Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Do we need WVRs for geodetic VLBI? Joerg Wresnik (1), Johannes Boehm (1), Harald Schuh (1), Arthur Niell (2) Workshop on Measurement of Atmospheric Water.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Do we need WVRs for geodetic VLBI? Joerg Wresnik (1), Johannes Boehm (1), Harald Schuh (1), Arthur Niell (2) Workshop on Measurement of Atmospheric Water."— Presentation transcript:

1 Do we need WVRs for geodetic VLBI? Joerg Wresnik (1), Johannes Boehm (1), Harald Schuh (1), Arthur Niell (2) Workshop on Measurement of Atmospheric Water Vapour: Theory, Techniques, Astronomical and Geodetic Applications Wettzell / Hoellenstein (Germany), October 9-11, 2006 (1) Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics (IGG), TU Vienna, Austria (2) MIT Haystack Observatory, MA, USA

2 VLBI 2010 Working Group 3 of IVS (2004-2005) Tasks: Current and Future Requirements for Geodetic VLBI Systems Design a new VLBI observing system based on small antennas with 1mm accuracy - number, location and configuration of antennas System studies and simulations accuracy of 1mm site position & of 1mm/year velocity continuous measurements for EOP rapid generation & distribution of IVS products Goals:

3 Monte Carlo simulation τ atmosphere clocks wzd & clocks are stochastic processes simulate for station 1 and 2 90-e 2 1

4 Simulation of wzd and clock parameters random walk variances of: 0.1 psec²/s 0.7 psec²/s Simulate the wet zenith delay

5 Simulation of wzd and clock parameters Simulate the clocks random walk Allan standard deviation of: 2∙10 -15 @15min 1∙10 -14 @50min

6 Simulation of wzd and clock parameters Simulate observation errors white noise: 4 psec 8 psec 16 psec

7 Simulation of wzd and clock parameters simulation of 25 identical 24 hour sessions What are the effects of wzd and clocks? Does a “4psec antenna” improve the results? simulate wzd 25 times for each station generate white noise 25 times for each station simulate clocks 25 times for each station 0.1 psec**2/sec 0.7 psec**2/sec 2e-15@15min 1e-14@50min 4 psec 8 psec 16 psec

8 Obs. Schedule: fast antennas The schedule was created by Anthony Searle and Bill Petrachenko

9 Obs. Schedule: high observation density 5760 scans 116308 observations 16 stations 120 baselines 100 scans/hour/station Antenna specification using 16 antennas with the same size as Algonquin but with faster slewing rates azimuth max slewing rate of 18 deg/s azimuth max acceleration of 3.6 deg/s² elevation max slewing rate of 4.5 deg/s elevation max acceleration of 0.9 deg/s² data rate of 48 Gb/s. Scan length 5 sec every 30 sec Source catalogue 50 sources

10 Baseline lengths repeatability 4 psec wet zenith delay 2e-15@15min (ASD) 0.0036 psec**2/sec (PSD) 0.1 psec**2/sec clocks 16 psec white noise if the PSD of wet zenith delay is 0.7 psec**2/sec, 4 psec antennas give the same result as 16 psec antennas by PSD of wet zenithdelay of 0.1 psec**2/s 0.7 psec**2/sec the wet zenith delay is the limiting factor

11 Largest PSD values for wet zenith delay – lowest PSD values for clocks: Conclusions and outlook PSD of wet zenith delays dominates the baseline length repeatability hardly any difference between ‘4, 8 and 16 psec antennas' WVR could improve geodetic VLBI Simulation for wzd station dependence elevation and azimuth dependence Next steps

12 Thanks for your attention


Download ppt "Do we need WVRs for geodetic VLBI? Joerg Wresnik (1), Johannes Boehm (1), Harald Schuh (1), Arthur Niell (2) Workshop on Measurement of Atmospheric Water."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google