FSW Workshop 2015 Rob Chambers Lockheed Martin “Orion FSW – Enabling the Future of Human Exploration of the Solar System”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CEOS WGISS & Subgroup Meeting, Budapest, May CCSDS Liaison Consultative Committee on Space Data Systems Wyn Cudlip BNSC/QinetiQ
Advertisements

Unit 3, Chapter 9, Lesson 9: Space Systems Engineering 1 The Systems-engineering Process Trading Requirements We use the requirements loopa necessary and.
Avionics Processing Evolution – Apollo to Constellation
AGC and Manual Control of the Saturn V Booster Infoage Science/History Learning Center AGC and Manual Control of the Saturn V Booster Frank O’Brien Infoage.
VI. Descent and Terminal Guidance for Pinpoint Landing and Hazard Avoidance Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman.
SATELLITES What They Do and How They Work Michael J. Mackowski Aerospace Engineer October 2013 With Updates from Shawn Shepherd.
Inner Guides=Text Boundary Outer Guides=Inner Boundary Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration Michele Gates Human Exploration and Operations Mission.
Design of a Piloted Spacecraft to Bridge the Gap between the Space Shuttle and Crew Exploration Vehicle Michael Seibert University of Colorado at Boulder.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Initiative Overview and Status to the COMSTAC Philip McAlister NASA Exploration Systems Mission.
Earth-Moon Transport Doroteo Garcia Kazuya Suzuki Patrick Zeitouni.
NASA_G_O_02_09_05.ppt 1 National Goals and Objectives National Goal To advance U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests through a robust space.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Centennial Challenges Program Space Technology Mission Directorate Cube Quest Challenge Lunar Derby and Deep.
Habitat & Waypoints Picture. 2-Dec-04 USC 2004 AME 557 Space Exploration Architecture Design Requirements: A safe, reliable, low maintenance habitat to.
NASA A LTAIR Lunar Lander Project NASA A LTAIR Lunar Lander Project Avionics System Architecture Study Minimum Functional Architecture (Subsystems & Components)
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Project Apollo. Apollo Mission of Apollo To establish the technology to meet other national interests in space To achieve preeminence in space for the.
Noah Garcia-Galan *Some information in this presentation comes from outside sources.
Dr. Jennifer Rochlis. Overview Build a technology testbed for future rover concepts Develop and demonstrate operations and mission concepts.
Space Systems Engineering: Scoping & ConOps Module Scoping & Concept of Operations (ConOps) Module Space Systems Engineering, version 1.0.
The Return to Space Exploration Constellation. NASA Authorization Act of 2005 The Administrator shall establish a program to develop a sustained human.
1 Formation Flying Shunsuke Hirayama Tsutomu Hasegawa Aziatun Burhan Masao Shimada Tomo Sugano Rachel Winters Matt Whitten Kyle Tholen Matt Mueller Shelby.
1 Head of Russian Federal Space Agency ISS Program International Cooperation Paris, June 17, 2009.
A3 Altitude Test Facility
Satellites and Launch Vehicles. “Gee Whiz” Facts Number of satellites currently in orbit is over 900 Satellites orbit at altitudes from 100 miles (Low.
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
PROGRAM UPDATE March 2012.
SAS_08_Automation_for_System_Safety_Analysis_Malin 1 Automation for System Safety Analysis Jane T. Malin, Principal Investigator Project: Automated Tool.
AAE 450- Propulsion LV Stephen Hanna Critical Design Review 02/27/01.
Space Station Will it be accessible for You and Me?
MIT : NED : Mission to Mars Presentation of proposed mission plan
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
The Augustine Committee Review of Human Spaceflight Plans Committee Briefing to COMSTAC October 29, 2009 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee.
NASA/Air Force Cost Model presented by Keith Smith Science Applications International Corporation 2002 SCEA National Conference June
Intelligent Distributed Spacecraft Infrastructure Earth Science Vision Session IGARSS 2002 Toronto, CA June 25, Needs for an Intelligent Distributed.
Idaho RISE System Reliability and Designing to Reduce Failure ENGR Sept 2005.
March 2004 At A Glance autoProducts is an automated flight dynamics product generation system. It provides a mission flight operations team with the capability.
The Space Race Part II The Quest for the Moon.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
March /5/2016 At A Glance STARS is a real-time, distributed, multi-spacecraft simulation system for GN&C technology research and development. It.
Final Version Kequan Luu May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Flight Software.
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR Test Suites (Backup) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
LuNet Integrated Network Architecture for Sustained Human and Robotic Exploration Gary Noreen Telecommunications Architect Communications Architecture.
1 EOS Aqua Mission Status at AMSR Science Team Meeting September 16, 2015 Huntsville, Alabama Bill Guit Aqua/Aura Mission Director - Code 584 phone
CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s Revised Budget. CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s New Vision and Objectives (as of January 14, 2004)  VISION  The fundamental goal.
CEOS WGISS Meeting, Hanoi May CCSDS Liaison Consultative Committee on Space Data Systems Wyn Cudlip BNSC/QinetiQ Presentation.
NASA Orion Avionics Architecture Joseph Moholt All Points Logistics © 2015 Lockheed Martin Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
March 2004 At A Glance The AutoFDS provides a web- based interface to acquire, generate, and distribute products, using the GMSEC Reference Architecture.
1 MINUS EIGHTY DEGREE LABORATORY FREEZER FOR ISS (MELFI) MSFC Briefing February 2005 John Cornwell
Orbital Aggregation & Space Infrastructure Systems (OASIS) Background Develop robust and cost effective concepts in support of future space commercialization.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
Apollo was a three-part spacecraft: 1. Command Module (CM)- held the crew's quarters and flight control section 2. Service module (SM)- for the propulsion.
An Earth – Moon Transportation System Patrick Zeitouni Space Technology.
Phil Dempsey ISS Vehicle Office July 15, 2014 Inspection Considerations from the ISS Program NASA In-Space Inspection Workshop 2014.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Long Duration Cislunar Habitation Andrea Riley | International Space Station Division | NASA HQ | May 2016.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Asteroid Redirect Mission Solar Electric Propulsion 18 May 2016 Michael J. Barrett NASA-Glenn Space Technology.
Engineering and Science Directorate Organization Structure June 2016.
Badri Younes, Deputy Associate Administrator for Space Communications and Navigation Goddard Contractors Association February 17, 2016 The Future of NASA’s.
National Goals and Objectives
Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman
Adam Schlesinger NASA – JSC November 3, 2011
The Space Race How it all Began.
The Space Race How it all Began.
Adam Schlesinger NASA – JSC November 3, 2011
Space Travel Present & Future
Ares I System Requirements Review (SRR)
Autonomous Operations in Space
NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Moblas 4 Monument Peak, CA LRO and HPWREN Scott Wetzel NASA Satellite Laser Ranging Program Near Earth Networks Programs.
Key Benchmarks in a LEO Economy Robert L. Curbeam Jr.
Team A Propulsion 1/16/01.
Presentation transcript:

