RHIANN WILLIAMSON, 3098 5475 SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP RESEARCH Integrating ICT in Formative Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Partners in Learning Partners in Learning UK: Next Steps Kristen Weatherby UK Programme Manager Partners in Learning.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Competencies for beginning teachers
PORTFOLIO.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Teacher Practices for Student Success Cathy Cavanaugh University of Florida College of Education
Claire Lloyd School of Education, Coleg Llandrillo, Claire Lloyd School of Education, Coleg Llandrillo,
21st Century Learning Summer Conference August 12-14, 2009 Canmore, Alberta Sharon Friesen, PhD.
Consistency of Assessment
SUNY Cortland Conceptual Framework … our shared vision for preparing candidates to work in P-12 schools.
Unit Assessment Plan Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
Working together to enhance teacher education: A collaborative project between Queensland College of Teachers and Queensland Deans of Education.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
ICT in Education UNESCO Bangkok
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Learning with Digital Technologies MRI Professional Learning 2015.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Technology Leadership
1 Intel ® Teach ST & ITA Summit Copyright © 2010 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Currituck County Schools READY to Make the Shift Implementing Common Core and Essential Standards “Inspiring Excellence in Every Student”
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Poll Everywhere
Intel ® Teach Program Thinking with Technology Course Pn. Idawati Che Mat Jabatan Teknologi Pendidikan
* Research suggests that technology used in classrooms can be especially advantageous to at-risk, EL, and special ed students. (Means, Blando, Olson,
EFFECTIVE LESSONS = EFFECTIVE TEACHING Fayetteville High School January 2012.
ICT in Education UNESCO Bangkok Reflecting National Education Goals in Teacher’s Competency Standards Jonghwi Park Programme Specialist ICT in Education,
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Teacher competencies. Professional competence with ICT Draw on appropriate ICT applications to enhance personal and professional effectiveness  Using.
“Growing Student Learning for Life” “Growing Student Learning for Life” Information Literacy/Technology Education Integration Plan Toolkit South Carolina.
New York Institute of Technology
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
1 Using the Instruction and Learning Appraisal (ILA) to Strengthen the Secondary Instructional Program WVDE Composite Results November.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Knowledge building in the 21 st century at The Geelong College: Information-to-Knowledge Continuum “As we increasingly move toward an environment of instant.
Texas STaR Chart Milby High School What is the Texas STar Chart The Teacher STaR Chart is designed to help teachers, campuses, and districts.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
How Do Principal Preparation Programs in Hong Kong and Ontario Address Equity? Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Teacher Professional Learning and Development Presentation for PPTA Curriculum Workshops 2009.
Equipping the Next Generation for Active Engagement in Science EngagingScience.eu שילוב נושאים סוציו-מדעיים ואתיים בלימודי מדע ד"ר יעל שורץ, אתי דגן ואמיל.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Defining 21st Century Skills: A Frameworks for Norfolk Public Schools NORFOLK BOARD OF EDUCATION Fall 2009.
Issues in Teaching EDU Session 1 The Conceptual Understanding of What You are Teaching.
The Big Interview Rebecca Jackson EDU 650: Teaching, Learning and Leading in the 21 st Century Dr. Doerflein January 12, 2015.
EDU 695Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 STUDY Lessons in Excellence-- edu695study.com.
EDU 695 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 695 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

RHIANN WILLIAMSON, SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP RESEARCH Integrating ICT in Formative Assessment

Why focus on formative assessment? “Assessment is an essential component of learning and teaching, as it allows the quality of both teaching and learning to be judged and improved.” Redecker & Johannessen (2013) p 79 “Formative assessment is a central feature of the learning environment of the 21 st century. Learners need substantial, regular and meaningful feedback; teachers need it in order to understand who is learning and how to orchestrate the learning process.” Redecker & Johannessen (2013) p 79

AITSL Standard 5 Assess, provide feedback and report on student learning  5.1 Assess student learning  5.2 Provide feedback to students on their learning  5.3 Make consistent and comparable judgements  5.4 Interpret student data  5.5 Report on student achievement

