Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expedited Family Reunification Project
Advertisements

Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Using Data to Plan Waiver Strategies and Drive Improvements: Key Indicators and Trends April 11, 2012.
Research Insights from the Family Home Program: An Adaptation of the Teaching-Family Model at Boys Town Daniel L. Daly and Ronald W. Thompson EUSARF 2014/
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
Foster Care Reentry after Reunification – Reentry in One or Two years – what’s the difference? Terry V. Shaw, MSW Daniel Webster, PhD University of California,
Race Matters: Synthesis of Research Findings Robert B. Hill, Ph. D. Disproportionality Teleconference May 24, 2005.
California Department of Social Services Children’s Services Operations and Evaluation PRESENTED TO THE CHILD WELFARE COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 12, 2012 REVISED.
Presentation to Children’s Administration CW Supervisors March 19, 2009 Lyman Legters and George Gonzalez Casey Family Programs.
Intersections between Child Welfare & Homeless Systems: Results from 2 Research Studies Stephen Metraux, PhD University of the Sciences in Philadelphia.
Alicia F. Lieberman Child Trauma Research Project University of California San Francisco San Francisco General Hospital Including and Serving Immigrant.
Demographics of Foster Care: Comparative Perspectives and Implications Fred Wulczyn, Ph.D Chapin Hall Center for Children University of Chicago International.
Parental Substance Abuse and Child Welfare: Promising Programs for Early Intervention and Permanency Claire Houston S.J.D. Candidate, Harvard Law School.
Rahn Kennedy Bailey, M.D., D.F.A.P.A 113 th President National Medical Association Chairman & Professor DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES.
How do Macon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Macon/Piatt Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement14833%
The Racial Geography of the Child Welfare System
Heidi Gulbrandson– Action Team Leader Hillary Millner Sunah Shin Champaign County Action Team.
How do Coles County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Clark...Shelby Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement7136%
How do LaSalle County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? LaSalle County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement20755%
How do Morgan & Scott County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Morgan and Scott Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Who lives in Rock Island County? Rock Island County Demographics by Race and/or Ethnic Group, 2009 estimate N = 148,826 White113, % Black or African.
How do McLean County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? McLean County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement23350%
How do Peoria County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Peoria County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement19235%
How do Champaign County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Champaign County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement22548%
How do Sangamon County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Sangamon County Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total Law enforcement21638%
How do Logan County Children Enter the Child Welfare System? Logan, Mason and Menard Counties Indicated reports FY 2010 SourceNumber Percent of total.
Foster Care Reentry Going Beyond 12 Months of Follow-up Terry V. Shaw, MSW, PhD Daniel Webster, MSW, PhD University of California, Berkeley School of Social.
Disproportionality in Human Services
Vermilion County Action Team Laurie Krolikowski & Susan Werner.
Improving Permanency and Addressing Disproportionality and Disparity in Peoria County Prepared by the Center for Adoption Studies School of Social Work.
Reunification – Old and New Information Diana J. English PhD Child Welfare League of America May 30, 2007.
Policy and Practice Options Related to Exit Issues Experimenting and Improving the Recovery Coach Model Joseph P. Ryan, Ph.D. Working Conference on Race.
Research Synthesis on Child Welfare Disproportionality and Disparities: Child Welfare Entries
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Addressing Disproportionality in Texas A Committed Community Collaboration Presented by: Carolyne Rodriguez, Director of Texas State Strategy, Casey Family.
