Developing & Implementing a State Plan George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October 9,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SWPBS Implementation Blueprint - revised George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut Mar
Advertisements

How is My Classroom Management?
Sustained Implementation of School-wide PBIS for All Students George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
Effective Behavior Management in the Classroom Setting
Responsiveness to Intervention & School-wide Positive Behavior Support George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Aligning Resource for School Improvement: Getting Everyone on Same Page George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
School Discipline & Classroom Management: Role of School Leadership George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
Addressing Bullying Behavior W/in a PBIS Framework George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
SWPBS: Preventing & Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Optional PBIS Coaches Meeting November 15, 2010 Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions and Supports.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS University of CT & OR
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
CT PBS Coaches’ Meeting Coaching SWPBS Basics December 9, 2008 Brandi Simonsen, Kari Sassu, & George Sugai.
SWPBS: Preventing & Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Outcomes, Data, Practices, & Systems George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
Preparing for End & Beginning SWPBS Year: Evaluation & Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Non-Classroom Settings: Active Supervision George Sugai Center on Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports September 25, 2007.
Training/Coaching Meeting & Team Training Debriefing George Sugai Center for Behavioral Education & Research Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
SWPBS: Implementing with Accuracy & Durability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut May.
Non-classroom Settings. Classroom SWPBS Subsystems Non-classroom Family Student School-wide.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Year One RI PBIS Team & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
Supporting and Evaluating Broad Scale Implementation of Positive Behavior Support Teri Lewis-Palmer University of Oregon.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support for All Students: Coaching Implementation George Sugai University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions.
RTI: Reasons, Practices, Systems, & Considerations George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut December 6,
SWPBS Coaching: More than Reminders Donald H. Eichhorn Middle School Team & Coaches George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education &
Sustained Implementation of School-wide PBIS for All Students George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of.
SWPBS: Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut March.
Bridging Primary & Secondary/Tertiary Tier Practices & Systems: Responding to Unresponsive Behavior Brandi Simonsen & George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
Implementation Example: Bullying Prevention. Bullying Program Component Review Purpose.
Is PBIS Evidence-based? George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August.
Understanding & Planning for Non- Responsive Behavior (Secondary/Tertiary Tier) George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports University.
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Systems Logic for Sustained Large Scale Implementation George Sugai National Center on Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports UConn Center for Behavioral.
SWPBS: Sustainability, Classroom Management, Interventions for Individual Students Celeste Dickey & George Sugai University of Oregon & Connecticut Center.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support: Discipline & Beyond George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of.
SWPBS: Leadership Team Follow-up Jon Dyson, Lavonne Nkomo, George Sugai Center on Disabilities University of Connecticut Center on Positive Behavioral.
School-wide Positive Behavior Support for All Lou DeLoreto E.O. Smith High School George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Project Hi’ilani PBS Team Follow-up George Sugai Center on Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports May 6, 2008.
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 SRIP – Cohort 9 August 2014.
SWPBS: Reducing Effectiveness of Bullying Behavior George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Sustaining Systems Level Implementation of SWPBS: Lessons Being Learned George Sugai & Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education &
SWPBS Fidelity & Sustainability George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Oregon Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut.
Sustaining Change: RtI & SWPBS George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut May 9,
Plants, Camps, Special Education, & Prevention Science George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education and Research University of Connecticut.
Preventing & Responding to Problem Behavior: Review of Best Practice Gene Thompson, Martha Wally, Brandi Simonsen, George Sugai Center on Positive Behavioral.
Introduction to PBIS Forum George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
Review & Re-establish School-Wide PBIS: Tier 1 Cohort 10 August 2015 *
Review & Re-establish SW PBIS Tier 1 Continuum of Support *
SWPBS & RtI for All George Sugai University of Connecticut OSEP Center on PBIS September 24, 2008
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Rationale, Readiness, Features George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University.
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
Scaling & Sustaining Evidence-Based Practices Glen Dunlap, Steve Goodman, Tim Lewis, Rob Horner & George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS OSEP Project Directors’
Multi-tiered Systems of Support & Bullying Behavior Phi Delta Kappan - UConn George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research.
RTI: Linking Academic and Behavior Support Wesley Temple Dawn Davis.
School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: Getting Started George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut April 6,
SWPBS: Sustainability
PBIS PRACTICES.
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Evidence-Based Intervention Practices
Sustainability & Scaling & Failure of Friday In-service Day
DW Leadership: Sustainable & Scalable SWPBS
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Presentation transcript:

Developing & Implementing a State Plan George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut October 9,

Purpose Discuss strategies for establishing & implementing state-wide plan for SWPBS. Purpose Discuss strategies for establishing & implementing state-wide plan for SWPBS. SWPBS Basics Organizational elements Guidelines Discussion SWPBS Basics Organizational elements Guidelines Discussion

Problem Statement: How is Durable, Accurate, & Effective Implementation Achieved? “We give schools strategies & systems for developing positive, effective, & caring school & classroom climates, but implementation is not accurate, consistent, or durable. Schools need more than training.”

