2013 Wind Conference. Transmission Service Study Process Steve Purdy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MISO Southern Region Integration – ARR/FTR Timeline FTR WG February 6,
Advertisements

Cleco Transmission Planning Summit Attachment K November 15, 2007 Terry Whitmore.
Open Season MT to Idaho Calendar of Events Posted on NWE OASIS September 30, 2004 (Slide 8 updated 2/28/05)
1 RTWG Tariff update to the BOD, MOPC, SPC, and RSC January 4, 2005.
Technical Conference Avoided Cost Modeling January 6, 2015.
Oasis Overview. 2 OASIS Overview What is OASIS? S –Open Access Same Time Information System –Electronic site for transmitting utility information to customers.
WELCOME Western Area Power Administration1. Where did the journey begin? Western Area Power Administration2.
OASIS Subcommittee Status EC Meeting 2/18/14. Preemption and Competition Annual Plan Items Affected 2013 AP Item 2(a) Develop version 2 business practice.
EC Meeting 2/24/ AP Item 7(b) Modify NAESB standards WEQ , WEQ , and related standards to be consistent with the Commission’s policy.
CLECO TRANSMISSION RATE CASE. AGENDA Welcome and Introduction Purpose of Meeting Transmission System Update Formula Rate Overview Formula Rate Protocols.
Kansas Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Conference Wind 2007 RFP Update John Grimwade - Sr. Director Strategic Planning and Development September.
Topics The Midwest ISO The Midwest Market Market Design Process
October 30, 2014 Terry Wolf, Manager of Transmission Services.
ATSS Backlog Clearing Process (BCP) Customer Workshop October 4, 2013.
SPP.org 11. SPP Delivery Point Addition (DPA) Process Effective May 1, 2010.
What’s New in Southern Companies’ OATT Southern Company Transmission 2008 Customer Forum.
Market Monitoring of AEP By Douglas R. Bohi Charles River Associates Washington, DC June 25, 2002.
Topics to Cover Interconnection Process Overview
SPP.org 1. 2 Aggregate Transmission Service Study (ATSS)
Network Economy System Overview and Demonstration May 3, 2007 Raj Hundal.
Solving the Mystery of Cost Sharing Sponsored Programs Office Technology and Economic Development November 4, 2009.
11 Why BPA Transmission Customers Aggregate Reservations Feb. 20, 2013.
Need for Transmission Investment 2010 Mid-American Regulatory Conference AEP.
2014 Attachment O True-Up Customer Meeting August 25, 2015.
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform Stakeholder Meeting February 19, 2009.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Thursday, May 19, :00 to 4:00 p.m. EDT 2 nd Quarter 2011.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Tuesday, April 21, :00 to 3:00 p.m. EDT.
ISO Outlook Summer 2005 and Beyond Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications Committee February 22, 2005 Jim Detmers Vice President of Grid Operations.
Flowgate Allocation Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
Parallel Flow Visualization Project NERC ORS Meeting May 4, 2011.
Electronic Scheduling /Information Technology Subcommittees (ESS/ITS) Update 2008 Review November 4, 2008.
AFC METHODOLOGY EMS USER GROUP SEP 12, 2004 AFC – New Developments EMS USER GROUP Sep
Market Operations and Development (MOD) System Upgrade Project Customer Information Session #2 April 9, 2010.
NITS Concepts  Contract Data Model: NITS Agreement represented as a Contract Contract has one or more Facilities Facility may be one or more Resources.
Large Generator Interconnection Procedures Reform 2 nd Stakeholder Meeting May 5, 2009.
Entergy AFC Stakeholder Meeting February 16, 2005 Houston, TX.
October 6, 2006 Public Stakeholder Review Portland, Oregon Conditional Firm.
Chicago Advanced Energy Demand Response & CSP Evolution Kellen Bollettino Comverge Inc. 10/23/14.
NAESB WHOLESALE ELECTRIC QUADRANT BUSINESS PRACTICES SUBCOMMITTEE ACTIVITIES UPDATE TO JOINT ELECTRIC SCHEDULING SUBCOMMITTEE JANUARY 5, 2012 BY ED SKIBA.
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting Independent Entity Services Wednesday, January 28, :00 to 3:00 p.m. ET.
Long-Term Solution for Negative Generation Entergy Transmission AFC Stakeholder Meeting August 22, 2006.
Generator Prioritization Option Parallel Flow Visualization Business Practices Subcommittee Meeting June , 2010.
ATSS New Aggregate Facilities Study Process Customer Workshop September 18, 2015.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N June 2011 Non-Treaty Storage Agreement non-Binding Terms for Storage Accounts.
ESI/SPP Seams Agreement Implementation Update Transmission Planning Summit August 11, 2010.
NAESB BPS Yasser Bahbaz– IDCWG Chair January 5 th, 2016.
Entergy AFC Stakeholder Meeting March 9, 2005 Houston, TX.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
WEQ Executive Committee Contract Path Task Force Additional Issues Related To Contract Path Management ( WEQ and WEQ )
Generator Interconnection Studies & Agreements Charles Hendrix.
Annual ARR Registration Workshop January 7, 2015.
NAESB BPS UPDATE TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AUGUST 21, 2012 BY NARINDER K SAINI ED SKIBA BPS-CO-CHAIRS PARALLEL FLOW VISUALIZATION PROJECT 1.
EE590 Transmission Planning Projects and Cost Allocation Ming NI Economic Studies, Midwest ISO.
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N BPA Network Open Season 2013 Cluster Study ColumbiaGrid Planning Meeting May 2, 2013.
WEQ OASIS Subcommittee
2014 Attachment O True-Up Customer Meeting August 25, 2015
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Duke Energy Carolinas Quarterly Stakeholder Meeting
Transmission Service Requests Overview
Service Across Multiple Transmission Systems
Pseudo-tie business procedure
T.O. Highway/Byway Recommendations
Rates & Regulatory Updates
Service Across Multiple Transmission Systems
2016 Attachment O True-up customer meeting
Transmission Service Requests Overview
OASIS Subcommittee Update 2/20/2018
Pseudo-tie business procedure
Presentation transcript:

2013 Wind Conference

Transmission Service Study Process Steve Purdy

Transmission Service Transmission Service Reservation (TSR) reserves a specific amount of –capacity in megawatts (MW) –across a specific transmission system path –for a given timeframe A Transmission Service Agreement (TSA) is a –legal contract between the customer and SPP –filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) –publicly available from FERC or SPP website 3

Transmission Service Parameters Term –Short-term (hourly, daily, weekly, monthly) –Long-term (yearly) Firmness (priority) –Firm –Non-Firm Class –Network (“NITS”) –Point-to-Point (“PTP”) 4

Network and Point-to-Point NITS service is charged a cost based on the customer’s “load-ratio share”, or the customer’s load as a percentage of SPP’s total network load –Network Load –Network Resources PTP service is charged based on the amount of reserved capacity and the path Designated Resources serve any load within the SPP region –Network Resources serve specifically Network Load 5

First-come, first-served Short-term – SPP Operations – AFC (Available Flowgate Capacity) process Long-term – SPP Engineering – Study Process Evaluation of Transmission Service Requests 6

Study Processes for LT Transmission Service 7 Aggregate Study Attachment Z1 Aggregate Study Attachment Z1 Delivery Point Transfer Study Attachment AR Delivery Point Transfer Study Attachment AR Delivery Point Addition Study Attachment AQ Delivery Point Addition Study Attachment AQ Transfer of an existing delivery point from one SPP Network Customer to another SPP Network Customer All new PTP requests and re-directs, all requests to designate new resources, any other requests that don’t fit one of the other processes New network delivery points, facility modifications to existing delivery points, and new “block” load additions to existing delivery points

Feb - MayOct - JanJune - Sept Aggregate Study Process Open Seasons All long-term transmission service requests submitted within a 4-month “open season” are aggregated for purposes of evaluation Three aggregate studies are started each year AG-1AG-2AG-3 8

Aggregate Study is an iterative process that continues until no customers withdraw Open Season (4 months) Open Season (4 months) Facilities Study (60 days) Facilities Study (60 days) Letter of Intent Response Period (15 days) Restudy Needed ? Write Service Agreement YES NO Aggregate Study Process 9