Risks of Reentry into the Foster Care System for Children who Reunified Terry V. Shaw, MSW University of California, Berkeley School of Social Welfare.
Social Work in PsycINFO Topics in PsycINFO of Relevance to Social Work PsycINFO is a research database published by the American Psychological Association.
The Role of Public Policy in Protecting Children from Violence.
©2008 National Association of Social Workers. All Rights Reserved. 1 CHILD PROTECTION IN THE UNITED STATES Norma Threadgill-Goldson, Ph.D., MSW Eastern.
An introduction to for Caregivers. The Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence is Washington’s first comprehensive statewide training partnership dedicated.
Safe & Equitable Foster Care Reduction in Multnomah County CCFC Commission Mtg Tuesday, Dec 8 th 2009.
A Case Study of the Intersection Between the Child Welfare and Criminal Justice Systems Charlene Wear Simmons, Ph.D. Parental Incarceration, Termination.
Contra Costa County Disproportionality – Examples and Changes Ray Merritt; Dorothy Powell; Children and Family Services Research and Evaluation.
The 8 th Annual COMMUNITY FORUM on the Conditions of Children in Orange County WELCOME.
Systems Change to Achieve Permanency Mountains and Plains Child Welfare Implementation Center Arlington, Texas April 15, 2009.
Hamilton County Mental Health and Recovery Services Board Provider Meeting Transforming the Hamilton County System of Care and Community for Transitional.
Crossover Youth: Research, Policy and Practice CYPM Overview
1 Data Revolution: National Survey of Child and Adolescent Well-Being (NSCAW) John Landsverk, Ph.D. Child & Adolescent Services Research Center Children’s.
1 Joyce James, LMSW-AP Associate Deputy Executive Commissioner Overview of the Texas Model for Eliminating Disproportionality and Disparities Center for.
A New Narrative for Child Welfare February 16, 2011 Bryan Samuels, Commissioner Administration on Children, Youth & Families.
Creating Racial Equity in Child Welfare: What Do We Know? Judith Meltzer, CSSP Jim Casey Youth Opportunities Initiative Fall Convening November 16, 2010.
The Link Between Thriving Children and Economic Security: Creating Equity in Early Childhood for Our Common Good.
Sangamon County Action Team Sara Sanders Christy Cunningham Chrissy Gosteli.
MICHIGAN'S INFANT MORTALITY REDUCTION PLAN Family Impact Seminar December 10, 2013 Melanie Brim Senior Deputy Director Public Health Administration Michigan.
Michigan’s Child Welfare System Why is Overrepresentation a Critical Issue?
Positive Outcomes for All: The Institutional Analysis in Fresno County’s DSS Catherine Huerta 1.
Foster Care Re-entry Study A Hennepin County Project conducted in collaboration with the Minnesota Department of Human Services and the University of Minnesota.
What’s Race Got To Do With It? An Honest Conversation About the Impact of Racism on the Child Welfare System.
Project KEEP: San Diego 1. Evidenced Based Practice  Best Research Evidence  Best Clinical Experience  Consistent with Family/Client Values  “The.
Constructing Safety Indicators from Child Welfare Events and Trajectories Fred Wulczyn, Bridgette Lery Center for State Foster Care and Adoption Data Chapin.
Program Evaluation - Reunification of Foster Children with their Families: NYS Office of Children and Family Services, Division of Child Care Evelyn Jones,
The Social and Family Backgrounds of Infants in Care: Predicting Subsequent Abuse Dr. Paul Delfabbro School of Psychology University of Adelaide.
RELATIVE GUARDIANSHIPS: INCREASED OPTIONS FOR SUSTAINED PERMANENCY Joseph Magruder, PhD University of California, Berkeley Daniel Webster, PhD University.
Background Objectives Methods Study Design A program evaluation of WIHD AfterCare families utilizing data collected from self-report measures and demographic.
Strategic Planning  Hire staff  Build a collaborative decision- making body  Discuss vision, mission, goals, objectives, actions and outcomes  Create.
Performance and Progress 2012/2013. Why We Do an Annual Data Presentation To assess the Levy’s performance in various categories against goals. To highlight.
Child Welfare Permanency and Racial Equity Efforts in Illinois Angela Baron-Jeffrey Center for Child Welfare and Education Child Welfare Advisory Council.
International & Transracial Adoption
Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.
Equity from the Start Disproportionality and Disparity Among Young Children in the CW System: What the Data Tell Us Wendy Wiegmann CCWIP May 10, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

