Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Transtions in West Virginia Melissa Gholson Office of Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 LAUSD Mathematics Periodic Benchmark Assessments Using Data to Inform Instruction.
Advertisements

PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
How the Assessment System Works Required Training Module 4.
Accessibility for All Students Required Training Module 3.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education
Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Consortium Patti Whetstone Center for Educational Testing and Evaluation University of Kansas The present publication.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Assessment Updates CD PST Meeting March 10, 2015.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
1 Presentation PURPOSE is to build awareness and knowledge of the ELD standards and how they relate to the content areas Master the knowledge of ELD Stds.
Spring Assessment Update Grades 3 to 8.
KRISTEN BURTON ERIN FAASUAMALIE Future of Alternate Achievement Standards and Assessment in Wisconsin Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
BADGER 3-8 EXAM : Wisconsin Smarter Assessment Updates & Resources 02/20/2015.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Division of Student AssessmentIllinois State Board of Education 100 North First Street, E-216 Springfield, Illinois
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
Michigan K−12 Statewide Assessments Division of Accountability Services (DAS) Office of Special Education (OSE) MDE Office of Special Education and ISD.
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
The Five New Multi-State Assessment Systems Under Development April 1, 2012 These illustrations have been approved by the leadership of each Consortium.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
Skills and Achievement Commencement Credential
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
PARCC Update June 6, PARCC Update Today’s Presentation:  PARCC Field Test  Lessons Learned from the Field Test  PARCC Resources 2.
School Improvement Improving what’s happening in the classroom for students with disabilities: instruction & its impact on student learning Systems that.
Wisconsin Extended Grade Band Standards
LEARNING DIFFERENCES - AGENCY SELF-ASSESSMENT GUIDE Program Year A tool for identifying program improvement and professional development needs.
Instruction aligned to Iowa Core: What does it look like? #CCSS.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Common Core State Standards Oregon Foundation of the Oregon Diploma.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction National Center and State Collaborative California Activities Kristen Brown, Ph.D. Common Core.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS INITIATIVE March 2011.
English Language Arts Single Plan for Student Achievement.
Summer 2012 Day 2, Session 6 10/13/2015R/ELA.EEA.2012.©MSDE1 Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts And the journey continues… “Transitioning.
Alternate Assessment Transitions in West Virginia Melissa Gholson Office of Assessment.
The Next Generation Science Standards From Awareness to Transition
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Assessing The Next Generation Science Standards on Multiple Scales Dr. Christyan Mitchell 2011 Council of State Science Supervisors (CSSS) Annual Conference.
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
Test Security and Alternate Assessments Melissa Gholson West Virginia Department of Education.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Alaska Measures of Progress Educators Webinar September 9, 2014 James Herynk.
Dynamic Learning Maps Update Linda Howley, Bureau of Assessment and Accountability Joanne Winkelman, Office of Special Education.
State Assessments ~Andover~ 2014 and Beyond. Future of Assessments State BOE Decision: Dec. 10, 2013 Did not approve the use of Smarter Balanced Assessments.
Timeline, Preparation & Implementation
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 2015 Missouri Assessment Program Assessment Updates Shaun Bates Director.
Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards August 2012IDEA Partnership1.
EL TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE MEETING Chart your data and state your findings. Let’s Get Started! LEP1 NEWCOMERS LEP2 FLEP1 FLEP2 NOMPHLOTE.
Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Alaska District Test Coordinator Training Fall 2015 The present publication was developed under grant X
MTSS PRESENTATION SEPTEMBER, 2013 NCSC Summative Assessment Update.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards and Literacy Standards.
AT Consideration Overview of Issues & Solutions. P ROCEDURAL ISSUES … Consideration / Assessment / Evaluation Integration into IEP Implementation & Progress.
DLM Alternate Assessment Test Administration Webinar March 2016.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
The ABCs of Accessibility and Accommodations in State Assessments Martha Thurlow, Sheryl Lazarus, and Laurene Christensen National.
Morris School District Grade 4 and 5 Math Grouping Alternative BOE Approved June 2015.
Summative Evaluation Shasta Davis. Dimension: Preparation (Score- 4) Plans for instructional strategies that encourage the development of critical thinking,
MEAP-Access & MOPLS Update
Melissa Gholson, Ed.D. June 28, 2017
Common Core State Standards
Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards
Georgia’s Tiered System of Supports for Students Karen Suddeth, Project Director Carole Carr, Communications & Visibility Specialist
New Assessments and Accommodations
Presentation transcript:

Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment Transtions in West Virginia Melissa Gholson Office of Assessment

Transition Accommodations policies Manuals Professional development Opportunities & challenges

How did your state prepare for DLM implementation in ? Variety of training on DLM with a focus on Educator Portal and the KITE platform, data management, test administrator modules and accessibility. State and regional trainings were provided to present the connection between the alternate assessment achievement standards, instruction and assessment.

