ECOS Information Session Draft EPA Quality Documents February 13, 2013 Presented by EPA Quality Staff, Office of Environmental Information For meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Will it Help Me Do My Job?
Advertisements

1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Protocol Development.
EPA Requirements for Quality Management Plans And Quality Assurance Project Plans Ray Terhune, QAS.
Participation Requirements for a Patient Representative.
ANSI/ASQ E Overview Gary L. Johnson U.S. EPA
Overview of the Board’s Quality Management Plan. Topics in this Session  Quality System Overview  Overview of the contents of the Board’s Quality Management.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP The Uniform Federal Policy for Implementing Environmental Quality Systems (UFP-QS) Emile I. Boulos.
REDUCING BURDEN WHILE INCREASING QUALITY AT A GOVERNMENT AGENCY David A. Marker (Westat), Mary K. Dingwall (Westat), and Marla D. Smith (U.S. EPA) Presented.
Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
Quality Assurance for Tribal FIFRA Enforcement Grants David R. Taylor EPA Region 9 Quality Assurance Office.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel PGIN Representative.
Role of actuarial function supporting the FLAOR leading to the ORSA Ian Morris June 2014.
Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar January 2014 Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar.
Business research methods: data sources
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
Dimensions of Data Quality M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Addis Ababa 4 to 8 June 2012 Arif Rashid, TOPS.
R8 QA Training Annual QAPP Review Sept 20121R8 QA Training - QAPP Annual Reviews.
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
QA/QC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
REVIEW AND QUALITY CONTROL
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
1 FCAP Review Comments and Responses – 05/13/08 Fermilab Contractor Assurance Program Ed Vokoun EG&G Sr. Logistics Manager at Fermilab.
DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 1 The Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force (IDQTF) April 2004 Presented By: James.
Quality assurance activities at EUROSTAT CCSA Conference Helsinki, 6-7 May 2010 Martina Hahn, Eurostat.
Introduction to EPA Quality System Requirements
Fundamentals of Writing an Effective QAP Presentation to: KWWOA April 15, 2013 Department for Environmental Protection Energy & Environment Cabinet To.
John Stem 7 th Annual Summit on VR PEQA Louisville, Kentucky.
Senior Capstone Experience Framework A Guide for South Dakota Schools.
Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) Department for Environmental Protection Environmental & Public Protection Cabinet To Protect and Enhance Kentucky’s Environment.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Quality assurance / Quality control system for the Greek GHG emissions inventory Yannis Sarafidis, Elena Georgopoulou UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service 1 National Advisory Committee on Meat and Poultry Inspection August 8-9, 2007.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
The Revised §1915(c) Waiver Application CMS Teleconferences Changes to the HCBS 1915 (c) Waiver August 8 th & 15 th, 2005 Presenter: Nancy Thaler, CMS.
Quality Requirements for Extramural Agreements: U.S. EPA Region 5 Perspectives Kevin Bolger Amberina Khan Office of the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA.
Science Advisory Board Review of the Implementation of the Agency-Wide Quality System February 25, 1999 EPA-SAB-EEC-LTR
1 Introduction of Research and Development Project Evaluation System at NEDO Momoko OKADA New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization(NEDO)
QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN OVERVIEW. Course Goals At the conclusion of this training, you will be able to: –Explain the basic considerations for Quality.
External examiner induction Alison Coates QA Manager (Validation & Review)
SWEN 5130 Requirements Engineering 1 Dr Jim Helm SWEN 5130 Requirements Engineering Requirements Management Under the CMM.
EPA Region  What are QAPPs?  Why are Quality Assurance Project Plans needed?  When are they needed?  How are they done?  Then…what do you do.
USEPA REGION 4 Quality Management Plan ( For training purposes only)
Presented by CIDA on behalf of the Task Team on Multilateral Effectiveness.
Presented by: Rick Kendall, NA-17 Integrated Safety Management Best Practices Workshop September 2006; Denver Co. Assessment Criteria and Guidelines for.
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
DRAFT EDMC Procedural Directives NOAA Environmental Data Management Committee 12/3/2015 1
Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.
Overview of EPA Quality System Requirements. Course Goals At the completion of this course, you will: Understand EPA's quality system requirements Understand.
Development of the Egyptian Code of Practice for Student Assessment Lamis Ragab, MD, MHPE Hala Salah, MD.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
Quality Management Plans (QMPs) and Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) Danny France and Greg Noah EPA Region 4, SESD December 6, 2006.
Preparation Plan. Objectives Describe the role and importance of a preparation plan. Describe the key contents of a preparation plan. Identify and discuss.
Dr. Salwa El-Magoli Chairperson of the National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee. Former Dean of the Faculty of Agricultural, Cairo university.
Public Consultation Session: Consultation and Transparency Requirements for Offshore Petroleum Activities Francesca Astolfi A/g General Manager, Offshore.
Computer Security: Principles and Practice First Edition by William Stallings and Lawrie Brown Lecture slides by Lawrie Brown Chapter 17 – IT Security.
Auditors’ Dilemma – reporting requirements on Internal Financial Controls under the Companies Act 2013 and Clause 49 of the Listing agreement V. Venkataramanan.
World Health Organization
Orientation to Quality Assurance
Quality assurance in official statistics
The Quality of an Emission Inventory
Research Program Strategic Plan
Setting Actuarial Standards
Maintaining quality data throughout the life of a project
Preparations for post-2020 Impact Assessment European Commission Directorate General for Regional and Urban Policy Unit DGA Policy.
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
Internal Control Internal control is the process designed and affected by owners, management, and other personnel. It is implemented to address business.
Presentation transcript:

ECOS Information Session Draft EPA Quality Documents February 13, 2013 Presented by EPA Quality Staff, Office of Environmental Information For meeting purposes only

Agenda Welcome Purpose of Information Session Overview Next Steps Questions 2

Purpose of Information Session To share the proposal to issue a Quality Standard for external organizations To provide general information about the proposed Quality documents and the rationale for the change To clarify the process for submitting questions and comments To provide the next steps in the process 3

Why the concern about “quality”? “[Quality Assurance] ensures that the data relied upon for decision making is of known and documented quality and is based on sound scientific principles.” EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson, May 2009 “Quality Assurance refers to the … systematic measurement, comparison with a standard, monitoring of processes and an associated feedback loop that confers error prevention.” Wikipedia, January

Benefits of documenting QA Documentation of processes and procedures reduces vulnerabilities and increases data reliability and defensible decisions: scientific data integrity justifiable resource expenditures transparent activities reliable and defensible decisions often results in burden reduction 5

The Graded Approach Excessive implementation of QA procedures and extensive documentation of protocols is not needed. QA activities and documentation should be proportionate with the: importance of the project or study resources available organizational management and structure intended use of the data potential risks of making wrong decisions 6

Good documentation Sound QA activities and good documentation are achieved through the use of Quality Management Plans (QMPs) and Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs). A QMP reflects the activities and policies common to the organization. It is the ‘umbrella’ under which individual projects are conducted. A QAPP contains the instructions by which individual projects are implemented. It documents exactly what needs to be done, how to do it, and when it will be done. 7

The Standards Proposed Quality Standards :  Quality Standard for Environmental Data Collection, Production and Use by EPA Organizations CIO Standard 2106-S-01  Quality Standard for Environmental Data Collection, Production and Use by non-EPA Organizations CIO Standard 2106-S-02 They are similar but tailored to meet the needs of specific users. The correlation between them is very high and cover the same technical areas. The only difference between them is in internal procedural matters and EPA responsibilities. 8

Rationale for the Change 9 Standards were developed to support the EPA Quality Policy (CIO ) issued in 2008 Standards are intended to incorporate and clarify the QA requirements for EPA organizations that are found in the EPA Order (CIO ) Standards are intended to incorporate and clarify the QA requirements for non EPA organizations found in external agreements

Replaces existing requirements When CIO Standard 2106-S-02 (External Standard) is issued, it will replace: QA/R-2 for Quality Management Plans (QMPs) QA/R-5 for QA Project Plans (QAPPs) Organizations continue to develop: QMPs QAPPs The External Standard continues the requirement for these Plans to be approved before environmental data are collected, produced or used. 10

How do they differ from existing? Compared with the existing requirements, these Standards are: reflective of current practices in quality more explicit in what is required consistent with EPA Quality Policy CIO 2106 better organized There will be very little change in practical application and will result in stronger QMPs and QAPPs 11

Coverage of the Standards Main document: Content of Quality Management Systems and Quality documentation Planning, implementation, and assessment processes Roles and responsibilities of management and staff Three Annexes: A. Requirements for QMPs (normative) B. Requirements for QAPPs (normative) C. Guidelines on Project Planning (informative) 12

Accompanying Handbooks Handbooks have been made for use with the Standards: Preparing Quality Management Plans Developing Quality Assurance Project Plans These non-mandatory advisory documents will: Address QA requirements found in the Standards Replace previous related guidance documents Provide greater clarity on relevant QA practices 13

Rationale for the Change 14 EPA plans to issue a Guidance document to support the EPA Quality Policy (CIO ). QA Handbooks are intended to provide detailed practical advice on how to prepare the QA documents described in the Quality Standards

What do the Handbooks replace? These Handbooks replace: Unofficial advice on QMPs Guidance for QA Project Plans (EPA QA/G-5) These Handbooks are not “stand-alone” documents but intended to be used together with the Standards. References to specific parts of the Standards are included in each section of the Handbooks. 15

Are there large differences between Handbooks and the old Guidance? No. The QAPP Handbook incorporates all the material in the old Guidance (QA/G-5) and adds some more advice. QA/G-5 QAPP Handbook 2A. Project Management 2.2 Project Management 2B. Data Generation & Acquisition 2.3 Data Acquisition 2C. Assessment & Oversight 2.4 Assessments 2D. Data Validation & Usability 2.5 Evaluation of Usability 3.1 Projects Using Existing Data 3.1 – 3.5 Evaluation of Existing Data …but there are differences 16

Differences for example? The QAPP Handbook adds the following topics: qualitative comparisons to acceptance criteria evaluation of unconventional measurements qualitative and quantitative evaluations of usability use of existing data qualitative comparisons information on modeling use of data quality indicators use of quality control samples 17

How to submit questions and comments to EPA Go to Enter EPA–HQ–OEI–2012–0774 in the search line Add a check in the box “Supporting & Related Material“ When leaving comments, go back to the results page click on “Comment Now!” Submit comments in the text box or by uploading a file 18

Next Steps Comments are due by February 28, 2012 EPA plans to post this presentation in the docket EPA plans to address all comments and questions received in the docket EPA response to questions and comments will be placed in the docket by April 15, 2013 EPA plans to issue the Quality Standards and QA Handbooks in April

QUESTIONS 20