doc.:IEEE /081r0March 2000 Submission James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co. Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [WG HRSG Process Discussion] Date Submitted: [13January2000] Source: [James D. Allen] Company: [Eastman Kodak Co.] Address: [1669 Eastman Ave. Rochester, NY, ] Voice:[(716) ], FAX: [(716) ], Re: [ ] Abstract:[This presentation to the 802 Excom summarizes the work done by the study group since its formation in November, 1999] Purpose:[To bring the SEC up to speed and hear any comments regarding the proposed PAR] Notice:This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release:The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P

doc.:IEEE /081r0March 2000 Submission James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co. Slide 2 IEEE High Rate WPAN Process Discussion March 6th, 2000 Jim Allen, Eastman Kodak

doc.:IEEE /081r0March 2000 Submission James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co. Slide 3 Objectives for the Week (doc.00/026r3) High Rate Task Group PAR Approval Make any amendments which are proposed others by 5pm Tuesday. Re-approve at WG level if necessary Begin presentations for CFA/CFPs

doc.:IEEE /081r0March 2000 Submission James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co. Slide 4 Monday Agenda Introduction of “Officers” - Allen Minutes from Tel Aviv - Alfvin List of presenters - Kinney Process explanation - Allen Review of Criteria - Marquess Call for Names results

doc.:IEEE /081r0March 2000 Submission James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co. Slide 5 CFA/CFP Process Letters of intent by midnight, March 6th (doc# 00/033r0 ) –Status 6 Apps (3/5/00) –9 Proposals (3/5/00) Criteria List (doc.: /007) –All proposals will be evaluated against criteria –75% vote to change criteria –All SG participants can vote this week. –the PAR is Normative

doc.:IEEE /081r0March 2000 Submission James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co. Slide 6 Process - continued Applications –Presentations –Questions/Answers –Review for Impact on Criteria –Vote to change Criteria if necessary

doc.:IEEE /081r0March 2000 Submission James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co. Slide 7 Process - continued Proposals –Presentations for collection of proposals –Questions/Answers –Discuss Self-rating against Criteria –If Self-ratings are not done, they will be taken off line and dealt with on telecom calls or next travel meeting –Discuss any request for Criteria changes

doc.:IEEE /081r0March 2000 Submission James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co. Slide 8 Name Suggestions Thanks for all the responses Jaws JawBreaker GoldMind HON (Home Operations Network SweetTooth FlashWave Root Canal - (Better than a blue tooth) Multimedia ISM Dentures White Teeth (32 teeth = 32 Mbps?) Top Gun (“I have a need for Speed”-movie quote) Top Tooth

doc.:IEEE /081r0March 2000 Submission James D. Allen, Eastman Kodak Co. Slide 9 And the Winner is…... “High Rate WPAN” –Current list clever but not descriptive or inspiring –Until another name surfaces