The Green Climate Fund Carmen Arguello LEDS-GP Punta Cana, DR

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Disaster Risk Reduction and Governance. Ron Cadribo.
Advertisements

Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Programming directions for GEF-6 Climate Change Mitigation
Overview of the Global Fund: Guiding Principles Grant Cycle / Processes & Role of Public Private Partnerships Johannesburg, South Africa Tatjana Peterson,
Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions (NAMAs) for low-carbon end-use sectors in Azerbaijan Chingiz Mammadov UNDP.
CFO & Director, Support Services- Javier Manzanares 9 December, 2014 Green Climate Fund and MOFA: General Overview and 2015 Collaboration Plan.
Massimiliano Di Pace1 EU TRADE POLICY Eu provides also initiatives, financing and services to support Eu companies’ efforts for internationalisation The.
Overview of financial sources and access modalities for mitigation actions, including support for CDM and NAMAs Regional Workshop on CDM and NAMAs for.
Climate Finance Inflows into the Caribbean Launch of the PANOS Caribbean Online Database & Its Establishment as a Regional Hub for Climate Change Information.
9-10/4/03AK1 Workshop on enabling environments for technology transfer Ghent, Belgium 9-10 April 2003 Andrej Kranjc Ministry of the Environment, Spatial.
CTCN ORIGINS 2 COP 15 (Copenhagen): agreement to establish a “Technology Mechanism” COP 16 (Cancun): Technology Mechanism further elaborated (TEC and.
EuropeAid 1 EU Blending mechanisms Caribbean Investment Facility (CIF) Eleftherios TSIAVOS Brussels, 6 October 2011.
European capacity building initiativeecbi What to do with the Adaptation Fund? Its role in relationship with the GCF Sunday, 7 December, Swissôtel Lima.
WHAT IS THE GEF? History and Structure GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Tbilisi, Georgia June 22-24, 2015.
Zukisani Jakavula, SouthSouthNorth (CDKN) Mobilising Climate Finance African Regional Workshop on Nationally Appropriate Mitigation Actions Kigali, Rwanda.
AF Project Cycle and Approval Process Panama City, Panama Nov, 2011.
Climate Finance: the national context Neil Bird Overseas Development Institute.
Highlights and Visions May 24,  Since joining the GEF as an Executing Agency in 2004, the Bank has developed a portfolio that amounts to nearly.
Engaging with the Green Climate Fund
1.Resourcing the response to climate change is a global challenge. 2.The proposed framework will develop evidence, and structure lesson learning, within.
TIMELINE 2010: Fund established by COP decision 2011: Transitional Committee designs Governing Instrument 2012: Board established and begins meeting 2013:
(Dr. Peter Heil, ALTUS – Hungary)
1 Overcoming Challenges in Preparation and Implementation of NAMAs Kigali, 17 th August 2015 African Regional Workshop on NAMAs.
PRESENTED BY: RAHIMA NJAIDI MJUMITA 3 RD APRIL 2012.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
1 Inter-American Development Bank Environment and Safeguards Policy - A Strategic Overview.
The Multilateral Fund and its Management Structure UNFCCC Workshop on the Adaptation Fund 3-5 May 2006 Alberta, Canada Maria Nolan Chief Officer - Multilateral.
Understanding Transformational Change in NAMAs Liberal Seburikoko UNFCCC regional workshop, Kigali 18 August 2015.
Institutional Structure of the GEF William Ehlers, Head, External Affairs Team American University Seminar April 9, 2012 Washington, DC.
Agence Française de Développement – AFD – Page 1 Alexis BONNEL Sector Operations Agence Française de Développement Infrastructure Trust Fund.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
Institutional Structure of the GEF GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop September 2011 Honiara, Solomon Islands.
Sudhir Sharma, URC 5th June 2014 Bonn, Germany Overview of NAMAs listed in UNFCCC Registry - Expressed support needs Sudhir Sharma Senior Climate Change.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Investment Planning and Implementation for Low Emissions Development LEDS Global Partnership Annual Workshop Punta Cana, Dominican Republic October 14-16,
Global Environment Facility Climate Change 14 May 2004 Siv Tokle GEF Monitoring and Evaluation Unit.
AfDB-IFAD Joint Evaluation of Agriculture and Rural Development in Africa Towards purposeful partnerships in African agriculture African Green Revolution.
Operational Policies and Guidelines of the Adaptation Fund March Manila, The Philippines.
Green Climate Fund.
Team Leader, Technology Policy and Strategy, UNFCCC Mr Andrew Higham THE CANCUN AGREEMENTS, THE TECHNOLOGY MECHANISM AND TECHNOLOGY NEEDS ASSESSMENTS UNFCCC.
Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
Accessing Resources from the Adaptation Fund – Accreditation for Direct Access.
Danida support to the microfinance industry. Overall objectives of Denmark’s development cooperation Overall objective To combat poverty and promote human.
Engaging with the Green Climate Fund Ousseynou Nakoulima
“Dialogue on Climate Change” June 2016, Rand Water GREEN CLIMATE FUND (GCF) Presentation Olympus Manthata: DBSA.
State of Play Update from the Green Climate Fund Tao Wang National Development Banks and Green Finance Mexico City | Mexico April 2015.
Presentation title Enhancing synergies towards climate action and sustainable development on the ground GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Da Nang, Vietnam,
Energy Efficiency Opportunities for Manufacturing Industries
Presentation title 9. Defining a country-specific NAP process: rapid stocktaking using a sample NAP process to identify building blocks, workstreams and.
Challenges to climate finance
Status Update Green Climate Fund
GEF governance reforms to enhance effectiveness and civil society engagement Faizal Parish GEC, Central Focal Point , GEF NGO Network GEF-NGO Consultation.
Green Climate Fund Da Nang, 5th April 2017 Dr. Binu Parthan
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
The International Solar Alliance (ISA)
CF Ready Climate Finance Webinar:
Green Climate Fund Update on activitities Jose Delgado
Strengthening the International & National Financial Architecture for SIDS Lia Nicholson, Project Consultant Department of Environment Antigua and Barbuda.
4.2 CLIMATE SERVICES, ACTION AND RESILIENCE
The Green Climate Fund and environmental and social safeguards
Ousseynou Nakoulima, Chantal Naidoo & Louise Brown 7 October 2014
GCF business model.
Ousseynou Nakoulima, Chantal Naidoo & Louise Brown 7 October 2014
Overview Rationale Context and Linkages Objectives Commitments
GCF – EU Meeting ACCESSING GCF FINANCE 5 November 2018 | ACP, Brussels
Partnering with the Green Climate Fund (GCF)
INTERNATIONAL FORUM «GREEN BRIDGE» PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM
Janie Rioux, Agriculture and Food Security Senior Specialist
CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT FOR DEVELOPMENT EFFECTIVENESS FACILITY FOR ASIA AND PACIFIC A framework for promoting lesson learning on the use of country systems.
Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

