S. Molloy, P. Emma, J. Frisch, R. Iverson, M. Ross, D. McCormick, M. Woods, SLAC, CA, USA S. Walston, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA, USA V.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg Short Bunches at FLASH.
Advertisements

Sub-ps bunch length measurements at the JLab FEL with coherent transition radiation (CTR) and “Martin-Puplett” interferometer Pavel Evtushenko, JLab 
Two-dimensional Effects on the CSR Interaction Forces for an Energy-Chirped Bunch Rui Li, J. Bisognano, R. Legg, and R. Bosch.
Paul Emma SLAC January 14, 2002 BERLIN CSR Benchmark Test-Case Results CSR Workshop.
ILC Accelerator School Kyungpook National University
J. Rudolph, Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin EuCARD 2nd ANNUAL MEETING Slice emittance measurements at the ELBE superconducting RF photoinjector.
LC-ABD P.J. Phillips, W.A. Gillespie (University of Dundee) S. P. Jamison (ASTeC, Daresbury Laboratory) A.M. Macleod (University of Abertay) Collaborators.
Bunch compressors ILC Accelerator School May Eun-San Kim Kyungpook National University.
Bunch Length Measurements in the E167 Experiment Ian Blumenfeld E167 Collaboration SLAC/UCLA/USC.
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Linear Collider Bunch Compressors Andy Wolski Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory USPAS Santa Barbara, June 2003.
R Scrivens, CERN, ABI Workshop, 12/2008 The Feschenko Bunch Shape Monitor User experience at CERN Developed by INR, Troitsk. High resolution bunch shape.
Ulrich RaichLinac-4 instrumentation day May 2007 Longitudinal Bunch Shape Monitor U. Raich.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Juhao Wu Feedback & Oct. 12 – 13, 2004 Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS Longitudinal Feedback with CSR as Diagnostic.
RF Systems and Stability Linac Coherent Light Source Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory Stanford Linear Accelerator Center.
Hamid Shoaee LCLS FAC Review – October Control System Overview Hamid Shoaee Controls System Manager Injector control system commissioning & Support.
July 22, 2005Modeling1 Modeling CESR-c D. Rubin. July 22, 2005Modeling2 Simulation Comparison of simulation results with measurements Simulated Dependence.
Henrik Loos High Level 17 June 2008 High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning Henrik Loos.
Magnetic Compression of High Brightness Beams: Survey of Experimental Results Scott G. Anderson ICFA Sardinia July 2002.
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
Injector Setup/Mini-phase  Description of injector setup  sources of drift  Mini-phase procedure for injector  Checking the rest of the machine. Stephen.
Influence of the Third Harmonic Module on the Beam Size Maria Kuhn University of Hamburg Bachelor Thesis Presentation.
Transverse emittance Two different techniques were used to measure the transverse emittance. The multislit mask in the injector 9 MeV Quadrupole scan for.
Longitudinal transfer function a.k.a. (M 55 ) measurements at the JLab FEL Pavel Evtushenko, JLab  Jlab IR/UV upgrade longitudinal phase space evolution.
ILC EMI and bunch length measurements Gary Bower, SLAC Nick Sinev, U. Oregon, speaker Sean Walston, LLNL.
SPPS, Beam stability and pulse-to-pulse jitter Patrick Krejcik For the SPPS collaboration Zeuthen Workshop on Start-to-End Simulations of X-ray FEL’s August.
Transverse Profiling of an Intense FEL X-Ray Beam Using a Probe Electron Beam Patrick Krejcik SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Dept. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility FEL Bunch length.
Coherent Diffraction Radiation experiment Konstantin Lekomtsev, Grahame Blair, Gary Boorman, Pavel Karataev, Maximilian Micheler John Adams Institute at.
A bunch compressor design and several X-band FELs Yipeng Sun, ARD/SLAC , LCLS-II meeting.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
1 Henrik Loos 1 13 Sep 2011 APE Meeting Recent Activities H. Loos 09/13/2011.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Max Cornacchia, SLAC LCLS Project Overview BESAC, Feb , 2001 LCLS Project Overview What is the LCLS ? Transition from 3 rd generation light sources.