Training Policy 2340 & DLM Administration First Contact Personal Needs Profile Security Data Management Policies and procedures Monitoring

Security Checklist

Implementation of DLM Confusion about the instruction-assessment connection Preparation for the assessment included focusing on instruction and resource development: –Instructional Guides to support the identification of instructional goals, resources, organizational framework. –Model interdisciplinary unit plan that focuses on concept development with lessons that identify multidisciplinary content standards coverage and valued life outcomes. A variety of instructional strategies and resources are provided with an emphasis on technology. –Diagnostic practice tests provided for all Essential elements at four levels of performance in both ELA strands and Math clusters, data sheets for evaluation.

Instructional Guides

Programmatic Interdisciplinary Unit Plan Multiple grade level coverage of standards Model lesson plans Themes that support concept development Resources emphasize utilization of technology

Lesson Plan Template

Diagnostic Tests –Supports the instruction of the unit and provides evaluation –Items were written to cover all Common Core Essential Elements –Can be used to assess all standards, select standards, a selected cluster or strand –Diagnostic test uses item types similar to those within the Dynamic Learning Maps –Diagnostic tests include data collection forms at each level –Can be used formatively for the provision of instruction and/or diagnostically for progress notes and informing present levels of performance.

Math Clusters of standards at this grade level

English Language Arts Story Boards are button provide the adapted literary and informational text. Students should be exposed to original texts. All items are related to these texts. Lesson plans are included in the unit.(Place- farm). Adapted versions Adapted versions are for independent practice. Vocabulary is controlled. The Six Strands of ELA

Organization and Layout The CCEE Learning Progression Audio button-reads the response to the student. Goal is to promote independence.

Self-Determination and Choice Making

Data Sheets Data Sheet Built in

Data Collection Items were written for the four instructional learning progressions. Two items were developed at the Level III because this is the target. There are five questions for every standard.

Feedback from Educators & Students Feedback from educators and students. Consortia representatives will share how students and educators in the field have responded to the changes in accessibility and accommodations as well as how they have responded to technology-enhanced test items.

Lessons Learned rollout of new accessibility and accommodations features, as well as new technology-embedded delivery systems. include how many students with disabilities and ELLs participated in field tests and how these students performed on the field tests. State representatives will share challenges related to the provision of accessibility tools and accommodations for the field tests, and any anticipated changes in policies and practices for the operational assessment.

DLM Assessment: What went well? Acceptance of more rigorous standards Ease of the platform Smooth delivery Brevity of testlets was helpful to students Ease of the KITE system for students and teachers Help desk response was timely and effective

Where were the challenges? Challenges High volume of calls to DLM help desk Manipulatives Monitoring was burdensome Data errors Generation of testlets Training of staff Overlap of testing windows with other tests Scheduling staff What we did about the challenges Provided webinar and communications around frequently asked questions. State help desk to support districts State level data monitoring of districts and frequent status up dates. State and regional training and weekly webinars.

Accommodations Monitoring Approaches to accommodations monitoring after the development phase. Accessibility and accommodations for next generation assessments and learners must be adaptable to innovations in technology, as well as research on accessibility and accommodations. States will share how data from the new assessment platforms will be used to monitor and improve accessibility for all student groups. In addition, states will share consortia approaches to being responsive to individual state needs (e.g., requests for new accommodations).

Supporting Progress Monitoring DLM Test Administration Short FormState Monitoring & Communication Focus on regular monitoring and communication

How are you planning for ? Alternate Assessment Advisory Team Communication plans Implementation of DLM Science standards and testing Emphasis on the instructionally embedded assessments Integrating science items into the current diagnostics and units Continued support for DLM assessment for districts Continued professional development on the instructional resources

Questions? Melissa Gholson