ComET Peer Input Meeting Path Forward Nov. 8th, 2004 B ette Meek, Health Canada www.hc-sc.gc.ca/exsd-dse.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Ministry of Finance Sweden Conclusions from the discussion in OECD, spring 2005 In principle, all OECD countries use performance information in different.

Advertisements

Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976(TSCA) *passed by the United States Congress in 1976 *The TSCA is found in United States law at *addresses the production,

ComET Peer Input Meeting Context & Objectives Nov. 8th, 2004 B ette Meek, Health Canada

I. Confirm Implementation of the CIP II. Assess the Effectiveness of the Strategies, Action Steps, Benchmarks III. Provide Feedback to CIP Team and Faculty.

PATIENT PARTICIPATION GROUPS. Why a patient participation group? Edict from the Care Quality Commission Edict from the Care Quality Commission To ensure.

Task Board Monitoring Cards Visit GoLeanSixSigma.com for more Lean Six Sigma ResourcesGoLeanSixSigma.com.

Canada/Australia Issues being faced in the regulation of nano-materials Deborah Willcocks – Department of Health and Ageing, Government of Australia Anne-Marie.

Ellen F. Heineman, Ph.D. National Cancer Institute Epidemiology & Genetics Research Program The GIS for the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project.

1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program Diane Sheridan Chief, Existing Chemicals Branch, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention.

Pieter Rienks, Director Hazard Management Division, WorkSafe Victoria Section 28 Duties of Designers of Buildings and Structures.

Discussion Sessions Facilitated by The LifeLine Group Slides and Materials Copyright Protected.

How can information technology help me understand the risks from flooding? 1.What information is available at a local level in order that I can decide.

1 High Production Volume (HPV) Challenge Program – Future Directions Jim Willis Director, Chemical Control Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and.

Inputs ACE curriculum Trained faculty Peer cohort support Affective factors Self-efficacy College Identity Interacting with others Teamwork Mindfulness:

Task and Process: Assessment and Evaluation of Outreach Efforts Susan Bell, Ph.D University of California – Berkeley Gary D Glass, Ph.D Duke University.

Update on Canada’s National Pollutant Release Inventory (NPRI) CEC – Public Meeting of the NAPRTR Project November 11, 2014 Karen Mailhiot Environment.

Results of Canadian DSL Categorization Activities – What’s Next CPPI April 28, 2006 Calgary AB Health Santé Canada.

Health-Related Components of DSL Categorization under CEPA 1999 Exposure and Hazard Tools Presented by: Jesse Ng Existing Substances Division Health Canada.

Ishrat Husain mHealth Summit December 4-5, Contents 1)What is USAID? 2)Context of Mobile Technology Meeting? 3)How are countries using Mobile.

1 Discussion of the 2006 Inventory Update Reporting Data December 12, 2006 Nhan Nguyen U.S. EPA.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research New Open Suite of Programs and Peer Review Enhancements University of Manitoba February 14, 2012.

DIRIGO HEALTH AGENCY’S MAINE QUALITY FORUM Statewide Patient Experience Survey August 2012 Patient Experience Matters.

Data to Decisions: What’s meaningful to you?. Why is AFHTO doing Data to Decisions (D2D) 1.0? D2D 1.0 is a starting place for primary care measurement.

International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell.

Results of Categorization and Next Steps George Enei Director, Existing Substances Division May, 2006.

Peer Input Meeting for ComET Model November 8, 2004 Health Canada The LifeLine Group.

Multimedia Assessment for New Fuels: Stakeholders’ Meeting September 13, 2005 Sacramento, CA Dean Simeroth, California Air Resources Board Dave Rice, Lawrence.

A case for THE entry OF COMMERCIAL BANKS IN PROMOTING HOUSING MICROFINANCE IN PAKISTAN September 6th

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Part B of CMF: Metadata, Standards Concepts and Models Jana Meliskova UNECE Work Session.

Gerry Pratt State AOC Coordinator, Division of Water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 625 Broadway, Albany, NY P: 518.

Quality Health Indicator Demonstration April 28, 2005.

Compliance Promotion Formalizing an Approach to Support Stakeholder Compliance.

Categorization and Screening of the Domestic Substances List Path forward towards ecological prioritization of substances for assessment Existing Substances.

HC Screening State of the Science Reports Update to the ICG February 14th/05 Presented by: Bette Meek Existing Substances Division Health Canada.

Recent Developments of the PEFA Program Video-conference of the PEMPAL BCOP PEFA Working Group February 20, 2009 Frans Ronsholt Head of PEFA Secretariat.

