A Radio Multiplexing Architecture for High Throughput Point to Multipoint Wireless Networks Ramakrishna Gummadi Rabin Patra, Sergiu Nedevschi, Sonesh Surana,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multihop Networks: Fact or Fiction?
Advertisements

Interference Avoidance and Control Ramki Gummadi (MIT) Joint work with Rabin Patra (UCB) Hari Balakrishnan (MIT) Eric Brewer (UCB)
IEEE INFOCOM 2004 MultiNet: Connecting to Multiple IEEE Networks Using a Single Wireless Card.
Performance Analysis Lab,
CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS. LTE Data Rate Requirements And Targets to LTE  reduced delays, in terms of both connection establishment and transmission.
Hidden Terminal Problem and Exposed Terminal Problem in Wireless MAC Protocols.
VSMC MIMO: A Spectral Efficient Scheme for Cooperative Relay in Cognitive Radio Networks 1.
Pushing the Envelope of Indoor Wireless Spatial Reuse using Directional Access Points and Clients Xi Liu 1, Anmol Sheth 2, Konstantina Papagiannaki 3,
Fault Tolerant Routing in Tri-Sector Wireless Cellular Mesh Networks Yasir Drabu and Hassan Peyravi Kent State University Kent, OH
22 nd September 2008 | Tariciso F. Maciel Suboptimal Resource Allocation for Multi-User MIMO-OFDMA Systems Tarcisio F. Maciel Darmstadt, 22 nd September.
Mesh Technology – The answer to the line of sight challenge? Nadeem Siddiqui Chief Operating Officer 19 th Feburary rd Annual Broadband Wireless.
RADWIN 5000 HPMP.
Oct 21, 2008IMC n Under the Microscope Vivek Shrivastava Shravan Rayanchu Jongwon Yoon Suman Banerjee Department Of Computer Sciences University.
Airmux 400 Version Slide 2 Airmux-400 in Brief Airmux-400 is a point-to-point radio solution for combined Ethernet and TDM traffic.
Barkotel Experience, Projects & Services Introduces through Broadband Technology.
for WAN (WiMax). What is WiMax? Acronym for Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access It’s the IEEE standard, first introduced in 2001, for.
This material is based in part upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No CDMA450 1xEVDO Performance in Long-Distance.
Mobile and Wireless Computing Institute for Computer Science, University of Freiburg Western Australian Interactive Virtual Environments Centre (IVEC)
CDMA X RTT Overview. Global 3G Evolution.
Hierarchical Cooperation Achieves Linear Scaling in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks David Tse Wireless Foundations U.C. Berkeley MIT LIDS May 7, 2007 Joint work.
DAC: Distributed Asynchronous Cooperation for Wireless Relay Networks 1 Xinyu Zhang, Kang G. Shin University of Michigan.
Networking with massive MU-MIMO Lin Zhong
Capacity of Wireless Mesh Networks: Comparing Single- Radio, Dual-Radio, and Multi- Radio Networks By: Alan Applegate.
Hierarchical Cooperation Achieves Linear Scaling in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks David Tse Wireless Foundations U.C. Berkeley AISP Workshop May 2, 2007 Joint.
Space Time Processing for Fixed Broadband Wireless A. Paulraj Gigabit Wireless & Stanford University ISART 6 -8 September, 2000 Boulder, CO.
SMART ANTENNA SYSTEMS IN BWA Submitted by M. Venkateswararao.
Capacity Scaling with Multiple Radios and Multiple Channels in Wireless Mesh Networks Oguz GOKER.
BEYOND OFDM A Systems Approach to Non-Line-of-Sight Fixed Wireless Rajeev Krishnamoorthy Broadband World Wireless Forum, San Francisco, CA February 19,
SMART ANTENNA under the guidance of Mr. G.V.Kiran Kumar EC
Addressing Deafness and Hidden Terminal Problem in Directional Antenna Based Wireless Multi-hop Networks Anand Prabhu Subramanian and Samir R. Das {anandps,
May 2000 Deploying the Optimal BWA Architecture PTP vs. PTMP Broadband Wireless World Forum 2001 Rami Hadar Executive Vice President Marketing & Business.