FSW Workshop 2015 Rob Chambers Lockheed Martin “Orion FSW – Enabling the Future of Human Exploration of the Solar System”

CU CSO – 10/8/20152 Orion Overview Crew Module (CM) Functions The CM provides a habitable pressurized volume to support crewmembers and cargo during all elements of a given mission - from Launch Operations to Earth Entry, Descent, Landing, and Recovery. Crew Module (CM) Functions The CM provides a habitable pressurized volume to support crewmembers and cargo during all elements of a given mission - from Launch Operations to Earth Entry, Descent, Landing, and Recovery. Service Module (SM) Functions The SM, comprised of two subcomponents the Crew Module Adapter (CMA) and the European Service Module (ESM), provides services to the CM in the form of propulsion, consumables storage, heat rejection and power generation. Service Module (SM) Functions The SM, comprised of two subcomponents the Crew Module Adapter (CMA) and the European Service Module (ESM), provides services to the CM in the form of propulsion, consumables storage, heat rejection and power generation. Orion Top Level Functions & Configuration The Orion Spacecraft will serve as the primary crew vehicle for NASA Exploration Systems Development (ESD) missions in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Beyond Earth Orbit (BEO). The vehicle will be capable of conducting regular in-space operations in conjunction with payloads delivered by the Space Launch System (SLS) Launch Vehicle. Orion Top Level Functions & Configuration The Orion Spacecraft will serve as the primary crew vehicle for NASA Exploration Systems Development (ESD) missions in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and Beyond Earth Orbit (BEO). The vehicle will be capable of conducting regular in-space operations in conjunction with payloads delivered by the Space Launch System (SLS) Launch Vehicle. Launch Abort System (LAS) Functions The LAS provides an abort capability to safely transport the CM away from the launch vehicle stack in the event of an emergency on the launch pad or during ascent. Launch Abort System (LAS) Functions The LAS provides an abort capability to safely transport the CM away from the launch vehicle stack in the event of an emergency on the launch pad or during ascent. Spacecraft Adapter (SA) Functions Provide structural connection to the launch vehicle from ground operations through orbital injection Provide protection for SM components from atmospheric loads and heating during first stage flight Spacecraft Adapter (SA) Functions Provide structural connection to the launch vehicle from ground operations through orbital injection Provide protection for SM components from atmospheric loads and heating during first stage flight CM CMA ESM SA LAS SM