10 Model Build Contingency Scan Constraint Analysis Cost Allocation 28 Models 7 Seasons: Years 1, 2, 5 Summer/Winter peak; Year 10 Summer peak 2 Cases: Base and Transfer 2 Scenarios: Projected Dispatch; Contractual Dispatch Contingencies and Monitored Elements N-1 Facilities in SPP Flowgates for First-Tier areas and beyond Identify Upgrades Least-cost Solution Utilize expansion-plan upgrades where possible Attachment J, Z1, and Z2 Allocate Upgrade Costs by Flow Impact, including Crediting Re-dispatch Calculation Aggregate Facilities Study Stages

NPPD AEP NPPD OPPD KCPL SUNC WR WFEC OKGE 11 AEP Decrease Generation Increase Generation Aggregate Study Process MISO AECI 100 MW SPP

Aggregate Study Process Upgrade Costs –Transmission System upgrades are determined for the entire aggregate group of requests –Upgrade costs are allocated to each request, based on its positive MW impact on the upgrade –The MW impact must meet at least a 3% Transfer Distribution Factor (TDF) to be allocated to a request Study Costs –Study costs are allocated to all requests in the first study iteration –Subsequent re-study costs are allocated to the withdrawing customer that drives the need for the re-study 12

Upgrade Funding for Service Upgrades Designated Resources –Base Plan “Highway/Byway”  Safe Harbor Cost Limit of $180,000/MW  Qualifications – 5-year term – Designated Resources ≤ 125% Designated Loads – Wind Resources ≤ 20% Designated Loads –Excess = Directly Assigned Upgrade Costs (“And” Charge) –Waiver Process PTP service –PTP revenue –Excess = Directly Assigned Upgrade Costs (“Or” Charge) 13

Documents Posted on SPP OASIS 14

Documents Posted on SPP OASIS 15 Informational Documents

SPP Aggregate Study Exploder 16

Frequently-Asked Questions What is a Letter of Credit and when do I have to provide it? –Financial Instrument provided to SPP to cover the cost of upgrades in case of customer default –Typically 1-2% of the amount of the LOC –Required prior to confirmation of service Can I request to be a Designated Resource for a Network Service Customer? –Only the Network Customer can request to designate a new resource 17

Frequently-Asked Questions What are the steps in finalizing service? –SPP sends to customer with instructions –Customer updates OASIS request as needed –Customer provides documentation as needed  Attestation for Designated Resources  Re-dispatch Agreements  Letter of Credit –SPP accepts OASIS request –Customer confirms OASIS request –SPP tenders service agreement 18

Current Study Queue Study Currently Active Iteration Due Date Requests Currently in Study MW Currently in Study Currently Posted Study Date Posted 2011-AG2AFS-10 LOI6/8/ ,252AFS-93/13/ AG3AFS-97/15/ ,069AFS-85/1/ AG1AFS-410/17/2013* 44 2,870AFS-34/5/ AG2AFS-59/15/2013* 40 4,756AFS-43/4/ AG3AFS-47/8/ ,435AFS-34/24/ AG1AFS-26/17/ ,584AFS-14/3/ AG2Open Season ends 5/31/2013 Total , As of May 30, 2013

Retract requests outside the parameters Open Season Aggregate Facilities Study Tender Service Agreements 105 Days Day 1105 Overview of the Proposed Process Feb 1 Example Dates Remove requests outside parameters from analysis Aggregate Facilities Study Agreement Accept/Confirm all requests within parameters June 1 Process continues without customer intervention until all remaining requests are within the specified parameters 1.Customer defines maximum acceptable directly-assigned upgrade cost & 3 rd party upgrade cost estimates 2.Customer defines acceptable deferred start date 3.Customer defines acceptable re- dispatch criteria 4.Execute study agmt. with obligation to take service. 5.Submit attestation for DR requests 1.Customer defines maximum acceptable directly-assigned upgrade cost & 3 rd party upgrade cost estimates 2.Customer defines acceptable deferred start date 3.Customer defines acceptable re- dispatch criteria 4.Execute study agmt. with obligation to take service. 5.Submit attestation for DR requests Prohibit “mutually- exclusive” requests Post study results with cost estimates for all requests, including removed

Questions 21