Beam Delivery System collimators J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
Marc Ross T9 – Snowmass 2001 Closing Plenary T9 – Diagnostics M. Ross/R. Pasquinelli Thursday, July 19 RD: 1) determine mixing between z and x/y 2) determine.
P. Krejcik LINAC 2004 – Lübeck, August 16-20, 2004 LCLS - Accelerator System Overview Patrick Krejcik on behalf of the LCLS.
Peterson xBSM Optics, Beam Size Calibration1 xBSM Beam Size Calibration Dan Peterson CesrTA general meeting introduction to the optics.
An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron radiation. I.Meshkov, T. Mamedov, E. Syresin, An electron/positron energy monitor based on synchrotron.
Tuning Techniques And Operator Diagnostics for FACET at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Chris Melton SLAC Accelerator Operations.
Lessons Learned From the First Operation of the LCLS for Users Presented by Josef Frisch For the LCLS March 14, 2010.
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Experience with Novosibirsk FEL Getmanov Yaroslav Budker INP, Russia Dec. 2012, Berlin, Germany Unwanted Beam Workshop.
X-band Based FEL proposal
XFEL Beam Dynamics Meeting Bolko Beutner, DESY First results of micro-bunching and COTR experiments at FLASH Bolko Beutner, Winfried Decking,
J. C. T. Thangaraj Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Batavia, Illinois 1 Experimental studies on an emittance exchange beamline at the A0 photoinjector.
A single-shot method for measuring fs bunches in linac-based FELs Z. Huang, K. Bane, Y. Ding, P. Emma.
Applications of transverse deflecting cavities in x-ray free-electron lasers Yuantao Ding SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory7/18/2012.
OPERATED BY STANFORD UNIVERSITY FOR THE U.S. DEPT. OF ENERGY 1 Alexander Novokhatski April 13, 2016 Beam Heating due to Coherent Synchrotron Radiation.
Bunch Length Monitor Development
Minjie Yan Ch. Gerth, E. Hass Deutsches Elektronen-Synchrotron (DESY)
LCLS Bunch Length Monitor Marc Ross - SLAC
Group and phase velocity matching in THz IFEL interaction
402.5 MHz Debunching in the Ring
ILC EMI and bunch length measurements
Beam-induced EMI and detector electronics
Beam Optics Set-Up at SLAC End Station A
Time-Resolved Images of Coherent Synchrotron Radiation Effects
Diagnostics overview and FB for the XFEL bunch compressors
OBSERVATION OF FEMTOSECOND BUNCH LENGTH USING A TRANSVERSELY DEFLECTING STRUCTURE Markus Hüning*, Andy Bolzmann, Holger Schlarb (DESY, Hamburg), Josef.
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback and Stability Requirements
LCLS bunch length monitor utilizing coherent radiation
High Level Physics Applications for LCLS Commissioning
Linac Diagnostics Patrick Krejcik, SLAC April 24, 2002
First results of micro-bunching and COTR experiments at FLASH
Linac Diagnostics Commissioning Experience
LCLS Longitudinal Feedback System and Bunch Length Monitor Juhao Wu Stanford Linear Accelerator Center LCLS DOE Review, February 08, 2006 LCLS longitudinal.