Challenges How do we….. Increase adoption of effective behavioral technologies in classrooms & schools? Ensure high fidelity of implementation of these technologies? Increase efficient, sustained implementation of these technologies? Increase accurate, efficient, & durable institutionalized use of these technologies? Decrease use of ineffective, inefficient, & irrelevant practices?

Predictable work environments are places where employees (Buckingham & Coffman 2002, Gallup) 1. Know what is expected 2. Have materials & equipment to do job correctly 3. Receive recognition each week for good work. 4. Have supervisor who cares, & pays attention 5. Receive encouragement to contribute & improve 6. Can identify person at work who is “best friend.” 7. Feel mission of organization makes them feel like their jobs are important 8. See people around them committed to doing good job 9. Feel like they are learning new things (getting better) 10. Have opportunity to do their job well. 1 million workers, 80,000 managers, 400 companies

Predictable work environments are places where educators, students, family members, etc…. 1. Know what is expected 2. Have curriculum & instruction to do job correctly 3. Receive recognition for demonstrating expectations. 4. Have teacher/parent/principal who cares, & pays attention 5. Receive encouragement to contribute & improve 6. Can identify someone who they can relate to.” 7. Feel mission of classroom/school makes them feel like their efforts are important 8. See students/teachers/principals around them committed to doing good job 9. Feel like they are learning new things (getting better) 10. Have opportunity to do their learning/teaching well. 1 million workers, 80,000 managers, 400 companies

SWPBS “Basics”

SWPBS is

SWPBS Implementation Features Matrix Draft Sugai & Horner, Aug 8 09

Implementation Levels Student Classroom School State District

Valued Outcomes Continuous Self-Assessment Practice Implementation Effective Practices Relevance Priority Efficacy Fidelity CONTINUOUS REGNERATION FOR SUSTAINABLE IMPLEMENTATION & DURABLE RESULTS

SYSTEMS PRACTICES DATA Supporting Staff Behavior Supporting Student Behavior OUTCOMES Supporting Social Competence & Academic Achievement Supporting Decision Making SWPBS Framework for operationalizing best practice

Agreements Team Data-based Action Plan ImplementationEvaluation GENERAL IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS Readiness agreements, prioritization, & investments 3-4 year implementation commitment Local capacity for training, coordination, coaching, & evaluation Systems for implementation integrity

Initiative, Project, Committee PurposeOutcomeTarget Group Staff Involved SIP/SID/etc Attendance Committee Character Education Safety Committee School Spirit Committee Discipline Committee DARE Committee EBS Work Group Working Smarter

Basic Meeting Structure Verified Need Planning Purpose & Outcomes Content Operations Decisions & Outcomes Summary of Outcomes & Agreements Follow-up & Evaluation Before During After See Appendices

Practice & Policy

Integrated Continuum of Support for ALL Dec 7, 2007

RtI

Responsiveness to Intervention

Classroom SWPBS Practices Non-classroom Family Student School-wide Smallest # Evidence-based Biggest, durable effect

Evaluation Criteria

SCHOOL-WIDE 1. Leadership team 2.Behavior purpose statement 3.Set of positive expectations & behaviors 4.Procedures for teaching SW & classroom-wide expected behavior 5.Continuum of procedures for encouraging expected behavior 6.Continuum of procedures for discouraging rule violations 7.Procedures for on-going data-based monitoring & evaluation EVIDENCE- BASED INTERVENTION PRACTICES CLASSROOM 1.All school-wide 2.Maximum structure & predictability in routines & environment 3.Positively stated expectations posted, taught, reviewed, prompted, & supervised. 4.Maximum engagement through high rates of opportunities to respond, delivery of evidence- based instructional curriculum & practices 5.Continuum of strategies to acknowledge displays of appropriate behavior. 6.Continuum of strategies for responding to inappropriate behavior. INDIVIDUAL STUDENT 1.Behavioral competence at school & district levels 2.Function-based behavior support planning 3.Team- & data-based decision making 4.Comprehensive person-centered planning & wraparound processes 5.Targeted social skills & self-management instruction 6. Individualized instructional & curricular accommodations NONCLASSROOM 1.Positive expectations & routines taught & encouraged 2.Active supervision by all staff (Scan, move, interact) 3.Precorrections & reminders 4.Positive reinforcement FAMILY ENGAGEMENT 1.Continuum of positive behavior support for all families 2.Frequent, regular positive contacts, communications, & acknowledgements 3.Formal & active participation & involvement as equal partner 4.Access to system of integrated school & community resources

