Global VLBI Solution IGG05R01 1 Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (IGG), Vienna, Austria 2 German Geodetic Research Institute (DGFI), Munich, Germany.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A comparison of R1 and R4 IVS networks S.B. Lambert, Royal Observatory of Belgium, formerly at NVI, Inc./US Naval Observatory A.-M. Gontier, Paris Observatory.
Advertisements

Processing of VLBI observation in St. Petersburg University Kudryashova Maria Astronomical Institute of Saint Petersburg University.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
04/22/02EGS G STABILITY OF GLOBAL GEODETIC RESULTS Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Vie_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.
On the alternative approaches to ITRF formulation. A theoretical comparison. Department of Geodesy and Surveying Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Athanasios.
Seasonal Position Variations and Regional Reference Frame Realization Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna Hana Spicakova Results obtained using VieVS: Love numbers and FCN period presented at IVS General Meeting.
DFG-Research Unit “Earth rotation and Global Dynamic processes” Poznan, 13 – 17 October 2008 N. Panafidina, M. Rothacher, D. Thaller Comparison and Combination.
International Terrestrial Reference Frame - Latest Developments Horst Müller 16th International Workshop on Laser Ranging, Poznan, Poland, October
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_MOD Lucia Plank.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 21 September, 2011 Vienna Reprocessing the complete history of VLBI observations with VieVS Sigrid Böhm.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_GLOB Hana Spicakova.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna VIE_INIT Tobias Nilsson.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna High frequency EOP estimated from the CONT campaigns Tobias Nilsson.
VieVS User Workshop 7 – 9 September, 2010 Vienna VIE_GLOB Hana Spicakova.
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_SCHED Jing SUN.
Laser Ranging Contributions to Earth Rotation Studies Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, CA 91109–8099,
VieVS User Workshop 14 – 16 September, 2011 Vienna VIE_LSM Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, 2-6 June 2008 M. Fritsche, R. Dietrich, A. Rülke Institut für Planetare Geodäsie (IPG), Technische Universität.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, Miami Beach, June 2008 Comparison of GMF/GPT with VMF1/ECMWF and Implications for Atmospheric Loading Peter Steigenberger.
SRI Seminar 2005 Time series of GPS stations For reference, monitoring and geophysics Günter Stangl Federal Office of Metrology and Surveying.
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
1/17 REFAG Symposium 6 October 2010 – Marne-la-Vallée, France Recent Results from the IGS Terrestrial Frame Combinations __________________________________________________________________________________________________.
Space Geodesy (1/3) Geodesy provides a foundation for all Earth observations Space geodesy is the use of precise measurements between space objects (e.g.,
Tropospheric parameters from DORIS in comparison to other techniques during CONT campaigns Johannes Böhm (1), Kamil Teke (1, 2), Pascal Willis (3, 4),
The Future of the VLBA Workshop, Charlottesville, VA Earth Orientation and GPS Outline Geodetic VLBI background Applications of Geodetic VLBI VLBI for.
IGS Analysis Center Workshop, 2-6 June 2008, Florida, USA GPS in the ITRF Combination D. Angermann, H. Drewes, M. Krügel, B. Meisel Deutsches Geodätisches.
GGOS User Requirements and Functional Specifications Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA Global.
An improved and extended GPS derived velocity field of the postglacial adjustment in Fennoscandia Martin Lidberg 1,3, Jan M. Johansson 1, Hans-Georg Scherneck.
Retreat Miesenbach Daniel Landskron - My previous and upcoming research 12015/04/28 Retreat 2015 Daniel Landskron.
The ICRF, ITRF and VLBA Chopo Ma NASA’s Goddard Spaceflight Center.
35th COSPAR Scientific Assembly, Paris, July 18-25, IVS Products for Precise Global Reference Frames Wolfgang Schlüter Bundesamt für Kartographie.
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
Prospective Improvements of IVS Products and Evolvement of Observing Programs Harald Schuh WG2 Chair Vienna University of Technology
E. Tanir(1), V. Tornatore(2), K. Teke(3,4) (1) Dept. of Geodesy and Photogrammetry Engineering, Karadeniz Technical University, Turkey (2) Dept. of Hydraulics,
Assessment of Reference Frame Stability trough offset detection in GPS coordinate time series Dragan Blagojević 1), Goran Todorović 2), Violeta Vasilić.
State-of-the-art physical models for calculating atmospheric pressure loading effects 1 Geodätische Woche October, Köln, Germany Dudy D.
Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.
1/16 ITRF2008-P: Some evaluation elements and impact on IGS RF products Paul Rebischung, Bruno Garayt, 16 April 2010 ITRF2008-P: SOME EVALUATION ELEMENTS.
Unified Analysis Workshop, December 5-7, 2007, Beach Resort Monterey, CA GG S Proposals for Extended Parameterization in SINEX Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
Reference Frame Theory & Practice: Implications for SNARF SNARF Workshop 1/27/04 Geoff Blewitt University of Nevada, Reno.
Combination of long time series of tropospheric parameters observed by VLBI R. Heinkelmann, J. Boehm, H. Schuh Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, TU.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 12 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 18 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
03/000 Effect of the reference radiosource instability on the TRF solution Australian Government Geoscience Australia 4 th General IVS Meeting, 9-13, January,
03/000 VLBI network design Australian Government Geoscience Australia NGRS Workshop, 1-2 February, Canberra.
Water vapour estimates over Antarctica from 12 years of globally reprocessed GPS solutions Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke Newcastle University, UK.
Modeling Errors in GPS Vertical Estimates Signal propagation effects –Signal scattering ( antenna phase center/multipath ) –Atmospheric delay ( parameterization,
Do we need WVRs for geodetic VLBI? Joerg Wresnik (1), Johannes Boehm (1), Harald Schuh (1), Arthur Niell (2) Workshop on Measurement of Atmospheric Water.
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
IVS High Accuracy Products for the Maintenance of the Global Reference Frames as a Contribution to GGOS VLBI provides high accuracy and unique products.
Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, Vienna University of Technology Vienna, February 2004 Harald Schuh Subgroup "Data Analysis" of Working Group 3 VLBI2010.
Reprocessing CEGRN campaigns M. Becker(1), A. Caporali(2), R. Drescher(1), L. Gerhatova(5), G. Grenerczy(3), C. Haslinger(4), J. Hefty(5), S.
Insensitivity of GNSS to geocenter motion through the network shift approach Paul Rebischung, Zuheir Altamimi, Tim Springer AGU Fall Meeting 2013, San.
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Status and Future of the IERS Combination Efforts Markus Rothacher GeoForschungsZentrum.
IERS Combination WG and CPP Meeting, April 27, 2005, TU of Vienna, Austria Strategies for Weekly Routine Generation of Combined IERS Products Markus Rothacher.
IERS Directing Board Meeting No.39, BIPM Paris, September 23, 2004 IERS2005: Plan “Integrated Earth orientation parameters, Radio sources, and Site coordinates.
Reference Frame Representations: The ITRF from the user perspective
IVS contribution to the ITRF2014
Assessing the Compatibility of Microwave Geodetic Systems
Kamil Teke and Johannes Böhm
Multi-technique comparison of troposphere zenith delays and gradients during CONT08 Kamil Teke (1,2), Johannes Böhm(1), Tobias Nilsson(1), Harald Schuh(1),
Troposphere and Clock Parameterization During Continuous VLBI Campaigns Kamil Teke1, 2, Johannes Boehm1, Hana Spicakova1, Andrea Pany1, Harald Schuh1 1.
IDS workshop, Venice, Italy, September 2012
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
VLBI Estimates of Vertical Crustal Motion in Europe
VIE_INIT_V30 Daniel Landskron.
Correlation coefficients
Presentation transcript:

