The U.S. Census Bureau’s Postcensal and Intercensal Population Estimates Alexa Jones-Puthoff Population Division National Conference on Health Statistics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE COMMONWEALTH FUND. THE COMMONWEALTH FUND 2 Purpose The goal of this chartbook is to create an easily accessible resource that can help policy makers,
Advertisements

Correspondence between interracial births and multiple race reporting in the National Health Interview Survey Jennifer D. Parker Academy Health Annual.
1 Accessing Census Bureau Population Estimates for the United States Ryan Burson Population Division U.S. Census Bureau July 16, 2014.
1 State & County Characteristics: Overview The basics State –The general method –July 1, 2000 beginning population –Domestic migration IRS pre-processing.
East Portland Demographics:2010 Uma Krishnan Demographer.
Oregon’s Changing Demographics Oregon Commision for the Blind December 13, 2007 Richard Bjelland (503)
Exploring Administrative Records Use for Race and Hispanic Origin Item Non-Response Sonya Rastogi, Leticia Fernandez, James Noon, Ellen Zapata and Renuka.
*Includes American Indian and Alaska Native alone, Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander alone, and Two or More Races **Hispanic origin based on Spanish.
ASDC Annual Meeting Carolyn Trent, Socioeconomic Analyst Center for Business and Economic Research November 10, 2011 Culverhouse College of Commerce and.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Division of Vital Statistics.
Data Products Released in 2011 and Products to be Released in the Next Year Paula Wright Information Services Specialist Dallas Regional Office May 23,
Demographic Trends and Missouri’s Children Missouri State Board of Education April 21, 2005 Dr. Bill Elder University of Missouri-Columbia Office of Social.
1 The American Community Survey (ACS) 2005 Data Release.
REVIEW OF VITAL STATISTICS Brady E. Hamilton, Ph.D. Reproductive Statistics Branch and Elizabeth Arias, Ph.D. Mortality Statistics Branch Division of Vital.
Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends Joint House Redistricting Committee hearing with the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence.
U.S. Census Bureau Demographic Census 2000 July 8, 2003.
Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce 1 The U.S. Census Bureau’s 2010 Demographic Analysis Estimates:
The Changing Population of Texas Government Finance Officers Association of Texas October 25, 2012 San Marcos, TX.
Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends Joint House Redistricting Committee hearing with the House Committee on Judiciary and Civil Jurisprudence.
Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Comparing IRS Exemptions to 2010 Census Population Counts Esther.
ASDC Annual Meeting Carolyn Trent, Socioeconomic Analyst Alabama State Data Center Center for Business and Economic Research November 2, 2012 Culverhouse.
11 The American Community Survey Steve Murdock, Ph.D. Director, Hobby Center for the Study of Texas Rice University.
U.S. Census Bureau census.gov Census Data Immersion From A Novice to A Skilled Data Miner Infopeople Webinar August 7,
ASDC Annual Meeting Carolyn Trent, Socioeconomic Analyst Alabama State Data Center Center for Business and Economic Research November 2, 2012 Culverhouse.
Latinos in the United States: Trends and Characteristics Presented By: Antonio Gonzalez President William C. Velasquez Institute 2914 N. Main Street Los.
Population Estimates and Projections in the U. S. John F. Long
111 American Community Survey Fundamentals 2009 Population Association of America ACS Workshop April 29, 2009.
Census Means Tracking the Trends: The Changing Marketplace Our Most Current Data on American Life.
Sandra Burke May 14, Iowa & U.S. trends How population changes Youth trends Race and ethnicity trends Language trends.
C2ER 52 nd Annual Conference & LMI Training Institute Annual Forum Regional Socioeconomic Statistics Update on U.S. Census Bureau Programs June 8, 2012.
1 Demographic Analysis of the 2010 Census Jason Devine U.S. Census Bureau 2010 SDC Steering Committee Meeting February 23, 2010 This presentation is released.
Power in Numbers: Putting 2010 Census Data to Use Presented by.
1 Overview of the 2010 Census Two Hundred Twenty Years and Counting …
Census Bureau’s Interim and Final State Projections Population Projections Branch Population Division U.S. Census Bureau.
Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU U.S. Department of Commerce Research on Estimating International Migration of the Foreign-Born.
The Intercensal Population Estimates and Projections Program Signe I. Wetrogan Assistant Chief for Population Estimates and Projections Presented to Metropolitan.
New Alternatives for Estimating Net Migration to the United States Using the American Community Survey Alexa Kennedy-Puthoff David Dixon Sonya Rastogi.
Bridged-Race Population Estimates for Chicago 6 June, 2004 NAPHSIS – Portland, OR Mark Flotow Illinois Center for Health Statistics.
1 Projecting Race and Hispanic Origin for the U.S. Population and an Examination of the Impact of Net International Migration David G. Waddington Victoria.
American Community Survey. Outline American Community Survey basics Accessing ACS data products Resources for learning more 2.
American Community Survey Maryland State Data Center Affiliate Meeting September 16, 2010.
1 The American Community Survey An Update Pamela Klein American Community Survey Office Washington Metropolitan Council on Governments Cooperative Forecasting.
Texas Indigent Healthcare Association State Conference October 31, 2013 Austin, Texas Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends and Health Issues.
U.S. Census Bureau’s Population Estimates Program Victoria Velkoff Population Division U.S. Census Bureau APDU 2010 Annual Conference Public Data 2010:
Texas Demographic Data Users Conference May 22, 2014 Austin, Texas.
The U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program Victoria A. Velkoff U.S. Census Bureau APDU Annual Conference September 25, 2008.
American Community Survey “It Don’t Come Easy”, Ringo Starr Jane Traynham Maryland State Data Center March 15, 2011.
Demographic Analysis Update This presentation is released to inform interested parties of research and to encourage discussion. Any views expressed.
Texas Rural Health Association Conference November 19, 2013 Fort Worth, Texas Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends and Health Issues.
Births and Birth Outcomes for Single- and Multiple-Race American Indian and Alaskan Native Mothers Brady E. Hamilton, Ph.D. National Center for Health.
STATE AND COUNTY CHARACTERISTICS ESTIMATES A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE VINTAGE 2003 METHODS AND PROCESSING.
U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. Census Bureau Overview of Race and Hispanic Origin: 2010 March 2011.
Chief Financial Officers of Public Universities in Texas November 5, 2013 Galveston, Texas Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends and Higher Education.
Texas Demographic Characteristics and Trends and Education
STATE AND COUNTY CHARACTERISTICS ESTIMATES A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE VINTAGE 2003 METHODS AND PROCESSING.
1 Population Controls for the American Community Survey Alexa Kennedy-Puthoff Population Division Prepared for the 2009 SDC Annual Training Conference,
Strengthening Partnerships: Shaping the Future Portland, OR June 6 th – 10 th, 2004 Quality of Race and Hispanic Origin Reporting on the US Death Certificate.
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Meeting June 17, 2011 Regional Demographic Profile: 2010 Census.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics Elizabeth Arias, Ph.D. Mortality Statistics Branch Division of Vital Statistics.
Population Estimates & Projections for the United States Emma Ernst Population Estimates Branch October 9, 2007.
American Community Survey (ACS) Using Census Data by Block Group January 21, 2016 Presentation at the National Community Development Association Winter.
Quality of Race and Hispanic Origin Reporting on Death Certificates in the US Elizabeth Arias, Ph.D. Mortality Statistics Branch Division of Vital Statistics.
CENSUS 2000 DATA AND HOW WE CAN USE IT Claudette Bennett Population Division U.S. Census Bureau January 2003.
Issues in the Classification of Race and Ethnicity Data Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics.
Intercensal Population Estimates Program: Post 2000 Signe Wetrogan Assistant Chief for Population Estimates and Projections Meeting of Federal State Cooperative.
CENSUS 2000 DATA ON RACE, HISPANIC ORIGIN, AND ANCESTRY Nancy M. Gordon Associate Director for Demographic Programs U.S. Census Bureau March 2001.
Measuring International Migration: An Example from the U. S
Update and Overview of Administrative Records for the 2020 Census
Community Health Indicators
Supplementary Data Tables, Community Health Indicators
Presentation transcript:

The U.S. Census Bureau’s Postcensal and Intercensal Population Estimates Alexa Jones-Puthoff Population Division National Conference on Health Statistics August 7,

Overview Postcensal Population Estimates Postcensal vs. Intercensal Estimates Intercensal Estimates Methods Race in the Population Estimates 2

3 Postcensal Estimates, Produced Annually Population –Nation by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin –States by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin –Counties by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin –Cities and towns (incorporated places and minor civil divisions / a.k.a. subcounty areas), total population only –Puerto Rico Commonwealth and municipios by age and sex Housing units –States –Counties 3

4 Uses of Population Estimates Distribution of federal funds Population controls for major surveys –American Community Survey –Current Population Survey –Survey of Income and Program Participation –American Housing Survey Denominators for statistical rates Program planning 4

5 Postcensal Population Estimates Methods Estimates base is most recent Census From the last Census forward, population is estimated using a cohort-component method (also called the administrative record method) at the national, state, and county levels –Nation: Population 2 = Population 1 + Births - Deaths + NIM NIM = Net international migration –States and counties: Population 2 = Population 1 + Births - Deaths + NIM + DM DM = Domestic Migration 5

6 Base population –The most recent census Births and deaths –National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) –Federal-State Cooperative for Population Estimates (FSCPE) Net international migration –American Community Survey (ACS) –Puerto Rico Community Survey (PRCS) –Census Bureau estimates of foreign-born emigration and native migration –Defense Manpower Data Center Domestic migration –Federal tax data –Medicare National, State, and County Data Sources 6

Historical Comparison, National Total Population Estimates and Census Counts: Year Postcensal Population Estimate Census Count Percent Difference ,672226, ,172248, ,520281, ,450308, Note: Percent difference = (Estimate – Census)/Census*100. Numbers are shown in thousands. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, Population Estimates Program. 7

8 Postcensal versus Intercensal Estimates Postcensal estimates –Every year –July 1 estimates, full series from last Census date forward (for 2009, series was April 1, 2000-July 1, 2009) –“Vintage” identified by terminal year in the series For example, series of estimates released beginning in December 2009 were the “Vintage 2009” estimates Intercensal estimates –Once a decade –July 1 estimates, full series between two most recent Census dates –Most recent intercensals begin with Census 2000 and end with Census

Intercensal Method for April 1, 2000 to April 1, 2010: County and Above Interpolation methodology Postcensal estimates served as the base Difference between the 2010 Census and the postcensal estimates– or “error of closure”– was calculated by age, sex, race, and Hispanic origin That difference was then smoothed back over the time period Methodological exceptions for small cells, but with controls to higher-level totals Patterns in postcensal estimates are preserved even when the level changes 9

2000 Census *

13 † without challenges or Special Censuses

14 † without challenges or Special Censuses

15 † without challenges or Special Censuses

16 Intercensal Estimates and Vintage 2010 Postcensal Estimates † for the Total Resident Population: District of Columbia † without challenges or Special Censuses

Intercensal Method for April 1, 2000 to April 1, 2010: Cities and Towns (Subcounty) Totals only; no demographic detail Intercensal estimates were calculated separately for the household and group quarters populations, then summed to create resident population At primitive geographic level (lowest level of mutually exclusive geographies): –Straight line interpolation between Census 2000 and Census 2010 –Controlled to county intercensal totals 17

“Intercensal Series” Estimates Method for April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2010 Many users needed an early (pre-Vintage- 2011) July 1, 2010 estimate consistent with the 2010 Census July 1, 2010 was estimated for the household population and the group quarters population (which, when summed, give the resident population) and housing units Numeric and percent change between April 1, 2010 and July 1, 2010 in the Vintage 2010 estimates were used to move the estimates forward from April 1, 2010 (Census)

Race in the Population Estimates

Modification of Race Responses Race groups differ across products/needs –Census (2000, 2010) data include “Some Other Race” as a valid race response –Population estimates data include five races “alone” and “in combination” with other races, but no “Some Other Race” –Bridged race estimates include only four single- race groups (no “Some Other Race” and no possibility of combinations) Stepwise process to accommodate these three different constructs 20

Census Race to Population Estimates Race Groups Responses of one or more of the five specified OMB races (White, Black, AIAN, Asian, NHPI) are not modified Responses that include Some Other Race (SOR) are modified as follows: –If SOR and one or more OMB races, SOR is dropped –If SOR alone, race is allocated either from within the household or from a hot deck, in both cases matched on specific Hispanic origin response In 2010, 97% of SOR alone population was Hispanic; modification does not affect Hispanic origin 21 Note: AIAN = American Indian and Alaska Native; NHPI = Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander.

Population Estimates Race Groups to Bridged Race Groups Responses of one or more of the four “bridged race” categories (White, Black, AIEA, API) are not modified Responses that include two or more races are modified to become single-race responses Modification done on the basis of specifications from NCHS 22 Note: AIEA = American Indian, Eskimo or Aleut; API = Asian and Pacific Islander.

Race Modification Results Race Census 2010Modified RaceBridged Race NumberPercentNumberPercentNumberPercent One Race 299,736, ,761, ,745, White 223,553, ,937, ,423, Black 38,929, ,250, ,065, AIAN 2,932, ,739, ,263, Asian 14,674, ,159, ,993, NHPI 540, , Some Other Race 19,107,3686.2(X) Two or More Races 9,009, ,984,1952.3(X) 23 (X) Not applicable Note: AIAN = American Indian and Alaska Native (American Indian, Eskimo or Aleut in bridged race); NHPI = Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander. Asian and NHPI combine to form Asian and Pacific Islander (API) in bridged race. Sources: Census 2010 data available via Modified Race data are from the intercensal estimates produced by the Population Division, U.S. Census Bureau, available via Bridged race data are from a special tabulation.

Products of Interest Intercensal Estimates Postcensal Estimates (Vintage 2011) Modified Race File Estimates Evaluation

Contact Information Alexa Jones-Puthoff Chief, Population Estimates Branch (branch) (direct) 25