Name______________________________Date_____________ Setting □ Hallway □ Entrance □ Cafeteria □ Playground □ Other_______________ Time Start_________ Time End _________ Tally each Positive Student ContactsTotal # Ratio of Positives to Negatives: _____: 1 Tally each Negative Student ContactsTotal # Non-Classroom Management: Self-Assessment

1.Did I have at least 4 positive for 1 negative student contacts? Yes No 2. Did I move throughout the area I was supervising? Yes No 3. Did I frequently scan the area I was supervising? Yes No 4. Did I positively interact with most of the students in the area? Yes No 5. Did I handle most minor rule violations quickly and quietly? Yes No 6. Did I follow school procedures for handling major rule violations? Yes No 7. Do I know our school-wide expectations (positively stated rules)? Yes No 8. Did I positively acknowledge at least 5 different students for displaying our school-wide expectations? Yes No Overall active supervision score: 7-8 “yes” = “Super Supervision” 5-6 “yes” = “So-So Supervision” <5 “yes” = “Improvement Needed” # Yes______

Teacher__________________________ Rater_______________________ Date___________ Instructional Activity Time Start_______ Time End________ Tally each Positive Student Contacts Total #Tally each Negative Student Contacts Total # Ratio of Positives to Negatives: _____ to 1 Classroom Management: Self-Assessment

Classroom Management Practice Rating 1. I have arranged my classroom to minimize crowding and distraction Yes No 2. I have maximized structure and predictability in my classroom (e.g., explicit classroom routines, specific directions, etc.). Yes No 3. I have posted, taught, reviewed, and reinforced 3-5 positively stated expectations (or rules). Yes No 4. I provided more frequent acknowledgement for appropriate behaviors than inappropriate behaviors (See top of page). Yes No 5. I provided each student with multiple opportunities to respond and participate during instruction. Yes No 6. My instruction actively engaged students in observable ways (e.g., writing, verbalizing) Yes No 7. I actively supervised my classroom (e.g., moving, scanning) during instruction. Yes No 8. I ignored or provided quick, direct, explicit reprimands/redirections in response to inappropriate behavior. Yes No 9. I have multiple strategies/systems in place to acknowledge appropriate behavior (e.g., class point systems, praise, etc.). Yes No 10. In general, I have provided specific feedback in response to social and academic behavior errors and correct responses. Yes No Overall classroom management score: 10-8 “yes” = “Super” 7-5 “yes” = “So-So” < 5 “yes” = “Improvement Needed” # Yes___

~80% of Students ~15% ~5% ESTABLISHING CONTINUUM of SWPBS SECONDARY PREVENTION Check in/out Targeted social skills instruction Peer-based supports Social skills club TERTIARY PREVENTION Function-based support Wraparound Person-centered planning PRIMARY PREVENTION Teach SW expectations Proactive SW discipline Positive reinforcement Effective instruction Parent engagement SECONDARY PREVENTION TERTIARY PREVENTION PRIMARY PREVENTION

Behavior Support Elements Problem Behavior Functional Assessment Intervention & Support Plan Fidelity of Implementation Impact on Behavior & Lifestyle *Response class *Routine analysis *Hypothesis statement *Function *Response class *Routine analysis *Hypothesis statement *Function *Alternative behaviors *Competing behavior analysis *Contextual fit *Strengths, preferences, & lifestyle outcomes *Evidence-based interventions *Alternative behaviors *Competing behavior analysis *Contextual fit *Strengths, preferences, & lifestyle outcomes *Evidence-based interventions *Implementation support *Data plan *Implementation support *Data plan *Continuous improvement *Sustainability plan *Continuous improvement *Sustainability plan Team-based Behavior competence

Policy Practice Feedback Loops Policy (Plan) Practice (Do) Structure Procedure Policy Practice Policy Enabled Practices (PEP) Practice Informed Policy (PIP) Fixsen et al. (2005) NIRN.

IMPLEMENTATION PHASES Need, Agreements, Adoption, & Outcomes Local Demonstration w/ Fidelity Sustained Capacity, Elaboration, & Replication 4. Systems Adoption, Scaling, & Continuous Regeneration

Sustainability Guiding Principles Is Student Affected Directly Continuous Regeneration

Effective Social & Academic School Culture Common Vision/Values Common Language Common Experience SWPBS

Investing in Sustainability & Scaling Wayne Gretzky Wisdom “Most players skate to where the puck is, but I skate to where the puck is going” “Most players skate to where the puck is, but I skate to where....” I want the puck to go

Some Lessons Plan for sustained implementation & expansion early & formally Invest in & adapt evidence-based practices to local context Give priority to relevant, measurable outcomes Treat school as basic unit for change, & districts/regions as main organizational units Establish demonstrations & data to enhance understanding Integrate initiatives based on common outcomes Invest early in local implementation capacity Emphasize continuous regeneration for efficacy, relevance, priority, & fidelity Positively reinforce successive approximations of implementer behavior