Early Molecular and Cytogenic Response Is Predictive for Long-Term Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Hanfstein B.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dr N M Butt Consultant Haematologist
Advertisements

The National CML Society 2012 CML UPDATE “What’s New? What’s Coming?” Luke Akard MD Co-Director Indiana Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program.
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Treatment Success and Milestones
Biomarker Analyses in CLEOPATRA: A Phase III, Placebo-Controlled Study of Pertuzumab in HER2- Positive, First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Baselga.
Long Term Follow-Up After Imatinib Cessation for Patients in Deep Molecular Response: The Update Results of the STIM1 Study1 Preliminary Report of the.
Randomized Phase II Trial of Erlotinib (E) Alone or in Combination with Carboplatin/Paclitaxel (CP) in Never or Light Former Smokers with Advanced Lung.
Final Study Results of the Phase III Dasatinib versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Trial (DASISION, CA )1.
Kovacs G et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 23.
Monitoring CML Treatment: Addressing the Issues for the Community Hematologist/Oncologist Hagop M. Kantarjian, MD Chairman; Professor, Department of Leukemia.
1 Rea D et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 811.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Interest in Topics Related to the Treatment of Patients with CML (Percent Responding 9 or 10)
Comparison of Nilotinib and Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): ENESTnd Beyond One Year Larson.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
CML SPIRIT 3 Steve O’Brien Northern Institute for Cancer Research Newcastle University Medical School Newcastle, March 2013.
Treatment of CML Transplant or Imatinib? Mark B Juckett MD Section of Hematology/BMT University of Wisconsin.
Ponatinib as Initial Therapy for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 1483.
Discontinuation of Imatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Maintained Complete Molecular Response: Updated Results of the STIM 1 Discontinuation.
CML in China Qian Jiang, MD Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology
ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and the Impact.
Dose Interruption/Reduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the First 3 Months of Treatment of CML Is Associated with Inferior Early Molecular Responses.
David Marin, Imperial College London Early molecular prediction of response to TKI.
High Cereblon Protein Expression Correlates with Improved Response and Survival in Myeloma Patients Treated with Lenalidomide 1 Cereblon Expression Predicts.
Current use of imatinib in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia Michael O’Dwyer Haematologica March 2003.
ENESTnd 24-Month Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase.
An Ongoing Phase 3 Study of Bosutinib (SKI-606) versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Gambacorti-Passerini.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
Complete Hematological Molecular and Histological Remissions without Cytoreductive Treatment Lasting After Pegylated-Interferon -2a (peg-IFN-2a) Therapy.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) Lipton JH.
Improved Survival in Patients with First Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Treated with Vosaroxin plus Cytarabine versus Placebo plus.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
Head-to-Head Comparison of Obinutuzumab (GA101) plus Chlorambucil (Clb) versus Rituximab plus Clb in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and.
Rituximab Maintenance versus Wait and Watch After Four Courses of R-DHAP Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Previously Untreated Young.
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
Dasatinib Compared to Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Twelve- Month Efficacy and Safety.
Time to Secondary Resistance (TSR) After Interruption of Imatinib: Updated Results of the Prospective French Sarcoma Group Randomized Phase III Trial on.
Initial Findings from the PACE Trial: A Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib,
Switching to Nilotinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase with Suboptimal Cytogenetic Response on Imatinib: Results from the LASOR.
Continued Overall Survival Benefit After 5 Years’ Follow-Up with Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) versus Melphalan-Prednisone (MP) in Patients with.
A Pivotal Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib, or with the T315I BCR ‐ ABL Mutation:
Significant Prognostic Impact of [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET Scan Performed During and at the End of Treatment with R-CHOP in High- Tumor Mass Follicular.
A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shah.
Lenalidomide Maintenance After Stem-Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: Follow-Up Analysis of the IFM Trial Attal M et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
HERA TRIAL: 2 Years versus 1 Year of Trastuzumab After Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Women with HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer at 8 Years of Median Follow-Up.
Moskowitz CH et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 673.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP):
Dasatinib or Imatinib (IM) in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Two-Year Follow-Up from DASISION Kantarjian H et al.
Bosutinib as Therapy for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Resistance or Intolerance to Imatinib: 36-Month Minimum Follow-Up Update Cortes.
Case report Sudden blastic transformation in patient with chronic myeloid leukemia treated with imatinib mesylate Mehrdad Payandeh,MD Hematology, Medical.
Kantarjian HM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Long-Term Follow-Up of Ongoing Patients in 2 Studies of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid.
Results from the International, Randomized Phase 3 Study of Ibrutinib versus Chlorambucil in Patients 65 Years and Older with Treatment-Naïve CLL/SLL (RESONATE-2TM)1.
Phase III EURO-SKI: Cessation of TKI Therapy Safe, Feasible for Pts Who Achieve Deep Molecular Response New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 200.
Shah N et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 206.
Soverini S et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 346.
Platzbecker U et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 12.
Early Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Predict for Better Outcomes in Untreated Patients with CML-CP — Comparison of 4 TKI Modalities (Standard- and.
Martinelli G et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 679.
Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 793.
Ellen K. Ritchie Clinical Director, Richard T. Silver MPN Center
Cortes JE et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6502.
Monitoring Milestones in Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukemia
Imatinib – where are we now. What about generic imatinib
Best Practices in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia by Multidisciplinary Teams
Crossover for pts meeting ELN 2013 failure criteria
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
1Kantarjian HM et al. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
Leber B et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 94.
Presentation transcript:

Early Molecular and Cytogenic Response Is Predictive for Long-Term Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Hanfstein B et al. Leukemia 2012;[Epub ahead of print]. Hanfstein B et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 783.

