DICOM to ISO-DICOM Report to joint ISO TC215/WG2 – DICOM WG10 meeting January 24, 2004, San Diego.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 2010 Plenary Session Slides for Governance Review IEEE 802 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: ec EC Date Submitted:
Advertisements

SEM10-04 Initiation of a Work Item ETSI Seminar © ETSI All rights reserved.
SEM16-05 Maintenance & withdrawal of documents ETSI Seminar © ETSI All rights reserved.
ECMA-373 Invitation to ETSI/SCP and JTC 1/SC 06 for open review For Ecmas comments and dispositions to DIS in ISO/IEC JTC 1s fast track procedure Ecma/GA/2006/136.
Promotion and Tenure Faculty Senate May 8, To be voted on.
W. Shannon Black Manager, Standards Processes Results Based Drafting 2013.
Step by Step Guide for Regulations S HELLY B EZANSON K ELLY O FFICE OF G ENERAL C OUNSEL S EPTEMBER 5, 2012.
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
THE STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS STEP 1 PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL STAGE PUBLIC AND COMMITTEE PROPOSAL CLOSING DATE FIRST TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING.
Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B5AStandards & Certification Project Management.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IEEE Down Selection Process Date Submitted: January 18, 2005.
ESSnet Stanprep The CEN Standardisation Process. CEN Overview: A standard (French: Norme, German: Norm) is a technical publication that is used as a rule,
Doc.: IEEE /1454r7 Submission March 2013 IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process 20 March 2013 Haasz et al, IEEESlide.
How an idea becomes an IEC standard Gary Johnson Chairman IEC SC45A
1 TR41Chairs’ Training Presented by: Billie Zidek-Conner Manager, Standards Secretariat Services Susan Hoyler Director, Standards Development and Promotion.
March 2010 Plenary Session Notes on IEEE 802 Governance Review IEEE 802 Presentation Submission Template (Rev. 9) Document Number: ec EC Date.
Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AS 20 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
API SC18 Work Group 2 API Exploration & Production Standards Conference on Oilfield Equipment and Materials Westminster, Colorado June 23, 2009 Ed Durante.
OVERVIEW OF ENGINEERING MANUAL, Part 1 Susan Hoyler TIA, Director Standards Development and Promotion.
1 JIC SDO Standards Development Processes Prepared by Dave Iberson-Hurst, CDISC 19 th January 2010 Second Draft.
NomCom WG IETF58 Minneapolis. Agenda Agenda Review Review of changes made in draft-ietf-nomcom-2727bis-08.txt Review of proposals for closing open issues.
Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AS 18 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
SC32/WG2 N0879 Proposal for WG2-level formal resolution using Bugzilla Japan National body ISO/IEC JTC1 SC32 WG2 Toronto Meeting 2005/09/26-30.
ISO Liaison Report Hidenori Shinoda Charles Parisot.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: REVP m-session-63-closing-report Title: m Session #63 Closing Report Date Submitted:
SC32/WG2 N889 Guideline to use Bugzilla in SC32WG2 (supersedes SC32/WG2 N0879) Bugzilla Drafting Committee SC32WG2 ISO/IEC JTC1 SC32 WG2 Toronto Meeting.
Overview of the IEEE Process. Overview of Process l Project Approval l Develop Draft Standards l Ballot Draft l IEEE-SA Standards Board Approval l Publish.
Consideration Of Updates And Additional Revisions To Procedures For Conducting Board and Committee Activities Board Item # 2.
Due Process – ISSAIs and INTOSAI GOVs Roberto José Domínguez Moro Superior Audit Office of Mexico INTOSAI Working Group on Public Debt June 14, 2010.
Dual Logo Procedures Alex Zamfirescu IEC USNC TA TC93 Convener IEC TC93 WG2 November 2004.
Doc.: IEEE /0792r0 Submission July 2008 Adrian Stephens, Intel CorporationSlide TGn Editor Report July 2008 Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0828r0 Submission May 2007 Harry Worstell, AT&TSlide 1 Procedural Clarification Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Report on ISO/TC215 WG02 Makoto Suzuki JIRA 2008/Sep/05 Munich, Germany.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
Slide 1 IEEE 802 Response to FDIS comments on IEEE 802.1AB 20 March 2014 Authors: NameCompanyPhone .
IEC TC93 Liaison Report DASC SC Alex Zamfirescu IEC USNC Technical Aadviser TC93 Convener IEC TC93 WG2 September,
Minutes Document March 2006 Terry Cole, AMDSlide Editor’s Best Practices Terry Cole, AMD WG Technical Editor & Simon Barber, Devicescape.
IEEE /r5 Submission November 2008 John Notor, Cadence Design Systems, Inc.Slide 1 IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process Date:
Page © ASME 2016 Module B – Process B8a. US TAG to International Standards Organization (ISO) Standards Development Standards and Certification Training.
Doc.: IEEE /1454r0 Submission Jan 2013 IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process 15 January 2013 Haasz et al, IEEESlide.
ISO Liaison Report Hidenori Shinoda Charles Parisot.
IEC TC93 Liaison Report to DASC Alex Zamfirescu IEC USNC TA TC93 Convener IEC TC93 WG2 September 2004.
ECMA-328 2nd edition Invitation for open review
Revisions to Codes and Standards
IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process
Editor’s Guideline Version 1.0
NCWG Terms of Reference NCWG April 2016, IHB, Monaco
2017 Amendments to the INCITS Organization, Policies and Procedures
Standards Development: An Overview
IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process
IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process
WG Chair: Charles Ehrlich, NIST, U.S.A. CIML Member
Procedural review of initial WG ballot on P802.1CF
IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process
ANSI REFRESHER COURSE 2018 CHANGES TO THE ISO DIRECTIVES
WG Technical Editor’s Report
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
Sponsor Ballot Comment Resolution
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [A Brief Overview of Draft Approval.
P Draft to Sponsor Ballot
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
IEEE IMT-Advanced Review Process
Comments for Rev PAR – July 2010 Plenary
Overview of WG Letter Ballot Process
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
IEEE 802 JTC1 Standing Committee Proposal for SC6 contribution process
Procedural Updates INCITS TC Officers Symposium April 1-3, 2019
Presentation transcript:

