Myths and Realities about Technology in K-12 Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructional Decision Making
Advertisements

APS District Technology Plan Team Project July 17, 2012 Jill Roberts, Sam Skeels, Deb Stevenson.
Learning and Teaching Using ICT Conferences Summer 2004.
West Virginia Achieves Professional Development Series Volume II Standards-Based Curriculum.
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Instructional Decision Making
Policy Considerations and Implementation. Overview Defining RtI Where did it come from and why do we need it? Support for RtI in federal law Core principles.
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
Data and Reporting In Schoolnet for District Admins Dan Urbanski, DPI IIS - Learning Systems Division.
Integrating Computers in Teaching Dr. Alex Pan. How are computers Used in the Schools: Some Indicators Student-computer ratio Internet Access Technology.
Singleton PLCs: Overcoming Barriers to Collaboration
Presented by: Laura Hines MCAS-Alt Teacher Consultant October 2014 MCAS Alternate Assessment (MCAS-Alt) Creating Portfolios that Address Access Skills.
Policy for Transforming Teaching & Learning through ICTs in South Africa Seugnet Blignaut Seugnet Blignaut
Assessment College of Engineering A Key for Accreditation February 11, 2009.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
The First Step in Building a Professional Learning Community Austin G. Buffum, Ed.D. Senior Deputy Superintendent Capistrano Unified School District.
1 Embedding ICT in PE Steve Cayley Adviser for e-Learning.
C Charting our Course Into Learning Through the Arts.
Teacher Certification Next Steps……. How certification works within your current practice Student Growth Criterion 3: Recognizing individual student learning.
The District Technology Plan The District Technology Plan Melanie & David Dillard Melanie & David Dillard
Aligning Observations and In-service Professional Development Prek-3 rd Jason Downer May 9, 2012.
FAEA Winter 2010 Meeting Digital Portfolio Assessment Kim Letellier, Music Team Leader Los Alamos Public Schools February 4, 2010.
GRAPHING CALCULATORS AND STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT BY RAED DANDAN.
Technology Leadership
Programs of the Intel Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation. Copyright © 2007 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
The Large Scale use of Computer Adaptive Assessment in Primary Schools in Northern Ireland Richard Hanna Director of Education Strategy April 2011 Council.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
The Impact of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative on Teachers, Students, and Learning Maine’s Middle School 1-to-1 Laptop Program Dr. David L. Silvernail.
Klein Independent School District Technology Integration Mentor Program Moving from learning to use technology...to using technology to learn Ann McMullan,
Educational Technology in Context The Big Picture.
Gifted and Talented: Self review Presented 28 Sept 4.15 – Webinar 3 of a series of 4 Carolyn English LEARNING MEDIA.
Timberlane Regional School District
E-Learning Strategic Plan E-Learning Vision: e-Learning expands opportunities for learners to do well at school and to be ICT capable for.
Michigan MSPs June 2007 Wendy Tackett, PhD, iEval
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
[District Name] & Voyager Strategic Partnership Proposal Insert district slogan here Insert district logo here.
Important to Remember! Name of tool used to collect data. Date the tool was administered.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
Chantal Heath Concept Map Technology Integration.
Community Context Series of Community Math Nights Leadership Development for Math Support Team Mathematics Content Courses for K-20 Teachers Ongoing support.
Classroom Technology Plan By Saundra Tyson-Dawson E7801 Instructional Technology Planning and Management Dr. Regina Merrwether.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
Professional Learning Communities A school-wide approach to ensure that all students learn.
Top-Down Support for Bottom-Up Leadership: What Actions can a State Education Agency Take to Best Promote and Support Teacher Leadership? Robert Sox EDRS.
The game is changing. It isn't just about math and science anymore. It's about creativity, imagination, and, above all, innovation.” –Business Week Magazine.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
“Growing Student Learning for Life” “Growing Student Learning for Life” Information Literacy/Technology Education Integration Plan Toolkit South Carolina.
CCSSM provides guidance and direction, and helps focus and clarify common outcomes. It motivates the development of.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Consultation, Leadership, and Empowerment Presenters: Ernest Cherullo Kim Conlon Felicia Watts.
Creative Classroom Collaboratives (C 3 ): Research Update December 1, 2011 Sponsored B y: Eastern Suffolk BOCES Presented By: Susanne Hartnett.
Washington State’s Professional Certification The Big Picture (reminder : ) Everett Public Schools Pre-Assessment Seminar
GSS as a Professional Learning Community. What do we already know about PLC’s?
Cliff Hutto Columbus State University. To best implement technology into the classrooms, there are some essential conditions that must be met: A Shared.
Evidence-based Research. Think Innovation…. The Day 8:30 am Introductions – Orientation for the Day – Expectation: Scenarios Three things about you,
Professional Learning Communities Supporting Student Achievement Supporting Student Achievement.
Principal Student Achievement Meeting PLC Visioning and Beyond.
Increasing Rigor in the Classroom Natalie Redman.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
PARCC Workshop February 29, Welcome! Presenters Mr. Baskerville Joann Abbate Kristen Gati Kelly Nickels Schedule Opening Break Out Sessions Q&A.
Models for Lessons Thinking about planning. The Verbs of Doing Mathematics Explaining Investigating Exploring Interpreting Analyzing Describing Deriving.
Information leadership: Managing ICT resources Module 3 Workshop 1.
Kansas College and Career Readiness Curriculum Sub-Committee Members Dr. David Conrady Carlos Gomez Jody Winfrey Jennifer Siverstein Lynne Ruschill.
Granby: 21 st Century Citizenship College and Career Ready with One to One Computing.
Educating the Digital Generation Randy Moczygemba.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
Presented by Diana Mitchell Beaumont ISD Central Medical Magnet High School.
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
Presentation transcript:

Myths and Realities about Technology in K-12 Education

Starting Assumptions Technology is changing our world Technology is changing what our students need to learn Technology can have significant impact on how we teach and how we learn The core of K-12 education remains unchanged: good teaching will always be the key

Technology can help teachers and students access information develop basic skills explore record organize analyze produce create communicate practice individualize collaborate and lots more!

The Challenge Putting these capabilities to effective use

Myth #1 Putting computers into schools will directly improve learning; more computers will result in greater improvements.

Eyes on your own work “Keep your eyes on your own screen.”

Reality #1 There will be minimal educational return from technology investments unless technology is one component of a well-designed educational improvement plan.

Myth #2 There are agreed-upon goals and "best practices" that define how computers should be used in K-12 classrooms.

Reality #2 Educational goals and approaches must be clarified and plans for purchasing, using and evaluating the impact of technology must be developed to fit those goals and approaches.

Myth #3 Once teachers learn the basics of using a computer they are ready to put the technology to effective use.

Reality #3 For technology to be used fully in schools, significant changes are required in teaching practices, curriculum, and classroom organization. These changes takes place over years and require significant professional development and support for teachers.

Myth #4 The typical district technology plan is sufficient for putting technology to effective use.

Reality #4 To use technology effectively, we must fully integrate it into school improvement plans, professional development plans, special education plans, etc. Technology must be viewed as providing tools to help us meet central educational goals, not as defining a new, separate set of goals.

Myth #5 Equity can be achieved by ensuring equal student-to- computer ratios

“Oh, we finished the basic subtraction. Now we’re designing a series of interrelated transformational geometric comparisons.”

Reality #5 When considering issues of equity, we need to examine all the essential conditions for making technology into effective tools for teaching and learning, not just the number and type of hardware available.

Some more myths Putting technology in the classroom will improve the quality of teaching Technology and web-based learning saves time and money The impact of technology on student achievement can be isolated and shown to increase student test scores Gifted students benefit more from technology If you build it they will come