Doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: 2013-04-13 Authors: May 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1100r0 September 2013 Osama Aboul-Magd (Huawei Technologies)Slide 1 HEW SG Progress Review Date: Authors:
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /1176r0 Submission Sep 2013 Reza Hedayat (Cisco Systems) Slide 1 Some Simulation Scenarios for HEW NameAffiliationPhone Reza HedayatCisco.
Doc.: IEEE /1167r2 Sept 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) TGax Functional Requirement Discussion Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Doc.: IEEE /0107 Jan 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) HEW Evaluation Metrics Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Doc.: Submission January 22, 2014 Rene Struik (Struik Security Consultancy)Slide Privacy & HEW Date: Authors: NameCompanyAddressPhone .
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-14/0026r1 January 2014 Yong Liu, et al.Slide 1 Thoughts on HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc. No. IEEE hew-r1 Submission July 2013 Klaus Doppler, NokiaSlide 1 Evaluation Criteria and Simulation Scenarios Date: July 16, 2013 Authors:
September 2013 doc.: IEEE 11-13/1105r0 Submission Meng Yang (CATR) Discussion on Access Mechanism for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0534r1 May 2013 HanGyu Cho, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Direction and Use Cases for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0214r1 Submission February 2014 Perahia, Cariou, Cho, Inoue, Liu and TaoriSlide 1 High Efficiency WLAN Overview Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0498r0 Submission April 2008 Eldad Perahia, Intel CorporationSlide 1 Modifications to the 60GHz PAR & 5 C’s Proposal Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0648r0 Submission May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network Date:
Doc.:IEEE /0536r0 Submission May 11th, 2009 Slide 1 OBSS issue in ac Authors: Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: ax Submission July 2014 Slide 1 Proposed Calibration For MAC simulator Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0786r0 Submission July 2013 Wu TianyuSlide 1 Discussions on System Level Simulation Methodology Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0800r3 SubmissionHemanth Sampath, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Study Group Documentation Date: Authors: July 2013.
Sep 2013 Jinsoo Choi, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Discussion on HEW Functional Requirements Date: Authors:
Doc.:IEEE /0821r3 Submission July 2008 Minho Cheong, ETRISlide 1 Some Ambiguities about Throughput Conditions in PAR Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0835r2 July 2014 Joe Kwak, InterDigitalSlide 1 Functional Requirements Discussion Date: Authors:
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Doc.: IEEE /0878r0 Submission July 2013 Jeongki Kim, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 Efficiency enhancement for dense WLAN environment Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1000r1 Submission Aug 2013 Simone Merlin (Qualcomm)Slide 1 Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion On Basic Technical Aspects for HEW Date:
Doc.: IEEE /1054 Sept 2013 SubmissionYonggang Fang, ZTETX HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /1032r0 Slide 1 Simulation Scenario for OBSS in Home Network Date: Authors: September.
Doc.: IEEE /1366r3 Submission November 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition Date: 2013-xx-11Authors:
Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Aug 2013 May 2013
VHTL6 task group work plan proposal (VHTL < 6 GHz)
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Requirements Discussion
HEW Evaluation Metrics Suggestions
VHT SG PAR Feedback from Individuals
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
On High Efficiency WLAN (HEW) TG PAR Scope
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
2111 NE 25th Ave, Hillsboro OR 97124, USA
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
HEW Study Group Documentation
TGax Functional Requirement Discussion
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Raising the PAR Date: Authors: January 2014 January 2014
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Efficient Frequency Spectrum Utilization
Discussions on 11ac PHY Efficiency
Some propositions to progress towards the PAR definition
High-efficiency WLAN Straw poll
Below 6GHz 11vht PAR scope and purpose discussion
Simulation Scenarios Date: Authors: Aug 2013 May 2013
Functional Requirements for EHT Specification Framework
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Date: September, 2019
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013

doc.: IEEE /0542r0 Submission Introduction The HEW study group was formed –Request approval by IEEE 802 LMSC to form an Study Group to consider High-efficiency WLAN [as described in doc r2] with the intent of creating a PAR and five criteria. –Do you support starting a new study group called “high efficiency WLAN” to enhance PHY and MAC in 2.4 and 5GHz with a focus on: Improving spectrum efficiency and area throughput Improving real world performance in indoor and outdoor deployments –in the presence of interfering sources, dense heterogeneous networks –in moderate to heavy user loaded APs Result: 128/1/27 This presentation provides our view of the HEW goals Simone Merlin, QualcommSlide 2 May 2013