DICOM to ISO-DICOM Report to joint ISO TC215/WG2 – DICOM WG10 meeting January 24, 2004, San Diego

2 DICOM becoming an ISO standard DICOM first explored the field by working on the approved workitem for “Web Access to DICOM persistent Objects”. The copyright issue had to be resolved between NEMA and ISO, first for the approved workitem. We are now ready to move forward with the entire DICOM standard. Letter with our understanding of the route to follow send on January 15, 2004 to Sophie Clivio, ISO Central Secretariat. Response back January 16, 2004, with agreement on principles and only small remaining issues.

3 DICOM becoming an ISO standard The DICOM Standards Committee is an internationally recognized standardization body with a Type A liaison to the ISO. Therefore, according to ISO's published procedures for the fast-track Process (type c), it may submit a complete and final version of the DICOM Standard (but not a draft) to ISO for consideration. Under these procedures, DICOM personnel would prepare a copy of the comprehensive version of the DICOM Standard with an ISO cover page and send it to ISO for forwarding directly to the voting members of the ISO for ballot.  CORRECT

4 DICOM becoming an ISO standard ISO members could choose to approve or reject it, in its entirety, but they could not alter it.  PARTLY CORRECT: The document will be sent to the ISO members for approval, and the may all APPROVE, REJECT AND COMMENT. If the document is approved ALL THE COMMENTS RECEIVED SHALL BE STUDIED BY A SMALL GROUP COMPRISING AT LEAST DICOM AND THE TC215 CHAIR. DICOM CAN CHOOSE TO INCLUDE SOME OF THE COMMENTS IN THE CURRENT VERSION (BOTH IN THE ISO AND DICOM VERSION), BUT DICOM CAN ALSO DECIDE NOT TO ACCEPT ANY COMMENTS AT THAT STAGE. They would be sent for inclusion in a subsequent revision of the standard. IT WILL THEN BE UP TO THE TC215 CHAIR TO DECIDE IF IT IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE ISO TC215 COMMUNITY OR NOT. IF NOT, THEN THE DOCUMENT SHALL NOT BE PUBLISHED BY ISO. IN OTHER WORDS, WE CAN GUARANTEE TO DICOM THAT THE FINAL DOCUMENT WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED BY ISO WITHOUT DICOM FULL AGREEMENT.  PROPOSED DICOM ACTION: ACCEPT

5 DICOM becoming an ISO standard The new Standard will be published and sold around the world by ISO with an ISO number and ISO copyright. At the same time, the DICOM Standards Committee may sell or otherwise distribute that same Standard with its own cover page and its own copyright. Neither organization would be authorized to sell or distribute any documents bearing the other's copyright. The DICOM Standard would include in its Foreword a sentence indicating that it "...is equivalent to ISO XXXXX." The ISO document would bear a similar reference to the DICOM Standard.  CORRECT

6 DICOM becoming an ISO standard The "current“ official version of the DICOM Standard always consists of the latest published document PLUS the FINAL text of any supplements and change items that were approved since the published version was issued. All of these documents are made available for free to the public on the DICOM Web Page. Every two years or so, these supplements and change items are folded into the most recently published comprehensive version to create a new edition of the Standard. Each new edition would be submitted to ISO for another ballot and, if approved, for subsequent publication.

7 DICOM becoming an ISO standard  PROPOSED CHANGE: This could be acceptable to ISO with a slight modification to make it in accordance with ISO rules for supplements or changes to a standard between official versions ( new editions). When a standard needs regular and frequent updates, A MAINTENANCE AGENCY (M.A.) IS CREATED, after approval by the ISO TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT BOARD (TMB). This latter delegates the authority to modify part of the standard to the M.A. It is proposed that such a M.A. be allocated to DICOM with no change to the DICOM procedure describes on the previous slide, and with changes provided on a DICOM webpage. The M.A. could also include some TC215 experts. Ideally the DICOM members should be ISO TC215 REPRESENTATIVE?? as well.

8 DICOM becoming an ISO standard  PROPOSED DICOM ACTION: 1.DICOM to send a letter confirming that we will act as Maintenance Agency for the standard. 2.Resolution for TC15 to approve DICOM as M.A. for the standard ( during next meeting in May). 3.Resolution and DICOM letter to be send to the ISO TMB for approval ( 1 month by correspondence). 4.Small note in the foreword of the standard to explain that the M.A. is with DICOM, changes at the DICOM web page. 5.All the above may be done in parallel to the DIS approval, but must be solved before the final publication of the ISO standard.

9 DICOM becoming an ISO standard Because of its size (over 2000 pages), complexity and the very rapid pace of revision, there will be no requirement to translate the DICOM Standard into any other language, nor to reformat the entire set of 16 documents to match precisely the current ISO word template – except for the cover page and introductory sections.  CORRECT

10 DICOM becoming an ISO standard Either party to the agreement may dissolve the agreement with 90 days notice to the other party.  DISCUSSION What would be the implications? Would ISO still be able to maintain its own standard in case DICOM decides to terminate the agreement? ISO process to withdraw a standard is not automatic and longer than 90 days. 6 months notice would then be more appropriate.  PROPOSED DICOM ACTION: Contractual statement that on termination ISO will withdraw the ISO version of the DICOM standard.