The Green Climate Fund Carmen Arguello LEDS-GP Punta Cana, DR 14-16 October 2015 Opportunity for countries to accelerate access Strengthening knowledge & understanding Collaborating with peers & partners Making concrete progress Overview of the Fund Fifty thousand foot view Introduce core pillars Whet your appetite – stimulate questions that we will answer during the course of the day

About the Fund NAME GREEN CLIMATE FUND TYPE Financial Mechanism of the Convention - UNFCCC ESTABLISHED 11 December 2010 in Cancun, Mexico STAKEHOLDERS 194 Countries Signatories to the UNFCCC GOVERNANCE Board + Secretariat + Independent Accountability Units Equal Board members from developing and developed countries MANDATE To promote low-emission and climate-resilient development in developing countries HEADQUARTERS Songdo, Republic of Korea Start with some basic facts Who we are? Multilateral fund Financial mechanism of the convention Governed by 24 Board members & headquartered in Songdo, Korea Why we’re here? Small island developing states and other developing countries wanted such a fund To promote climate-resilient, low-emission development in developing countries

Fund architecture Simple picture of the architecture Fund with resources flowing through accredited entities To climate change projects/programmes in countries Using one of four financial instruments or a combination With NDAs/focal points playing a key role all through

How to engage with the Fund? Project/Programme Proposals Accreditation Readiness

Roles of NDAs and focal points Play some very important roles in the Fund’s operations Strategic alignment with country priorities Identify entities to work with, and even nominate direct access entities Approve projects before the Fund considers it through no-objection procedure Also approve deployment of readiness support available

NDAs, focal points and readiness overview Readiness status (as of 1 Oct) 135 NDAs or focal points 87 readiness requests $4.6 million committed 17 NDAs/focal points Just on readiness, it’s really starting to take off in the last couple of months - Until May, we had only committed readiness support to 1 country - Now, we’re at 17 and likely to be around 30 by the end of the year We have committed resources to two countries in the Caribbean – Antigua & Barbuda, and Dominican Republic Hope to have several others after this workshop Cover more on the role of the NDAs and focal points, and readiness tomorrow

Access to Green Climate Fund resources Through a country-driven approach, the National Designated Authority (NDA) of a country can identify the strategy by which it will address climate change, and provide broad strategic oversight of the Fund’s activities in the country. Access to Fund resources to undertake climate change projects/programmes will be through accredited national, regional and international implementing entities and intermediaries. Entities seeking accreditation to the Fund in order to access its resources will be assessed against the Fund’s fiduciary principles and standards, environmental and social safeguards (ESS) and gender policy. Through the 3-stage accreditation process and the fit-for-purpose approach, entities will be accredited for certain fiduciary functions, size of project/activity within a programme, and environmental and social risk category. Entities can apply on a rolling basis and applications are reviewed on a rolling basis. Decisions on accreditation will be made by the Board at its meetings. 8

