1r1 r2r2 Motion of Two Bodies Each type of motion is best represented in its.
Superinductor with Tunable Non-Linearity M.E. Gershenson M.T. Bell, I.A. Sadovskyy, L.B. Ioffe, and A.Yu. Kitaev * Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Resonances and optical constants of dielectrics: basic light-matter interaction.
Light and Matter Tim Freegarde School of Physics & Astronomy University of Southampton Quantum electrodynamics.
Electrical Techniques MSN506 notes. Electrical characterization Electronic properties of materials are closely related to the structure of the material.
Sinai University Faculty of Engineering Science Department of Basic sciences 5/20/ From Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices, Third Edition,
Materials Science in Quantum Computing. Materials scientist view of qubit Materials –SiOx sub substrate –Superconductor (Al,Nb) –SiO x dielectric –Al0.
CHAPTER 7: Dielectrics …
From Principles of Electronic Materials and Devices, Third Edition, S.O. Kasap (© McGraw-Hill, 2005) These PowerPoint color diagrams can only be used by.
High fidelity Josephson phase qubits winning the war (battle…) on decoherence “Quantum Integrated Circuit” – scalable Fidelity b reakthrough: single-shot.
Coherent Quantum Phase Slip Oleg Astafiev NEC Smart Energy Research Laboratories, Japan and The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN), Japan.
NIST ARDA/DTO review 2006 Materials David P. Pappas Seongshik Oh Jeffrey Kline.
Transducers Devices to transform signals between different physical domains. Taxonomy –Active: input signal modulates output energy; e.g. liquid crystal.
Operating in Charge-Phase Regime, Ideal for Superconducting Qubits M. H. S. Amin D-Wave Systems Inc. THE QUANTUM COMPUTING COMPANY TM D-Wave Systems Inc.,
Entanglement and Quantum Correlations in Capacitively-coupled Junction Qubits Andrew Berkley, Huizhong Xu, Fred W. Strauch, Phil Johnson, Mark Gubrud,
Josephson Junctions, What are they?
Lecture 6 The dielectric response functions. Superposition principle.
Lecture 20-1 Alternating Current (AC) = Electric current that changes direction periodically ac generator is a device which creates an ac emf/current.
SQUID Based Quantum Bits James McNulty. What’s a SQUID? Superconducting Quantum Interference Device.
Introduction to Infrared Spectrometry Chap 16. Infrared Spectral Regions Table 16-1 Most used – 15.
r2 r1 r Motion of Two Bodies w k Rc
Coherence and decoherence in Josephson junction qubits Yasunobu Nakamura, Fumiki Yoshihara, Khalil Harrabi Antti Niskanen, JawShen Tsai NEC Fundamental.
26. Magnetism: Force & Field. 2 Topics The Magnetic Field and Force The Hall Effect Motion of Charged Particles Origin of the Magnetic Field Laws for.
Superconducting Qubits Kyle Garton Physics C191 Fall 2009.
ELECTRICITY & MAGNETISM
RFID II Inductive and Microwave Systems
Atomic Orbitals, Electron Configurations, and Atomic Spectra
Magnetism is not like electricity exactly. magnets come only in +/- or N/S pairs.
15_01fig_PChem.jpg Particle in a Box. Recall 15_01fig_PChem.jpg Particle in a Box.
Avalanche Transit Time Devices
2007 Quantum Computing (QC) & Quantum Algorithms (QA) Program Review Quantum Materials Jeffrey S. Kline, Seongshik Oh*, David P. Pappas National Institute.
Coherence in Superconducting Materials for Quantum Computing David P. Pappas Jeffrey S. Kline, Fabio da Silva, David Wisbey National Institute of Standards.
Physics 1220/1320 Electromagnetism&Thermodynamics Lecture Magnetostatics, chapter
1 Chapter 3 Electromagnetic Theory, Photons and Light September 5,8 Electromagnetic waves 3.1 Basic laws of electromagnetic theory Lights are electromagnetic.
2008 BBN Quantum Computing Kickoff Quantum Materials David P. Pappas Jeffrey S. Kline, Minhyea Lee National Institute of Standards & Technology, Electronics.
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY Basics of …….. NMR phenomenonNMR phenomenon Chemical shiftChemical shift Spin-spin splittingSpin-spin splitting.
Ch ; Lecture 26 – Quantum description of absorption.
ROTATIONAL SPECTROSCOPY
Quantum entanglement and Quantum state Tomography Zoltán Scherübl Nanophysics Seminar – Lecture BUTE.
Two Level Systems and Kondo-like traps as possible sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits Lara Faoro and Lev Ioffe Rutgers University (USA)
Noise and decoherence in the Josephson Charge Qubits Oleg Astafiev, Yuri Pashkin, Tsuyoshi Yamamoto, Yasunobu Nakamura, Jaw-Shen Tsai RIKEN Frontier Research.
DC-squid for measurements on a Josephson persistent-current qubit Applied Physics Quantum Transport Group Alexander ter Haar May 2000 Supervisors: Ir.
Introduction to Josephson Tunneling and Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling
Epitaxial superconducting refractory metals for quantum computing
Entanglement for two qubits interacting with a thermal field Mikhail Mastyugin The XXII International Workshop High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory.
Lecture 19-1 Potential Difference Across Inductor VV ++ - I internal resistance Analogous to a battery An ideal inductor has r=0 All dissipative effects.
Phonons Packets of sound found present in the lattice as it vibrates … but the lattice vibration cannot be heard. Unlike static lattice model , which.
Physical Chemistry III (728342) The Schrödinger Equation
Physics Lecture 11 3/2/ Andrew Brandt Monday March 2, 2009 Dr. Andrew Brandt 1.Quantum Mechanics 2.Schrodinger’s Equation 3.Wave Function.
MODULE 3 MORE ABOUT MOTION We have seen that by applying our postulates to the particle in an infinite well (length L) and using the recipe for construction.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Chapters 17 through 23 Midterm Review. Midterm Exam ~ 1 hr, in class 15 questions 6 calculation questions One from each chapter with Ch. 17 and 18 combine.
MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY
Physics 213 General Physics Lecture Last Meeting: Self Inductance, RL Circuits, Energy Stored Today: Finish RL Circuits and Energy Stored. Electric.
Per Delsing Chalmers University of Technology Quantum Device Physics Interaction between artificial atoms and microwaves Experiments: IoChun Hoi, Chris.
Unbound States A review on calculations for the potential step.
Millimeter Wave IC Design
Superconducting Qubits
BCS THEORY BCS theory is the first microscopic theory of superconductivity since its discovery in It explains, The interaction of phonons and electrons.
Capacitance and Dielectrics
Atomic BEC in microtraps: Localisation and guiding
Microwaves for Qubits on Helium
AC circuits Physics /23/2018 Lecture XIX.
Coupled atom-cavity system
Chapter 3 Electromagnetic Theory, Photons and Light
Chapter 25 Capacitance-II
Presentation transcript:

