STASIS Open WorkshopPage 1 Modelling Interoperability: The Modelling Framework of BREIN STASIS Open Workshop BOC Asset Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Next Generation Grid Kostas Tserpes, NTUA Beijing, 22 of June 2005.
Advertisements

CWE, EC – ESA joint activities on e-collaboration Brussels, 13 April 2005 IST Call 5 Preparatory workshop.
Language Specification using Metamodelling Joachim Fischer Humboldt University Berlin LAB Workshop Geneva
Profiles Construction Eclipse ECESIS Project Construction of Complex UML Profiles UPM ETSI Telecomunicación Ciudad Universitaria s/n Madrid 28040,
ISWC Doctoral Symposium Monday, 7 November 2005
Looking ahead: caGrid community requirements in the context of caGrid 2.0 Lawrence Brem 7 February 2011.
OMG Architecture Ecosystem SIG Federal CIO Council Data Architecture Subcommittee May 2011 Cory Casanave.
ELSE – eLearning in Software Engineering Stanimir Stoyanov, Distributed eLearning Center (DeLC), University of Plovdiv.
An Integrated Approach to Enterprise Architecture LIACS, Martijn Wiering 23 juni ‘04.
1 Richard White Design decisions: architecture 1 July 2005 BiodiversityWorld Grid Workshop NeSC, Edinburgh, 30 June - 1 July 2005 Design decisions: architecture.
1 CSL Workshop, October 13-14, 2005 ESDI Workshop on Conceptual Schema Language and Tools - Aim, Scope, and Issues to be Addressed Anders Friis-Christensen,
Amit, Keyur, Sabhay and Saleh Model Driven Architecture in the Enterprise.
Aligning Business Processes to SOA B. Ramamurthy 6/16/2015Page 1.
UML CASE Tool. ABSTRACT Domain analysis enables identifying families of applications and capturing their terminology in order to assist and guide system.
1212 Management and Communication of Distributed Conceptual Design Knowledge in the Building and Construction Industry Dr.ir. Jos van Leeuwen Eindhoven.
Course Instructor: Aisha Azeem
Cloud based linked data platform for Structural Engineering Experiment Xiaohui Zhang
Software Architecture premaster course 1.  Israa Mosatafa Islam  Neveen Adel Mohamed  Omnia Ibrahim Ahmed  Dr Hany Ammar 2.
Domain Modelling the upper levels of the eframework Yvonne Howard Hilary Dexter David Millard Learning Societies LabDistributed Learning, University of.
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 11 Slide 1 Architectural Design.
Application of PDM Technologies for Enterprise Integration 1 SS 14/15 By - Vathsala Arabaghatta Shivarudrappa.
1 Conceptual Modeling of User Interfaces to Workflow Information Systems Conceptual Modeling of User Interfaces to Workflow Information Systems By: Josefina.
Ontology Development Kenneth Baclawski Northeastern University Harvard Medical School.
Chapter 8 Architecture Analysis. 8 – Architecture Analysis 8.1 Analysis Techniques 8.2 Quantitative Analysis  Performance Views  Performance.
Integrating Security Design Into The Software Development Process For E-Commerce Systems By: M.T. Chan, L.F. Kwok (City University of Hong Kong)
Integrating Business Process Models with Ontologies Peter De Baer, Pieter De Leenheer, Gang Zhao, Robert Meersman {Peter.De.Baer, Pieter.De.Leenheer,
Introduction to MDA (Model Driven Architecture) CYT.
The complementary use of IDEF and UML modelling approaches 第四組 M 莊承勳 M 陳德熙 M 吳炳煌 M 吳自晟.
ASG - Towards the Adaptive Semantic Services Enterprise Harald Meyer WWW Service Composition with Semantic Web Services
©Ian Sommerville 2000 Software Engineering, 6th edition. Chapter 10Slide 1 Architectural Design l Establishing the overall structure of a software system.
1 MFI-5: Metamodel for Process models registration HE Keqing, WANG Chong State Key Lab. Of Software Engineering, Wuhan University
Košice, 10 February Experience Management based on Text Notes The EMBET System Michal Laclavik.
1 Ontology-based Semantic Annotatoin of Process Template for Reuse Yun Lin, Darijus Strasunskas Depart. Of Computer and Information Science Norwegian Univ.
What is Information Modelling (and why do we need it in NEII…)? Dominic Lowe, Bureau of Meteorology, 29 October 2013.
10/18/20151 Business Process Management and Semantic Technologies B. Ramamurthy.
© DATAMAT S.p.A. – Giuseppe Avellino, Stefano Beco, Barbara Cantalupo, Andrea Cavallini A Semantic Workflow Authoring Tool for Programming Grids.
1 27th of March, 2007 © ATHENA Consortium 2007 B5 EADS piloting Nicolas Figay, EADS Flora Robin, EADS ATHENA Intermediate Review March 2007 Funchal,
An Ontological Framework for Web Service Processes By Claus Pahl and Ronan Barrett.
Knowledge Representation of Statistic Domain For CBR Application Supervisor : Dr. Aslina Saad Dr. Mashitoh Hashim PM Dr. Nor Hasbiah Ubaidullah.
FDT Foil no 1 On Methodology from Domain to System Descriptions by Rolv Bræk NTNU Workshop on Philosophy and Applicablitiy of Formal Languages Geneve 15.
Semantic Annotation of Services and Processes in Business Alliances Karol Furdík 1,2 1 InterSoft, a.s., Floriánska 19, Košice, Slovakia
Introduction to Semantic Web Service Architecture ► The vision of the Semantic Web ► Ontologies as the basic building block ► Semantic Web Service Architecture.
NGCWE Expert Group EU-ESA Experts Group's vision Prof. Juan Quemada NGCWE Expert Group IST Call 5 Preparatory Workshop on CWEs 13th.
ICT EMMSAD’05 13/ Assessing Business Process Modeling Languages Using a Generic Quality Framework Anna Gunhild Nysetvold* John Krogstie *, § IDI,
Of 33 lecture 1: introduction. of 33 the semantic web vision today’s web (1) web content – for human consumption (no structural information) people search.
1 Centre for Intelligent Systems and their Applications Division of Informatics, University of Edinburgh Draft for AKT July Workshop Jessica Chen-Burger.
Independent Insight for Service Oriented Practice Summary: Service Reference Architecture and Planning David Sprott.
Issues in Ontology-based Information integration By Zhan Cui, Dean Jones and Paul O’Brien.
Virtual Information and Knowledge Environments Workshop on Knowledge Technologies within the 6th Framework Programme -- Luxembourg, May 2002 Dr.-Ing.
Ontology-Based Interoperability Service for HL7 Interfaces Implementation Carolina González, Bernd Blobel and Diego López eHealth Competence Center, Regensurg.
ONION Ontologies In Ontology Community of Practice Leader
March 24, 2007 SOA CoP Demo Model Driven Enterprise SOA GSA Financial Management Enterprise Architecture Cory Casanave cory-c (at) modeldriven.com Oct.
© The ATHENA Consortium. CI3 - Practices of Interoperability in SMEs Proposed Solutions.
Ontologies Reasoning Components Agents Simulations An Overview of Model-Driven Engineering and Architecture Jacques Robin.
1 4th of October, 2006 © ATHENA Consortium 2006 B5 EADS CCR piloting Nicolas Figay, EADS Flora Robin, EADS ATHENA Intermediate Review October 2006.
Slide 1 Chapter 8 Architectural Design. Slide 2 Topics covered l System structuring l Control models l Modular decomposition l Domain-specific architectures.
International Workshop 28 Jan – 2 Feb 2011 Phoenix, AZ, USA Modeling Standards Activity Team Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Initiative Roger Burkhart.
RDA 9th Plenary Breakout 3, 5 April :00-17:30
Giuseppina Inserra INFN Catania
Web Application Modeling
Web Ontology Language for Service (OWL-S)
XML Based Interoperability Components
Enterprise Data Model Enterprise Architecture approach Insights on application for through-life collaboration 2018 – E. Jesson.
Service-centric Software Engineering
© umweltbundesamt.at Bringing the LCML and EAGLE CONCEPTS TOGETHER STANDARDs FOR THE LAND COVER and LAND USE DOMAIN ISO TC211 - STANDARDS in ACTION Workshop,
Tools for Composing and Deploying Grid Middleware Web Services
Constructing MDA-based Application Using Rational XDE for .NET
Metadata Framework as the basis for Metadata-driven Architecture
Execute your Processes
Toward an Ontology-Driven Architectural Framework for B2B E. Kajan, L
Presentation transcript:

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 1 Modelling Interoperability: The Modelling Framework of BREIN STASIS Open Workshop BOC Asset Management GmbH Vienna 25th April 2008, Berlin

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 2 Topic 1 – Introduction Topic 4 – Conclusion and Outlook Topic 2 – The Modelling Challenge in BREIN Topic 3 – Addressing the BREIN Modelling Challenge

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 3 Business objective driven REliable and Intelligent grids for real busiNess BREIN will realise the flexible, intelligent Virtual Organisation support to significantly reduce the complexity of modern day business-to-business collaborations BREIN Mission Statement 2 Scenarios Airport Management SzenarioAirport Management Szenario Virtual Engineering SzenarioVirtual Engineering Szenario

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 4 Introduction The aim of BREIN is to transfer business collaboration onto the Grid Complex relations between different Service Providers and their Business Processes have to be analysed and mapped to the grid Existing business models are usually broken down to business process models which have become a commodity Need of flexible adaptive ICT systems which understand business processes and can respond to changing business needs  A Modelling Framework supporting these tasks is needed

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 5 Topic 1 – Introduction Topic 4 – Conclusion and Outlook Topic 2 – The Modelling Challenge in BREIN Topic 3 – Addressing the BREIN Modelling Challenge

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 6 The Modelling Challenge in BREIN Modelling Framework has been defined to allow: Process oriented Requirements Analysis Specification of Software Architecture Externalization of Expert Know-How Based on the Scenarios with complex suppy Chains and inter-organisational collaboration the requirements were derived Modelling layers: Business Level: Supply Chains, Business Processes, and Goal Models IT-Level: Workflow and Service Description and Software Architecture Best Practise Roadmap

