National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services NIEHS SRP Annual Meeting November 18 – 20, 2015 George Tucker Chief, Grants.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1. Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documentation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient Accounting System 6. Budget Controls.
Advertisements

© 2014 University of New Hampshire. All rights reserved. Uniform Guidance Highlights What you really need to know.
Rules Governing Sponsored Projects (aka OMB Circulars) Presented by Beverly Blakeney, Diane Cummings and Julie Macy.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200.  The final guidance was issued on December 26, 2013 and supersedes and streamlines requirements from OMB Circulars.
1. An Introductory Look at the New Omni-Circular Big changes have arrived! Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements.
Government Grants and Contracts: Getting Reimbursement for Your Nonprofit's Indirect Costs Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit.
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
Grant Guidance Changes
Presented by Edward A. Hofma, CPA, CGMA Principal in the CPA firm of Averett Warmus Durkee, PA 1417 East Concord Street Orlando, Florida (407) 849.
Office of the Vice President for Research N ORMAN C AMPUS AND N ORMAN C AMPUS P ROGRAMS AT OU-T ULSA Subpart – C Pre-Federal Award Requirements and Contents.
1 2 CFR Part 200 Uniform Guidance -- History & New Structure Steve Bradley, Director.
Uniform Guidance: Summary of Significant Changes 2 CFR PART 200—UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL.
Indirect Cost Presented by Bonita Brown HMEP Grant Program
Circular A-110 Everything You Didn’t Want to Know.
UNIFORM GUIDANCE OVERVIEW. OMB Circulars Before and After A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions A-21 Cost principles for Educational Institutions.
Negotiating Federal Awards April 17, Negotiating Federal Awards Vincent (Bo) A. Bogdanski Assistant Director, Office of Sponsored Projects, University.
 Presented By: NameTitleOffice PresentationTitle NCURA Region V Annual Conference April 21, 2015 Michelle G. Bulls, Director Samuel Ashe, Grants Policy.
Washington University Washington University School of Medicine Research Administrator’s Forum February 2002.
UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, AUDIT REQUIREMENTS, AND COST PRINCIPLES 2 CFR CHAPTER 1, CHAPTER 2, PART 200, ET AL. Uniform Guidance Training June.
Financial Management Stacey Jones, Resolution Specialist OGCM- Division of Policy, Review and Resolution Young Offender Grants New Grantee Orientation.
Impact of Changing Regulations University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
2015 VOCA National Training Conference Grant Financial Management.
KEYS TO SUCCESS NCURA Region IV Spring Meeting April 27 – 30, 2014 © 2014 National Council of University Research Administrators Cost Principles: It Depends!
Cost Principles – 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart E U.S. Department of Education.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards The OMB SuperCircular Information for FTA Grantees.
1 Federal Grants Streamlining Michael Nelson Director, Grants Management Division.
Presented by: Dan Parker/FHWA. Streamlines the language from eight OMB circulars to one consolidated set of guidance. The following have been combined.
Washington University Washington University Hilltop Campus Research Administrator’s Forum March 2002 Presented by The Research Office and Sponsored Projects.
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
SBIR Budgeting Leanne Robey Chief, Special Reviews Branch, NIH.
Uniform Guidance Updates: What PI’s and their staff need to know April 2, 2015 Syracuse University Office of Sponsored Programs.
COST SHARE Neta Fernandez Director, Grants and Contracts.
Audit and Audit Resolution Presented by Wendy Spivey ADECA Audit Manager.
FSU’s Policy on Advances CReATE CReATE ver. 5/13 © 2013 Florida State University. All rights reserved.
SUBAWARDS & SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING UNIFORM GUIDANCE AT K-STATE 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements.
Recovering Overhead Costs in Government Contracts: New Opportunities November 5, 2015 Co-sponsored by: California Community Foundation Center for Nonprofit.
MAY 10, 2011 SESSION 6 OF AAPLS – BUDGET PREPARATION & IMPLICATIONS OF COST SHARE APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES Module C: Budget.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
Indirect Cost Rates 101 CNCS Uniform Guidance § Indirect Costs.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Fiscal Compliance Corner – Uniform Guidance Update MRAM October 2014 Ted Mordhorst Assistant Director for Post Award Financial Compliance Research Accounting.
OMB’s “Super Circular”: What Community Development Professionals Need to Know National Community Development Association Presented by Bob Lloyd January.
1 Weatherization Assistance Program: Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, & Audit Requirements For Federal Awards WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE.
Financial Management Program Top Ten Things to Know About New Federal Grant Compliance Presented by: Tracy Arner, CPA 1.
Sponsored Project Administration Fall 2012 CERTIFICATION PROGRAM Sponsored Project Lifecycle Introduction Overview Creating a Project Budget Compliance.
OMB Circular A-122 and the Federal Cost Principles Copyright © Texas Education Agency
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Accounting for Grant Funds, including Documentation for Expenditures.
Office Of Sponsored Programs Allowable Costs. What is 2 CFR Chapter 1 and 2 parts 200 Subpart E (OMB Uniform Guidance)? A document that contains Principles.
F&A Rates 101 Basics of F&A rates for Proposals, Grants, & Contracts Dr. Mindy S. Connolly, CPCM Sr. Sponsored Research Officer Office of Sponsored Projects.
Copyright © Texas Education Agency Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements.
Welcome to Workforce 3 One U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Webinar Date: November 3, 2015 Presented by: Office of Grants.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
Subrecipient Monitoring
UNIFORM GUIDANCE: RESULTS AND BEST PRACTICES
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
OMB Super Circular Big Changes for Nonprofits
Maximizing the De Minimis Rate
Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements
ETA Financial System Hot Topics
Uniform Guidance Discussion
Managing Outgoing Subawards April 18, 2017
DCED Fiscal Directives & Fiscal Questions and Answers
Office of Sponsored Programs ~ Jacksonville State University
Introduction to Indirect Costs
Sponsored Programs at Penn
Sponsored Programs at Penn
DGCA Breakfast Briefing Program Income
Grants Policy Issuance (GPI) 18-02
Introduction to Indirect Costs
Presentation transcript:

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services NIEHS SRP Annual Meeting November 18 – 20, 2015 George Tucker Chief, Grants Management Branch

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Uniform Guidance Policy Update 2

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Uniform Guidance Policy Update Subpart B – General Provisions : Effect on Other IssuancesRevised : Agency ImplementationRevised : OMB ResponsibilitiesRevised : InquiriesRevised : Review DateRevised : Effective DateRevised : English LanguageNew : Conflict of InterestNew : Mandatory DisclosuresNew 3

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Uniform Guidance Policy Update Subpart C – Pre-Award Requirements : Federal Awarding Agency Review of Merit of Proposals New : Federal Awarding Agency Review of Risk Posed By Applicants New : Standard Application Requirements New : Pre-Award CostsNew : Information Contained In Federal Awards New, A : Public Access To Federal Award InformationNew 4

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Uniform Guidance Policy Update Subpart D –Post Award Requirements Direct and Indirect (F&A) Costs : Classification of Costs New Special Considerations for Institutions of Higher Education : Cost Accounting Standards and Disclosure Statement New 5

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Uniform Guidance Policy Update Subpart D –Post Award Requirements General Provisions For Selected Items of Cost : Commencement And Convocation CostsNew : Exchange RateNew : Intellectual PropertyNew : Taxes (Including Value Added Tax) New, A-21, A-87 6

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services : Program Income (a) Non-Federal entities are encouraged to earn income to defray program costs where appropriate. (b) Cost of generating program income. If authorized by Federal regulations or the Federal award, costs incidental to the generation of program income may be deducted from gross income to determine program income, provided these costs have not been charged to the Federal award. 7

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1) Deduction. Ordinarily program income must be deducted from total allowable costs to determine the net allowable costs. Program income must be used for current costs unless the Federal awarding agency authorizes otherwise. Program income that the non-Federal entity did not anticipate at the time of the Federal award must be used to reduce the Federal award and non-Federal entity contributions rather than to increase the funds committed to the project. 8 Program Income

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2) Addition. With prior approval of the Federal awarding agency (except for IHEs and nonprofit research institutions, as described in paragraph (e) of this section) program income may be added to the Federal award by the Federal agency and the non-Federal entity. The program income must be used for the purposes and under the conditions of the Federal award. 9 Program Income

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (3) Cost sharing or matching. With prior approval of the Federal awarding agency, program income may be used to meet the cost sharing or matching requirement of the Federal award. The amount of the Federal award remains the same. 10 Program Income