doc.: IEEE /0542r0 Submission HEW Scope I - Background Past 11b/g/n/ac focused on optimizing link throughput in isolated BSS. E.g., 11ac PAR: –5.2 Scope of Proposed Standard: This amendment defines standardized modifications to both the physical layers (PHY) and the Medium Access Control Layer (MAC) that enable modes of operation capable of supporting: A maximum multi-station (STA) throughput (measured at the MAC data service access point), of at least 1 Gbps and a maximum single link throughput (measured at the MAC data service access point), of at least 500 Mbps. Below 6 GHz carrier frequency operation excluding 2.4 GHz operation while ensuring backward compatibility and coexistence with legacy IEEE devices in the 5 GHz unlicensed band. –Purpose of Proposed Standard: The purpose of the amendment is to improve the wireless local area network (LAN) user experience by providing significantly higher basic service set (BSS) throughput for existing WLAN application areas and to enable new market segments for operation below 6 GHz including distribution of multiple multimedia/data streams. May 2013 Simone Merlin, QualcommSlide 3

doc.: IEEE /0542r0 Submission HEW Scope II – OBSS HEW focus should be on improving MAC and PHY for operation in networks with dense STAs and BSSs that potentially interfere with each other –Real world networks often consist of OBSSs and large numbers of STAs Several well known examples: apartments, enterprise, stadiums, malls, airports… 2.4GHz already congested, and likely 5GHz to be congested soon Increased of P2P services in the same area enabled smartphones/tablets is the fastest growing market –There is much evidence of issues due to OBSS/dense deployments Insufficient per-user throughput for common applications –MAC/PHY operations of current is not designed/optimized for efficient OBSS and dense network operation –Solutions to these issues will have a broad sets of applicability May 2013 Simone Merlin, QualcommSlide 4

doc.: IEEE /0542r0 Submission HEW Scope III – User Experience HEW focus should be on improving per-user experience; overall network efficiency/throughput also to be improved –HEW evaluation metrics should include per-user throughput metrics Important to (somehow) look at the ‘tail’ performance in the per- user throughput CDF Metric need be designed according to per-user traffic specifications –HEW evaluation metrics should include aggregate throughput Subject to per-user throughput improvements/QoS limitations, i.e. support higher throughput for more users, not just higher throughput for a few user –Performance improvement can be compared to 11n/ac in the respective bands May 2013 Simone Merlin, QualcommSlide 5 11ac HEW CDF Tput

doc.: IEEE /0542r0 Submission Scenarios and Evaluation HEW SG should define reference scenarios and target metrics for –Assessing feasibility –Evaluate quality of solutions to be adopted in the standard Detailed simulations to be used for evaluating candidate solutions –Need to agree on simulation methodology The following 3 scenarios are proposed for representing the most relevant classes of dense networks issues –Residential –Enterprise –Outdoor May 2013 Simone Merlin, QualcommSlide 6

doc.: IEEE /0542r0 Submission Residential Apartment building with several apartments A closed BSS per apartment –Only users in the apartment can connect with the apartment’s AP Random APs locations Several STAs per each apartment Traffic profile defined per STA –Similar to 11ac, but with updated profiles to reflect current/future profiles; include P2P This scenario will highlight realistic issues related to worst case interference due to closed unplanned deployments May 2013 Simone Merlin, QualcommSlide 7

doc.: IEEE /0542r0 Submission Enterprise Enterprise building One ESS constituting of several APs –Users can connect with any AP (‘open’ APs) –May include also an interfering (closed) ESS Planned (regular) APs locations Several STAs per AP Traffic profile defined per STA –Similar to 11ac, but with updated profiles to reflect current/future profiles; include P2P This scenario will highlight realistic issues and solutions in open networks where a certain level of control is possible May 2013 Simone Merlin, QualcommSlide 8

doc.: IEEE /0542r0 Submission Outdoor Dense outdoor deployment One ESS constituting of several APs –Users can connect with any AP (‘open’ APs) –May include also an interfering (closed) ESS Several STAs, with mobility Outdoor channel with longer delay spread than indoors Traffic profile derived from typical mobile applications (TBD) This scenario will highlight realistic issues in dense outdoor networks with mobility May 2013 Simone Merlin, QualcommSlide 9

doc.: IEEE /0542r0 Submission Summary HEW should focus on addressing dense networks with potentially high OBSS interference –Need to agree on reference scenarios that are representative of real world deployments and use cases. These scenarios will be used to identify issues and evaluate solutions Residential, Enterprise, Outdoor –Need to define traffic models HEW should focus on improving per-user throughput; aggregate throughput also important –Need to agree on exact metrics for evaluation of solutions quality A detailed simulation methodology need be agreed and used for assessing the quality of candidate solutions May 2013 Simone Merlin, QualcommSlide 10