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 7 Best-Practice Roadmap Business Modelling Level CIM Software Architecture IT Modelling Level PSM, PIM Business Models Supply Chain- Modelling Business Process- Modelling Goal- Modelling Workflows and Service Description Workflows and Service Description Modelling methods to be considered: BPEL, SAWSDL, WSDL-S, OWL-S, OWL-WS, WS-CDL, WS-Agreement, WS-Agreement Negotiation, WSLA, WSMO, SWSF Modelling methods to be considered: UML 2.0 Modelling methods to be considered: SCOR ® Modelling methods to be considered: BPMN, E-BPMS, EPC, IDEF, LOVEM-E Modelling methods to be considered: GORE Vertical integration Vertical integration Horizontal integration Horizontal integration The BREIN Modelling Framework PROMOTE

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 8 The Modelling Challenge in BREIN Following Modelling Challenges have been identified 1. Syntactic Level: concerns models and their representation –Models are stored in different formats –no unified way to access them 2. Semantic Level: concerns the modelling languages and the integration of them –Integration of two modelling languages usually results in a gap –Example: “IT-Business gap” 3. Contextual Level: same term is used in different contexts –Example: Service Business expert: non-material equivalent of a good Technician: software that is deployed as a web service –Ambiguity is a mayor problem –common understanding of the domain between all stakeholders is essential

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 9 Topic 1 – Introduction Topic 4 – Conclusion and Outlook Topic 2 – The Modelling Challenge in BREIN Topic 3 – Addressing the BREIN Modelling Challenge

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 10 Addressing the BREIN Modelling Challenges 1.Syntactic Level: through the use of standards –One generic model repository acting as a mediator, all models stored in XML format –Model may be accessed through web service interfaces –Standard exchange formats such as EPC, UML/XMI, BPEL, OWL 2. Semantic Level: through Meta-model integration pattern –Modelling methods are coupled using a “transition layer” containing concepts form both worlds –Example: “IT-Business gap” 3. Contextual Level: through integration of meta-models and ontologies –Most difficult challenge –Bootstrapping approach: Models serve as basis for the generation of the ontology and vice versa –Definition of a Terminology to assist the user in modelling –Two related Modelling services available: Ontology Generator, Modelchecker

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 11 Contextual Challenge Ontology Generation (1) Use of models use of business process models for the generation of ontologies - filtering them according to relevant concepts and transformation into an ontology We distinguish two approaches: - ontology on a meta-model layer - ontology on a model layer BREIN Scenario Models BREIN-BML Meta-Model Virtual Engineering Scenario Models Airport Scenario Models Instantiation of Models Selected Meta- Model Concepts Ontologies BREIN Core Ontology BREIN Scenario Ontologies Selected Airport Concepts Selected Virt. Eng. Concepts Selection of generic concepts Business Modelling Language

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 12 Contextual Challenge Ontology Generation (2) Organisational model Ontology Automatic generation of Ontology

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 13 Contextual Challenge Ontology Generation (3) 13 Top-down by domain experts Bottom-up by knowledge engineers Modelling process using BPMS Modelling process using card sorting Ontology Domain feedback Ontology feedback Ontology input Domain input

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 14 Contextual Challenge Modelchecker (1) Checking the consistency of the models according to the terminology –ontology is considered complementary to models –defining the domain conceptually, contains the correct terminology and may serve as reference during modelling Ontology Modelling Modelcheck

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 15 Topic 1 – Introduction Topic 4 – Conclusion and Outlook Topic 2 – The Modelling Challenge in BREIN Topic 3 – Addressing the BREIN Modelling Challenge

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 16 Conclusion and Outlook (1) The BREIN Modelling Framework has been implemented trying to address the presented Modelling Challenges The Modelling Framework is currently in use by the project consortium Next steps include: Development of Best Practise Roadmap Development of additional Modelling Services Detailed definition of „Workflow and Services Description“ - Building Block Reference models for all related methods

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 17 Internet Modelling LanguageModels Internet Run Time Web Client Modelling Framework Workflow Engine CMDB Internet Agent Run Time Interfaces Build Time Interfaces Service Oriented Modelling Framework Semantic Modelling Kernel Web Portal Data Service Accounting Service Web Modelling Portal Internet Build Time (Third Party Legacy Application) Security Service Info Service MM to Ontology Ontology Integration Ontology Transformation Specific Represenation of Ontologies Text-basaed Modelling Graphical Design of BPs Graphical Design of WFs Formalisation Modelling Rich Client Modeller Repository Service Legend Internet Excel Graphical Design Formalisation Discussion Forum Excel Graphical Design Formalisation Wiki EPC ADONIS BPMN e.g. Business Process Domaine.g. IT Domain ISO Cobit ITIL Conclusion and Outlook (2)

STASIS Open WorkshopPage 18 BOC Asset Management Vienna Web: BREIN: Thank you for your attention