© PCaW Making whistleblowing work Guy Dehn Director, PCaW, UK IPRCCBPF, Brussels
© PCaW Why whistleblowing matters
© PCaW The human dilemma
© PCaW Whistleblowing: some of the key issues Public Concern at Work
© PCaW Who do you want to blow the whistle? When? What’s the main driver - regulation or good business? How can you separate public concerns from private complaints? What safeguards against abuse? How do you judge success? Starters
© PCaW Do you want your people to raise a concern openly, confidentially (so, if requested, the person’s identity is not freely disclosed), or anonymously (the person does not identify himself)? It’s your call…
© PCaW Do you want people to raise a concern… with the alleged wrongdoer? with their manager? with senior management? with the regulatory authorities? Whom to tell?
© PCaW Should it be a duty to blow the whistle? If not, should good faith be a requirement? Hotlines and helplines Where does responsibility lie internally? EU Data Protection and SOX conflicts Other issues
© PCaW Whistleblowing & Data Protection Whistleblowing
© PCaW How the UK approach meets US & EU rules and helps sound business The UK approach
© PCaW signals a change in the culture, is not prescriptive, and provides strong civil sanctions against reprisal. The UK approach UK’s Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA), praised by Lord Nolan for ‘ so skilfully achieving the essential but delicate balance between the public interest and the interest of employers ’
© PCaW This approach promotes & protects public interest whistleblowing, focuses on wrongdoing that threatens the public interest, encourages open rather than anonymous whistleblowing, and has a stepped disclosure regime that emphasises internal accountability, strengthens regulatory oversight and recognises public accountability The UK approach
© PCaW The stepped disclosure regime Public disclosure protected The actual disclosure is reasonable Regulatory disclosure protected Valid cause to go wider Internal disclosure protected Substance to the concern Genuine suspicion Internal disclosure Regulatory disclosure Public disclosure
© PCaW As to purpose and effect, the UK approach reassures workers there is a safe alternative to silence, sees the whistleblower as a witness not a complainant, encourages all half decent organisations to solicit and address concerns, helps target regulatory activity better, promotes the public interest, and seems to work in practice. Practical benefits
© PCaW Effective whistleblowing arrangements Policy & Practice
© PCaW The purpose The essence of whistleblowing arrangements are that staff should be able to a) by-pass the direct management line, because that may well be the area about which their concerns arise, and b) go outside the organisation if they feel the overall management is engaged in an improper course.
© PCaW Key issues leadership policy is written to give assurance to the ‘silent majority’ default is that staff should raise concerns openly distinguish whistleblowing concerns from grievances & bullying provide internal and external disclosure options promotion
© PCaW Whistleblowing Best Practice: Whistleblowing
© PCaW Whistleblowing - a. Bringing an activity to a sharp conclusion as if by the blast of a whistle (OED) b. Raising concerns about misconduct within an organisation or within an independent structure associated with it (Nolan Committee) c. Giving information (usually to the authorities) about illegal or underhand practices (Chambers) d. Exposing to the press a malpractice or cover-up in a business or government office (US, Brewers) e. Providing a safe alternative to silence ( Public Concern at Work ) f. (origins) Police constable summoning public help to apprehend a criminal; signal to stop work in the industrial age; referee stopping play after a foul in football. Whistleblowing