1 Heterogeneity in Multi-Hop Wireless Networks Nitin H. Vaidya University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign © 2003 Vaidya.
Design and Implementation of a Multi-Channel Multi-Interface Network Chandrakanth Chereddi Pradeep Kyasanur Nitin H. Vaidya University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Wireless Mesh Network 指導教授:吳和庭教授、柯開維教授 報告:江昀庭 Source reference: Akyildiz, I.F. and Xudong Wang “A survey on wireless mesh networks” IEEE Communications.
Cellular System Objectives Optimize Spectral efficiency Increase Affordability Increase Subscriber Capacity Provide Global Compatibility Provision Quality.
Ultima 3 Product Family Presentation. Presentation Outline Product Family Overview Competitive Advantages Applications Competitive Analysis.
End-to-End Performance and Fairness in Multihop Wireless Backhaul Networks V. Gambiroza, B. Sadeghi, and E. Knightly Department of Electrical and Computer.
An Adaptive, High Performance MAC for Long- Distance Multihop Wireless Networks Presented by Jason Lew.
1 SMART ANTENNAS FOR TDMA Jack H. Winters AT&T Labs - Research Red Bank, NJ September 7, 2000.
Deploying Wifi on Lampposts Nicolas MECHIN Ozone EU-Mesh’s Heraklion meeting 07/08 The Ozone way…
CELLULAR CONCEPT SHUSHRUTHA K S “Provide additional radio capacity with no additional increase in radio spectrum”
Architectures and Algorithms for Future Wireless Local Area Networks  1 Chapter Architectures and Algorithms for Future Wireless Local Area.
INTRODUCTION. Homogeneous Networks A homogeneous cellular system is a network of base stations in a planned layout and a collection of user terminals,
Vidya Bharathi Institute of Technology
1 SMART ANTENNAS FOR THIRD GENERATION TDMA (EDGE) Jack H. Winters AT&T Labs - Research Red Bank, NJ July 17, 2000.
Wireless Networks Standards and Protocols & x Standards and x refers to a family of specifications developed by the IEEE for.
An Adaptive, High Performance MAC for Long-Distance Multihop Wireless Networks Sergiu Nedevschi *, Rabin K. Patra *, Sonesh Surana *, Sylvia Ratnasamy.
On Exploiting Diversity and Spatial Reuse in Relay-enabled Wireless Networks Karthikeyan Sundaresan, and Sampath Rangarajan Broadband and Mobile Networking,
Presented by: Edgar Mendez System Engineer Specialist Airmux-400 Version 2.1 GA.
Unit 4 Cellular Telephony
[1] TECHNICAL SEMINAR PRESENTATION SMART ANTENNA Edited by: Priyabrata Nayak, Lecturer, Dept. of CSE SMART ANTENNA.
(Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access)
Introduction to SkyPilot Networks November 2005
Architecture and Algorithms for an IEEE 802
Support for Advance Antennas & Techniques in WNM
SMART ANTENNA.
Evaluation Model for LTE-Advanced
Evaluation of a Novel Low Complexity Smart Antenna for Wireless LAN Systems T.J. Harrold*, D.C. Kemp†, M.A. Beach*, C. Williams*, M. Philippakis† and M.W.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CA combinations are divided into intra-band (contiguous and non-contiguous) and inter-band. Aggregated carriers can be adjacent or non-adjacent.
Antennas Topologies Directly connecting two duplexers together can affect each other’s filter characteristic, thereby losing the isolation that is needed.
Wireless Communication Co-operative Communications
Interference Avoidance and Control
A contribution to TG4a Dani Raphaeli InfoRange Inc
Royal Institute of Technology Dept. of Signals, Sensors and Systems
Royal Institute of Technology Dept. of Signals, Sensors and Systems
Wireless Communication Co-operative Communications
Multimedia Training Kit
SMART ANTENNA.
ECE 5233 Satellite Communications
Cellular Telephone Networks
Presentation transcript:

A Radio Multiplexing Architecture for High Throughput Point to Multipoint Wireless Networks Ramakrishna Gummadi Rabin Patra, Sergiu Nedevschi, Sonesh Surana, Eric Brewer UC Berkeley WiNS-DR 2008 MIT CSAIL

A radio multiplexing architecture Architecture (noun): the manner in which the components of a computer or computer system are organized and integrated - For what particular wireless configuration? - Why do we care about a radio architecture? 19 September 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 2

18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 3 Rural network connectivity  What is the need? Divide:  Rural vs urban, Intranet vs Internet Applications:  Health, Education, Information access  Requirements for rural networks Low cost per user Good performance (throughput) Grassroots deployment and management Scalable expansion

18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 4 Typical rural scenario

18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 5 Typical rural scenario

18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 6 Point-Multipoint (PMP) networks

18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 7 PMP features  Base station: Multiple sector or steerable antennas Multiple radios  Client: Single radio Directional antenna  Distances: Up to 20km  Traffic: Demands are time-varying and bursty

Why a radio architecture for PMP?  Point-point (P-P) links needs high throughput Know how to do this well for P-P (e.g., 2P, WiLDNet)  But cannot extend to PMP directly System as a whole susceptible to interference Maintaining links tedious and error-prone Incremental scalability hard Inflexible to bursty traffic Most importantly, high total cost of ownership 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 8

High cost? 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 9 Cost: $70,000 Cost: $3,000 In relative GDP terms, costs can be comparable !

Towers are the hidden cost Requirements  Low cost per user  Good performance (throughput)  Grassroots deployment and management  Scalable expansion Status quo  Large initial costs  Interference lowers throughput  Expensive and tedious to realign or troubleshoot  Adding capacity and links impossible once “maxed out” 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 10

Goal Design and evaluate high-throughput yet low-cost radio multiplexing architectures for PMP n/w 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 11

Where is the architecture? 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) Architecture goes here Cheap $$, lower interference with larger sector separation

18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 13 Talk outline  Why multiplexing architecture?  Architectural principles and implications  Evaluation

18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) Single sector scenario  Clients: c 1,c 2 …c n  Single base-station

18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 15 Multiple-sector scenario (today)  Clients: c 1,c 2 …c n  Radios: R 1,R 2 …R m  Sector antennas Ch: 1

But interference can kill 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 16 A B C 1 2 Simultaneous receive α A B C 1 2 Simultaneous send α α should be large enough!

Principle 1: Separate channels for more degrees of freedom 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 17  Clients: c 1,c 2 …c n  Radios: R 1,R 2 …R m  Sector antennas  Each sector on different channel  Both directional and frequency separation gains Ch: 1 Ch: 2 Ch: 3

Principle 2: Exploit spatial reuse  Multiple channels per sector antenna  Channels as widely separated as possible  Spatial diversity and multiplexing gains 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR)

Principle 3: Use cheap h/w to increase capacity 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 19  Wireless cards cheap  Commodity splitters and combiners cheap  Linear capacity increase possible  But ensure sufficient RF isolation!

RF isolation  Isolation from commodity splitters may not be enough  TDMA MAC solves this problem nicely 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 20 Tx Rx

Principle 4: Allocate radios dynamically for bursty traffic  Client traffic is bursty  Static radio assignment sub-optimal  A multiplexing controller after splitter switches radios to clients dynamically  2/4-port muxers affordable; higher port counts lossy and costly 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 21

Key architectural benefits  Number of sectors: S  Number of orthogonal channels: C  Total #antennas: S*C  Peak #clients per sector: C After  Still S*C cards, but:  Total #antennas: S Towers can be smaller  Peak #clients per sector: S*C Greater spectral efficiency So, more throughput per client, or more clients 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 22 Before

Additional benefits  Low cost per user Fewer antennas with more channels and radios  Grassroots deployment and management Shorter towers means easier alignment If radio or link fails, switch to under-used or spare  Scalable expansion New clients added by allocating radios permanently 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 23

18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 24 Talk outline  Why multiplexing architecture?  Architectural principles and implications  Evaluation

Evaluation  3 clients, 3 PMP links  Radios: 25 dBm max.  3-way muxer, 20 dB isolation  20 dB attenuators  Metrics: Simultaneous Tx/Rx, Tx+Rx throughput Effect of channel separation, isolation 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 25

Aggregate UDP throughput 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 26 #RadiosChannelsAll radios Tx All radios Rx Mix Tx/Rx 21, , , ,6, Muxing works as expected for 3 radios, even for Rx/Tx

Throughput vs. isolation 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 27 At sufficient channel separation and isolation, aggregate CSMA throughput unaffected. Need for TDMA otherwise.

Conclusions  Radio multiplexing can reduce large-towers Maintains throughput and simplifies management  Commodity splitter and combiners can be used Need to think about RF isolation carefully Cost complexity trade-off can be hard  At PHY layer, complementary to WiLDNet  Future work Look into actual deployments TDMA MAC must synchronize Tx/Rx across radios 18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 28

18 August 2008Networked Systems for Developing Regions (NSDR) 29 Thank You!