1 Proposals of WLTC versions for low powered vehicles Heinz Steven 09.03.2012 WLTP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WLTP-EU DB short trip analyis 1 by H. Steven Overview of the WLTP-EU database short trip analysis.
Advertisements

WLTP Elaborated by the WLTP downscaling issues task force OIL #5 Proposal for modifications of the calculation parameter/coefficients.
Working Paper No. WLTP-09-07e 1 Agenda item 5: Progress report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) by H. Steven th WLTP IG meeting, 14.
WLTP - Development of the Harmonized driving Cycle A few considerations on the current approach for deriving the WLTC
Further modifications on the gearshift calculation tool
WLTP OIL #6, annex 2, section 2 Use of the gearbox, required data.
1 Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
Informal document No. GRPE (63rd GRPE, Jan. 2012, agenda item 3(a)) 1 1 Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle Prepared by DHC.
WLTP-E-Lab Sub Group Test procedure
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Application of the development approach described in WLTP-DHC on ACEA’s EU database By H. Steven
Working Paper No. WLTP-07-06e 1 Agenda item 5: Status report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) Points that are resolved in the TFs are written in.
Working Paper No. WLTP-07-06e short 1 Agenda item 5: Status report on Downscaling / Gearshifting (OIL #4-9) Points that are resolved in the TFs are written.
WLTP-DHC Current status of WLTP-DHC & Mode Construction Prepared by Japan the 16 th DHC group under GRPE/WLTP informal group 15 th Jan Palais.
1 Proposal for a downscaling procedure for the extra high speed phases of the WLTC for low powered vehicles within a vehicle class Technical justification.
WLTP-DHC Validation Phase I Results and Recommendations by India
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
WLTP-DHC Current status of WLTP-DHC & Mode Construction Prepared by DHC Secretary the 18 th DHC meeting under GRPE/WLTP informal group 5 th Jun.
Renault statements and questions: Page Autor/Abt.: ACEA WLTP EV Group /Samarendra Tripathy 1] Phase specific calculation (appendix YYY of attached.
XX OCT 2011 Japan Automobile Research Institute 1 Study on cycle modification ~ Reflect validation test 1 result ~ 10 th DHC sub-group meeting under GRPE/WLTP.
under GRPE/WLTP informal group
WLTC* methodology Proposed by Japan
Working paper number WLTP-DHC Comparison of different European databases with respect to road category and time periods (on peak, off peak, weekend)
1 Mr H A Nakhawa, ARAI, Pune, India 13 th DHC Informal Group Meeting 64 th GRPE Session, June 2012 Geneva Validation 1 results of Indian Vehicles on LPVC.
WLTP-DHC WLTC* Methodology ~ Initial Analysis Results & Modification on proposed methodology ~ Presented by Japan GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup 14.
1 Comments on the Ste 3 gearshift calculation tool from validation 2 participants Heinz Steven WLTP WLTP-DHC
1 Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data delivered by vehicle manufacturers By Heinz Steven
DTP/DHC update. DTP 13 th to 15 th April, EPA, Ann Arbor Chair: Michael Olechiw (co-chair from India unable to attend) No great advances were made in.
IFM, Institute for Vehicle Technology and Mobility 1 Mobilität Motorcycle Noise Emission Proposal for a measurement method representing rural driving behaviour.
WLTP-12-17e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
1 Comparison of the worldwide weighted WLTP database and EU regional database with WLTC rev3 and further modifications performed by JARI, JRC and HS Heinz.
WLTP-DHC Development of World-wide Light- duty Test Cycle -- Proposal for the threshold vehicle speed of Low/Middle/High(/extra-High) phase --
Starting note on gearshift issues
WLTP-DHC Analysis of in-use driving behaviour data, influence of different parameters By Heinz Steven
2013 年 6 月 12 日 所内フォーラム nd half1 st half2 nd half1 st half2 nd half1 st half2 nd half1 st half2 nd half WLTP-gtr.
WLTP-11-5e Status report about the work of the gearshift issues task force.
Motorcycle Noise Emission
Progress Report of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
Analysis of Fiat Ecodrive data
N. Ligterink, R. Cuelenaere
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
RDE Regulation Commission Meeting
In-use Data Conversion Technique ( Re-Categorization of in-use data )
Comparison of different gearshift prescriptions
Weighting Factors impact on WLTP CO2 emissions
WLTP-21-04e Revision 1 Amendment proposals for annex 2 of GTR #15 from the cycle gearshift issues task force Heinz Steven
Current status of WLTP-DHC
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
WLTP-DTP-LabProcICE-229
Development of World-wide Light-duty Test Cycle
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update and summary of previous presentations by H. Steven
Institute for Internal Combustion Engines and Thermodynamics
GTR Corrections, Open Points, Expert Proposals and Confirmations in GTR 15 1/2/2019.
Analyses related to dynamic effects in vehicle speed and NOx emission measurements by H. Steven
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven
Overview of in-use driving behaviour data from different regions
Analysis of the WLTP EU in-use database with respect to RDE-like trips, update of the presentation from by H. Steven , modified
WLTP-25-07e Gearshift Issues Heinz Steven
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-12
WLTP Comparison of WLTP unified database distributions and WLTC rev2 distributions Heinz Steven
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
WLTP Modelling of fuel consumption and detection of driveability problems for “borderline” cars with different maximum speed caps. Heinz Steven
In-use Data Conversion Technique ( Re-Categorization of in-use data )
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Comparison NEDC/WLTC Comparison of the influence of weighting factors as proposed by France on the validation 2 CO2 emission results for the WLTC By H.
WLTP-26-03e - Revision 1 Final amendments for annex 2 and status report about the programming code development subgroup Heinz Steven
Comparison of key parameters of EU WLTP database and WLTC version 5
Working Paper No. WLTP-05-10e
WLTP/DHC meeting on 29th March 2012 at Ispra, Italy.
Additional discussion points from the gearshift issues task force
GRPE/WLTP-IG/ DHC subgroup
Presentation transcript:

1 Proposals of WLTC versions for low powered vehicles Heinz Steven WLTP

Content 2 Structure of the additional in-use data from India and Overview of the whole Indian in-use data, Analysis of positive acceleration percentiles,  Per vehicle,  Per region, Analysis of relative positive accelerations, Proposal for vehicle classes, Summary and conclusions

Vehicle classification 3 Based on the analysis results of the acceleration performance of the vehicles in the WLTP in-use database (see WLTP-DHC-TC _Analyses_related_to_low_powered_vehicles.pptx ) the following draft vehicle classification was used for the cycle development:  Class 1: pmr < 21 kW/t,  Class 2: 21 kW/t <= pmr < 35 kW/t,  Class 3: pmr >= 35 kW/t. The 6 vehicles in class 1 are all from India, the 5 vehicles in class 2 are from India (3), Japan (1) and Europe (1). The in-use database for class 1 vehicles contains short trips from the low and the medium speed part, the in-use database for class 2 vehicles contains ST from low, medium and high speed parts.

Development approach 4 The cycle for class 3 vehicles is WLTC version 4 as used for validation 1b consisting of the 4 speed parts low, medium, high and extra high. The following approach was used for the development of complementary cycles for class 1 and 2 vehicles:  According to the in-use databases the extra high speed part was skipped for class 2 vehicles and the extra high speed part as well as the high speed part were skipped for class 1 vehicles.  The structure of the cycle parts in terms of cycle duration, idle time percentages and number and duration of short trips were taken over from WLTC version 4.  The vehicle speed - acceleration distributions for class 1, class 2 and class 3 were calculated from the corresponding parts of the WLTP database.

Development approach 5  This calculation was performed with equal weightings for the individual vehicles within the 3 classes.  The class 3 distributions were used for a comparison with the WWW database distributions.  The short trips for the class 1 and class 2 cycles were then chosen from the database on the basis of a least square analysis. In this analysis only positive accelerations were taken into account.  Further modifications on the candidate short trips were necessary in order to bring the distributions closer to the database distributions and in order to make sure that the acceleration values would be within the limits defined by the speed dependent acceleration distributions (<= a_95).  But it must be pointed out, that no smoothing of microtransients was applied so far.

Results 6 The following conclusions could be drawn from initial analysis results related to low powered vehicles:  It must clearly be stated that a separate cycle version for the low speed part is required for vehicles with power to mass ratios (pmr) below 20 kW/t. Since this separate version cannot be derived from the existing WLTC because only 2 vehicles belong to this class, more in-use data was required for the development.  It could well be that vehicles with pmr below 30/35 kW/t would also need cycle versions with reduced accelerations for the low and medium speed parts but since there was only 1 vehicle in this pmr class no general conclusions could be drawn without additional in- use data. In the meantime India delivered additional in-use data for 9 vehicles with pmr between 9.1 and 29.1 kW/t.

Class 1, low speed part 7 Figure 1

Class 1, medium speed part 8 Figure 2

Class 2, low speed part 9 Figure 3

Class 2, medium speed part 10 Figure 4

Class 2, high speed part 11 Figure 5

Comparison of distributions with DB 12 The mentioned modifications were made in order to get a better fit with the database distributions. The following figures show the corresponding comparisons. The fit is generally equally good as for the WLTC version 4 and the WWW database distributions. The latter are in good accordance with the class 3 distributions, at least for the low and medium speed parts.

Vehicle speeds, low speed part 13 Figure 6

Accelerations, low speed part 14 Figure 7

Vehicle speeds, medium speed part 15 Figure 8

Accelerations, medium speed part 16 Figure 9

Vehicle speeds, high speed part 17 Figure 10

Accelerations, high speed part 18 Figure 11

Proposal for vehicle classes 19 Based on the analysis results the following amended draft vehicle classification is proposed (square brackets means to be discussed and decided):  Class 1: pmr < [21] kW/t, v_max < [70] km/h, low speed part with highly reduced accelerations, v_max >= [70] km/h, low and medium speed parts with highly reduced accelerations.  Class 2: [21] kW/t <= pmr < [35] kW/t, v_max < [90] km/h, low and medium speed parts with reduced accelerations, v_max >= [90] km/h, low, medium and high speed parts with reduced accelerations.

Proposal for vehicle classes 20  Class 3: pmr >= [35] kW/t,  v_max < [135] km/h, low, medium and high speed parts only,  v_max >= [135] km/h, all parts This proposal is intended as starting point for the discussion and needs to be further evaluated.