The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Thierry Ranchin, France Francesco Pignatelli,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© GEO Secretariat Agenda Item 3. GEO UPDATE. © GEO Secretariat Membership 67 members and 43 Participating Organisations – New Members:Latvia, Moldova,
Advertisements

GEOSS Data Sharing Principles. GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan 5.4 Data Sharing The societal benefits of Earth observations cannot be achieved without.
User Interface Mechanism GEO GEO-I Meeting Ad Hoc User Interface Workgroup May 2005 Geneva.
Work Plan Development Guidelines and Schedule.
Work Plan Development Guidelines and Schedule.
Capacity Building Mandate We, the participants…recognize the need to support: …A coordinated effort to involve and assist developing countries in improving.
UIC Draft Report to C4: Issues and Recommendations 25 September, 2008 The UIC Co-Chairs Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Thierry Ranchin, France Francesco Pignatelli,
GEO-5 in Ottawa 1 29 November 2004 Draft GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan and Status Report on Reference Document Ivan B. DeLoatch, Toshio Koike, Robert.
ID-06 Building a User-Driven GEOSS Essential Components of User Management for GEO Tasks.
Standards and Interoperability Forum: Status, Issues & Plans GEO Architecture and Data Committee Kyoto, Japan 9 February 2009 Siri-Jodha Singh Khalsa.
Call for Proposals: Earth Observations in Decision Support Joint Effort of GEO Capacity Building Committee and User Interface Committee March 2009.
ID-04 Building Communities and Increasing Awareness & ID-06 (proposed) Building a user-driven GEOSS.
UIC Report to the GEO-VI Plenary: Accomplishments, Activities, and Recommendations November, 2009 The UIC Co-Chairs Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Carsten.
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Francesco Pignatelli,
EGIDA Stakeholder Network and Advisory Board and Their Relevance for EGIDA and GEO Stefano Nativi 1 st Joint Workshop of the EGIDA Stakeholder Network.
© GEO Secretariat The Group on Earth Observations – Status and Post 2015 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat 41 st CGMS Tsukuba, Japan 8-12 July 2013.
From “Usability Testing 2009” to the “Sprint to Plenary 2011” GEO Portal and Clearinghouse: reaching out to users with user-friendly interfaces. Gary J.
GEOSS Architecture Describes how components fit together for providing data and information that will be better …than the individual components or systems.
The IGWCO Transition into GEO August 2007 IGWCO Secretariat 7bis, avenue de la paix CH-1211 Geneva 2.
ESIP Air Quality Workgroup and the GEO Air Quality Community of Practice collaboratively building an air quality community network for finding, accessing,
Slide: 1 27 th CEOS Plenary |Montréal | November 2013 Agenda Item: 15 Chu ISHIDA(JAXA) on behalf of Rick Lawford, GEO Water CoP leader GEO Water.
2016 Transitional GEO Work Programme Discussion & CONSOLIDATION Session 10, 2015 GEO Work Plan Symposium Geneva, 7 May 2015 Alan Edwards (IPWG) Giovanni.
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Ellsworth LeDrew,
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-05 Resource Mobilization for Capacity Building (individual, institutional & infrastructure)
Task AR-07-03: Global Geodetic Reference Frames Report to ADC-5 prepared by Hans-Peter Plag (IAG/GGOS) Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
The Communities of Practice: Implementation & Users Engaging Users? Meeting User Expectations? Gary J. Foley, PhD Co-chair, User interface Committee 10.
The Group on Earth Observations (GEO): An Introduction.
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing By John Lyon and Co-Chairs, UIC Introduction to the UIC: A User Requirements Approach Gary J. Foley,
Report of the Science and Technology Committee GEO Plenary VIII Istanbul, Turkey 16 November 2011.
1 ID-03 Science and Technology in GEOSS C1 Engaging the Science and Technology (S&T) Community in GEOSS Implementation Hans-Peter Plag IEEE.
SAON is a process to support and strengthen the development of multinational engagement for sustained and coordinated pan-Arctic observing and data sharing.
GEO Architecture and Data Committee Architecture Workshop Hosted by the European Commission At the Joint Research Centre February 2008 DRAFT.
Plenary Session P4: GEOSS Strategic Targets and Their Alignment to Millennium Development Goals and Global Sustainability Research GEOSS Science and Technology.