Background The advent of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the front-line treatment setting of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has prompted a closer evaluation of the response to imatinib (N Engl J Med 2010;362:2251, 2260). Early assessment of response markers might identify slow responders harboring a BCR-ABL positive clone with an inferior susceptibility to TKIs. Slow responders could benefit from an early dose escalation or a change of treatment to a second-generation TKI, thus avoiding the risk of disease progression. Current study objective: Evaluate the impact of molecular and cytogenetic response levels after 3 months of an imatinib-based treatment on the course of CML. Hanfstein B et al. Leukemia 2012;[Epub ahead of print].

CML Study IV Methods Patients with CML treated with imatinib (n = 1,303). Patients were randomly assigned to receive: –Imatinib 400 mg/d –Imatinib 400 mg/d + interferon alpha (IFN) –Imatinib 400 mg/d + low-dose cytarabine (arm closed 2005) –Imatinib 400 mg/d after IFN failure (arm closed 2005) –Imatinib 800 mg/d Molecular and cytogenetic responses analyzed at 3 months and 6 months. BCR-ABL and total ABL transcript levels were measured by quantitative RT-PCR, standardized according to international scale (BCR-ABL IS ). Cytogenetic response was determined by conventional metaphase analyses with standard G-banding or fluorescence R-banding techniques. Endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Hanfstein B et al. Leukemia 2012;[Epub ahead of print].

PFS by Molecular Response BCR-ABL IS at 3 months Five-year PFSp-value ≤1% (n = 218)96% NS — >1%-10% (n = 281)92% >10% (n = 189)87% — BCR-ABL IS at 6 months Five-year PFSp-value ≤1% (n = 498)96% — >1%-10% (n = 194)89% NS >10% (n = 91)86% — NS = not significant PFS was defined as the absence of accelerated phase, blast crisis and death. Probability of PFS was calculated from the Kaplan-Meier plot and compared by log-rank statistics. Hanfstein B et al. Leukemia 2012;[Epub ahead of print].

PFS by Cytogenetic Response Ph+ at 3 months Five-year PFSp-value ≤35% (n = 336)94% >35% (n = 122)87% Ph+ at 6 months Five-year PFSp-value 0% (n = 319)97% >0% (n = 160)91% Hanfstein B et al. Leukemia 2012;[Epub ahead of print]. Median proportion of Philadelphia chromosome-positive metaphases (Ph+) = 8%

OS by Molecular Response BCR-ABL IS at 3 months Five-year OS p-value ≤1% (n = 218)97% NS — >1%-10% (n = 283)94% >10% (n = 191)87% — BCR-ABL IS at 6 months Five-year OS p-value ≤1% (n = 498)97% — >1%-10% (n = 196)90% NS >10% (n = 95)88% — OS was defined as the absence of death from any cause. Probability of OS was calculated from the Kaplan-Meier plot and compared by log- rank statistics. Hanfstein B et al. Leukemia 2012;[Epub ahead of print].

OS by Cytogenetic Response Ph+ at 3 months Five-year OSp-value ≤35% (n = 336)95% >35% (n = 124)87% Ph+ at 6 months Five-year OSp-value 0% (n = 320)97% >0% (n = 162)91% Hanfstein B et al. Leukemia 2012;[Epub ahead of print].

Author Conclusions The levels of molecular or cytogenetic response at 3 months of imatinib treatment allow for a risk stratification of patient outcome in terms of PFS and OS. Patients (28%) who failed to achieve 10% BCR-ABL IS level at 3 months had a 5-year OS of only 87%. Survival rates were significantly better for patients with >1% to 10% and ≤1% BCR-ABL IS. However, there was no significant difference between the >1% to 10% and ≤1% BCR-ABL IS groups. Therefore, missing the 10% BCR-ABL IS landmark at 3 months predicts inferior survival. A similar risk group is defined by failure to achieve the 35% Ph+ landmark at 3 months: –5-year OS with Ph+ >35% at 3 months is 87%. Treatment optimization is suggested for patients missing these landmarks. Hanfstein B et al. Leukemia 2012;[Epub ahead of print].

Investigator Commentary: Molecular and Cytogenetic Response After 3 Months of Imatinib Treatment Predicts Survival in CML This study reported a significant difference in outcome for patients with CML depending on molecular and cytogenetic responses after 3 months of imatinib treatment. After 3 months of therapy, it is possible to predict the risk of disease progression and death. Results from this study raised the question as to whether a patient’s treatment should be changed early on, depending on the response after 3 months of imatinib therapy. Clinical studies have already been initiated based on these results, in which early use of a different TKI has been attempted to improve outcomes in patients with CML in chronic phase. Second-generation TKIs like dasatinib and nilotinib have received FDA approval in the front-line setting for CML. Although this study suggests the administration of a different second-generation TKI as first-line therapy for patients who will not fare well on imatinib, the question of how such patients will be predefined remains unanswered. Overall, monitoring of molecular and cytogenetic responses to therapy early on may help community oncologists in treatment decision-making. Interview with Srdan Verstovsek, MD, PhD, January 25, 2012