151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions 151 First Side Pittsburgh, PA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fraser Centre State College, PA Tyler Strange Structural Option Consultant: Dr. Thomas Boothby April 13, 2011 Tyler StrangeStructural Option Fraser Centre.
Advertisements

Jeremiah Ergas AE 482 – 5 th Year Senior Thesis Structural Option April 15 th, 2008 Faculty Consultant: Dr. Ali Memari Northside Piers – Brooklyn, NY Structural.
A Medical Office Building For The Primary Health Network Daniel Goff I Structural Option Dr. Thomas Boothby l Faculty Advisor Sharon, Pennsylvania Source:
Penn State Hershey Medical Center Children’s Hospital Hershey, Pennsylvania Matthew Vandersall Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Dr. Richard Behr.
The University Sciences Building Northeast, USA Final Presentation Chris Dunlay Structural Option Dr. Boothby.
Pennsylvania College Of Technology Dauphin Hall Williamsport, Pennsylvania Aubert Ndjolba Structural Option AE Senior Thesis Thesis Advisor: Dr.
Crocker West Building State College, Pa Eric M. FosterStructural OptionSpring 2009.
Daniel Bellay Lancaster County Bible Church Structural Option Lancaster County Bible Church.
Frank Burke Structural Option Sallie Mae HQ Reston, VA.
Courtesy of Holbert Apple Associates Georgia Avenue Building Introduction Statistics Gravity System Lateral System Problem Statement & Solution.
360 State Street New Haven  CT  Structural | Sabrina Duk | T. Boothby.
George Read Hall The University of Delaware
Rockville Metro Plaza II Rockville Pike John Vais | Structural Option PSU AE Senior Thesis 2014 Faculty Advisor – Dr. Hanagan Rockville, Maryland
Hershey Research Park Building One Jonathan Krepps Structural Option Senior Thesis 2013 Faculty Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Senior Thesis Structural Option Ryan Friis Spring Morgan St. Chicago, IL 111 Morgan St. Chicago, IL Ryan Friis Structural Option.
All Hakuna Resort photos in courtesy of LMN Development LLC Young Jeon Structural Option Advisor: Heather Sustersic Hakuna Resort AE Senior Thesis 2015.
Introduction Connected to existing Benton Hall via skywalk Size: 103,154 SF above grade on 4 levels 82,661 SF below grade parking on 3 levels Cost: $23,651,159.
GARY NEWMAN STRUCTURES OPTION ADVISOR: DR. HANAGAN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION SPRING 2008.
AMERICAN EAGLE OUTFITTERS Quantum II Corporate Headquarters Michael Sandretto Spring – 2007 Structural Option.
Southeast View of IRMC West View of IRMC. Presentation Outline Introduction Existing Structure Thesis Goals Structural Depth Lighting Breadth Conclusion.
BRYAN DARRIN SENIOR THESIS PRESENTATION MILLENNIUM HALL DREXEL CAMPUS PHILADELPHIA, PA.
Duquesne University Forbes Expansion
SEAN BEVILLE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. BOOTHBY APRIL 13, 2009 TEMECULA MEDICAL CENTER “STRUCTURAL SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT OF ARCHITECTURAL.
Gateway Plaza Wilmington, DE Elizabeth Hostutler Structural Option.
Caitlin Ferrell Structural Option Senior Thesis Presentation Spring 2006 The Erie Convention Center and Sheraton Hotel Erie, Pennsylvania Architectural.
Mathew Nirenberg AE Senior Thesis Structural Option.
Helios Plaza Houston, TX Advisor - Dr. Hanagan Kevin Zinsmeister Structural Option.
Seth M. Moyer Office Buildin g Sayre, PA Structural OptionAdvisor: Dr. Thomas E. Boothby.
The Towers at the City College of New York Robin Scaramastro - Structural Option - Advisor: Dr. Memari Senior Thesis Final Presentation – Spring 2007.
URS – ARENA DISTRICT OFFICE BUILDING DAVID LEE STRUCTURAL OPTION.