Global VLBI Solution IGG05R01 1 Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (IGG), Vienna, Austria 2 German Geodetic Research Institute (DGFI), Munich, Germany Robert Heinkelmann 1, Johannes Boehm 1, Harald Schuh 1, and Volker Tesmer 2

2  general aim: contributions to future realizations of IVS and IERS combined products - TRF - CRF - EOP time series  special aim: investigations of dependencies between the long-term characteristics of - met data in VLBI Analysis - tropospheric parameters - station positions and velocities - scale factor and scale rate Motivation 4th IVS General Meeting

3  unconstrained simultaneous estimation of - source positions (VieCRF) - station positions and velocities (VieTRF) - Earth orientation parameters (VieEOP)  using OCCAM 6.1 (LSM) VLBI software and DOGS-CS for handling the normal equations 1  geodetic datum definitions: - VieCRF: NNR w.r.t. ICRF-Ext.1 using 199 stable sources - VieTRF: NNR+NNT w.r.t. ITRF2000 using 15 stations 1 the DOGS-CS software was developed at DGFI, Munich; thank you for provision IGG05R01 – General characteristics 4th IVS General Meeting

4  3,414,325 observations  1450 globally estimated parameters  2702 sessions in NGS-format  till IGG05R01 – General characteristics total number of sessions available in NGS-format IGG05R th IVS General Meeting

5 session criteria  minimal duration: 18h (no intensive sessions)  minimum of 3 stations  no sessions unreliable for the determination of EOP ( )  rms < 2 cm, fraction of outliers < 3.5 % station criteria  50 VLBI stations (of 136 out of ITRF2000)  no mobile stations (but TIGOCONC) source criteria  552 radio sources (of 667 out of ICRF-Ext. 1)  minimum of 3 observations per session  minimum of 3 sessions for global estimation of source position Criteria for the solution 4th IVS General Meeting