CRI – A provider perspective Focusing on ‘targeted’ services – ie not those already held in safeguarding systems with CP plan etc. Consider barriers to.

An Overview of the Objectives, Approach, and Components of ComET™ Mr. Paul Price The LifeLine Group All slides and material Copyright protected.

Radiation Exposure Screening and Education Program Peer Learning Workshop Vanessa Hooker, B.A. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) Health.

Industry Perspective on TSCA Modernization ABA Conference June 11, 2010.

Research in the Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapies: Vision and Overview Jesse Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation.

A web-based focused solution for chemical and polymer management in Canada with Simplifying CEPA Compliance EASE your regulatory burden Chemical and Polymer.

1 januari 2008 RIBASIM input data by Wil N.M. van der Krogt.

STATE OF THE NORTH AMERICAN ENVIRONMENT CEC Council Session 26 June 2008.

COMMUNITY HEALTH DEN 4362 (with: Angela Tedeschini)

Economic resources. To produce goods and services we need resources. Economic resources are scarce relative to infinite needs and wants of people and.

Outcome of the Workshop on PFOA organised by the Commission 4 th of May 2010 Christine Wistuba, DG ENV, D3.

Lab Symbols. HHPS Hazardous Household Products Symbols (HHPS) Found on consumer products – Specify both the nature and the degree of any hazard Each symbol.

Birmingham Progress Graphs for EAL Based on “SEN or EAL? Distinguishing the Difference” by Birmingham Advisory and Support Service.

Prevention Services for Maine’s Public Health Districts RFP# Bidder’s Conference March 28, 2016 Attachment A.

NICNAS Reforms Community Stakeholder Workshop. Input from non-industry stakeholders on NICNAS Reforms Working within parameters of Government decision.

Alberta Region Winnie Cheng Sr. Risk Manager Safe Environments Program Aboriginal Children Health & Environment Workshop February 25, 2010 Your health.

Chemical products should be designed to preserve efficacy of function while reducing toxicity Brooke Winters and Kelly Li.

Microsoft Project 101: How to Build a Project Plan

Lecture 4: Risk Analysis

Principle and application of risk assessment for food hazards

North Carolina Division of Air Quality Mike Abraczinskas

REACH Regulation (EC) No.1907/2006

Health Risk = Consequences X Probability (Likelihood)

Flood Risk Management Towards a New Paradigm

Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976

AFA Teacher of the Year Program Update

Laying a Foundation for Working Effectively with EPA and ATSDR

Categorization of the Canadian Domestic Substances List

Some Quiz Questions Unit: Risk Assessment.

Computer Workstation - Ergonomics for Mouse Users

International Initiatives and the U.S. HPV Challenge Program

ATSDR Office Of Tribal Affairs

WG Hazardous substances * Marine Strategy 19 November 2003

The Creative Process CREATIVE PROCESS

Presentation transcript:

ComET Peer Input Meeting Path Forward Nov. 8th, 2004 B ette Meek, Health Canada

ComET Peer Input meeting, Cincinnati, Nov. 8 th, Keep in Mind Development of this “tool” (ComET) is a work in progress –Default values provided principally as examples, for illustration, currently –Not encompassing at this stage Continuing suggestions are welcome, but this is NOT peer review –Deadline will determine form of peer review pre 2006 It is the “tool” (ComET) which is the focus of this meeting, not the substances –Substances for illustrative purposes, only “Tool” currently a spreadsheet but form will change

ComET Peer Input meeting, Cincinnati, Nov. 8 th, Where to From Here? Expansion of numbers of scenarios to be encompassing for substances in the program Application of tool to remainder of substances on the high and mid groups of the maximal list –Where data/information will help Development of a more efficient platform (moving from Access/Excel) –Data entry aids, menu selections Review/revision of specific scenarios –Consistency

ComET Peer Input meeting, Cincinnati, Nov. 8 th, Additionally Focussing Effort – the Maximal List Focus on 1573 substances in “high” and “mid” groups Subset of 314 substances in the “high” likelihood group, identified on basis of hazard for which exposure is low –Risk management in place? Subset of 388 substances in the “mid” likelihood group for which determinations of persistence or bioaccumulation will contribute Data limited for certain types of substances –UVCBs, polymers To extent possible, will identify the more limited numbers of substances for which additional information on toxicity will be helpful

ComET Peer Input meeting, Cincinnati, Nov. 8 th, Current Path/Timeline

ComET Peer Input meeting, Cincinnati, Nov. 8 th, More Information? Health Canada Existing Substances Division Website – Health Canada Existing Substances Mailing List – sesc/exsd/listserv.htm sesc/exsd/listserv.htm CEPA Registry – (