E-resource with no wall and no firewalls Dr.H.S.Siddamallaiah Principal Library and Information officer (Rtd) NIMHANS, Bangalore

We spend lot of money ….. Buy many things – Including eresources But E-resources exist on publisher servers Not on library server (we do not have control) Print resources exist in library …, users does not come to library …. We establish server …, with many repositories – Users are not going through - library server – They go through Google - first point of search

When we look at the … Scientific progress Progress is not just due to just more literature or more research – More due to finding gaps and links to relevant research Gap and links are found through published results

Therefore – vertical division of web based information authentic scholarly content Un-authentic ???? content Authentic research – using un-authentic information resource ????????????????

At the same time -Users think about – Accessing free of cost – not willing to pay Libraries are – identified as authentic sources Therefore – Libraries are only place for them – Meets both authentic and free – Can serve information in all media

In context of resources from libraries Libraries – are to compete --- Google Google is known for – Single and simple search box – Ranking of results – Users are sure of getting some free information resources ---- may be authentic or not

Libraries started – competing Google – With many web-scale discovery tools Google provide – – less of scholarly content (deep or hidden web) Web Scale discovery tools – More of scientific and scholarly information

Web scale Discovery tools – Single point access to range of library resources – Single Index to all library content – Can be single point search for all kind of library collection – Simple, fast search – Single list of search results (from all sources) – Relevance Ranked results

Resources it cover includes – Library collection (print and electronic) – Local digital repository and archives – Online and offline

Central Index – Pre-harvested Central Index (overcome – some of the problems of federated search engines) (Index based on library internal and external collection) Limitation of index based interface – Competing vendors

Tools + technology + skillset – In library is getting standardized To compete Google Majority are algorithmic search in future Then more concern is about – Content, content, and content

Otherwise tools and technology become – Empty container and Then …. bother more about content (not carrier or container)

How users are coping in existing one If user won’t find access to particular article approach the author or order directly from the publisher inter library loans library-held hard copies Some indications shows the – Pay-per-view

Nowadays – expectation is not just fulltext – Expect associated datasets, software, video links with text, etc., Open access has increased availability – free at the point of use (May be gold or green route) 20.6% OA articles are available – ISI-indexed articles -- in 2008 – via the green or gold routes.

is unwillingness to pay by users

Coping if required document not available – Gave up and look for similar content – Approach the author – Gave up and did something else – Requested an interlibrary loan – Checked in-house – Checked with a colleague – Ordered it online from the publisher (in order of preference- above aspects) Some indications shows the – Pay-per-view

Patron Driven Acquisition (PDA)

Why PDA Site licenses and subscriptions …. is unsustainable – due to rising costs and falling library budgets. Leads to gaps in access Lead to.. Explore patron-driven acquisition (PDA). (ReadCube Access and PDA) – Allow immediate access to individual articles at a cost lower than traditional interlibrary loan, pay per view, or document delivery

Libraries become Channels for obtaining unsubscribed content Ranging from traditional approaches, – like interlibrary loan (ILL), – open access databases. – acquiring articles on PDA or DDA

Even ‘Big deals’ are finding un-sustainable There are novel approach to purchasing unsubscribed content at a lower cost than – ILL, pay per view, or document delivery.

to answer a number of questions. Would it result in unsustainably heavy use? Would it be accepted as an alternative to subscription? Would patrons accept DRM technology applied to journal articles? Would patron accept to install a client application to read and store the articles be accepted by patrons? Would the cost is comparable with other means of obtaining content? How is it compare with ILL requests ?

Majority of content is – digitized Content is not stored within – library (digitally) Content – is accessible from – Cloud and use web-scale data-center Libraries are to work ---- sustainable model – for the library budget

Thank you