CU CSO – 10/8/20153 Orion FSW Distribution Flight Control Module (FCM) Communications Control Module (CCM) Vision Processing Unit (VPU) Display Unit (DU) SM Power and Data Unit (PDU) Displays Control Module (DCM) CM Power and Data Unit (PDU) Camera Controller (CC) Guidance, Nav, Ctrl and Propulsion Environmental Control and Life Support (ECLS) Power Mission Automation Communications and Tracking (C&T) External / Internal Network Routing Displays and Controls Electronic Procedures (eProc) System-Level Fault Management Backup Software Engage Display Formats Bezel Key I/O Data Bus Management D/A Conversion Power Control Camera Housekeeping Wireless Bridge Optical Navigation Data Storage Video Compression Backup Software Primary FSW Recon Flew on EFT-1 (about ½ the total EM-2 code base) Added for EM-1 or -2 (each flight adds about ¼ the total EM-2 code base) All FSW is Scaled Agile Model-Based C++ Development Using Matlab/ Simulink or Rhapsody

CU CSO – 10/8/20154 Orion FSW CSCIs CORE Syncs applications with ARINC 653 O/S and exchanges data with onboard Ethernet GNCP Performs guidance, navigation, controls, and prop management DACF Provides interface between the crew and the other on-board CEV systems via display formats NRC Network Router Card manages the external network connectivity and IP related functionality VPUD VPU Drivers for backup and recording computer, interfaces with CFS ECLS Performs environmental control and life support SMG Systems-level fault management TVM Timeline and vehicle management performs mission automation VID Video support executing on camera control computer Infrastructure, GN&C, and crew displays comprise nearly 60% of Orion FSW Orion FSW has 22 CSCIs

CU CSO – 10/8/20155 EFT-1 Ascent Video

CU CSO – 10/8/20156 Orion Ascent FSW  The launch vehicle controls the stack, with limited crew manual steering on 1 st stage  We’re a “payload”…  Inertial and GPS-based navigation  Communications through LV  Mission sequencing for Orion staging events  …unless something goes wrong  Launch Abort System (LAS)  Untargeted Abort Splashdown (UAS) EM-2 Reference Mission PA-1 Flight Test

CU CSO – 10/8/20157 Orion Orbital FSW  “The Usual Stuff” for Earth Orbiters  Star tracker and GPS-based attitude and nav  Attitude control and maneuvers with RCS, aux thrusters, or main engine  Antenna and solar array pointing (TDRS, DSN)  Battery management  Data recording and playback  Fault management EM-2 Reference Mission  More “Unique” Functionality  Environmental control and life support Pressurization, humidity, CO2 rejection  Significant interaction between vehicle, ground, and crew  Full-mission coverage backup FSW  Extensive video ops (13 cameras)

CU CSO – 10/8/20158 Orion Deep-Space FSW EM-2 Reference Mission  “The Usual Stuff” for Deep Space Probes  Ground-based navigation  Extensive automated mission sequencing  More “Unique” Functionality  Optical navigation  Radiation monitoring  Time-critical powered flybys (EM-1)  Anytime abort / early return  On-board mission replanning  Multi-week duration life support  Flexible system configurations

CU CSO – 10/8/20159 Orion Crewed Operations FSW  Two primary categories – manual piloting and supervised autonomy  Manual piloting  Stack steering during ascent  Large number of in-flight piloted modes  Entry steering, bank rates  Orion is fly-by-wire – manual piloting is really manual guidance into closed-loop controls EM-2 Reference Mission  Supervised autonomy  Landing site selection  Mission sequencing pause, resume, authority to proceed  Over 80 display formats and various hand controllers  Key capability – electronic procedures (eProcs) which interact with formats to simplify crew operations

CU CSO – 10/8/ EFT-1 Entry Video

CU CSO – 10/8/ Orion Entry FSW  Orion lands off San Clemente instead of in mid-Pacific like Apollo  Tight landing accuracy and long entry-to- splashdown range – “skip” entry  Propagates to landing sites and calculates corrections  Developed for Apollo but insufficient computational throughput to execute  Multiple time-critical event-based triggers EM-2 Reference Mission  Various primary and backup flight software downmodes  Precision guidance  Loads managed  Manual crossrange control  Ballistic (lift-cancelled)

CU CSO – 10/8/ What’s Next?  Orion provides NASA’s access to human exploration beyond LEO  Cis-lunar “Proving Grounds”  Long-duration Martian exploration  Proving ground mission manifests in work using minor Orion upgrades (mostly flight software – less than 5% additional code)  Orion lunar sample return  Orion lunar habitat-based science support (e.g., far side telerobotics)  Orion exploration of lunar vicinity asteroid Extra-Vehicular Activity (EVA)Rendezvous, Proximity Operations, and Docking (RPOD)