First results of the HRMT-09 tests on a LHC TCT collimator in HiRadMat Collimation WG Meeting 21.01.2013 Oliver Aberle on behalf of the Collimation team,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preliminary studies for T2 primary target for the NA61 fragmentation beam run 11 th October 2010 – NA61 Collaboration Meeting M. Calviani on behalf of.
Advertisements

Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
Beam-plug under M2 and HCAL shielding studies Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt October 9,
TRAIL BRIDGE INSPECTION BRIDGE INSPECTION PROCEDURES.
MERIT Beam Collimator Design Nicholas Olesen 9 August 2006.
SLAC rotating collimator for HiRadMat beam tests 14 March 2014 S. Redaelli, A. Bertarelli, CERN T. Markiewicz, SLAC US LHC Accelerator Research Program.
Collimation Meeting Tests on a Fully Assembled TCT Collimator in the HiRadMat Facility M. Cauchi, D. Deboy, on behalf of the Collimation Team.
Status of Phase II Energy Loss Studies 1. FLUKA with “simple” CERN-provided input file modeling ~40m around primary collimators used for all SLAC studies.
Estimation of temperature increase in the dump through Monte – Carlo simulations and rough calculations N. Charitonidis (EN/MEF)
Ralph Assmann What Do We Want To Measure (in 2009) R. Assmann S. Redaelli, V. Previtali CERN/BE discussed with W. Scandale CERN/EN26/3/2009CC09  See also.
LHC Machine Protection System Review LHC Machine Protection System Review Oliver Aberle13 April 2005 with input from R. Assmann and R. Losito Ensuring.
DS Heat Load Scenarios in Collision Points and Cleaning Insertions. Prepared by F. Cerutti, A.Lechner and G. Steele on behalf of the FLUKA team (EN-STI)
Status of LS1 collimator maintenance O. Aberle – 03/03/14 With input from P. Bestmann, S. De Man and J. Lendaro.
Updates on FLUKA simulations of TCDQ halo loads at IR6 FLUKA team & B. Goddard LHC Collimation Working Group March 5 th, 2007.
Results of microphone tests in HiRadMat Collimation WG Meeting Daniel Deboy on behalf of the Collimation team, thanks to A. Masi, J. Lendaro,
G4Beamline Simulated Electron Distribution within the HPRF Cavity 2/15/20121.
First radiological estimates for the HIRADMAT project H. Vincke and N. Conan 1.
LHC Crystal MD 22/09/2015 – LSWG #7 R. Rossi for the LHC Collimation team and the UA9 Collaboration.
Simulation comparisons to BLM data E.Skordis On behalf of the FLUKA team Tracking for Collimation Workshop 30/10/2015 E. Skordis1.
Nigel Watson / Birmingham CollimationCollimation EDR to specify and find optimal solutions for  Damage survival, 2 (1) bunches at 250 (500) GeV  Jaw.
Heat Deposition Pre-Evaluation In the context of the new cryo-collimator and 11-T dipole projects we present a review of the power deposition studies on.
HRMT14 – Post Irradiation F. Carra on behalf of the HRMT14 team 189 th Collimation Working Group – 20 April, 2015.
Cryo back at 17:30 Beam back at 19:00 IR2 aperture until ~03:00 Since then no beam from the SPS:  Connector problem on MKD  Connector eroded, needs to.
A. Bertarelli – A. DallocchioWorkshop on Materials for Collimators and Beam absorbers, 4 th Sept 2007 LHC Collimators (Phase II): What is an ideal material.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study (a sub-system of HL-LHC) is co-funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme 7 Capacities Specific Programme,
Summary of the technical stop activities on collimators (w17, 2012) O. Aberle – 07/05/12.
H. Matis, S. Hedges, M. Placidi, A. Ratti, W. Turner [+several students] (LBNL) R. Miyamoto (now at ESSS) H. Matis - LARP CM18 - May 8, Fluka Modeling.
Collimation design considerations at CERN (with some applications to LHC) R. Bruce on behalf of the CERN LHC collimation project R. Bruce,
E.B. Holzer BLM Meeting: Q & A March 20, Questions and Answers.
accident deformation – doyle 1/12 Phase II Collimator - Accident Deformation Simulation December 11, 2006.
V. Raginel, D. Kleiven, D. Wollmann CERN TE-MPE 2HiRadMat Technical Board - 30 March 2016.
Preliminary ANSYS Studies for Tungsten Collimators
R.W. Assmann, V. Boccone, F. Cerutti, M. Huhtinen, A. Mereghetti
Results of the 2007 BLM hardware tests in LSS5
C. Bracco, R. Bruce, B. Goddard, C. Wiesner, A. Lechner, M. Frankl
on behalf of the Phase II Collimation Design team
TCT BLM response from tertiary halo at 6.5 TeV
L. Gentini, A. Bertarelli, F. Carra
Design and testing of the Beam Delivery System collimators for the International Linear Collider J. L. Fernandez-Hernando STFC/ASTeC Daresbury Lab.
Tracking simulations of protons quench test
Motivations and Introduction to MultiMat Experiment in HiRadMat
M.Fitterer, A.Patapenka, A.Valishev (FNAL)
S. Roesler (on behalf of DGS-RP)
Status of HRMT23 Activities F. Carra, E. Berthomé, G
Proposal TDIS-TZM WP14 TDIS jaw validation testing
Outcome of recent impedance bench measurements on collimators
PANDA Yoke of the Magnet
Review on collimator movement with stepping motors
A. Rossi on behalf of the whole team:
Problem: A kicker failure can deposit 9 x 1011 protons on any metallic
Saturday 21st April 00:33 Interlock during ramp on BLM HV
Advanced Beam Dump for FCC-ee
Friday 30th September 06:00 Operator dump fill #2171, int. lumi about 75 pb-1 Previous operator dump from physics was on 14 September ! 07:00 Start of.
Federico Carra – EN-MME
Beam collimation for SPPC
Review on collimator movement with stepping motors
Interpretation and use of BLM Data
23 April 2012 Tom Markiewicz/SLAC
Damage Levels V. Kain AB/Co
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
HiRadMat Test Facility
External Review of LHC Collimation Project Oliver Aberle 1th July 2004
Status of energy deposition studies IR7
MERIT Beam Collimator Design
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
RC1 Prototype Conceptual Design Review 15 December, 2005
FLUKA Energy deposition simulations for quench tests
US LHC Accelerator Research Program
FOLLOW-UP FOR THE TDI = LHC injection beam stopper
Presentation transcript:

First results of the HRMT-09 tests on a LHC TCT collimator in HiRadMat Collimation WG Meeting Oliver Aberle on behalf of the Collimation team, special thanks to M. Cauchi, K. Weiss, R. Bebb and J. Lendaro HRMT-09 1 Collimation WG Meeting

First visual inspection in B Collimation WG Meeting History can be found in Marija‘s presentation (CWG, ): Preliminary Results of TCT HiRadMat Tests Preliminary Results of TCT HiRadMat Tests RP check before inspection (Kurt Weiss): Dose rate is the highest under the collimator box, not in excess of 40 contact. Contamination found, results available soon

First visual inspection in B Collimation WG Meeting History can be found in Marija‘s presentation (CWG, ): Preliminary Results of TCT HiRadMat Tests Preliminary Results of TCT HiRadMat Tests TestIntensity [p]Number of bunches* Beam Energy [GeV] Energy on Jaw [kJ] TNT equivalent [g] BBA before Test x pilot440 Test x high-intensity BBA after Test x pilot440 BBA before Test x pilot440 Test 2 9 x high-intensity BBA after Test2/before Test x pilot440 Test x high-intensity TOTAL x * Pilot bunch: ~ 5 – 10 x 10 9 ppb; High-intensity bunch: ~ x ppb

Some pictures –Downstream side clean (on first glance) 4 Collimation WG Meeting –Particles and dust between jaws and behind RF fingers

Some pictures Loose particles, fragments and droplets of different sizes. Distribution could have been modified by transportation and manipulation. (Note: Jaws have been moved prior to inspection) Collimation WG Meeting

Impact side - Upstream Upstream side Spread droplets Large lips of excess metal Collimation WG Meeting

Impact side - Upstream Debris of large dimensions. Concentrated around the impact region. Some distant projections? Collimation WG Meeting 7

Jaws opened Collimation WG Meeting 8 Jaw opened to full retracted position (switches). Projections from impact towards top and bottom plate (from test 3 towards opposite jaw). Vaporisation deposit around molten region. Test 1 Test 2 Test 3

Left jaw Collimation WG Meeting 9 34 mm ~ 3 mm Deposition from test 3

Right jaw Collimation WG Meeting 10 ~ 4 mm ~ 2 blocks (400mm)

Next steps Results from smear test to quantify and qualify contamination. Cross check the beam and impact parameters and compare with simulations. Better estimate of dimensional extent of visible damage. Possibility of inserting tools? Access to the tungsten blocks, open the box? Collaboration with external partners (e.g. PSI)? Collimation WG Meeting 11