Designing Opportunities for Learning Chapter 2 By Sheri Higgs.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Problem- Based Learning in STEM Disciplines Saturday, November 10, 2007 JHU/MSU STEM Initiative.
Advertisements

Performance Assessment
Project-Based vs. Text-Based
PORTFOLIO.
Queen Anne’s County: New Teacher Portfolio Prepared by: Hired: August, 2006.
Dr. Allen Webb Western Michigan University  Raise the academic level for all students.  Prepare students for the intellectual challenges of college.
Integrating Educational Technology into Teaching
Integrating the Skill Theme Approach across the Curriculum
Project-Based Learning
Intervention Resource Guide. Math Intervention Courses Address foundational math skills – Whole numbers – Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication, Division.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
FTCE 3.3 Identify and Apply Motivational Theories and Techniques That Enhance Student Learning Learning – Relatively permanent improvement in performance.
Lesson Design: An Overview of Key Tools for Flexible Math Instruction Think about Ms. Christiansen—the teacher in the video. What helps a teacher plan.
INTEGRATED LEARNING: STAGE 4 (SECONDARY COGS) Principles and process.
Meaningful Social Studies & Meaningful Learning
Lynette Molstad Gorder, Ed.D. Dakota State University Madison, SD.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Copyrightstefanakis2003, harvard university EFFECTIVE TEACHING & LEARNING : LATEST RESEARCH A Presentation for Program on Improving Quality in Educational.
By Weizmar Lozada. Content-based Instruction Use of content from other disciplines in language teaching. Build on students’ previous knowledge. Students.
Foundations in Education for the 21 st Century Nancy Swan-Cendejas Educational Technology University of Northern Colorado.
Communicating Ocean Sciences to Informal Audiences (COSIA) Session 3 Teaching & Learning.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
Technology in High Schools Kenyon Walker & Fawzia Rashid.
Project Based Learning
Standards-Based Science Instruction. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
The Areas of Interaction are…
1. Principles Equity Curriculum Teaching 3 Assessment Technology Principles The principles describe particular features of high-quality mathematics programs.
Authentic Learning and Assessment Erin Gibbons Five Standards of Authentic Instruction  Higher-Order Thinking  Depth of Knowledge  Connectedness to.
ationmenu/nets/forteachers/2008s tandards/nets_for_teachers_2008.h tm Click on the above circles to see each standard.
A. Erzberger, April, 2003 Inquiry & Scientific Research.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Dr. Ronald J. Anderson, Texas A&M International University 1 Chapter 2 Designing Opportunities for Learning Teaching with Technology: Designing Opportunities.
Physical Education Standards Toolkit (4 hours) OCISS Instructional Services Branch.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
Education That Is Multicultural
Crysten Caviness Curriculum Management Specialist Birdville ISD.
How Languages are Learned and Acquired
Constructivism A learning theory for today’s classroom.
Christine Yang March 17, As a teacher it is critical for me to demonstrate mastery of technology teacher standards. ISTE-NETS Teacher Standards.
Put Your Classroom On A 21 st Century DI-IT Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated Classroom Environments Create Engaging Technology Rich Differentiated.
Welcome Alabama Course of Study Technology Education Workshop.
Problem-Solving Approach of Allied Health Learning Community.
April 25 th Classrooms for the Future Facts 08’  358 High Schools in PA  12,100 Teachers  83,000 Laptops  101 Million Statewide Spent  3.75.
Introduction to STEM Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math.
Hannah Love LSIS 5645 Core Assessment IV. Why is information literacy necessary?  To fulfill the goals of education by preparing students for The workplace.
Standards-Based Science Assessment. Ohio’s Science Cognitive Demands Science is more than a body of knowledge. It must not be misperceived as lists of.
Module 1: Developing 21 st Century Skills Module 2: Learning Computer Basics and the Internet Module 3: Fostering Critical Thinking and Collaboration Module.
How Students Learn College Teaching Institute Presenter: Monica McCrory The Graduate School.
Relationships in the 21 st Century Parent Teachers Students Association (PTSA) Goals, Membership, Participation.
Chapter 8 Putting It All Together DEVELOPING A TEACHING PHILOSOPHY © 2015 Etta R. Hollins.
Programs of the Intel® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel. Copyright © 2007, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel,
Christchurch New Zealand October 2009 Integrating new technologies to empower learning and transform leadership.
Teaching Children About Food Safety Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators.
Planning for Instruction and Assessments. Matching Levels Ensure that your level of teaching matches your students’ levels of knowledge and thinking.
Casimir Middle School TUSD Transition to the Common Core.
Susannah Moran Karen Diaz. Assessment  Authentic Tasks: –Do you think the United States should sign the Kyoto Protocol? Write a memo to the president.
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
Chapter 8: Performance-Based Strategies
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
Lesson 3: The Roles of Technology
Inquiry-based learning and the discipline-based inquiry
Teaching and Learning with Technology
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 6
What to Look for Mathematics Grade 1
Teaching All Children: Planning and Assessment
Building an Educational Philosophy in a Changing World
CONSTRUCTIVISM Submitted To: Ma’am Misbah Yasmeen BPGCW (Air University)
Presented by: Jenni DelVecchio, Renee Mathis, and Kevin Powell
Presentation transcript:

Designing Opportunities for Learning Chapter 2 By Sheri Higgs

“We’ve Always Done It This Way”

Examples of the Efficiency Model Programmed instruction – (Skinner, 1958) Instructional objectives – (Mager, 1962) Mastery Learning - (Bloom, Madaus, & Hastings, 1981) Gagne’s Conditions of Learning (1965) ADDIE - (Fardouly, 1998)

Top 10 Attributes of the Efficiency Model 1.Scientific, measurable content. 2.Designed to teach large numbers quickly. 3.Standardized curriculum. 4.Test, teach, test, reteach, test 5.Reinforces desired behaviors.

Top 10 Attributes of the Efficiency Model 6.Memorization and fact based. 7.Uses Blooms Taxonomy. 8.Teacher centered. 9.Lead to state standards movement. 10.Textbook is main technology.

Top 10 Challenges to the Efficiency Model 1.Does not encourage extending the curriculum. 2.Discourages group work. 3.Not student centered. 4.Does not allow deviation from standardized curriculum in some schools. 5.Does not prepare students for today's world.

Top 10 Challenges to the Efficiency Model 6.Does not encourage student use of technology for individual expression. 7.Does not use real world problem solving skills. 8.Does not use social learning 9.Does not use multiple intelligences. 10.Education for education sake and not for living.

Reflection Time Click the “check” for yes and the “X” for no Do YOU enjoy being “fed” instruction? Do YOU learn best with the Efficiency Model? Do you think your students learn best this way? Do YOU teach this way?

A New Way of Teaching

Constructivist Learning 1.Knowledge depends on past constructions. 2.Constructions come about through systems of assimilation and accommodation. 3.Learning is an organic process of invention, rather than a mechanical process of accumulation. 4.Meaningful learning occurs through reflection and resolution of cognitive conflict, negating earlier, incomplete levels of understanding

Attributes of Constructivist Learning 1.Provide multiple representations of reality; 2.Represent the natural complexity of the real world; 3.Focus on knowledge construction, not reproduction; 4.Present authentic tasks;

Attributes of Constructivist Learning 5.Provide real-world, case-based learning environments, rather than predetermined instructional sequences; 6.Foster reflective practice; 7.Enable context- and content-dependent knowledge construction; and 8.Support collaborative construction of knowledge through social negotiation.

Efficiency Learning and Constructivist Learning Efficiency LearningConstructivist Learning Teachers present; students listen. Teachers facilitate; students do, present, think, construct. Working together is cheating. Working together facilitates learning and problem solving. Subjects are presented separately. Subjects are integrated into a learning whole. Learning is fact- centered. Learning is problem- centered.

Efficiency Learning and Constructivist Learning Efficiency LearningConstructivist Learning The teacher is the source of all knowledge. There are many rich resources for learning. Print is the primary source of information. Concepts are explored using a variety of communication tools.

Efficiency Learning and Constructivist Learning Efficiency LearningConstructivist Learning Assessment is based on how much is memorized and can be given back to the teacher. Assessment is based on each student’s developing abilities to solve problems, communicate ideas, present information, and learn how to learn. Schools are isolated and separate from the rest of the community. Technology connects the world to the classroom and the classroom to the world.

Six Guiding Questions 1.What foundations of learning do today’s students most need to know? 2.What activities should designers choose to ensure that students become actively engaged in learning through construction? 3.What contents, ideas, and/or concepts afford a context for student learning?

Six Guiding Questions 4.What tools might a designer choose to best support and enhance student learning? 5.What system of assessment might a designer construct to appropriately assess student learning? 6.How might learning environments be constructed to complement the overall learning design?