6 Estimated parameters with OCCAM  CRF: right ascension α, declination   TRF: positions X, Y, Z  EOP: nutation ,  , and ERP: Xp, Ẋp, Yp, Ẏp, dUT1, dUṪ1  tropospheric zenith delays: offset, PWLF with 1 hour interval, rates constrained with 10 mm/h  tropospheric gradients: offset constrained with 0.5 mm  clock parameters: offset, rate, and squared rate w.r.t. reference station + clock breaks (if necessary), PWLF with 1 hour interval, rates constrained with 30 mm/h 4th IVS General Meeting

7 Estimated parameters with DOGS-CS  CRF: right ascension α, declination   TRF: positions X, Y, Z, and velocities Ẋ, Ẏ, Ż discontinuities:GILCREEK| | earthquake TSUKUB32| | rail repair DSS65| | rail repair EFLSBERG| | rail repair MEDICINA| | rail repair DSS15| | earthquake MOJAVE12 | | earthquake NRAO85 3 | | unknown  EOP  tropospheric zenith delays  tropospheric gradients  clock parameters reduced 4th IVS General Meeting

8 Analysis settings and geophysical models  outlier elimination: data snooping with threshold of 3.5  mapping function: VMF  cutoff elevation angle : 5°  a-priori zenith delays from homogenized pressure records  axis offsets: taken from the Analysis Coordinator webpage (  model of relativity: ‘consensus model’  ephemerides: DE405/LE405  model of nutation: MHB 2000 (without FCN)  solid earth tides: IERS Conv  ocean loading: GOT00p2 (provided by H.G. Scherneck)  no a-priori tropospheric gradients  no atmospheric loading, snow loading, …  no antenna thermal deformation 4th IVS General Meeting

9 VieCRF* w.r.t. ICRF-Ext.1   [hour]   [deg]   [mas]  *cos(  ) [mas] 1.1 %>3 mas 0.8 %>3 mas 4th IVS General Meeting * sources with >3 sessions

10 VieEOP w.r.t. IERS-C04 MHB2000 model was used without free core nutation part!  : signal with period ~ 430 d (free core nutation) shift: mas rate: mas/y  : signal with period ~ 430 d (free core nutation) shift: mas rate: mas/y 4th IVS General Meeting

VieEOP w.r.t. IERS-C04 ITRF2000, ICRF-Ext.1 and EOP-C04 are from different solutions! dXp: shift: mas rate: mas/y dYp: shift: mas rate: mas/y dUT1: shift:  s rate:  s/y 11 4th IVS General Meeting

12IGG05R01 VTRF2005 VieTRF 4th IVS General Meeting

13 Vertical component w.r.t. ITRF2000 VieTRF VTRF2003 VTRF2005 DGFI-TRF The 15 datum stations 4th IVS General Meeting

14 Helmert parameters from VieTRF into ITRF2000  12 regularly used stations (IVS 2005) epoch   [  as] ± ± 240   [  as] ± ± 247   [  as] ± ± 236  X [mm] 1.5 ± ± 6.3  Y [mm] -2.6 ± ± 6.2  Z [mm] 1.0 ± ± 6.0 scale [ppb] 0.81 ± ± 0.94 scale [mm]* ALGOPARK FORTLEZA GILCREEK HARTRAO HOBART26 KOKEE MATERA NYALES20 SESHAN25 TSUKUB32 WESTFORD WETTZELL  scale rate is ppb/y, 0.02 mm*/y * at Earth radius 4th IVS General Meeting

16 Earthquake near Concepci ó n, superconducting gravity meter jump of +26  Gal (free-air gradient ≈ mgal/m) =>  up= ̶ 84 mm model 2: constant rate =>  up= ̶ 7.7 mm model 1: two rates =>  up= +0.5 mm 4th IVS General Meeting no comparable jump in up component! instrumental effect?!

17 Summary and outlook  IGG05R01, the Vienna global solution, is already of acceptable quality  it can be improved by  using met data from NWM  extending the number of stations  extending the number of sources (outside the ICRF-Ext.1)  adding sub-sets of 24h type of sessions, in particular the large VLBA sessions  applying atmospheric loading corrections  applying corrections for the thermal deformation of telescopes  applying a-priori atmospheric gradients  applying new mapping functions VM1 (instead of VMF)  optimizing soft + hard constraints 4th IVS General Meeting

contacts: R. Heinkelmann Thank you for your attention! end 4th IVS General Meeting The coauthors are greatly acknowledged for their scientific advice. Project is funded by