© GEO Secretariat GEO Work Plan 2nd GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholder Workshop "GEOSS: Supporting Science for the Millennium Development.
Phase I. Determine Earth Observation Requirements for Air Quality SB Sub-Area (AQ CoP) K. Hoijarvi, S. Falke, J. Husar, R. Poirot, M. Schulz., K. Torsett,
GEO Architecture and Data Committee Task AR Architecture Implementation Pilot George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium GEO Task AR Point.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-04 – GEOSS-Wide Activities for a User-Driven GEOSS.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-03: Science and Technology in GEOSS ID-03-C1: Engaging the Science and Technology (S&T) Community in GEOSS Implementation.
EPA’s Role in the Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS)
The Use of the Targets by the Institutions & Development Implementation Board in Monitoring the Work Plan Implementation 2nd GEOSS Science and Technology.
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Francesco Pignotelli,
© GEO Secretariat 10 th UIC Outcomes User Interface Committee Sofia Antipolis, February 2009 UIC co-leads / GEO Secretariat Geneva, Switzerland.
Preparation of the 2010 GEO Ministerial Summit GEO Science and Technology Committee Preparation of the 2010 GEO Ministerial Summit Gilles OLLIER Head of.
Task AR-07-03: Global Geodetic Reference Frames Report to ADC-4 prepared by Hans-Peter Plag (IAG/GGOS) Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological.
A GEO Label: Scope of Review Hans-Peter Plag IEEE University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA;
A GEO Label: Scope of Review Hans-Peter Plag IEEE University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA;
Introducing the Science and Technology Roadmap 1 st GEO/EGIDA Workshop Bonn, Germany, May 09 th - 11 th, 2011.
UIC Work Plan Analysis Discussion 15 November, 2009 Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE, Univ. Waterloo Kathy Fontaine, NASA Lawrence Friedl, NASA.
The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.
An Integrated A&D Strategy Jay Pearlman, A Annoni I DeLoatch, B Ryan Briefing to ADC Meeting March
Earth Sciences Sector Canada Centre for Remote Sensing By Edward Washburn, And Co-Chairs, UIC User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits.
Capacity Building & the European Community Research Framework Programme: (FP7) Alan Edwards European Commission.
© GEO Secretariat Welcome Note on Behalf of GEO S&T Stakeholders Workshop Bonn, Germany 28 August 2012 Barbara J. Ryan Director, GEO Secretariat.
The GEOSS Science & Technology Stakeholder Network – Workshop Goals Michael Nyenhuis Hans-Peter Plag.
The ADC, the CBC and the UIC Where Should These Committees Be Interacting? Gary J. Foley, USEPA Co-Chair User Interface Committee July 20, 2006.
1 BUILDING A USER-DRIVEN GEOSS: Continuing User Engagement as a Priority of GEO Presented by Lerato Senoko, South Africa On behalf of the UIC Co-Chairs:
WGCapD, CEOS and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Committee on Earth Observation Satellites Deputy CEOS Executive Officer / CSA Marie-Josée.
GEO 2016 Work Programme Giovanni Rum, GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
Towards a New Phase of GEOSS Implementation : The GEO Work Plan Alexia C. Massacand GEO Work Plan Coordinator
Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)
Capacity Building in: GEO Strategic Plan 2016 – 2025 and Work Programme 2016 Andiswa Mlisa GEO Secretariat Workshop on Capacity Building and Developing.
GEO Strategic Plan : Implementing GEOSS Douglas Cripe GEO Work Programme Symposium 2-4 May 2016, Geneva.
The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits
GEO WP 1. INFRASTRUCTURE (Architecture and Data Management)
Programme Board 6th Meeting May 2017 Craig Larlee
GEOSS Data Sharing Principles
Work Plan Management GEO Work Plan Symposium 30 April – 2 May 2012
Oceans and Society: Blue Planet
EV Workshop, June 11-12, 2015, Bari, Italy
Air Quality Data Systems and the GEOSS Architecture
Presentation transcript:

The GEO User Requirements Approach to Achieving Societal Benefits Gary J. Foley, USA Ellsworth LeDrew, IEEE Thierry Ranchin, France Francesco Pignatelli, JRC

Terms of Reference- GEO User Interface Committee Goal To engage users in the development and implementation of a sustained GEOSS that provides the data and information required within and among the nine societal benefit areas as specified by user groups on national, regional and global scales Also a specific goal to address cross-cutting issues and oversee the Communities of Practice (CPs), ensuring continuity & avoiding duplication.