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Program Income Use of program income. If the Federal awarding agency does not specify in its regulations or the terms and conditions of the Federal award, or give prior approval for how program income is to be used, the Deduction must apply. For Federal awards made to IHEs and nonprofit research institutions, if the Federal awarding agency does not specify in its regulations or the terms and conditions of the Federal award how program income is to be used, the Addition must apply. 11

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services In specifying alternatives to Deduction and Addition, the Federal awarding agency may distinguish between income earned by the recipient and income earned by subrecipients and between the sources, kinds, or amounts of income. When the Federal awarding agency authorizes the Addition and Cost Sharing or Matching approaches, program income in excess of any amounts specified must also be deducted from expenditures. 12 Program Income

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Income after the period of performance. There are no Federal requirements governing the disposition of income earned after the end of the period of performance for the Federal award, unless the Federal awarding agency regulations or the terms and conditions of the Federal award provide otherwise. The Federal awarding agency may negotiate agreements with recipients regarding appropriate uses of income earned after the period of performance as part of the grant closeout process. 13 Program Income

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Income after the period of performance. Unless the Federal statute, regulations, or terms and conditions for the Federal award provide otherwise, the non- Federal entity has no obligation to the Federal awarding agency with respect to program income earned from license fees and royalties for copyrighted material, patents, patent applications, trademarks, and inventions made under a Federal award to which 37 CFR part 401,“Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Awards, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements” is applicable. 14 Program Income

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services : Indirect (F&A) Costs Predetermined Rates for Indirect (F&A) Costs Public Law (76 Stat. 437) as amended (41 U.S.C. 4708) authorizes the use of predetermined rates in determining the “indirect costs” (indirect (F&A) costs) applicable under research agreements with educational institutions. 15

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Indirect (F&A) Costs Predetermined Rates for Indirect (F&A) Costs The stated objectives of the law are to simplify the administration of cost-type research and development contracts (including grants) with educational institutions, to facilitate the preparation of their budgets, and to permit more expeditious closeout of such contracts when the work is completed. 16

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Indirect (F&A) Costs An indirect (F&A) cost rate is not binding upon the Federal Government if the most recent required proposal from the institution has not been certified. 17

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services : Vendor vs Contractor and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) Does the elimination of the term "vendor" in favor of "contractor" require non-Federal entities (such as states) to change their longstanding practice of awarding "contracts" to nonprofits which they treat substantively as "subawards" for purposes of this guidance? Would continuing this practice be contrary to GAAP? 18

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Vendor vs Contractor and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) No, this policy does not require such a change, nor would it be in conflict with GAAP. States may call an agreement with a nonprofit however they like, so long as the agreement is audited according to the appropriate policies under the Uniform Guidance. A subaward may be provided through any form of legal agreement, including an agreement that the pass-through entity considers a contract. 19

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services : Pass-through Entities and Indirect Cost Rate Negotiation Pass-through entities are expected to honor a subrecipient’s negotiated F&A rate agreement, or use a 10% MTDC de minimis rate, or negotiate an F&A rate with the subrecipient. Is it acceptable to require a subrecipient to accept a rate lower than 10% MTDC via negotiation, or in lieu of their negotiated F&A rate? If a subrecipient requests to establish a rate via negotiation, does the pass-through entity have to establish the rate via negotiation? 20

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Pass-through Entities and Indirect Cost Rate Negotiation If the subrecipient already has a negotiated F&A rate with the Federal government, the negotiated rate must be used. It also is not permissible for pass-through entities to force or entice a proposed subrecipient without a negotiated rate to accept less than the de minimis rate. The cost principles are designed to provide that the Federal awards pay their fair share of the costs recognized under these principals. Pass-through entities may, but are not required, to negotiate a rate with a proposed subrecipient who asks to do so. 21

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services : De Minimis Rate and Governments Is the 10 percent de minimis rate for new organizations which have never negotiated an IDC rate available to governmental organizations or tribal government entities which have never negotiated an IDC rate? 22

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services De Minimis Rate and Governments Yes. Provision of the 10 percent de minimis indirect cost rate is conditioned on the non- Federal entity meeting the requirements specified. Factors affecting allowability of costs, costs must be consistently charged as either indirect or direct costs, but may not be double charged or inconsistently charged as both. 23

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services De Minimis Rate and Governments If chosen, this methodology once elected must be used consistently for all Federal awards until such time as a non-Federal entity chooses to negotiate for a rate, which the non-Federal entity may apply to do at any time. 24

National Institutes of Health U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Questions or Comments? 25