Accredited entities Regional National International Ministry of Natural Resources of Rwanda National If NDAs and focal points are at the heart of the Fund, the accredited entities are the arteries They carry the much needed resources (the blood) to the different parts of the economy and society To help make people, infrastructure, and ecosystems more resilient to the impacts of climate change, and reduce GHG emissions from human activities They may be of different kinds – big, small, regional, national or international – with different capacities and reach The objective is that they deliver resources where its most needed International

Fit-for-purpose approach to accreditation Entities will be accredited with certain fiduciary functions, size of project/activity within a programme, and environmental risk category. Fiduciary functions Size of project/activity within a programme Environmental and social risk category Shapes how the entity will operate using the Fund’s resources (e.g., grants, concessional loans, equity, guarantees) Micro Small Medium Large High risk Category A/ Intermediation I (I-1) Medium Category B/I-2 Low/no Category C/I-3 14

Resources & allocation $10.2 billion in pledges $5.8 billion in signed contributions (1 Oct) 37 governments, 8 developing countries Geographical balance Sufficient resources for readiness Resources we have and how we’re expected to balance the overall portfolio over time Here’s what we have: 10.2 billion in pledges 5.8 converted into signed contributions that we can commit Comes from 37 countries, 8 developing Here’s how we need to allocate: 50% each to adaptation & mitigation (overall, not by country, and measured in grant-equivalent terms) 50% of adaptation has to go to SIDS, LDCs & African states Ensure geographical balance but no country allocations Significant allocation to the private sector Sufficient resources for readiness (have $16million released, of which $4.6 million committed to 17 countries) Resources and allocation targets Significant allocation to private sector

Terms determined on a case-by-case basis Financial Instruments 1 Terms determined on a case-by-case basis 2 Equity 3 Grants 4 Guarantees Fund has the ability to deploy 4 types of financial instruments – grants, equity, guarantees and loans Grants with/without repayment contingency Loans with high concessionality – 40 years maturity, 10 years grace, 0% interest Loans with low concessionality – 20 years maturity, 5 years grace, 0.75% interest Other non-grant instruments terms determined on a case-by-case basis On what basis are terms decided? Concessional loans

Size of project/activity within a programme Total Projected Costs* * At the time of application, irrespective of the portion that is funded by the Fund and, if applicable, other sources, for an individual project or activity within a programme. 16

Projects & programmes With a focus on… Impacts What areas of mitigation and adaptation will we fund? Adaptation – Activities that make resilient : the livelihoods of people and communities Infrastructure & built environment Ecosystems & ecosystem services Health, food & water systems Mitigation – activities that reduce or avoid emissions: Energy generation & access Transport Appliances, buildings, cities & industries Forests & land use For each activity in any of these areas, we will also be looking for impacts, paradigm shift potential, crosscutting benefits & sustainable development co-benefits Will cover this in more detail in the next presentation With a focus on… Impacts Paradigm-shift potential Crosscutting adaptation-mitigation benefits Sustainable development co-benefits

Six Investment Criteria Impact potential Paradigm shift potential Sustainable development potential Responsive to recipients needs Promote country ownership Efficiency & effectiveness Potential to contribute to achievement of Fund's objectives and result areas Catalyze impact beyond a one-off investment Wider economic, environmental, social (gender) co-benefits Vulnerability and financing needs of beneficiary in targeted group Six high-level investment criteria of the Fund [READ DEFINITIONS] These form the high-level filter for assessing funding proposals and are relatively straightforward Country ownership and capacity to implement (policies, climate strategies and institutions) Economic and, if appropriate, financial soundness, as well as cost-effectiveness and co-financing for mitigation

Proposal Approval Process Lastly, touch on the proposal approval cycle Generation  Concept Note Funding Proposal Iterative process until funding proposal is submitted Analysis/Recommendatoin  Decision Decision based on analysis by Secretariat and Technical Advisory Panel Work under way to simplify the approval process once some experience is gained

Scope of Readiness Activities Scope of Readiness Support Strengthening NDAs/FPs Developing Strategic Frameworks Accrediting Entities Developing Pipelines Sharing Information & Experiences

Thank you! Carmen Arguello Regional Advisor for Latin America Telephone:   +52 1 2221 40 6711 E-mail: carguello@gcfund.org Website: www.GCFund.org  

Snapshot view of the Fund Delve deeper next couple of days