Dan Donecker BAE/MAE – Structural Option Senior Thesis Project 35 West 21 st Street New York, New York.
Howard County General Hospital Patient Tower Addition Columbia, MD Kelly M. Dooley Penn State Architectural Engineering Structural Option.
Whiteland Village Mary Longenecker Structural Option Senior Thesis August 7, 2007.
Ryan Pletz Structural Dr. Hanagan The Pennsylvania State University Department of Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis April 14, 2008.
Welcome to Daniel Painter’s Architectural Engineering Senior Thesis Presentation of Two Freedom Square April 16, 2003 Pennsylvania State University.
Swedish American Hospital Heart and Vascular Center Philip Frederick Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 15 April 2008.
Senior Thesis 2006 The Pennsylvania State University
Brad Oliver – Structural Option Advisor – Professor Memari.
Oklahoma University Children’s Medical Office Building Oklahoma City, Oklahoma AE Senior Thesis Final Report April 14, 2014 Jonathan Ebersole Structural.
Fordham Place Bronx, NY Aric Heffelfinger Structural Option Spring 2006.
Jon Hill – Structural OptionSpring 2005 Senior Thesis Structural Analysis and Redesign of Lynde and Harry Bradley School of Technology & Trade Milwaukee,
Justin Purcell Structural Option Advisor: Dr. Hanagan.
Computer Associates International, Regional Office
Introduction 120,000 SF 10 Stories (90ft) $40 Million Aug – Dec.2011 Presentation Outline Introduction Base Steel Redesign Progressive Collapse Tie.
Park Potomac Office Building “E” Kyle Wagner l Structural Option AE Senior Thesis l Spring 2010 Faculty Consultant l Prof. Kevin Parfitt.
Eastern USA University Academic Center Alexander AltemoseIStructural Option.
SteelStacks Performing Arts Center Sarah Bednarcik | Structural BAE/MAE Faculty Advisors: Dr. Linda Hanagan & Dr. Ali Memari Spring Thesis 2013Bethlehem,
200 Minuteman Drive New Design for Additional Floors and Vibration Sensitive Equipment Brent Ellmann Structural Option Dr. Linda Hanagan - Consultant.
Student Health Center Jacob Brambley - AE (structural option)
Michael A. Troxell Structural Option Senior Thesis 2006 The College of Business Administration Northern Arizona University Flagstaff, Arizona.
Biobehavioral Health Building The Pennsylvania State University Daniel Bodde Structural Option Advisor – Heather Sustersic.
THE NORTHBROOK CORPORATE CENTER Redesign of the Lateral Load Resisting System.
William W. Wilkins Professional Building Columbus, Ohio Michelle Benoit Senior Thesis Presentation Spring 2007 Structural Option.
ANTONIO DESANTIS VERNE STRUCTURAL OPTION ADVISOR: PROF. PARFITT APRIL 14, 2008 BRIDGESIDE POINT II PITTSBURGH, PA “BUILDING SYSTEM OPTIMIZATION” THE DEPARTMENT.
Hunter Woron Spring 2012 Structural Professor Parfitt.
CBD Chemical Production Building Virginia, USA Christina DiPaolo │ Structural Option.
R. Bryan Peiffer– Structural Option AE Senior Thesis 2011 Three PNC Plaza, Pittsburgh Pa.
Pearl Condominiums Philadelphia, PA
CONDOMINIUM TOWER & PARKING
Advisor: Professor M. Kevin Parfitt
Introduction James W. & Frances G. McGlothlin Medical Education Center
Acterna Headquarters John M Sekel, EIT Germantown, Maryland
Biobehavioral Health Building, University Park, PA
JAKE POLLACK NEW YORK POLICE ACADEMY STRUCTURAL OPTION
TOWERS CRESCENT BUILDING B Mike Synnott Structural.
Rutgers University Law School Building Addition and Renovation Nathan E. Reynolds Advisor: M. Kevin Parfitt Structural Option The Pennsylvania State.
North Shore at Canton The Pennsylvania State University
Project: 250 West Street, Columbus, Ohio
Mitre III Building McLean VA Debra Schroeder Structural Option.
RiverView Condominiums II Chicago, IL
Presentation transcript:

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions 151 First Side Pittsburgh, PA William J. Buchko Structural Option Senior Thesis April 14 th, 2008 Advisor: Kevin Parfitt introduction

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Presentation Outline  Overview  Proposal  Structural Depth  Acoustics Breadth  Construction Management Breadth  Conclusions  Acknowledgements and Dedication  Questions introduction

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Overview  Location: Pittsburgh, PA  Significance: First condominium built downtown since 1968  Architecture: 18 stories 82 units Open floor plan 233,000 SF overview

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Overview  Mechanical: 36.7 Ton roof top unit by AAON Individual heat pumps  Electrical: 120/208 3 phase system 1800a main switch  Lighting: Incandescent downlights in units Fluorescent downlights and wall washers in corridors and public areas overview

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Overview  Construction: $24M construction cost Owned by Zambrano Corp., Ralph A. Falbo, Inc., and EQA Landmark Communities Design-build construction  Structural: Hambro composite joist floor system Braced frame and moment connection lateral system overview

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Proposal  Structural Depth Decrease cost and increase performance by using typical structural systems  Acoustics Breadth Analyze proposed systems and check existing systems for acoustical quality  Construction Management Breadth Analyze and compare proposed systems to current systems proposal

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Structural Depth  Floor System Current Hambro MD2000 composite joist system compared to a typical composite beam system  Lateral System Current combination braced frame and moment connection system compared to concrete core, braced frame, and moment connection systems structural depth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Structural Depth  Current Hambro floor system 3¼” concrete on metal decking Supported by joist with composite top chord structural depth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Structural Depth  Proposed composite steel system 4” light weight concrete on B-LOK decking with 1 stud/ft Beams placed at third points of bays structural depth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Structural Depth Typical floor beam layout and design structural depth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Structural Depth Column redesign structural depth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Structural Depth  Current lateral system Combination of braced frames and moment connections structural depth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Structural Depth Frames long grids 2, 3, and 4 in north-south direction structural depth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Structural Depth Frames long grids E and F in east-west direction structural depth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Structural Depth  Concrete core lateral system Utilizes concrete core to handle all lateral loading Unacceptable due to interaction of trades structural depth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Structural Depth  Braced frame lateral system Utilizes braced frames for all lateral loading Quicker installation Low torsion due to design Unacceptable due to diagonal braces within floor plan structural depth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Structural Depth Proposed braced frame layout structural depth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Structural Depth  Moment connection lateral system Utilizes moment connections for all lateral loading Fully restrained connections recommended for greater than 10 stories Unacceptable due to cost and scheduling of fully restrained connections structural depth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Acoustics Breadth  Floor system Compare current Hambro system to proposed composite beam system  Mechanical system Analyze current issues and provide alternative solutions acoustics breadth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Acoustics Breadth  Current Hambro floor system STC of 57 IIC of 30 Susceptible to structure born sound Susceptible to “wave” phenomenon acoustics breadth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Acoustics Breadth  Proposed beam floor system STC of 55 IIC of 35 Potential for better low end absorption Not susceptible to “wave” phenomenon acoustics breadth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Acoustics Breadth  Mechanical system Roof top unit in direct line of sight with penthouse terraces Most common complaint from workers and potential tenants acoustics breadth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Acoustics Breadth  Existing sound levels AAON representative unable or unwilling to provide acoustical data Data obtained through IVIE IE-33 Pocket PC and similar unit Values were confirmed by 3 rd party acoustician acoustics breadth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Acoustics Breadth IVIE IE-33 Graph acoustics breadth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Acoustics Breadth  Proposed solutions Acoustical barrier would only provide 6dB reduction System can be relocated to minimize sound levels on terraces acoustics breadth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Acoustics Breadth Proposed roof top unit relocation acoustics breadth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Acoustics Breadth  Relocation effects 30ft gives 15dB reduction Nosier supply intake now faces away from all occupied spaces Two walls separate unit from terraces, adding approximately 20dB of reduction Total reduction of approximately 40dB, putting the terrace at an acceptable sound level acoustics breadth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Construction Management Breadth  Schedule Compare scheduling impacts of proposed systems both on and off of the critical path  Cost Compare cost of proposed systems to current systems cm breadth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Construction Management Breadth  Schedule Steel placement takes 177 days and is unaffected by floor system change Pouring of proposed floor system would save a minimum of 1 day per floor, though not on the critical path A potential 10 days could be saved through fire protection, though not on the critical path The braced frame lateral system could save 5 days along critical path, but was found to be unacceptable cm breadth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Construction Management Breadth  Cost Larger slab and more expensive concrete offset with cheaper steel, resulting in a similar cost between floor systems Redesign of columns and beams save 131 Tons of steel, which saves approximately $228,000 Labor savings estimated at approximately $30,000 Potential system savings of 1-2% of total building cost cm breadth

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Conclusions  Structural Depth A composite beam floor system would be both feasible and economical to use No better lateral system was found  Acoustics Breadth A composite beam floor system could provide equal acoustical qualities Mechanical system can be moved to provide a better sound level on outdoor terraces  Construction Management Breadth All proposed systems could be implemented without a change in the critical path All proposed systems would be similar in cost or less expensive conclusions

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Acknowledgements I would like to thank the following companies and individuals:  Zambrano Corp.  The Kachele Group  Indovina Associates Architects  Hambro Systems  Cenkner Engineering Associates, Inc.  Professor Kevin Parfitt  Professor Moses Ling  The Thesis Mentors  Family and friends for their support and understanding conclusions

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Dedication This Thesis presentation and year long project is dedicated to the memory of: Nicholas Buchko 9/15/15 – 12/6/06 “Never give up.” conclusions

151 First Side William J. Buchko introduction overview proposal structural depth acoustics breadth cm breadth conclusions Questions? conclusions