Why focus on ICT? “Student teachers should be prepared to integrate information and communication technology (ICT) into their future teaching and learning practices.” Sang, Valcke, van Braak, & Tondeur (2010) p. 103 “... the way in which students are using computers in schools... [has] a stronger effect on scientific literacy than how often computers are accessed” Luu & Freeman (2011) p. 1072

AITSL Standards - ICT 2.6 Information and Communication Technology (ICT)  Implement teaching strategies for using ICT to expand curriculum learning opportunities for students. 3.4 Select and use resources  Demonstrate knowledge of a range of resources, including ICT, that engage students in their learning. 4.5 Use ICT safely, responsibly and ethically  Demonstrate an understanding of the relevant issues and the strategies available to support the safe, responsible and ethical use of ICT in learning and teaching.

Key themes for pre-service teachers Key themes that need to be taught to preservice teachers about integrating ICT: 1. Aligning theory with practice 2. Using teacher educators as role models 3. Reflecting on attitudes about the role of technology in education 4. Learning technology by design 5. Collaborating with peers 6. Scaffolding authentic technology experiences 7. Moving from traditional assessment to continuous feedback Tondeur et al (2012) pp

School Environment “the local conditions of schooling impact on teachers’ attempts to integrate these technologies in their classrooms... successful integration of ICT requires fundamental shifts in the core activities of schools.” Hayes (2007) p.385 “Evaluation of current use and integration level of technology in schools is important for policy-makers, school administrators and educators to make decisions about budget allocation, staff development and personnel development.” Summak, Samancioglu, & Baglibel (2010) p 1725

School Environment “There are six computing labs and 120 laptops on five trolleys...” My School (2014) para. 1 In our department there is one trolley with 32 laptops. On any given period of the day we can have every room teaching, which is approximately 5 classes. This means sharing. One trolley for one class in a week is not enough.

Programs You Can Use When You Have Access I will now quickly demonstrate to the group how to use these programs I plan on utilising more when I become a graduate:  Bitesize  Oxford Digital  Socrative

Benefits of ICT Formative Assessment The benefits include: 1. Improvement of learner engagement 2. Development of a learning community 3. Foster a learner and assessment centred focus Gikandi, Morrow, & Davis (2011) p Creating records that can help make consistent and comparable judgements (AITSL 5.3) through for example:  self-test quiz tools (Socrative)  discussion forums (AITSL 4.3)  e-portfolios

Final Thoughts “What is key is not how we assess but what we do with the data we generate as a result of interventions which can be supported by technologies.” Pachler, Daly, Mor & Mellar, 2010, p719 “…no technology-based assessment is in itself formative, but almost any technology can be used in a formative way…” Pachler, et al. 2010, p720

References Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership Ltd (2014). Australian Professional Standards for Teachers. Education Services Australia. Retrieved from: teachers/standards/list Berte, B., West, M., & Duncan, C. (2014) Socrative. Mastery Connect. Retrieved from: British Broadcasting Corporation. (2014) GSCE Bitesize. BBC. Retrieved from: Cash, S. (2012). Oxford Big Ideas Science 8: Australian Curriculum. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from Oxford Digital: Donnelly, D., McGarr, O., & O'Reilly, J. (2011). A framework for teachers’ integration of ICT into their classroom practice. Computers & Education. 57(1), doi: /j.compedu Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D. & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(1), doi: /j.compedu Hayes, D. N. A. (2007). ICT and learning: Lessons from Australian classrooms. Computers & Education, 49(1), doi: /j.compedu Luu, K., & Freeman, J. G. (2011). An analysis of the relationship between information and communication technology (ICT) and scientific literacy in Canada and Australia. Computers & Education, 56(1), doi: /j.compedu Pachler, N., Daly, C., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Formative e-assessment: Practitioner cases. Computers & Education, 54(1), doi: /j.compedu Redecker, C. & Johannessen, O. (2013). Changing Assessment —Towards a New Assessment Paradigm Using ICT. European Journal of Education, 48(1), Retrieved from Sang, G., Valcke M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), doi: /j.compedu Summak, M. S., Samancioglu, M., & Baglibel, M. (2010). Technology integration and assesment in educational settings. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(1), doi: /j.sbspro Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012) Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), doi: /j.compedu