Two Level Systems in Phase Qubits: Tunnel Barriers & Wiring Dielectrics Jeff Kline March 6, 2008

Josephson Junctions  : complex pair wavefunction  : phase of Cooper pairs  =  1 -  2 is the phase difference across the junction Josephson Inductance The phase  changes according to the potential U The motion of  has an exact correspondence with the motion of a particle moving in the potential U It is easier to visualize the particle’s motion, so we speak in terms of the fictitious “particle” in the washboard potential “Flux quantum” Tilted Washboard Potential Josephson Relations S1S1 S2S2 I

Phase Qubits Nonlinearity Unlike other qubits, the phase qubit must be current-biased with I bias ~I o and  ~  /2 This is necessary to obtain a large nonlinearity in the Josephson inductance This nonlinearity is what produces the unequal energy level spacing required for unique level addressability I bias JJ A phase qubit is simply a current biased JJ in parallel with its “self capacitance” For I bias ~I o &  ~  /2 It is a cubic potential (i.e.,  3 ), so QM energy levels have unequal spacing Avg. Slope of U(  ) is  –I/Io For I<I o, U(  ) has relative minima, and particle can be trapped When particle is trapped, JJ is in zero-voltage state When particle escapes from well, JJ makes transition to non-zero voltage state (a.k.a. running state) CJCJ “self-capacitance” Trapped stateRunning state QM Energy levels

I bias ~ I o U(  ) |0> |1> ħ  10 Qubit Spectroscopy-Theory I bias JJ

Qubit Spectroscopy-Theory I bias ’ > I bias U(  ) |0> |1> |0’> |1’> ħ  10 ’ ħ  10  10 (GHz) I bias (a.u.) I bias JJ

Qubit Spectroscopy-Experiment “Splittings”

Spurious Two Level Systems Displacement Transverse Bond direction Rotational SiO 2 U ħħ 1 2 11  2 2  d (displacement) Isolated Harmonic Potentials ħħ

U EoEo E1E1 tunneling Spurious Two Level Systems Displacement Transverse Bond direction Rotational SiO 2 00 11 d Dipole moment Overlapped Harmonic Potentials 

Spurious TLS coupled to qubit S S I Microwave + TLS || TLS  TLS II –Can align with electric field –Lowers energy state TLS  –Cannot align –No preferred orientation TLS fluctuates with microwave field –Resonant effect, only when TLS energy matches microwave energy –Dissipates microwave power Resonant interaction between TLS and qubit –Only occurs when TLS and qubit energies match S S I ~ Microwave - TLS || TLS  V ac ~

Raw data-multiple valued “Splittings”

Smoothed data-single valued Flux bias (mV) Frequency (GHz)

Sizes of splittings

Integrated splittings N/GHz (.01 GHz < S < S’) Splitting size S’ (GHz) Integrate splittings and display on semi- log graph Normalize to 1 GHz bandwidth Density of splittings S: Integrate w.r.t S: A: junction area  : materials constant related to defect density Slope =  Maximum splitting size S max N tot

Integrated splittings-material comparisons epi-Al 2 O 3 epi-MgO amorph-AlO x  = 20  = 60

Min-SiO 2 Re/MgO/Al Qubit Splitting density –Similar to AlO x T 1 = 80 ns –Worse than Al 2 O 3 & AlO x –Phonon loss? P1 (%) t (ns) P1 (%) T 1 = 80 ns t (ns) Flux bias (mV) Freq (GHz) Spectroscopy Rabi Osc.

Spurious TLS in wiring dielectrics S S I Microwave + TLS || TLS  TLS II –Can align with electric field –Lowers energy state TLS  –Cannot align –No preferred orientation TLS fluctuates with microwave field –Resonant effect, only when TLS energy matches microwave energy –Dissipates microwave power Resonant interaction between TLS and qubit –Only occurs when TLS and qubit energies match ~ V ac Insulator thickness Tunnel barrierWiring Dielectric 2 nm200nm Dielectric loss decreases at high T or high power Schickfus 1977

Future Directions Re/Al 2 O 3 /Al qubit with Re wiring –Avoid trap states in native oxide of Al wiring Try atomic oxygen for Al 2 O 3 barrier growth –Fix pinhole problem? Try annealing finished chip in hydrogen –Passivate surface states? Try rf-sputt MgO and AlO x t-barrier –Could be pinhole free Try Nb/Al 2 O 3 /Al JJ –University of Illinois failed, but could be tool-specific Try ALD of dielectrics –Conformal coverage  can decrease thickness!