UIC Objectives Enable GEO to address in a systematic, targeted, focused and comprehensive way the needs and concerns of a broad range of user communities in developing and developed countries, across issues and trans-disciplinary needs, with a particular focus on fostering new or less organized communities. Enable GEO, in the implementation of GEOSS, to engage a continuum of users, from producers to the final beneficiaries of the data and information Facilitate linkages and partnerships between established Communities of Practice (CoP) and new user groups or organizations interested in collaborating.

The GEOSS Architecture Users and Scientific Communities Served By GEOSS Common Approaches Systems within their Mandates UIC Goal Organize this side of the GEOSS Architecture

A user-led community of stakeholders, from providers to the final beneficiaries of Earth observation data and information, with a common interest in specific aspects of societal benefits to be realized by GEOSS implementation. The Communities of Practice will be self organized and will include stakeholders required to achieve benefits. Communities of Practice: What are They?

Communities of Practice Each CP will have slightly different objectives but of necessity there will be common objectives such as: To provide a forum for discussion and to identify, gather, and seek agreement on their particular user community requirements; To identify linkages and opportunities for collaborative strategic and technical projects. Coordinate the target delivery to enable the realization of societal benefits To advise the User Interface Committee, GEO Plenary and all other CPs on matters relating to their particular area of interest or societal benefit. Objectives:

Development of GEO Communities of Practice The Current GEO Communities of Practice –Air Quality and Health: May 5, Toronto –Energy: –Coastal ecosystems: IGOS-P –Forests –Geohazards –Water Cycle: IGOS-P –Water & Health –Biodiversity

An Example Community of Practice Air Quality & Health The Public

UIC & the GEO Workplan Tasks The main focus of the UIC to date is on Task US Other tasks are assigned to the UIC so that the Committee can draw from these tasks the following: –User communities to engage –User requirements identified in the conduct of the task –Involvement in Communities of Practice

GEO TASK US Establish a GEO process for identifying critical Earth observation priorities common to many GEOSS societal benefit areas, involving scientific and technical experts, taking account of socio-economic factors, and building on the results of existing systems’ requirements development processes.

UIC Meeting August, 2007 A Process for TASK US The User Requirements Gathering Processes Presentation by Dr. Lawrence Friedl User Needs and System Performance Utility (UNSPU) Proposed Functional Specifications Presentation by Dr. Hans-Peter Plag

The User Requirements Gathering Processes A 2-year timeline of US activities. How an “Advisory Group” and an “Analyst” will work together to develop the priorities within each SBA. The analyst will be the primary coordinator and organizer of the activity to meet the schedules, and will interact with and utilize the Advisory Group for each SBA. UIC’s Refined Process in nine steps. Explanation that the process “harvests” observation needs expressed in existing documents.

Progress since August 2007 Completion of Improving Management of Energy Resources, the Strategic 5-10 Year Plan by the GEO Energy CP, Oct. 12, 2007 Initiation of US work by analysts for –Energy SBA – lead IEEE –Biodiversity SBA – lead USEPA –Health SBA – lead USEPA

What’s Next Completion of the first round of user requirements gathering by August Next meetings of the UIC –Toronto, May, 2008 –TBD, September, 2008

Evolving Links to ADC  2 – 3 April, 2007, Scope of potential demonstration projects reviewed by George Percivall at UIC meeting, Geneva.  ADC/UIC co-sponsorship of Workshop in Yellowknife in association with Canadian IPY GeoNorth program entitled “ The Impact of Climate Change and Variability on Energy Development and Biodiversity in the Arctic”. Included Demonstration Projects.  “Kick the Tires” workshop on Air Quality as part of UIC Committee meeting (6-8 May, Toronto) held on May 5. Announcement forthcoming after details to be worked out this week.