Race and Child Welfare: Exits from the Child Welfare System Brenda Jones Harden, Ph.D. University of Maryland College Park Research Synthesis on Child Welfare Disproportionality and Disparities Alliance for Racial Equity in Child Welfare 1

Racial Disproportionality and Disparity in Child Welfare FAMILY RISKS Poverty Substance Abuse Single Parenthood Mental Health Challenges Intimate Partner Violence Parent Incarceration Child Age and Functioning RACIAL BIAS/DISCRIMINATION Reporter Bias Caseworker Bias Cultural Sensitivity and Competence Institutional Racism SYSTEM PROCESSES AND RESOURCES Lack of Agency Resources Caseworker Factors Lack of Culturally Appropriate Services Caseworker/family race matching Multiplicative processes GEOGRAPHICAL CONTEXT Neighborhood Segregation Neighborhood Economic and Social Resources Concentration of poverty Jurisdiction-specific child welfare policy and practice Explanatory Framework 2

Placement Nationally, race has emerged as a factor in placement decisions, particularly for African Americans and American Indians ▫In 2008, African American children were 15% of the national child population, 26% of children who entered care; White children were 75.9% of the national child population, 44% of children who entered care Other factors that may impact the placement decision include: ▫Poverty and perceived family safety/risk ▫Family structure ▫Prior history of maltreatment ▫Type of maltreatment allegation ▫Child age ▫Geographic region, including access to community services ▫Interactions between factors and race in some studies 3

Exits from Care Longer duration of care Slower exits from care ▫Increased likelihood of kinship care placement ▫Decreased likelihood of reunification ▫Decreased likelihood of adoption ▫Slower reunification process 4

Types of Out of Home Care With respect to disproportionality and disparities, most of the literature focuses on kinship care Nationally, African American and American Indian children are more likely to be placed with relatives than their White counterparts The rate of Hispanic children and youth being placed in kinship care is growing 5

Kinship Care Inconsistent definition of kin Inconsistent licensing standards for kinship families Unequal levels of funding reimbursement, services, and/or caseworker contacts Longer lengths of stay for children, contributing to disproportionality and disparities 6

Outcomes of Kinship Care Family preservation Increased placement stability Cultural identity development Achievement of permanency Child outcomes no worse ▫Kinship families more vulnerable ▫Select children with fewer problems 7

Reunification Nationally and regionally, African American and American Indian children are less likely to reunify with their families than are White children After controlling for risks 0-6 month old infants Some literature indicates that birth family reunification is slower for children in kinship care, thus impacting children of color 8

Reunification Family structure may influence reunification rates Single parenthood – more common among African American families In some locations, family race is a factor influencing the decision to reunify a child with his or her family After considering/controlling for risks and other factors 9

Adoption Greater adoption disparities for children of color, particularly African American children ▫Longer time to finalize adoptions for African American children, adding to their already longer duration of care Likelihood of adoption continues to increase for African American children In some cases greater than for White children, especially re: infants Leading to reduction of racial disparities 10

Guardianship African American and American Indian children less likely to exit the system through legal guardianship Subsidized guardianship increased permanency and has potential to reduce disparities The research regarding guardianship is currently limited 11

Independent Living Due to longer lengths of stay in care, youth of color more likely to “age out” of the system Outcomes, such as level of education, employment, and annual income, not as positive for African American youth Child welfare system “significant contributing source” to overrepresentation of youth of color (specifically African American youth) in the juvenile justice system 12

Service Disparities Limited research Child welfare and ancillary services Linked to child welfare status Families of color less likely to receive services to address risks ▫After controlling for poverty Particularly challenging for families who do not speak English and who are immigrants ▫Latinos and African American families 13

Service Disparities Case management Family support Mental health treatment and counseling Substance abuse treatment Housing Employment services Home visitation 14

Service Disparities Lower frequency and lower quality Less contact with child welfare workers In-home family services Foster parents ▫Counseling ▫Child care ▫Educational services ▫Fewer services for kinship care providers 15

Promising Policies and Practices Limited and geographically-specific evidence Family group decision making Team decision making Differential response Randomized control trial (Ohio) Permanency approaches Child welfare workforce development Service access, quality, and coordination Community collaborations 16

Summary Child welfare experiences are different for children of color ▫Placement decision ▫Placement duration ▫Services ▫Type and timing of exits to permanency Changing child welfare policies and practices are reducing disparities ▫Prevention/entry/permanency programs ▫Guardianship ▫Adoption 17

Summary Need for additional research ▫Broader and more careful examination of race/ethnicity ▫Explanatory factors (targets of intervention) ▫Effective strategies to reduce disparities ▫Workforce: decision-making and development ▫Context-specific research and continuous improvement 18