Presentation transcript:

S. Molloy, P. Emma, J. Frisch, R. Iverson, M. Ross, D. McCormick, M. Woods, SLAC, CA, USA S. Walston, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, CA, USA V. Blackmore, Oxford University, Oxford, UK Picosecond Bunch Length and Energy-z Correlation Measurements at SLAC's A-Line and End Station A Absolute Bunch Length Measurement There are no diagnostics in ESA that would allow an absolute measure of the bunch length. The longitudinal phase space distribution of the beam in an upstream region of the machine could be propagated to ESA using the known R56 of the A-line. Synch light fan generated by the bending magnets. Low energy particles High energy particles Screen The energy spread of the bunch may be measured by monitoring the synchrotron light generated by the beam in the dispersion of the A-line bend. The spread of the particles longitudinally may be determined using the LOLA at the end of the SLAC linac. A combination of these techniques yields an expansion of the bunch profile in E and z. Screen Calibration Energy Calibration Alter the energy of the beam using the energy feedback. Record the SLM image at each energy set-point. Correlate the mean of the image’s horizontal projection with the energy. z Calibration Alter the LOLA phase by small amounts from the zero crossing. Record the SLM image at each phase. Correlate the mean of the image’s vertical projection with the phase. Using the known frequency of LOLA, convert this to a correlation with z. Determine Bunch Length from Image LOLA does not perform a 90° rotation of the bunch, so the height of the image will include contributions from the transverse bunch size, and the tilt of the bunch. These are removed by performing a parabolic fit to the image height versus LOLA amplitude. Only three points were recorded: LOLA on, LOLA off, and LOLA on with 180° phase difference. The phase difference was plotted as a negative amplitude. Zero offset of fit due to transverse height of bunch. Asymmetry of plot due to tilt of bunch. Location of minimum on horizontal axis gives the LOLA amplitude and phase that would remove this tilt. LiTrack simulation of the longitudinal distribution at the end of the linac. Tilt of the core in z-E generated by linac wakefields, and the tails that create the “S” shape generated by linac phasing. The phasing of the linac may be altered to adjust the slope of the core. Due to the R56 of the A-line (R56 = 0.465), this results in difference bunch lengths in ESA. The extent of the phasing is limited by the generation of excessive tails.

Abstract We report on measurements of picosecond bunch lengths and the energy-z correlation of the bunch with a high energy electron test beam to the A-line and End Station A (ESA) facilities at SLAC. The bunch length and the energy-z correlation of the bunch are measured at the end of the linac using a synchrotron light monitor diagnostic at a high dispersion point in the A-line and a transverse RF deflecting cavity at the end of the linac. Measurements of the bunch length in ESA were made using high frequency diodes (up to 100 GHz) and pyroelectric detectors at a ceramic gap in the beamline. Modeling of the beam's longitudinal phase space through the linac and A-line to ESA is done using the 2-dimensional tracking program LiTrack, and LiTrack simulation results are compared with data. High frequency diode and pyroelectric detectors are planned to be used as part of a bunch length feedback system for the LCLS FEL at SLAC. The LCLS also plans precise bunch length and energy-z correlation measurements using transverse RF deflecting cavities. The measured longitudinal distribution is converted into an array of several thousand points that represent the bunch in E-z space. Using a dedicated longitudinal dynamics software package (such as LiTrack), this distribution is tracked around the A-line into ESA. Since there are no accelerating elements in the A-line, a simple R-matrix calculation suffices (as shown). Relative Bunch Length Measurements A system that measures the relative bunch length for every pulse could be employed as part of a feedback system. This system is based on the bunch length measurements of the SLC final focus system at SLAC. The length of the bunch at LOLA and in ESA was measured for a series of linac phase settings. Principle of Measurement A beam radiates RF as it passes the electrical discontinuity presented by a ceramic gap. The spectrum of this radiation is determined by the bunch shape. Thus, shorter bunches will generate higher frequency RF, and a measurement of the power present in a particular frequency band will provide a relative measure of the bunch length. This experiment used diodes sensitive to different frequency bands, and a pyro detector to monitor radiation produced at ceramic gaps in the ESA beamline. Experimental Setup Four different diodes were tested. ~20 m of WR90 brought a portion of the radiation from a ceramic gap (see photo) to a splitter, which then directed the power to two identical, ~20 GHz diodes, via 16 and 23 GHz lowpass filters. ~1 m of WR10 (see photo) was used to channel the power to two 100 GHz diodes. Since the power radiated at a certain frequency P(ω) is proportional to the square of the charge, it must be normalised by this value. Both the 100 GHz and the pyro-detector respond strongly to changing the linac phase ramp, indicating a strong response to the bunch length. The pyro is capable of measuring shorter lengths due to its wideband response. When plotted alongside the bunch length as measured by LOLA, it can be seen that the 100 GHz diode has a dynamic range of at least 400 – 800 µm. This is consistent with the theory.